I think this is not a bad idea to. Space is big why not ccp put more system in. Longer travel to get somewhere once you are in the border. That's ok since space is really big. I don't have a clue how their network server works, but I'm sure it would be do able.

Same thing with wormhole, to often your are 6 friend working your way and then 30 ships roll true and kill everything you work for. I understand the game really well. I have been playing really well. But I think it would be way more fun to be able to have hundred and thousand of little corp having there own system and being proud of it, not like 1 in a 5000 guy alliance. No body even know who you are, you just one more ship.

I am not sure about your tight-knit statement. My feeling is that a lot of null sec residents joined sov holding alliances for the higher profits that it brings and count on the security that big nap trains can provide them to keep profits stable. When these null bears have just a slight feeling that things start to get out of hand, a lot of them simply move to another null sec alliance that holds space somewhere else on the map.

I am not sure that the sense of attachement within null sec players is as strong as you say.

Perhaps sov could be changed so an alliiance can only officially hold 1 system per corporation within an alliance. Maybe make it easier for sov to change hands.

screw 6 guys

Limits like that simply don't work. Wanna know why?

==ANNOUNCEMENT==
Everyone train corporation management 1! We're going to break into 9500 1 man corps!

Limit the number of corps in an alliance?

==ANNOUNCEMENT==
Hey guys! We're breaking into 700 alliances, we'll coordinate through the forums and jabber.

Oh that's an easy enough fix. Simply have it so the ceo of each corporation that would be designated as a holder corp for an alliance train Empire Control I, or some other training standard.

As if that would do much.
Alliances in null often announce preferred training goals that are months into the future. A change like this being announced would have nearly every member of every nullsec alliance prepared before or shortly after it went live.

Point is, you cannot mechanically limit alliance organization. Because the vast majority of said organization exists outside of EVE, all you end up doing is pushing more of it outside of the game itself, without actually damaging it one bit. Minor speedbumps are the worst that can be done.

At least the way it is now, its easy to reset TEST.

Can you imagine how hard it would be if they broke into 7000 1 man alliances?

CCP, people are getting tired of the null sov system. Even people in it. Yes its nice to be a group of people fighting to get your own space. But at one point it gets boring. Fighting for moons, anything else really?
If a group of individual, let's say 6 of them, why cant they own there own system, why as it come the need to be 5000. It's nice to lots but that's not community.
I suggest you change it so those 6 guys can actually own something and work to keep it.

Anyhow, I don't think it ll change anytime soon, but lot's of people are getting bored.

this current sov system , while a good step forward compaed to the previous one

Would be nice to see something that makes them move their buts more often .... like moongoo that depletes ... cough cough ;..omy the epic whines that would create

No, it really wasn't.


I hope you don't think that would actually help anyone, nor that it would bring down T2 prices. Quite the contrary.

If a group of individual, let's say 6 of them, why cant they own there own system, why as it come the need to be 5000. It's nice to lots but that's not community.

tl;dr: if 6 people can claim sov, then an alliance of 5,000 can have 6 people claim sov for them and the other 4,994 people making sure your 6 guys don't get anywhere near the sov buttons.

The issue is any system the 5000 have sov in will have 5000 defending it when you attempt to contest it.

wait..
That 5000 man alliance... can't they claim sov in 830 systems now?