| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1833
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 18:55:00 -
[1] - Quote
Welp, I'm stealing it for my sig nonetheless. This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1833
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 18:57:00 -
[2] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Qolde wrote:I just think it's a sad waste to see people being afraid to even attempt to leave the newbie area. Mining is a necessary part of the game. I have mined quite a bit, but have hauled more for mining ops. Ain't nothing wrong with it. What's wrong, is expecting to not get blown up every once in a while. In highsec, you have a reasonable expectation to not get blown up so often, but enough of the playerbase has decided not so with T2 mining barges anymore. Mining in null used to be the shiznit, til people started afking their hulks in hisec so much. I guess people are shaping that sand how they want. Now, if you want to afk mine in Hisec, you have to use covetors or battleships.  So, why you try to change the way ultimate carebear like me plays EVE?
'Cause we feel like it. You can choose to let us change the way you play or not. How you react to other player's influence is entirely up to you. This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1833
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 19:39:00 -
[3] - Quote
Zhihatsu wrote:Ban Bindy wrote:Ho hum. Another everything you do is PVP post. You guys have truly deluded yourselves. Its true, not everything you do is PVP in eve. Sitting on your butt on your space couch really isn't pvp.
That indent in your couch is making my experience less pleasant when I come visit SoonGäó This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1838
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 22:38:00 -
[4] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:RubyPorto wrote:'Cause we feel like it. You can choose to let us change the way you play or not. How you react to other player's influence is entirely up to you. Just tell me when and I undock my Rokh and warp to nearby asteroid belt.
So now you admit you like the suggestions I've made in EVERY SINGLE THREAD about this. This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1839
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 23:04:00 -
[5] - Quote
Qolde wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Zhihatsu wrote:Ban Bindy wrote:Ho hum. Another everything you do is PVP post. You guys have truly deluded yourselves. Its true, not everything you do is PVP in eve. Sitting on your butt on your space couch really isn't pvp. That indent in your couch is making my experience less pleasant when I come visit SoonGäó Zhihatsu's couch lightly scratches your butt for 69 points of damage.
RubyPorto lands a Wrecking Shot on Zhihatsu's Couch This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1841
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 23:59:00 -
[6] - Quote
adam smash wrote:So why can I not can flip noobs in the "sandbox"
O right because it is a sandbox WITH LIMITS....
So ccp can choose what to limit and what to not. I see no reason why HS ganking can not be limited. Here is an idea. Miner can pay concord a SMALL price to come into the belt and sit in it... ALL DAY... boom ganking prices go WAY up as you need WAY more ships.
All the sandbox bullshit needs to stop
You want PVP head over to world of tanks
**** shoots back.
I want PvP, I come to EvE. That's what the game's based on. See any NPCs in the mineral market? Then mining is PvP. See any NPCs in the LP item market? Then selling LP goods is PvP. See any NPCs caring about the buying power of ISK? Then running Isk faucets is PvP.
EvE's core (and only redeeming feature) is the fact that player vs player interaction permeates the game. This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1842
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 00:23:00 -
[7] - Quote
Zhihatsu wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Qolde wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Zhihatsu wrote:
Its true, not everything you do is PVP in eve. Sitting on your butt on your space couch really isn't pvp.
That indent in your couch is making my experience less pleasant when I come visit SoonGäó Zhihatsu's couch lightly scratches your butt for 69 points of damage. RubyPorto lands a Wrecking Shot on Zhihatsu's Couch Is this a euphemism for something that I am missing here?
Did you clicky the link? I think it's pretty explicit about what's being wrecked.
(It's the Couch) This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1844
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 04:29:00 -
[8] - Quote
Nikodiemus wrote:No other MMO offers a single shard and a single economy driven by players where it is easily affordable in game or through real world transaction to an in-game currency (PLEX) to instantly kill a player's investment (also including time, money (subscriptions), effort, and long term investment)
The addition of the T3 BC created a gap not compensated for by by the industrial devs (if there are any left) to create ships that can counter effortless instagib.
Single shooting high value ships with a ship as affordable as a destroyer or a T3 BC while suffering no consequences (the laughable buddy system and a game where multiple simultaneous accounts is both accepted and encouraged with 3 characters given to each account) defeats the purpose of the sandbox.
The t3 BC gank of today costs more than the AlphaBS gank did before the t3 were introduced. The insurance nerf compensated for the introduction of the t3 BCs perfectly as far as ganking cost is concerned.
Destroyer Ganks do not single-shot anything. They beat them down with high DPS (again, at a higher cost than the pre-dessiebuff/insurancenerf thorax ganks). The fact that they do not single-shot their targets leaves them open to disruption via death or ECM jam (i.e. an AlphaNado of your own or ECM drones) if they're shooting down a tanked Hulk.
If you're going to claim that ganking has gotten too cheap, it helps to include all the game mechanical factors that affect the cost of ganking.
If you want to make your hulk less cheap to gank, it helps to fit a tank or take some measures to protect your expensive investment. This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1844
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 05:12:00 -
[9] - Quote
Aramatheia wrote:Disregard That wrote:Statistically speaking why would more botters be caught in high-sec than in low-sec?
Are you implying that CCP uses different metrics between the two security levels?
Maybe null doesn't have logs?
Statistically, if more botters are caught in Caldari High-sec than anywhere else, that means that in all likelihood that's where the most botters are.
Edit: I like the part how I'm winning Eve and you tell me I'm losing. so why dont the hulkageddoners focus on the botting hotspots. players will all lose ships its a given, but when its a bunch of ones and zeros commanding pilotless ships from a basement computer farm to mine 25/8 well thats not a hisec "whiner" or "bear" thats just dirty ass scum. Kill that crap, wipe them out. Theres your holy crusade, now go forth champions. Also im still failing to understand where all the ungodly wealth supposedly is in highsec mining. pyroxeres? the odd kernite belt? really? 3-4 hours to pay for a covetor, is 10m an hour really that insane? gee all you guys need to play more if 10m per hour is too much
You're assuming we gank you because we don't like what you do. That assumption is faulty. This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1844
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 06:00:00 -
[10] - Quote
Aramatheia wrote: perhaps not all gankers, but what about the ones who yell without hesitation how all high sec players need to be killed. They send a pretty loud and clear message. And while im not saying highsec should be immune. I think they should first off realise that high sec mining isnt the bountifull bag of goodness they think (except for 25/8 botters). And that thier not champions of a noble cause. Thier kicking kittens, not really anyhting to be proud off. I respect killmails showing fighting ships a hell of alot more than killmails of hulks, mackinaws and industrials.
dont make high sec safe, but drop the acts of "high sec mining is too rich" and "champions of the light"
They could be kidding or RPing. Or they could be serious, what do I care?
Nobody's yelling that it's too rich (if they were, disrupting it would be silly, since disruption makes mineral prices go up, thus making it more lucrative). The problem is that miners have gotten used to and subsequently developed a sense of entitlement to the ability to make Isk almost completely AFK. This has lead them to (wrongly) believe that HiSec space should be "safe" or that their untanked Max Yield/Cargo Hulks should be ungankable. This belief has led them to make annoying posts on the forums. These annoying posts on the forums have led to people disliking miners due to their inability to comprehend simple premises of EvE that have not changed since Beta; namely that you are never safe.
I am not saying all of this applies to you, personally. But it does apply to most of the people who are writing threads whinging about getting ganked.
As for respect, if you don't like shooting exhumers, that's totally fine. But you have to admit that ganking exhumers is also totally fine and is at the very least, more effort than AFK mining is. Whether you respect the gankers for their specialized skills (it does take some skill to pull off successful, cost effective ganks) or not is entirely up to you. This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1845
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 08:54:00 -
[11] - Quote
Aramatheia wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Aramatheia wrote: perhaps not all gankers, but what about the ones who yell without hesitation how all high sec players need to be killed. They send a pretty loud and clear message. And while im not saying highsec should be immune. I think they should first off realise that high sec mining isnt the bountifull bag of goodness they think (except for 25/8 botters). And that thier not champions of a noble cause. Thier kicking kittens, not really anyhting to be proud off. I respect killmails showing fighting ships a hell of alot more than killmails of hulks, mackinaws and industrials.
dont make high sec safe, but drop the acts of "high sec mining is too rich" and "champions of the light"
They could be kidding or RPing. Or they could be serious, what do I care? Nobody's yelling that it's too rich (if they were, disrupting it would be silly, since disruption makes mineral prices go up, thus making it more lucrative). The problem is that miners have gotten used to and subsequently developed a sense of entitlement to the ability to make Isk almost completely AFK. This has lead them to (wrongly) believe that HiSec space should be "safe" or that their untanked Max Yield/Cargo Hulks should be ungankable. This belief has led them to make annoying posts on the forums. These annoying posts on the forums have led to people disliking miners due to their inability to comprehend simple premises of EvE that have not changed since Beta; namely that you are never safe. I am not saying all of this applies to you, personally. But it does apply to most of the people who are writing threads whinging about getting ganked. As for respect, if you don't like shooting exhumers, that's totally fine. But you have to admit that ganking exhumers is also totally fine and is at the very least, more effort than AFK mining is. Whether you respect the gankers for their specialized skills (it does take some skill to pull off successful, cost effective ganks) or not is entirely up to you. i'm not joining the bandwagon of delete guns from highsec. In fact i think im guilty of becoming what i actually hate and that is a person who hates another demographic just cause of how they act. I'll get over myself soon enough i hope. I dont hate the act of blowing stuff up, its just the attitudes the most vocal supporters have. Like thier some sort of CCP/Eve saviour crew. You may be right it could all be just RP and i might just be making myself look like a big ass fail on these forums. Thats something im willing to eat i guess, just like when i lost my last mining ship. If you look me up on those combat board thingo's you'll see i've had almost no pvp experience. But thats not cause im scared to lose a ship, but mostly cause i havent found an enjoyable means of doing it yet. For the time being i'll just carry on providing the tools pvpers use to do thier thing, and in another 5 days i'll roll out my own tanked hulk and up the output further
You are an EvE player who mines. Your attitude is exactly what's missing from the miner's who are stuck in EvE and whine about it.
Now stop letting yourself get conned into not shooting people. Go do it. Maybe join a corp that suits your style. For a PvP intro, RvB is pretty good, Rifterlings and Black Rebel Rifter Club fly frigates, that's what's off the top of my head. This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1856
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 16:18:00 -
[12] - Quote
Barbara Nichole wrote:Qolde wrote:Welcome to Eve. "EVE isn't designed to just look like a cold, dark and harsh world, it's designed to be a cold, dark and harsh world." --CCP Wrangler * Nonconsensual Ship combat will not go away. Eve didn't even have sentry guns or CONCORD at the beginning. It is part of the core philosophy of the game........ ............ .....When Band of Brothers believed that G Alliance had a mothership on the build, they didn't whine for them to be nerfed, they round up others who would fight with them, and sieged EC-P8R 23/7 for a week. When Goonswarm first started. They weren't the most experienced players, but they had the drive. They took out veteran alliances battleship fleets with rifters. RIFTERS. Look at them today. So before you post, think about what you're going to say, and if it will even be worth your typing. Please. *the actual quote is here as pointed out by Yuda Mann No intelligent person has said " let's remove all the danger from the game" or even just from high sec. What they've said that riles your feathers is that suicide ganking is overpowered, the battles are lopsided, and they need to be re-examined... that's all. Yeah goon is the new bob... great.
Hulks can be tanked such that they are unprofitable to gank (even counting the GSF bounty, which is not a game mechanic) Hulks can be flown in such a way that they are impossible to gank without pilot error on the Hulk's part
Suicide Ganks can be disrupted quite easily
The battles are only lopsided because one side doesn't bother putting any effort into the fight because they feel they're entitled to safety without effort. This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1856
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 16:21:00 -
[13] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:Tippia wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:Uinuva Karma wrote:Take your buddies and claim your own space, make it as strong as you want. Get hot-dropped a week later and lose it all... If that's how strong you want it to be, yes. If not, then no. "horsepuckey"
What is an alliance but an organized group of people? HiSec has people, it just needs to organize.
Go take some shitty sov for a while, use the money you've made from HS's lack of constant ship loss (20% of characters are in Null yet ~50% of ships are lost there) to build up a Cap/Supercap fleet. Learn to fight. Start taking more sov. Expand into mediocre space. Then even into good space.
The last Tech holding coalition was destroyed by a coalition that did not hold any (or at least any significant) tech. It could happen to this one. This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1856
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 16:47:00 -
[14] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:RubyPorto wrote:What is an alliance but an organized group of people? HiSec has people, it just needs to organize.
Go take some shitty sov for a while, use the money you've made from HS's lack of constant ship loss (20% of characters are in Null yet ~50% of ships are lost there) to build up a Cap/Supercap fleet. Learn to fight. Start taking more sov. Expand into mediocre space. Then even into good space.
The last Tech holding coalition was destroyed by a coalition that did not hold any (or at least any significant) tech. It could happen to this one. Thanks Ruby - I really needed to snort soda through my nose! GODDAM that's funny **** right there man! You should go into standup!
Thank you. This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1860
|
Posted - 2012.06.11 15:30:00 -
[15] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:Tippia wrote:What he described is entirely accurate and the only thing that is stopping you is you. What is stopping me is lack of interest.
So why complain about the people who are interested? This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1909
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 14:12:00 -
[16] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:Tippia wrote:What he described is entirely accurate and the only thing that is stopping you is you. What is stopping me is lack of interest. So why complain about the people who are interested?  Don't know where that came from, or the crack about me whining about GS... but ok...
Noticing your posts in other threads, I may have conflated you with other posters. Sorry. This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1916
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 21:39:00 -
[17] - Quote
Barbelo Valentinian wrote:RubyPorto wrote: Nobody's yelling that it's too rich (if they were, disrupting it would be silly, since disruption makes mineral prices go up, thus making it more lucrative). The problem is that miners have gotten used to and subsequently developed a sense of entitlement to the ability to make Isk almost completely AFK. This has lead them to (wrongly) believe that HiSec space should be "safe" or that their untanked Max Yield/Cargo Hulks should be ungankable. This belief has led them to make annoying posts on the forums. These annoying posts on the forums have led to people disliking miners due to their inability to comprehend simple premises of EvE that have not changed since Beta; namely that you are never safe.
And round and round we go. What you are not getting is that the AFK aspect is why some people do mining and other AFK-able pursuits in EVE. If they can't do it, they won't "learn" anything else, they'll just leave. And you can bet your bottom dollar that CCP wants to have such players in the game. Otherwise mining would not be as it is - it's pretty obviously designed to be one part of the game that's AFK-friendly. Their money is as good as your average EVE mini-me Nietzsche's money  The whingeing (so far as I can see) is not about being ganked per se, it's about a concerted perma-campaign to grief miners. A player who likes AFK playing has already accepted the compact that they'll occasionally be ganked. Even Hulkageddon per se was cool, because a canny player might take advantage of it, and anyone who was really risk-averse could just sit it out. But a perma-campaign? I doubt it will really do much good in the long run. I think some of you guys have your heads so far up your metagame that you forget that there are plenty players of EVE for whom such concerns are meaningless, they just want to potter about in a space game. Now, anyone who wants to potter about in EVE to the extent of subscribing to it has to have accepted that they're never absolutely safe (otherwise they really are an idiot), but an OOC campaign specifically targeted against them (for the sake of someone else's silly metagame) is a whole different enchilada. The imperceptible shift in EVE from a virtual world (where the omnipresent danger is part of the lore) to a game in which winning at all costs is all that matters, is a huge mistake. It's a monumental stupidity to try to turn EVE into "LOL in Space".
What's wrong with the campaign? Either ganking is allowed or it's not. There're no fishing quotas to be enforced. There's no hunting season. There's just what players decide to do within the rules.
If they've accepted the risk of ganks, and aren't complaining when they get ganked, then I've got no problem with them. They understand that that risk may vary due to other players actions.
Winning at all costs has been the only thing that matters since day one. Look at the history of Nullsec. BoB engaged the entire GBC against the Goons because I think they noticed that the Goons were a potential threat. The entire weight of the GBC against an alliance fielding Rifter fleets. BoB and the GBC vs a bunch of newbies in Rifters. This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |
| |
|