Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 .. 17 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 12 post(s) |
|
CCP Fallout
|
Posted - 2009.09.14 21:50:00 -
[1]
CCP Greyscale has a new blog. One word: nullsec. Read. Discuss. You're welcome.
Fallout Associate Community Manager CCP Hf, EVE Online Contact us |
|
Ivanna Nuke
Daralux
|
Posted - 2009.09.14 21:53:00 -
[2]
First in what will be an epic thread.
|
Mashie Saldana
BFG Tech
|
Posted - 2009.09.14 21:59:00 -
[3]
Oh, devblog *off to read*.
|
Tobin Shalim
Warped Mining Strip Mining Club
|
Posted - 2009.09.14 22:00:00 -
[4]
Will post impressions in a minute, reading now. -----
Originally by: Gierling Tech III is going to be "Fully modular" until someone crams the "EW Bonus" modules together with the "8 Midslots" modules...
|
Evelgrivion
Ignatium. Rote Kapelle
|
Posted - 2009.09.14 22:01:00 -
[5]
Quote: A reduction in the value of moon minerals
How is this going to be achieved? Is it tied to the resource density improvements mentioned in the blog?
|
ArmyOfMe
The Athiest Syndicate Advocated Destruction
|
Posted - 2009.09.14 22:05:00 -
[6]
first page in a epic thread about an epic dev blog
|
Breaker77
Gallente
|
Posted - 2009.09.14 22:06:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Evelgrivion
Quote: A reduction in the value of moon minerals
How is this going to be achieved? Is it tied to the resource density improvements mentioned in the blog?
Better alchemy, moon mining in WH space, reduction in materials needed for T2, and the aforementioned resource improvements are all very viable ways to achieve this. Especially if it's a combination of them.
|
Evelgrivion
Ignatium. Rote Kapelle
|
Posted - 2009.09.14 22:08:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Breaker77 Better alchemy, moon mining in WH space, reduction in materials needed for T2, and the aforementioned resource improvements are all very viable ways to achieve this. Especially if it's a combination of them.
These are all possibilities, but the all important question remains: How does CCP actually plan to do it?
|
Liang Nuren
The Hull Miners Union Gentlemen's Club
|
Posted - 2009.09.14 22:10:00 -
[9]
Edited by: Liang Nuren on 14/09/2009 22:13:43 Oh man, this is shaping up to be an awesome expansion. Now just fix Minmatar and blasters (to a much less extent) without breaking everyone else and I'll <3 you long time!
-Liang
Ed: It occurs to me to ask about NPC space. This has traditionally been sort of a no-man's-land... any plans to improve NPC space? Please? -- Liang Nuren - Eve Forum ***** Extraordinaire www.kwikdeath.org |
ArmyOfMe
The Athiest Syndicate Advocated Destruction
|
Posted - 2009.09.14 22:19:00 -
[10]
Quote: It makes it much harder to be a big, rich, military alliance; rather, things should move more back towards the old dichotomy between big rich carebear alliances and smaller, poorer military alliances
what makes you think that the current owners of dysp/prom moons will actually ever manage to loose their current isk in the first place? they already have so much isk that they can replace cap fleets the same way smaller alliances could replace a cruiser fleet
|
|
Haradgrim
Tyrell Corp Fuzzy Nut Attack Squirrels
|
Posted - 2009.09.14 22:21:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Liang Nuren Edited by: Liang Nuren on 14/09/2009 22:13:43 Oh man, this is shaping up to be an awesome expansion. Now just fix Minmatar and blasters (to a much less extent) without breaking everyone else and I'll <3 you long time!
-Liang
Ed: It occurs to me to ask about NPC space. This has traditionally been sort of a no-man's-land... any plans to improve NPC space? Please?
The first question that popped into my head was, well what does this mean for curse and syndicate?
I'm very curious about this resource density improvement concept, but my mind keeps coming back to the question of; how are they going to devalue moon minerals and will it break the t2 economy? --
Originally by: CCP Oveur Just donęt forget the reach-around.
|
Destination SkillQueue
Are We There Yet
|
Posted - 2009.09.14 22:22:00 -
[12]
I like these kind of devblogs that plainly show CCPs thinking on something. It's much easier and productive to comment and give ideas, when you know what the goal is supposed to be. It also gives some confidense in what you are doing, since it shows you didn't just put together random ideas you picked from a hat.
|
Cypherous
Minmatar Liberty Rogues Rally Against Evil
|
Posted - 2009.09.14 22:23:00 -
[13]
Well i didn't really understand most of that because i r dumb but it seems like you're doing something good, might make more sense to me once the dev blogs on exact features come out :)
Look forward to seeing you make 0.0 a little more interesting for those dusty regions nobody wants :)
|
rubico1337
Caldari Mnemonic Enterprises
|
Posted - 2009.09.14 22:24:00 -
[14]
oh dear
this is awesome. cant wait
Originally by: Lana Torrin
I'm getting pretty ****ed off with the supposedly hard core PvPers complaining about every little thing that gets changed. seriously, more tears than carebears.
|
Kalissa
Amok. Minor Threat.
|
Posted - 2009.09.14 22:24:00 -
[15]
Originally by: ArmyOfMe
Quote: It makes it much harder to be a big, rich, military alliance; rather, things should move more back towards the old dichotomy between big rich carebear alliances and smaller, poorer military alliances
what makes you think that the current owners of dysp/prom moons will actually ever manage to loose their current isk in the first place? they already have so much isk that they can replace cap fleets the same way smaller alliances could replace a cruiser fleet
It's true that the leaders of some of the major alliances are so rich now that making a change to the value of moon minerals wont affect them at all, but in the long term it will as these players either stop playing, or get royally fed up of being the banker of their alliance.
Lots of good ideas on the sov though, it's only a shame CCP didnt do this a year or so ago before the situation became as bad as is so accurately described in the beginning of the blog.
Least it shows CCP see the problem as most of us see it.
|
Sgt Napalm
SiN. Corp Sons of Tangra
|
Posted - 2009.09.14 22:26:00 -
[16]
Originally by: CCP Fallout CCP Greyscale has a new blog. One word: nullsec. Read. Originally by: CCP Kayne West I'm really happy for you, I'm gonna let you finish, but Beyonce had one of the best videos of all time!!!!
Discuss. You're welcome.
Thanks bro
|
Jimer Lins
Gallente Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
|
Posted - 2009.09.14 22:28:00 -
[17]
I sense a lot of wailing and gnashing of teeth from high-end moon holders in the future.
Killboard-Declarations of War Podcast |
Kazuo Ishiguro
House of Marbles
|
Posted - 2009.09.14 22:28:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Breaker77
Originally by: Evelgrivion
Quote: A reduction in the value of moon minerals
How is this going to be achieved? Is it tied to the resource density improvements mentioned in the blog?
Better alchemy, moon mining in WH space, reduction in materials needed for T2, and the aforementioned resource improvements are all very viable ways to achieve this. Especially if it's a combination of them.
A wholesale revision of the moon-mining system is another possibility. --- 34.4:1 mineral compression ISRC Racing, Season 7 - schedule |
Bilbo II
Serenity Engineering and Transport Company Wildly Inappropriate.
|
Posted - 2009.09.14 22:30:00 -
[19]
We already knew they were gonna change everything, no new news here. When will we get some details?
|
Soleil Fournier
AWE Corporation Intrepid Crossing
|
Posted - 2009.09.14 22:31:00 -
[20]
Edited by: Soleil Fournier on 14/09/2009 22:33:56 This is a great blog, lots of good stuff and I'm impressed so far with CCPs vision. The trick will be implementing it right, so we'll have to wait and see. But on paper I love it.
I'm dying to get some info on mothership changes though. We know the titans changing but no ones given any more info other than the single target DD. Are supercaps going to be able to survive for longer than 60 seconds? What about capital ships in general...how do CCP envision cap ships when they're obviously pressing for small ship combat? What are dreadaughts going to shoot at now? How are titans/moms going to be worth the investment? Are motherships going to be something other than a pretty ship sitting behind a pos shield?
So CCP....pleeeease....can we get a blog or someone post some tidbits on the capital combat and super capital changes (moar mothership info!)?
|
|
Adam C
Caldari Rionnag Alba
|
Posted - 2009.09.14 22:31:00 -
[21]
faith +10 points
|
Daan Sai
Polytrope
|
Posted - 2009.09.14 22:32:00 -
[22]
OK, exacly how do you think this is going to lead us away from the pervasive NBSI culture, that will still effectively lock out smaller groups? Will you put in place mechanisms that make NRDS a more advantageous option for space holding alliances??
--------------------------------- Internet Submarines is Serious Business ---------------------------------
|
Soi Mala
|
Posted - 2009.09.14 22:33:00 -
[23]
I'm really not convinced that the anti-sprawl tactic is going to be as effective as ccp believe...
|
Callistus
Reikoku
|
Posted - 2009.09.14 22:34:00 -
[24]
Sounds awesome, but we need specifics! ------------
|
Meissa Anunthiel
|
Posted - 2009.09.14 22:34:00 -
[25]
Originally by: Destination SkillQueue I like these kind of devblogs that plainly show CCPs thinking on something. It's much easier and productive to comment and give ideas, when you know what the goal is supposed to be. It also gives some confidense in what you are doing, since it shows you didn't just put together random ideas you picked from a hat.
It became apparent to me more than 6 months ago that CCP not only had some good ideas about the whole 0.0 thing, but that they actually understand what's going on there...
I, for one, am highly confident they'll be doing a great job on this one, and most likely give themselves some room for adjusting things should it be needed.
|
Xessej
|
Posted - 2009.09.14 22:35:00 -
[26]
Originally by: Haradgrim I'm very curious about this resource density improvement concept, but my mind keeps coming back to the question of; how are they going to devalue moon minerals and will it break the t2 economy?
I'd assume they will go with one of the simpler fixes. Better alchemy or more widespread seeding of the high end moon mins.
|
Trenjeska
Chumly Incorporated Space Exploration and Logistic Services
|
Posted - 2009.09.14 22:39:00 -
[27]
Ah finally it will not be about holding space just to generate static income. Moon mining should be as dynamic as belt mining.
|
Casiella Truza
Back Alley Trading Company
|
Posted - 2009.09.14 22:43:00 -
[28]
I'm also very interested in what this might herald for NPC 0.0, and also whether the new setup will have a place for small corps who want to work together to find niches out there.
I'm confident that the resources will move more to the exploration system, as CCP has wanted to do for a long time, and so you can find moon minerals (and everything else) in exploration sites. The site quality goes up with the infrastructure investment, relating to the hint in the previous devblog.
WTB more data! But I did like this. A deep understanding of the social background here gives everybody more to chew on. -- EVE Blog EVE Twitter |
Tobias Sjodin
Ore Mongers BricK sQuAD.
|
Posted - 2009.09.14 22:43:00 -
[29]
Pretty words, hope the expansion will be equally pretty. So it's not just all hype. Until then, colour me sceptical.
|
Ix Forres
Caldari Righteous Chaps
|
Posted - 2009.09.14 22:44:00 -
[30]
*Golf clap*
Seriously, I like where this is going. In b4 whines from PL, Goons, NC, etc. Especially all the alliances who have little to no industrial backbone. PL are screwed, but that's a good thing. -- Ix Forres EVE Application Developer Charactr (NEW) | EVE Metrics | I Tweet |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 .. 17 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |