| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Velicitia
Open Designs
1005
   |
Posted - 2012.06.07 12:05:00 -
[31] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Velicitia wrote:Wait, how'd my argument of "shoot the -5 pilot" turn into "Vel is a newb-ganking n00b"? Because you suggested that someone shoot something, and that level of unrepentant savagery obviously indicates that you do nothing but feast on the bones of the innocent and unwary.
well, yeah ... I've been petitioned by the Dense Veldspar a few times for griefing.
Probably not as much as Chribba though  |
Kohiko Sun
Stormcrows
12
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 12:07:00 -
[32] - Quote
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:Kohiko Sun wrote:To prove this immunity exists, get to outlaw status and fly a faction-fit CNR through high sec. Please, record it for peer review, and, remember, it must be repeated at least three times to be considered a valid experiment. Fit warp stabs, nanos, and run 4TW
We, your peers, await the video evidence. A few smartbombs should have you flashy in seconds, so it shouldn't take long to begin the experiment that could earn someone a Space Nobel Prize. |
Disdaine
403
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 12:12:00 -
[33] - Quote
No fair.
You just want to stop me flying my outlaw nanod discophoon through high for ***** and giggles whilst making the rage. |
Grumpymunky
Super Monkey Tribe of Danger
202
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 12:25:00 -
[34] - Quote
Musashi IV wrote:players with -5 or lower security standing can play in hi-sec with imunity. What the hell, I put a lot of effort into grinding an alt below -5, and it doesn't get anything even resembling immunity. Why am I missing out? CCP FIX MY GAME!
Post with your monkey. |
Khanh'rhh
Sudden Buggery
1300
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 12:29:00 -
[35] - Quote
A -5 player is a valid target to all 40,000+ players logged on.
Yet, is apparently "immune" eh?
Sounds like that person is BEYOND elite and needs to have all manner of glory bestowed upon his shoulders for achieving this level of win.
Or, maybe, you can test whether his immunity is iron clad.
-
"Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930's |
Khanh'rhh
Sudden Buggery
1300
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 12:33:00 -
[36] - Quote
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:Kohiko Sun wrote:To prove this immunity exists, get to outlaw status and fly a faction-fit CNR through high sec. Please, record it for peer review, and, remember, it must be repeated at least three times to be considered a valid experiment. Fit warp stabs, nanos, and run 4TW
How many WCS stop a WDG?
Assuming you fit 1 nano and 4 stabs, what stops 5 points / 3 scrams from stopping you?
I'll let you mull over this and weigh it against why you don't see red CNRs flitting about highsec.
-
"Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930's |
Velicitia
Open Designs
1005
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 12:34:00 -
[37] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote:
Or, maybe, you can test whether his immunity is iron clad.
Antimatter, Phased Plasma, Widowmakers, or Multifrequency works well. |
HVAC Repairman
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
141
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 12:47:00 -
[38] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:HVAC Repairman wrote:Musashi IV wrote:Why even have hi-sec or a security standing if players with -5 or lower security standing can play in hi-sec with imunity. A player who reaches -5 should be banned from entering or playing in hi-sec. im down with this as long as every player with 1 million sp is banned from hi-sec So, Gank alts only?  throwawaygank alts must be protected at all costs it's all a part of the NTAE (new throwaway alt experience). i love me some made up acronyms
Follow me on twitter |
RubyPorto
SniggWaffe
YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1802
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 12:59:00 -
[39] - Quote
HVAC Repairman wrote:RubyPorto wrote:HVAC Repairman wrote:Musashi IV wrote:Why even have hi-sec or a security standing if players with -5 or lower security standing can play in hi-sec with imunity. A player who reaches -5 should be banned from entering or playing in hi-sec. im down with this as long as every player with 1 million sp is banned from hi-sec So, Gank alts only? throwawaygank alts must be protected at all costs it's all a part of the NTAE (new throwaway alt experience). i love me some made up acronyms
But then what jucies shall they gank? Retriever's maybe? Mammoths?
(I don't know what gank-worthy ships you can actually fly sub 1m SP)
Single-Shard, Player Driven-áSandbox.
5 words. That's what makes it special. |
Virgil Travis
GWA Corp
Unified Church of the Unobligated
311
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 13:08:00 -
[40] - Quote
If you use bots you aren't playing the game so your opinion is utterly irrelevant to the rest of us that do play the game.
And besides that, it's already been explained that your idea is rubbish even if you weren't a bot using waste of oxygen.
Unified Church of the Unobligated - madness in the method |
|
|
Doc Severide
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
110
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 13:13:00 -
[41] - Quote
So many fewls want so much changed that isn't really broken. Why not just FO and play something else and let the EVE players play EVE? |
Cebraio
Starfire Oasis
74
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 13:14:00 -
[42] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:evereplicant wrote:the people you are ganking are usually NOOBS >Hulks >New players lmao
According to this old thread it takes about 30 days to train for a Hulk. A thirty day old player, I'd still consider a noob. Also, he will be in other gank target mining barges before that.
There are filthy industry corps out there that encourage players to get into a mining barge or exhumer as fast as possible. So I think many of your gank targets are still noobs in one way or another (one way being "new", the other being "clueless").
|
Rengerel en Distel
Amarr Science and Industry
168
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 13:19:00 -
[43] - Quote
He's obviously talking about someone using an orca and people with -5 and lower running in with capsule to grab a ship and gank. No one is going to pop a capsule at gates in high sec unless the guy lags out. Outlaw status is irrelevant at that point, as they just get concorded and do it again. The only way to stop it is to not allow outlaws to board ships in space in high sec, but that makes no sense with game mechanics.
|
seany1212
Zat's Affiliated Traders
Originally Riotous Corps
186
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 13:22:00 -
[44] - Quote
Rengerel en Distel wrote:He's obviously talking about someone using an orca and people with -5 and lower running in with capsule to grab a ship and gank. No one is going to pop a capsule at gates in high sec unless the guy lags out. Outlaw status is irrelevant at that point, as they just get concorded and do it again. The only way to stop it is to not allow outlaws to board ships in space in high sec, but that makes no sense with game mechanics.
He's obviously mad because he's back to botting and now hulkageddon is mainstream he's getting popped seeing as he isnt sitting at his computer...  |
RubyPorto
SniggWaffe
YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1802
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 13:44:00 -
[45] - Quote
Cebraio wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:evereplicant wrote:the people you are ganking are usually NOOBS >Hulks >New players lmao According to this old thread it takes about 30 days to train for a Hulk. A thirty day old player, I'd still consider a noob. Also, he will be in other gank target mining barges before that. There are filthy industry corps out there that encourage players to get into a mining barge or exhumer as fast as possible. So I think many of your gank targets are still noobs in one way or another (one way being "new", the other being "clueless").
Sounds like those industrial corps are doing their newbies a serious disservice if they aren't teaching them about the well documented mechanics of the game they play.
Single-Shard, Player Driven-áSandbox.
5 words. That's what makes it special. |
Kyra Yaken
State War Academy
Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 13:50:00 -
[46] - Quote
Make them unable to dock in hisec |
RubyPorto
SniggWaffe
YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1802
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 14:00:00 -
[47] - Quote
Kyra Yaken wrote:Make them unable to dock in hisec
Wouldn't actually cause much trouble.
Single-Shard, Player Driven-áSandbox.
5 words. That's what makes it special. |
Ris Dnalor
Black Rebel Rifter Club
344
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 14:53:00 -
[48] - Quote
Musashi IV wrote: A player who reaches -5 should be banned from entering or playing in hi-sec.
Your opinion is incorrect.
... |
Tenchi Sal
Dust Bunnies 514
86
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 15:04:00 -
[49] - Quote
ccp shouldn't ban players with -5 or below from hi sec. what ccp should do is deny them docking rights in hi sec. low sec, fine, null sec fine. there needs to be penalty for the things you do. as it stands, griefers run free and wild all over hi sec. every couple of weeks i run around in my inty trying to catch red pods, and every time its the same thing:
pirate docks, cant do jack.
pirate undocks, immunity sets in, cant even target them, they warp away instantly.
pirate hits a gate, jumps. again nothing.
pirate pops out of the gate, instantly warps off, again, nothing.
it would seem ccp just wants to baby them and not let them pay for their actions. |
HVAC Repairman
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
142
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 15:07:00 -
[50] - Quote
the correct solution is to ban all players from all secs
Follow me on twitter |
|
|
Lucy Ferrr
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
62
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 15:08:00 -
[51] - Quote
CCP needs to ban idiots who make dumb posts from the forums. |
RubyPorto
SniggWaffe
YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1807
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 15:08:00 -
[52] - Quote
Tenchi Sal wrote:
it would seem HS Players just wants to baby them and not let them pay for their actions.
Fixed that for you.
Single-Shard, Player Driven-áSandbox.
5 words. That's what makes it special. |
Disregard That
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
23
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 15:09:00 -
[53] - Quote
Tenchi Sal wrote:ccp shouldn't ban players with -5 or below from hi sec. what ccp should do is deny them docking rights in hi sec. low sec, fine, null sec fine. there needs to be penalty for the things you do. as it stands, griefers run free and wild all over hi sec. every couple of weeks i run around in my inty trying to catch red pods, and every time its the same thing:
pirate docks, cant do jack.
pirate undocks, immunity sets in, cant even target them, they warp away instantly.
pirate hits a gate, jumps. again nothing.
pirate pops out of the gate, instantly warps off, again, nothing.
it would seem ccp just wants to baby them and not let them pay for their actions.
If high-sec risk-averse filth would just use the aggression flags for what they are meant for, players could ban -5s from high-sec. Without a doubt this is the stupidest topic to continuously rear its head in GD.
Eve players taking control of their own destinies by utilizing Home Defense tactics?
Part of the playerbase gets it.
The rest just mewl on. |
EnslaverOfMinmatar
You gonna get aped
34
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 15:14:00 -
[54] - Quote
This thread should be renamed "CCP needs to ban bots from hi-sec, low-sec, null-sec"
Every EVE player must read this http://www.eveonline.com/background/potw/default.asp?cid=29-01-07 or uninstall and DIAF |
Shaera Taam
Minmatar Death Squad
Broken Chains Alliance
39
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 15:43:00 -
[55] - Quote
Velicitia wrote:... Isn't a sub -5 status in HS an indicator of "You can violence them without repercussion from Concord"? edit, yup. Quote:Once your security status reaches -5 you are considered an outlaw and can be attacked by players anywhere without CONCORD intervention. Be really careful about CONCORD Assembly Sovereignty! - CONCORD marks the ship as an outlaw and you are not able to jump out of the system or move in general; you will be shot down!
From here.So... they are "banned" ... it's just up to you to enforce the "ban".
/end thread
wow, that was easy...
Thus Spake the Frigate Goddess! |
Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated
Adhocracy
471
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 15:45:00 -
[56] - Quote
Musashi IV wrote:Why even have hi-sec or a security standing if players with -5 or lower security standing can play in hi-sec with imunity. A player who reaches -5 should be banned from entering or playing in hi-sec.
So says the botter....
Wormholes: The *NEW* end game of Eve - Online:
No Local. No Lag. No Blues (No Intell Channesl). No Blobs.
NEW FEATURE: NO INCARNA! |
Spurty
D00M.
Northern Coalition.
283
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 15:52:00 -
[57] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote:Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:Kohiko Sun wrote:To prove this immunity exists, get to outlaw status and fly a faction-fit CNR through high sec. Please, record it for peer review, and, remember, it must be repeated at least three times to be considered a valid experiment. Fit warp stabs, nanos, and run 4TW How many WCS stop a WDG? Assuming you fit 1 nano and 4 stabs, what stops 5 points / 3 scrams from stopping you? I'll let you mull over this and weigh it against why you don't see red CNRs flitting about highsec.
One focused point heavy dictor will solve this. He is going no where.
Web him, blap him, kill mail for all
----
CONCORD arrested two n00bs yesterday, one was drinking battery acid, the other was eating fireworks. They charged one and let the other one off. |
Spurty
D00M.
Northern Coalition.
283
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 15:54:00 -
[58] - Quote
Biggest issue when playing in a sandbox is it requires you to exist in a place full of kids with sand in their pants.
----
CONCORD arrested two n00bs yesterday, one was drinking battery acid, the other was eating fireworks. They charged one and let the other one off. |
Disregard That
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
25
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 15:56:00 -
[59] - Quote
Spurty wrote:Biggest issue when playing in a sandbox is it requires you to exist in a place full of kids with sand in their pants.
Don't forget the moronic kid who pees in the sand... |
adam smash
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
98
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 16:37:00 -
[60] - Quote
Lexmana wrote:And this is the OP in that thread for all of you that don't like to follow links: Musashi IV wrote:Several months ago I created my own mining bot program. I was pulling in about 250 mil a day but was not satisfied. How could I raise the price of ICE? The price of ICE was low because of mining bots. I decided to start writing anti-botting threads on all the forums. I wanted CCP to change the mechanics of the game to put other bot programs out of action. I knew I could change my program to compensate for any changes CCP could make. After several months of campaigning against bots CCP finally started taking action against them. The only problem is they started banning players instead of changing the game mechanics. I soon got banned. Dont worry this is not my main char, its only an alt. BTW, this is the best bot tears thread in a while.
HAHAHAHAHAHA
You should be banned LOL O wait... you were. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |