| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Dianabolic
Reikoku
   |
Posted - 2009.09.26 09:15:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: Tiger's Spirit
Originally by: Harkwyth Mist
It's too low.
Taxation is a start but it's not enough.
Needed Changes:
- People should pay to Dock at stations.
- People should pay for cargo handling.
- People should pay for using Hanger Storage per m3.
- People should pay to use Warp Gates.
Agreed
Or :
1-3 months players just pay 0% tax.
3-6 months players just pay 11% tax.
6-12 months players just pay 25% tax.
Over 12 months players just pay 50% tax.
(Over 24 months players just pay 75% tax.)
And time spent in an NPC corp for this calculation should be cumulative.
|
Dianabolic
Reikoku
|
Posted - 2009.09.29 15:24:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Shana Matika
See what happens:
Create new char. Create corp. Put main in that. Play...wardec (onoes)...create new corp, move misson char...play...what do you think how long a mission runner can play that and who get bored first: Those who pay for a wardec on a 1 man corp where that 1man is just a rookie on a trial or altaccount and get deleted once the corp got one wardec to create new char and corp or the missionrunner who got 24h to change corp before fights can start...
But nice try ;)
That's corp hopping to avoid a war-dec and is already classed as an exploit.
But nice try.
|
Dianabolic
Reikoku
|
Posted - 2009.09.29 17:36:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Kachiko Sama
Originally by: Dianabolic
That's corp hopping to avoid a war-dec and is already classed as an exploit.
But nice try.
Has anyone ever ever been sanctioned for that? It's almost completely unenforceable (like several other offences).
I don't know, however in the scenario posted above I'd expect to see it be petitioned and then the gm's hand out warnings / bans because it isn't THAT difficult to spot, is it?
|
Dianabolic
Reikoku
IT Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.09.30 15:01:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Shana Matika
Originally by: Dianabolic
Originally by: Kachiko Sama
Originally by: Dianabolic
That's corp hopping to avoid a war-dec and is already classed as an exploit.
But nice try.
Has anyone ever ever been sanctioned for that? It's almost completely unenforceable (like several other offences).
I don't know, however in the scenario posted above I'd expect to see it be petitioned and then the gm's hand out warnings / bans because it isn't THAT difficult to spot, is it?
It's my choice which corp i use. All missionrunners know enough people to join their corp. I don't see any "exploit" in that. If i want to change corp that's my choice.
Just to anoy those "YOu don't play that game i want YOU to play so i wardec you" crowd it's worth it.
You said you would use an alt to create a corp, then jump to it.
Not join other corps that are already running.
There's a difference, no?
|
Dianabolic
Reikoku
IT Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.09.30 20:40:00 -
[5]
I stand corrected.
I'll also say that's pretty f'in stupid, but oh well.
|
| |
|