| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
|

CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
2450

|
Posted - 2012.06.08 17:04:00 -
[1] - Quote
CCP Recurve is known for keeping a close eye on the economy and how it reflects your various undertakings. Check out his latest price indices blog, complete with sexy graphs!
CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |-á@ccp_guard |
|

Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E. Comic Mischief
711
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 17:09:00 -
[2] - Quote
Seems we should buy on the announcement, sell on deployment.
Edit: First! http://vincentoneve.wordpress.com/ |

PinkKnife
The Scope Gallente Federation
109
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 17:30:00 -
[3] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote:Seems we should buy on the announcement, sell on deployment.
Edit: First!
If the announcement has to do with minerals, then aye.
Most everything else is pretty easy.
New ships, buy in jita, move to other trade hubs that lag behind and make boats of isk.
I made about 200m moving Oracles from jita to Rens in Crucible.
I'd like to hear the analysis on T2 prices whenever recurve has some free time. |

Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E. Comic Mischief
711
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 17:38:00 -
[4] - Quote
Aye, I was looking at minerals. I did not do a mineral investment, but I did notice that ice did not spike with the other minerals. So before Hulkaggedon, that's what I invested in. Not a big investment, but I did come out 1 billion ahead. http://vincentoneve.wordpress.com/ |

Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
452
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 17:46:00 -
[5] - Quote
hurrrr guys burn Jita and Hulkageddon have been such terrible failures and haven't affected the game at all hurrrrrr Titans were never meant to be "cost effective", its a huge ****.-á- CCP Oveur, 2006
~If you want a picture of the future of WiS, imagine a spaceship, stamping on an avatar's face. Forever. |

Iniquita
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
75
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 17:49:00 -
[6] - Quote
Any information about how the recently formed Technetium cartel has affected these indexes. Technetium is up nearly 70k/ a unit since the beginning of march |

Celebris Nexterra
Lowsec Static
45
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 17:53:00 -
[7] - Quote
I fully support suicide ganking being possible and common, but I think Hulks need a bit of a tank buff. They're just huge targets with nary the ability to move, and aside from not mining or not fitting mining lasers, it's nearly impossible for them to avoid getting ganked. Seems a bit silly that 3 Thrashers (total value ~30mil) can easily gank something that costs 180mil+. |

Henry Haphorn
Aliastra Gallente Federation
376
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 18:05:00 -
[8] - Quote
This just proves how wrong the doomsayers really are. They predicted that such events would cause the market to go out of control, but as the graphs show (thank you, CCP Recurve), the market simply finds a "new equilibrium". Another example of "the invisible hand" theory at work as characterized by Adam Smith when he authored the book "Wealth of Nations". Adapt or Die |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
1120
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 18:28:00 -
[9] - Quote
lol @ lowsec mining stats |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
880
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 18:33:00 -
[10] - Quote
Celebris Nexterra wrote:I fully support suicide ganking being possible and common, but I think Hulks need a bit of a tank buff. They're just huge targets with nary the ability to move, and aside from not mining or not fitting mining lasers, it's nearly impossible for them to avoid getting ganked. Seems a bit silly that 3 Thrashers (total value ~30mil) can easily gank something that costs 180mil+.
the cost of your ship isn't part of its tank, hope this helps eh |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1220
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 18:39:00 -
[11] - Quote
Henry Haphorn wrote:This just proves how wrong the doomsayers really are. They predicted that such events would cause the market to go out of control, but as the graphs show (thank you, CCP Recurve), the market simply finds a "new equilibrium". Another example of "the invisible hand" theory at work as characterized by Adam Smith when he authored the book "Wealth of Nations".
Markets don't go out of control. Just have to follow them and then you can make billions at patch release.
A great thank you to all those who made me stupid amounts of money on this expansion!
Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Gogela
Direct Action LLC.
804
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 18:41:00 -
[12] - Quote
There's a wide array of risk and speculative positions you can take on things. The risk is in buying something when it's announced, or worse yet, when the devs are speculating on the future. Those kind of long term positions can be very lucrative or it can just fail to materialize and then you might be left taking a small hit if the other people doing what you are get out first. That said, being in commodities is a classic hedge against inflation... so the worst case scenario isn't that bleak. I'm sorry I missed the PI gravy train. There are some neat things they mentioned at fanfest I'm trading on for the winter expansion though. EvE keeps ya busy...
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
7780
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 18:54:00 -
[13] - Quote
GǪyes, wellGǪ what good is fuel if you don't burn it?  GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
CONCORD spawns: quick enough to save you?
|

Haifisch Zahne
HZ Corp
50
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 19:46:00 -
[14] - Quote
The dev blog leaves out a number of important points.
First, the graph for Mined Volume took a major bath after Inferno and has not recovered to pre-Hulkageddon (formerly Hoaxageddon) numbers. Can anyone say, Unified Inventory sucks and miners are only slowly starting to get any work done again?
And, yet, even with Mined Volume down for months, prices have fallen and continue to fall since April's high. Yet, CCP Recurve writes, "Hulkageddon suppresses the supply of minerals, which forces prices upwards." Until hoarded minerals are sold off, we won't know whether mined volume has affected prices *or* the nerf to meta 0 loot.
Second, CCP has been on a major push to get Inflation under control. At Fanfest, CCP's resident economist spoke of the ISK sinks and faucets, and how CCP would, with Escalation and Inferno, begin to open up the sinks (e.g., increased fees/taxes, etc.) and close the faucets (e.g., Incursion changes, etc.).
The Eve Economy is a balance sheet with total ISK on one side and total Goods on the other side, with the "ephemeral" PLEX thrown in. PLEX is injected into the game with real money, not player in-game interaction, and is then consumed for game time. At Fanfest, the other side of the balance sheet, Goods, was never discussed, only the ISK faucets and sinks, i.e., total ISK in-game.
Burn Jita and Hulkageddon destroyed large amounts of in-game Goods. And, CCP is drying up the total amount of ISK in-game. And, CCP Recurve has said nothing about the ephemeral PLEX: supply, demand and prices.
With so little of the total picture drawn, just Minerals, CCP's projection of 2-3 months to recovery is "optimistic", if not purely fanciful. |

Andrea Griffin
287
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 19:56:00 -
[15] - Quote
Haifisch Zahne wrote: Can anyone say, Unified Inventory sucks and miners are only slowly starting to get any work done again? More like the unified inventory completely screwed up botting software which wasn't prepared to handle the new interface. CCP Sreegs is my favorite developer. |

Panhead4411
Rothschild's Sewage and Septic Sucking Services The Possum Lodge
131
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 20:07:00 -
[16] - Quote
http://cdn1.eveonline.com/www/newssystem/media/62806/1/Mined_Volume_-_2.png
Yeah, hulkageddon didn't slow the drop of mineral prices...the Inventory system did it....that is really sad, your broken system did more dmg than the GOONS!!!!
Also, to the comment about the bots...all the bots i had tagged seemed to be back up and running within 2 days, their owners just likely needed to add a few lines for (minimize this thing....after every action...)
The blog doesn't mention how despite all the intentions of Goons and HA-V....the overall prices for most things have only gone down since the "burn" even though they had slowly climbed throughout the year.
I also want to see a blog about the ratio of newb ships/dessies that were piloted by Goons...b/c thats all that was popping up on the KB for the "Burn" event...then the occasional freighter which happens on a regular basis anyways. In my travels in/out of Jita that day, it actually seemed safer than normal, if you weren't a Goon...in a cheap ship... http://blog.beyondreality.se/shift-click-does-nothing -á-á < Unified Inventory is NOT ready... |

Nevigrofnu Mrots
Goonswarm Federation
18
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 20:32:00 -
[17] - Quote
Panhead4411 wrote:http://cdn1.eveonline.com/www/newssystem/media/62806/1/Mined_Volume_-_2.png
Yeah, hulkageddon didn't slow the drop of mineral prices...the Inventory system did it....that is really sad, your broken system did more dmg than the GOONS!!!!
damage... to all the bot miners that stop working |

Aryth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
96
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 23:30:00 -
[18] - Quote
When some people notice a fire, their instinctive reaction is to reach for a bucket of fuel. Many of those people play EVE.
and most of them are Goons |

Swidgen
Republic University Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 23:37:00 -
[19] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:lol @ lowsec mining stats lol @ wormhole mining stats
Let this put an end once and for all to the notion that wormhole minerals need to be nerfed. There just ain't that much there, folks. |

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
377
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 00:31:00 -
[20] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:lol @ lowsec mining stats
the interesting thing is now low sec would be safer the high sec to mine...
you have low local counts better ores and if you are attacked just as likely to die... PLEX FOR PIZZA!
TECH iii MINNING SHIPS! |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
224
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 01:33:00 -
[21] - Quote
OK CCP ReCURVE what where the numbers for the ISK Faucets/sinks broken down for May? I'm curious if the Drone bounties outpaced the Incursion nerf payouts & if WH 'blue loots' increased with pilots scuttering around for new sources of income. CCP Soundwave "Incursions are not a big issue in terms of isk globally" |

Alice Katsuko
Terra Incognita Intrepid Crossing
126
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 03:08:00 -
[22] - Quote
So in short, you replaced a mineral faucet with an ISK faucet just before a major player event which suppressed the remaining source of minerals, which quite obviously led to both price inflation and monetary devaluation. Individual player real income went down just as real prices were going through the roof.
But good to know that you're keeping an eye on the overall EVE economy. Just hope we're not going to run into full-on stagflation.
I'd definitely be interested in a breakdown of ISK inflows/outflows, especially broken down by activity and region. I'd be very surprised if the nerf to incursions wasn't more than offset by the addition of rogue drone bounties. |

Hakaru Ishiwara
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
197
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 03:09:00 -
[23] - Quote
Golly, the CCP documented single digit price increases, etc. are so quaint. Crazy how the gear that I use, need and for which I trained has gone up in price by 50 - 500% over the past 6 - 12 months.
In my small world, costs have skyrocketed with little-to-no reciprocation in earnings potential. What a great business opportunity for CCP to sell me GTCs so that I can cash them in for ISK, you say?
"Not on your life," as Arnie once said.
I used to buy GTCs with disposable RL income as a way to ISK up. No way that's going to happen with CCP's recent Inventory ****-up and egotistical treatment of their customers. Hilmar's 'humility blog' from last Fall falls completely flat with how CCP released Inferno. 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284286 |
|

Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises Otherworld Empire
3679
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 05:33:00 -
[24] - Quote
So that's how my mineral investment dropped lol
|
|

Jagga Spikes
Spikes Chop Shop
72
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 09:59:00 -
[25] - Quote
Aryth wrote:When some people notice a fire, their instinctive reaction is to reach for a bucket of fuel. Many of those people play EVE.
and most of them are Goons
not likely. why would people that set fire go for the buckets? |

Shobon Welp
Band of Brothers
43
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 10:14:00 -
[26] - Quote
Alice Katsuko wrote: Just hope we're not going to run into full-on stagflation. Why would that be a bad thing for Eve? Please answer taking into account that this is a pretend spaceship game, and unlike in the real world, nobody goes hungry or loses their job when it occurs. |

BleedingAngl
Twist The Rusty Knife
1
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 16:04:00 -
[27] - Quote
Shobon Welp wrote:Alice Katsuko wrote: Just hope we're not going to run into full-on stagflation. Why would that be a bad thing for Eve? Please answer taking into account that this is a pretend spaceship game, and unlike in the real world, nobody goes hungry or loses their job when it occurs.
apart from people at ccp loose their job |

Hakaru Ishiwara
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
197
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 16:22:00 -
[28] - Quote
BleedingAngl wrote:Shobon Welp wrote:Alice Katsuko wrote: Just hope we're not going to run into full-on stagflation. Why would that be a bad thing for Eve? Please answer taking into account that this is a pretend spaceship game, and unlike in the real world, nobody goes hungry or loses their job when it occurs. apart from people at ccp loose their job Is that because subscriptions are either stagnant or decrease? I am not following your line of thinking, tbh.
If the in-game economy suffers severe stagflation and RL subscription rates start to suffer, then are there not tools or design tweaks that CCP could use to massage the in-game economy into better health? 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284286 |

Alx Warlord
SUPERNOVA SOCIETY Tribal Conclave
130
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 16:37:00 -
[29] - Quote
" It should prove interesting to watch it recover over the next 2 to 3 months. "
Then we get another fuel bucket!!! Moon minerals on planetary belts and Ice Comets roaming every system with good industrial index???
I can't wait for that!!!!  |

Shobon Welp
Band of Brothers
43
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 18:55:00 -
[30] - Quote
BleedingAngl wrote:Shobon Welp wrote:Alice Katsuko wrote: Just hope we're not going to run into full-on stagflation. Why would that be a bad thing for Eve? Please answer taking into account that this is a pretend spaceship game, and unlike in the real world, nobody goes hungry or loses their job when it occurs. apart from people at ccp loose their job
Why does stagflation in a virtual spaceship economy cause CCP employees to lose their jobs in real life? Does CCP pay its developers in asteroid minerals now? |

Trollin
72
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 19:02:00 -
[31] - Quote
because cancelled subs don't usually return
recruiting new subs to a game, with a well documented history of misconduct by the people who make it as well as indifferent attitude to the displeasure their ineptness cause isn't as easy as u imagine.
think
incursion nerf walking in stations unified inventory etc, etc... You are your own worst enemy. |

Alia Gon'die
Aliastra Gallente Federation
67
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 21:53:00 -
[32] - Quote
Trollin wrote:because cancelled subs don't usually return
recruiting new subs to a game, with a well documented history of misconduct by the people who make it as well as indifferent attitude to the displeasure their ineptness cause isn't as easy as u imagine.
think
incursion nerf walking in stations unified inventory etc, etc...
not to mention its northern hemisphere summertime and competion from other games
just wait till you can hear the sound of all the neut RR alts being biomassed cos of upcoming crimewatch changes
they may try to tell you that its all fixed in 2-3 months but chances are its 2-3 years before they even realized what happened, let alone figure out any way to "fix" it and implement fix
You mean the indifferent attitude towards Unified Inventory that has released how many quick patches in the two weeks since release? |

Alice Katsuko
Terra Incognita Intrepid Crossing
126
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 22:51:00 -
[33] - Quote
I wrote a response, but the forum ate it. So consider this a **** You to the web team. Re-post forthcoming. |

Alice Katsuko
Terra Incognita Intrepid Crossing
126
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 23:17:00 -
[34] - Quote
Please refer to Wikipedia or any basic Economics text if you do not understand what stagflation is, or if you don't understand basic economic concepts. It is not my job to correct that sort of ignorance.
Stagflation occurs where there is high inflation, low or even negative economic growth, and high unemployment.
As the dev blog quite clearly shows, we've been experiencinng a period of high inflation, driven primarily by the removal of drone alloys, a major source of minerals.
Economic growth, at its most basic and meaningful, is an increase in real individual income. Nominal individual income in EVE has remained static or been reduced for most players. Nominal income from bounties and missions has not changed in years; incursion nominal income has been nerfed; trader and manufacturer margins have gone down slightly due to an increase in the transaction tax. Only the income of miners and Technetium moon holders has increased, and mining has its own problems, which I will not discuss here.
So nominal prices have increased across the board while nominal individual income has remained static or has gone down. Real player income has gone down, aside from a few special cases. In more simple terms, if it took an hour of anomaly running to buy a Drake this time last year, it now might take two hours, so it takes more grinding to get the reward (whether it is PvP or a new shiny module or what have you).
The danger is that we may hit a point where the tedium of the grind exceeds the rewards. And ISK-making in EVE is actrociously boring; EVE is perhaps the only game where players regularly watch movies or do other things during PvE. At that point player activity may decline. For a game like EVE, where players generate most of the game content, a decline in player activity is very dangerous, for obviious reasons. That would be analogous to the "high unemployment" part of stagflation, if we really want to be particular about fulfilling all the elements of that definition.
I am not saying that we are at that point. CCP is watching the game economy, and they should have all the tools necessary to nudge the EVE economy if necessary. We know that the game needs more ISK sinks, but it also probably needs more sources of moon goo and of basic minerals. |

Lykouleon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
476
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 01:00:00 -
[35] - Quote
Alice Katsuko wrote:As the dev blog quite clearly shows, we've been experiencinng a period of high inflation, driven primarily by the removal of drone alloys, a major source of minerals. And the botters who were reaping the alloys...
Just sayin'...
Lykouleon > CYNO ME CLOSER SO I CAN HIT THEM WITH MY SWORD |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
224
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 01:50:00 -
[36] - Quote
Bring back the QEN! What ya scared of? Also shouldn' graph #3 included the amount of ore processed from alloyes so we get a better picture of the amount of ore in the system? CCP Soundwave "Incursions are not a big issue in terms of isk globally" |

Hakaru Ishiwara
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
201
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 03:49:00 -
[37] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Bring back the QEN! What ya scared of? Also shouldn' graph #3 included the amount of ore processed from alloyes so we get a better picture of the amount of ore in the system? CCP has made the choice to reduce the marketing "intelligence" available about their EVE intellectual property for one reason or another. Purely speculative on my part, but I believe that their formerly good subscription increases have leveled off to a point where investors, potential clients and other parties of value might raise an eyebrow and consider CCP to be a has-been business opportunity. After all, everybody wants to be associated with a rising star, but not so much with the skinny guy treading water with the sharks circling.
Personally, I miss the statistics having to do with ships, manufacturing, statistics on **** blown (and where), etc. Again, I will speculate that this data analysis may provide too much information on either business or game design weaknesses putting CCP at a business-related disadvantage, somehow.
If I put on my tin foil hat and conspiracy cape, I'd speculate that CCP had much to keep on the down low from current and future business partners. 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284286 |

Shobon Welp
Band of Brothers
43
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 08:30:00 -
[38] - Quote
Quote:The danger is that we may hit a point where the tedium of the grind exceeds the rewards. On the other hand, the easier it is to make money the less rewarding it becomes to do so. If everyone is stupendously rich and has a deadspace tengu and a supercap alt, where's the excitement and sense of achievement in joining that not-so-exclusive club yourself? Decreasing the rewards may actually result in players setting more modest goals for themselves, or making their goals to be something other than grinding isk for months to spend on Flashy Hull X, perhaps they'll make their goal 'learn how to probe' or 'get good at PvP'. The ship balancing efforts that have begun will go a long way to fixing this issue if they succeed in making viable roles for less expensive T1 ships and we don't have to spend 6 months of boredom on getting into T2 fitted battleships or whatever the next flavour of the month is.
Quote:And ISK-making in EVE is actrociously boring; EVE is perhaps the only game where players regularly watch movies or do other things during PvE. At that point player activity may decline. For a game like EVE, where players generate most of the game content, a decline in player activity is very dangerous, for obviious reasons. Everybody knows that PvE in Eve is a terrible boring grind and has been saying it for years. Even CCP are now looking into ways to make mining and industrial activities both more rewarding and more interesting (and the drone alloy removal was an important first step on this path). The fact that grinding is boring and you have to grind to get into a lot of the viable hulls isn't directly relevant to any sense of impending economic crisis since it was just as true 6 months and 2 years and 5 years ago as now. |

Guttripper
State War Academy Caldari State
132
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 15:30:00 -
[39] - Quote
After reading the blog, I have one question -
Where is the fun factor in the game?
|

Haifisch Zahne
HZ Corp
51
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 17:39:00 -
[40] - Quote
Alice provides some excellent, well-reasoned thoughts. I think it compliments my earlier post.
Alice Katsuko wrote:... Only the income of miners and Technetium moon holders has increased, and mining has its own problems, which I will not discuss here.
At Fanfest, it became very clear to me that mining was to become a major push in Eve by CCP. Myself, I would be very interested to hear your thoughts on mining.
Alice Katsuko wrote:So nominal prices have increased across the board while nominal individual income has remained static or has gone down. Real player income has gone down, aside from a few special cases. In more simple terms, if it took an hour of anomaly running to buy a Drake this time last year, it now might take two hours, so it takes more grinding to get the reward (whether it is PvP or a new shiny module or what have you).
Yes, yes, and a thousand times, yes. And, what happens when players don't want to grind? They buy PLEX. And, more PLEX. And, from Fanfest, it became clear that CCP makes most of its money from PLEX sales. And, how will Dust 514 make CCP money? ONLY through the sale of PLEX. There is no subscription fee for Dust 514. Indeed, this may tie into CCP's interest in mining, with PI headed into its own Inferno with the release of Dust 514.
**It is my contention that CCP is attempting to manipulate the Eve economy to maximize its profit in the sale of PLEX.**
CCP has stated they simply want a healthy economy. "Nuts."
CCP reports that they have stepped up bot detection and elimination efforts. This certainly would drive revenue from PLEX sales to Iceland and not China. From CCP's perspective, this is, A Good Thing (tm).
CCP is clearly drying up ISK supply-- CCP has stated it is their intention to do so.
The last piece of the equation is mining and manufacturing, the supply of Goods and the other side of the Balance Sheet, of which I know little. CCP has nerfed mineral supply (e.g., drone poopies and meta 0 loot), T2 datacores will increasingly be supplied through Faction Warfare (I presume a hotbed of lost ships?), Dust 514 is coming (which will upset PI), and Belt Trawling as discussed at Fanfest coming Not Soon (tm).
Alice Katsuko wrote:I am not saying that we are at that point. CCP is watching the game economy, and they should have all the tools necessary to nudge the EVE economy if necessary. We know that the game needs more ISK sinks, but it also probably needs more sources of moon goo and of basic minerals.
I would like some examples of where CCP got anything right. That said, Eve does have a resident economist (albeit I won't, and probably can't, comment on his abilities) who may know how to get what CCP wants. MONEY in its COFFERS, especially with the upcoming release of Dust 514, which CCP believes will make the Eve-Dust 514 universe the largest game of all. |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
229
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 17:56:00 -
[41] - Quote
Haifisch Zahne wrote:Alice provides some excellent, well-reasoned thoughts. I think it compliments my earlier post. Alice Katsuko wrote:So nominal prices have increased across the board while nominal individual income has remained static or has gone down. Real player income has gone down, aside from a few special cases. In more simple terms, if it took an hour of anomaly running to buy a Drake this time last year, it now might take two hours, so it takes more grinding to get the reward (whether it is PvP or a new shiny module or what have you). Yes, yes, and a thousand times, yes. And, what happens when players don't want to grind? They buy PLEX. .
Or they unsub which I'm planning on doing this week. TBH I liked the Incursion grinding pre-Escalation because of the communities but post-Escalation the DEVs just made it way too tedious and DESTROYED whole communities! I bet with the meta-0 NERF the tedious factor of missions has gone way up too. The tedious factor of mining of course is unchanged.
Guttripper wrote:After reading the blog, I have one question -
Where is the fun factor in the game?
It was NERFed out of the game by DEV's for me. CCP Soundwave "Incursions are not a big issue in terms of isk globally" |

Max Swagger
State War Academy Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 18:50:00 -
[42] - Quote
I think it is pretty obvious CCP will stop at nothing to sell PLEX. After the Fashion Cluster F*ck (where all they wanted to do was sell clothes and call it content) they were at least smart enough to pay attention to people unsubbing and salvage the situation (by abandoning it) Believe it or not, many companies do not seem to pay attention to their cash cows.
Now they are messing with the economy. They are doing their best to ensure everyone needs to buy PLEX to play this game (in addition to monthly fee). Soon the people who have no interest in the economic side of eve will probably move on, as the price to play will get too high. Until the unsub's increase, we know nothing will be done to easy this inflation.
CCP really really wants have a forced cash shop (PLEX) with a monthly fee. And, this is fine, if the game provides the entertainment value. I am willing to bet, over all, Eve is already one of the highest costing MMO's out there on a per customer basis (not account). Lets say they have 400k accounts, that probably translates to 150k customers (or less) And I bet 20% of those buy at least 1 PLEX or more every month, in addition to month subscription. If the PLEX prices were rising also, I would see less issues, but they seem to be going in opposite direction lately.
They are here to make money. And they have the some of the most loyal fans. Lets hope they don't take us for granted and continue to provide great entertainment value in exchange for our money. |

Haifisch Zahne
HZ Corp
51
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 19:54:00 -
[43] - Quote
Shobon Welp wrote:On the other hand, the easier it is to make money the less rewarding it becomes to do so. If everyone is stupendously rich and has a deadspace tengu and a supercap alt, where's the excitement and sense of achievement in joining that not-so-exclusive club yourself?
If everyone is stupendously rich, you get hyper-inflation, such as we practically have now, and no one can afford those tengus and supercap alts.
|

Haifisch Zahne
HZ Corp
51
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 20:07:00 -
[44] - Quote
Follow the PLEX.
What the Eve economy comes down to is simply this: the null-sec players making boatloads of ISK, which they cash in for PLEX to play for free. Meanwhile, the newbies have to grind away, get bored, and buy PLEX to sell for ISK.
The null-sec players are diehard Eve players here to stay. And why not? They play for free. CCP counts on new customer turnover to constantly refresh the supply of PLEX to the null-sec player base.
Dust 514 will be the saving grace for CCP, which has exhausted its supply of new players willing to forkover money for PLEX. Endless fodder of young kiddies needing new shinies to fight, after getting griefed by the Goons.
Thanks, but no thanks. I'll continue to grind, never having bought a PLEX ever on principal.
Or, get wise, like the rest, and quit. |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
1206
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 20:23:00 -
[45] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Haifisch Zahne wrote:Alice provides some excellent, well-reasoned thoughts. I think it compliments my earlier post. Alice Katsuko wrote:So nominal prices have increased across the board while nominal individual income has remained static or has gone down. Real player income has gone down, aside from a few special cases. In more simple terms, if it took an hour of anomaly running to buy a Drake this time last year, it now might take two hours, so it takes more grinding to get the reward (whether it is PvP or a new shiny module or what have you). Yes, yes, and a thousand times, yes. And, what happens when players don't want to grind? They buy PLEX. . Or they unsub which I'm planning on doing this week. TBH I liked the Incursion grinding pre-Escalation because of the communities but post-Escalation the DEVs just made it way too tedious and DESTROYED whole communities! I bet with the meta-0 NERF the tedious factor of missions has gone way up too. The tedious factor of mining of course is unchanged. Guttripper wrote:After reading the blog, I have one question -
Where is the fun factor in the game?
It was NERFed out of the game by DEV's for me. Posting to confirm that not looting and reprocessing a certain item type completely took the fun out of high sec mission running.
And Darth, we all know that when you say incursion communities you mean ISK. I've read your proposals on incursions, they have all been purely focussed on buffing the reward. The only exception is the incursion bar, which you only started putting in your posts after Serge mentioned it.
At least be honest in your posts, and admit its about the isk. Also, unsub faster. Its been months.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Apolyon I
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
80
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 22:14:00 -
[46] - Quote
Haifisch Zahne wrote:Follow the PLEX.
What the Eve economy comes down to is simply this: the null-sec players making boatloads of ISK, which they cash in for PLEX to play for free. Meanwhile, the newbies have to grind away, get bored, and buy PLEX to sell for ISK.
The null-sec players are diehard Eve players here to stay. And why not? They play for free. CCP counts on new customer turnover to constantly refresh the supply of PLEX to the null-sec player base.
Dust 514 will be the saving grace for CCP, which has exhausted its supply of new players willing to forkover money for PLEX. Endless fodder of young kiddies needing new shinies to fight, after getting griefed by the Goons.
Thanks, but no thanks. I'll continue to grind, never having bought a PLEX ever on principal.
Or, get wise, like the rest, and quit. hisec carebears whine about hisec income??
I mine for an hr with 2 accounts and make enough to buy 1 PLEX, L2makeisk |

Olleybear
I R' Carebear
84
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 23:54:00 -
[47] - Quote
Am I really reading these responses correctly?
People have been saying for years that mining needs a buff to be a valid profession in Eve. The reason is you can run lvl 4 missions in hi-sec or belt rat in 0.0 and bring in more minerals in addition to the bounty paid and the salvage collected. So, drone regions get a change and start paying bounties and mission runners have meta 0 loot removed. These two things, in addition to hulkageddon having some effect on mining, and apparantly the war on botting has reduced the supply of minerals, has made mining a profitable profession and mining appears to be needed more by the player base now....
...and people are complaining because they are getting exactly what they wanted?
Whats next? Someone figures out the isk / hr a hulk pilot is now bringing in? We are going to start hearing, "Nerf hi-sec mining! People can make tons of isk mining in hi-sec with little risk while us poor 0.0 and low-sec people have to run gate camps to get our minerals to market.".
 When it comes to PvP, I am like a chiwawa hanging from a grizzley bears pair of wrinklies for dear life. |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
1206
|
Posted - 2012.06.11 04:24:00 -
[48] - Quote
Olleybear wrote:Am I really reading these responses correctly? People have been saying for years that mining needs a buff to be a valid profession in Eve. The reason is you can run lvl 4 missions in hi-sec or belt rat in 0.0 and bring in more minerals in addition to the bounty paid and the salvage collected. So, drone regions get a change and start paying bounties and mission runners have meta 0 loot removed. These two things, in addition to hulkageddon having some effect on mining, and apparantly the war on botting has reduced the supply of minerals, has made mining a profitable profession and mining appears to be needed more by the player base now.... ...and people are complaining because they are getting exactly what they wanted? Whats next? Someone figures out the isk / hr a hulk pilot is now bringing in? We are going to start hearing, "Nerf hi-sec mining! People can make tons of isk mining in hi-sec with little risk while us poor 0.0 and low-sec people have to run gate camps to get our minerals to market.".  Gate camps? JFs... Hell, can even just bridge a regular freighter.
But yeah, the people complaining are the ones who see the Eve economy as a real economy, or they are new to the game and they don't realise there was a time when ships were genuinely valuable. In a game economy cheap and readily available gear is not always a good thing, being able to grind out the money for a drake in an hour in high sec is silly.
I sincerely hope CCP mess with the economy some more.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Qvar Dar'Zanar
EVE University Ivy League
49
|
Posted - 2012.06.11 09:08:00 -
[49] - Quote
The amount of whine in this forum is overwhelming. |

Haifisch Zahne
HZ Corp
53
|
Posted - 2012.06.11 10:06:00 -
[50] - Quote
Seems recent posts are trolling to portray me as a whiny carebear.
My original posts were intended to come to understand what CCP is trying to do with the Eve economy, theoretically-- something few understand these days, Alice excluded. And to point out that the alternative to the grind is shelling out real money to CCP for PLEX or take the plunge into low/null sec. |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
1207
|
Posted - 2012.06.11 11:34:00 -
[51] - Quote
Haifisch Zahne wrote:Seems recent posts are trolling to portray me as a whiny carebear.
My original posts were intended to come to understand what CCP is trying to do with the Eve economy, theoretically-- something few understand these days, Alice excluded. And to point out that the alternative to the grind is shelling out real money to CCP for PLEX or take the plunge into low/null sec. So "take the plunge"?
By your logic, anything devaluing high sec is dismissed as CCP forcing players to purchase plex. Maybe it's not, maybe it's them redressing a risk/reward imbalance that has crept into the game?
You even place claim their anti-botting efforts, something which has been almost universally praised by the community, are secretly motivated by a desire to force players to buy plex? This does not strike me as a logical set of arguments. It sounds to me more like you are angry, presumably at not being able to afford plex, and are attempting to vent your rage at CCP by assigning an ulterior motive to every single action they take.
And that's without even getting into whether or not their actions will in reality increase plex sales.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E. Comic Mischief
714
|
Posted - 2012.06.11 16:51:00 -
[52] - Quote
Olleybear wrote:Am I really reading these responses correctly? People have been saying for years that mining needs a buff to be a valid profession in Eve. The reason is you can run lvl 4 missions in hi-sec or belt rat in 0.0 and bring in more minerals in addition to the bounty paid and the salvage collected. So, drone regions get a change and start paying bounties and mission runners have meta 0 loot removed. These two things, in addition to hulkageddon having some effect on mining, and apparantly the war on botting has reduced the supply of minerals, has made mining a profitable profession and mining appears to be needed more by the player base now.... ...and people are complaining because they are getting exactly what they wanted? Whats next? Someone figures out the isk / hr a hulk pilot is now bringing in? We are going to start hearing, "Nerf hi-sec mining! People can make tons of isk mining in hi-sec with little risk while us poor 0.0 and low-sec people have to run gate camps to get our minerals to market.". 
Its different people complaining. The miners are not complaining. They like to watch the isk roll in. The hours of mining needed to buy a PLEX has dropped significantly.
Now on a different note, the PLEX has been slowly dropping from its high at the graphics card offer. Sort of expected, and does not look too different from typical market variations. But what is odd is the PLEX daily traded volume has been dropping (this is all based on Jita data). That is a little odd. Its been rising steadily since the creation of the PLEX. This is the first real drop in traded volume. Is that an indication of a contracting economy? Or a sustained anti bot and RMT effort? http://vincentoneve.wordpress.com/ |

Max Swagger
State War Academy Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2012.06.11 17:08:00 -
[53] - Quote
Simi Kusoni wrote:Haifisch Zahne wrote:Seems recent posts are trolling to portray me as a whiny carebear.
My original posts were intended to come to understand what CCP is trying to do with the Eve economy, theoretically-- something few understand these days, Alice excluded. And to point out that the alternative to the grind is shelling out real money to CCP for PLEX or take the plunge into low/null sec. So "take the plunge"? By your logic, anything devaluing high sec is dismissed as CCP forcing players to purchase plex. Maybe it's not, maybe it's them redressing a risk/reward imbalance that has crept into the game? You even place claim their anti-botting efforts, something which has been almost universally praised by the community, are secretly motivated by a desire to force players to buy plex? This does not strike me as a logical set of arguments. It sounds to me more like you are angry, presumably at not being able to afford plex, and are attempting to vent your rage at CCP by assigning an ulterior motive to every single action they take. And that's without even getting into whether or not their actions will in reality increase plex sales.
If CCP management is not thinking about how to raise the subscription numbers and how to maximize revenue from each customer, they better be looking for new management. If you think they just willy-nilly make changes to the ingame economy, you are mistaken. They employ economists for eve.
I agree, the removal of botting is not 100% motivated by their desire to sell PLEX. But when you take all their actions into account, I beg to differ. I think it is a pretty simplistic view if you think they do not understand the effects of all these changes. |

Fracture Antollare
Opposite of YARR
8
|
Posted - 2012.06.11 17:10:00 -
[54] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:CCP Recurve is known for keeping a close eye on the economy and how it reflects your various undertakings. Check out his latest price indices blog, complete with sexy graphs! More importantly Guard, you didn't mark on the graph when "Burn Jita" was announced. Much of the price speculation and hoarding occurred because of the psychological impact of the threat to the high sec lifestyle. |

Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
467
|
Posted - 2012.06.11 17:19:00 -
[55] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote:Now on a different note, the PLEX has been slowly dropping from its high at the graphics card offer. Sort of expected, and does not look too different from typical market variations. But what is odd is the PLEX daily traded volume has been dropping (this is all based on Jita data). That is a little odd. Its been rising steadily since the creation of the PLEX. This is the first real drop in traded volume. Is that an indication of a contracting economy? Or a sustained anti bot and RMT effort? Most likely its at least partly due to the players who ran Incursion alts to fund multiple accounts all switching back to paying in real money and/or cutting back their alt army now that their risk-free gravy train has left the station. Titans were never meant to be "cost effective", its a huge ****.-á- CCP Oveur, 2006
~If you want a picture of the future of WiS, imagine a spaceship, stamping on an avatar's face. Forever. |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
1207
|
Posted - 2012.06.11 17:26:00 -
[56] - Quote
Max Swagger wrote:If CCP management is not thinking about how to raise the subscription numbers and how to maximize revenue from each customer, they better be looking for new management. If you think they just willy-nilly make changes to the ingame economy, you are mistaken. They employ economists for eve.
I agree, the removal of botting is not 100% motivated by their desire to sell PLEX. But when you take all their actions into account, I beg to differ. I think it is a pretty simplistic view if you think they do not understand the effects of all these changes. Me?
I'm not complaining about them increasing subscription numbers, just at the statement that all of their anti-RMT and incursion rebalancing efforts are supposedly a thinly veiled attempt to force people to buy plex instead of a monthly subscription.
I'm also not of the view that CCP does not understand the effects of market changes, just that Haifisch doesn't.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Jared Tobin
Bloodstone Industries B.S.I.
171
|
Posted - 2012.06.11 19:57:00 -
[57] - Quote
Just an observational question to CCP Recurve's analysis and graphs...
This observation in particular:
"In the long-term, the economy is probably in reasonably good health, although it does seem to have bad case of the flu at the moment."
It appears that every notable "incident", "period" and "upgrade" are mentioned, especially the first graph, however, there is no mention of the 10 (+2) patches involving the Unified Inventory UI bugs and errors which, in my economic observations (it's a large part of what I do), also should be noted as at least part of the lower counts on mining and the economy in general.
The "at a glance" approach is adequate, but it would be nice to see the graph "In the short-term" outlining these mining amounts/figures between May 22-Today, noting each day all 12 patches were thrown into the mix. Regardless of what people think of the Unified Inventory UI, I personally have seen mining players from, not only inside my own corp and alliance but, outside (contractors) who regularly have mined in 0.0, low and hi sec... whom, surprisingly, have definitely quit the game.
Guess I found that shocking, and therefore naturally would be poignant thing to note among the graphs of miners and merals mined after Inferno's launch date.
Just a genuine comment after reading the Devblog written less than 3 days ago using data dated up to (what appears to be) June 1...ish. |

Alice Katsuko
Terra Incognita Intrepid Crossing
132
|
Posted - 2012.06.11 22:29:00 -
[58] - Quote
Those of us who live in the drone regions have been fairly ambivalent about the removal of drone alloys. I supported their removal, but on the assumption that it would be accompanied by a thorough review of mining, especially nullsec industry and low-end mineral supplies, and by the addition of rogue drone officer and faction loot. Neither have occurred so far. CCP appears to be using rogue drones to seed experimental module BPCs, but I do not think that is sufficient in the long-term to make the drone regions truly competitive with other nullsec regions of the game.
From what I understand, CCP does have plans for mining and industry, however, so I do remain hopeful.
In general, there must be a balace between grind and reward. If the period between rewards is too long, players will lose interest and find other things to do. In EVE, grind has increased since Escalation. Note that it does not matter where you live; so long as your ISK comes from a static source such as bounties, your income has gone down since Escalation. Income from selling PLEX probably has not gone up in the long-run nearly as much as folk think for the same reason: it takes more ISK to buy stuff now than it used to.
Check out this article for why balance between grind and reward is important.
|

Louis deGuerre
The Dark Tribe Against ALL Authorities
322
|
Posted - 2012.06.12 09:46:00 -
[59] - Quote
Good stuff, but the economy is still in for trouble if action is not taken. Moon minerals should become a dynamic resource of which finite amounts will appear at random in 0.0. This will have dramatic benefits - In 0.0 it will become worth fighting again for territory where new moon minerals appear. - Consequently, PVP will become much more prevalent which will boost the economy. - This will also prevent a strangehold on moon mineral market which is ruinous to the economy, driving up prices and discouraging people to PVP. - It will allow small alliances a chance to gain a foothold in 0.0 as territory will lose and gain value and alliances will start to move around more.
FIRE FRIENDSHIP TORPEDOES ! Louis's epic skill guide v1.1 |

Ticarus Hellbrandt
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
20
|
Posted - 2012.06.12 09:54:00 -
[60] - Quote
interesting to see that mining hasnt increased very much in null sec since before the drone alloy changes, yet the high end mineral prices continue to fall. |

Celebris Nexterra
Lowsec Static
47
|
Posted - 2012.06.12 21:33:00 -
[61] - Quote
Max Swagger wrote:I think it is pretty obvious CCP will stop at nothing to sell PLEX. After the Fashion Cluster F*ck (where all they wanted to do was sell clothes and call it content) they were at least smart enough to pay attention to people unsubbing and salvage the situation (by abandoning it) Believe it or not, many companies do not seem to pay attention to their cash cows.
Now they are messing with the economy. They are doing their best to ensure everyone needs to buy PLEX to play this game (in addition to monthly fee). Soon the people who have no interest in the economic side of eve will probably move on, as the price to play will get too high. Until the unsub's increase, we know nothing will be done to easy this inflation.
CCP really really wants have a forced cash shop (PLEX) with a monthly fee. And, this is fine, if the game provides the entertainment value. I am willing to bet, over all, Eve is already one of the highest costing MMO's out there on a per customer basis (not account). Lets say they have 400k accounts, that probably translates to 150k customers (or less) And I bet 20% of those buy at least 1 PLEX or more every month, in addition to month subscription. If the PLEX prices were rising also, I would see less issues, but they seem to be going in opposite direction lately.
They are here to make money. And they have the some of the most loyal fans. Lets hope they don't take us for granted and continue to provide great entertainment value in exchange for our money.
If you have to buy PLEX to be able to make it in the game, you're either flying WAY too expensive of ships, or you're just doing it completely wrong. Also, they nerfed bots, so by extension you are saying you support bots by saying that you disagree with what they did (nerf bots). Right on CCP's forums, nice one. |

Celebris Nexterra
Lowsec Static
47
|
Posted - 2012.06.12 21:36:00 -
[62] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Celebris Nexterra wrote:I fully support suicide ganking being possible and common, but I think Hulks need a bit of a tank buff. They're just huge targets with nary the ability to move, and aside from not mining or not fitting mining lasers, it's nearly impossible for them to avoid getting ganked. Seems a bit silly that 3 Thrashers (total value ~30mil) can easily gank something that costs 180mil+. the cost of your ship isn't part of its tank, hope this helps
Hm, wish I had watched this thread and responded sooner. Anyway, no, you are right. But only technically. In reality, the cost of a ship almost always reflects its ability to tank: Titan costs ~30bil, has millions of EHP. Incursus costs ~300k, has a few thousand EHP. You can most certainly fit those ships in a way which robs them of tank, but if you are TRYING to tank them it's easily done. Even if you TRY to tank a Hulk, it can still be ganked by just a few much cheaper ships.
And no, I'm not a miner. |

Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
194
|
Posted - 2012.06.12 21:41:00 -
[63] - Quote
Shobon Welp wrote:On the other hand, the easier it is to make money the less rewarding it becomes to do so. If everyone is stupendously rich and has a deadspace tengu and a supercap alt, where's the excitement and sense of achievement in joining that not-so-exclusive club yourself?
You're right, the only ones deserving to fly 3billion Tengus, buy super caps and titans+ pilots are Alliance leaders, their fellah directors and corp leaders/directors. The rest of you shouldn't even fly other thing than rifters/drakes to be the previous ones content.
Awesome player driven content for a dog shift sandbox 
brb |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
1212
|
Posted - 2012.06.12 21:45:00 -
[64] - Quote
Celebris Nexterra wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:Celebris Nexterra wrote:I fully support suicide ganking being possible and common, but I think Hulks need a bit of a tank buff. They're just huge targets with nary the ability to move, and aside from not mining or not fitting mining lasers, it's nearly impossible for them to avoid getting ganked. Seems a bit silly that 3 Thrashers (total value ~30mil) can easily gank something that costs 180mil+. the cost of your ship isn't part of its tank, hope this helps Hm, wish I had watched this thread and responded sooner. Anyway, no, you are right. But only technically. In reality, the cost of a ship almost always reflects its ability to tank: Titan costs ~30bil, has millions of EHP. Incursus costs ~300k, has a few thousand EHP. You can most certainly fit those ships in a way which robs them of tank, but if you are TRYING to tank them it's easily done. Even if you TRY to tank a Hulk, it can still be ganked by just a few much cheaper ships. And no, I'm not a miner. My cynabal costs ~700m, has a **** tank.
My hurricane costs ~60m, has an epic tank.
Go figure.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
1212
|
Posted - 2012.06.12 21:46:00 -
[65] - Quote
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:Shobon Welp wrote:On the other hand, the easier it is to make money the less rewarding it becomes to do so. If everyone is stupendously rich and has a deadspace tengu and a supercap alt, where's the excitement and sense of achievement in joining that not-so-exclusive club yourself? You're right, the only ones deserving to fly 3billion Tengus, buy super caps and titans+ pilots are Alliance leaders, their fellah directors and corp leaders/directors. The rest of you shouldn't even fly other thing than rifters/drakes to be the previous ones content. Awesome player driven content for a dog shift sandbox  Or you could just get better at PvE? I can afford a super just fine and I'm in a 3 man corp.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
1141
|
Posted - 2012.06.12 22:01:00 -
[66] - Quote
ccp make it so i can equip plex to my hulks' midslots please |

Olleybear
I R' Carebear
88
|
Posted - 2012.06.12 22:23:00 -
[67] - Quote
Simi Kusoni wrote: My cynabal costs ~700m, has a **** tank.
My hurricane costs ~60m, has an epic tank.
Go figure.
Considering that cynabal by themselves are around 250mil, it sounds like you have just disclosed to the Eve forums that you fitted the cynabal with close to 450mil worth of mods.
Hmmm, wonder how long it will be before someone runs a locator agent on you.... When it comes to PvP, I am like a chiwawa hanging from a grizzley bears pair of wrinklies for dear life. |

Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
196
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 12:27:00 -
[68] - Quote
Simi Kusoni wrote:Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:Shobon Welp wrote:On the other hand, the easier it is to make money the less rewarding it becomes to do so. If everyone is stupendously rich and has a deadspace tengu and a supercap alt, where's the excitement and sense of achievement in joining that not-so-exclusive club yourself? You're right, the only ones deserving to fly 3billion Tengus, buy super caps and titans+ pilots are Alliance leaders, their fellah directors and corp leaders/directors. The rest of you shouldn't even fly other thing than rifters/drakes to be the previous ones content. Awesome player driven content for a dog shift sandbox  Or you could just get better at PvE? I can afford a super just fine and I'm in a 3 man corp.
PVE to support my pvp yes, zombie PVE alike to post "I win at Eve because I have a 3 man corp and a supercap I can barely to almost never use" ... welp, I feel bad for you if you have nothing better to do of your full time. brb |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
1226
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 13:12:00 -
[69] - Quote
Olleybear wrote:Simi Kusoni wrote: My cynabal costs ~700m, has a **** tank.
My hurricane costs ~60m, has an epic tank.
Go figure.
Considering that cynabal by themselves are around 250mil, it sounds like you have just disclosed to the Eve forums that you fitted the cynabal with close to 450mil worth of mods. Hmmm, wonder how long it will be before someone runs a locator agent on you.... Yep, it's totally top sekrit information that I have a bling cynabal.
If you think that's bad, you should see my T3s.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

ReiAnn
Nova-Tek
16
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 19:03:00 -
[70] - Quote
Im not great at the economics, but I do pattern analysis for a living. It seems the bottom line is people aren't mining. It's just people flooding the market with inventory to take advantage of market prices. It might take monthes for those supplies to dry up, but unless mining increases everything will get more expensive. again. With the isk sinks being impemented, no one is going to be able to afford the expensive ships/mods. people will turn to plexing for isk, at least the serious players , so in the end you are going to have pay to win, which i thought CCP stood firmly against. |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
1228
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 19:11:00 -
[71] - Quote
ReiAnn wrote:Im not great at the economics, but I do pattern analysis for a living. It seems the bottom line is people aren't mining. It's just people flooding the market with inventory to take advantage of market prices. It might take monthes for those supplies to dry up, but unless mining increases everything will get more expensive. again. With the isk sinks being impemented, no one is going to be able to afford the expensive ships/mods. people will turn to plexing for isk, at least the serious players  , so in the end you are going to have pay to win, which i thought CCP stood firmly against. Except... Plex prices are governed by supply and demand just like everything else.
If less people can afford to buy plex, plex price drops. If more people are selling plex, plex price drops. Etc.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

sm1thy
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.17 09:47:00 -
[72] - Quote
too many ppl don't really grasp the concept of PLEX.
It is an item a player sells to another player. It may be a way to keep content or discontent ppl in the game, thus maintaining a bigger player base. BUT It is as profitable to ccp as having everyone pay their subscription as usual. Go find out for yourself.
There may be games, mmo's, where companies charge unfairly for content. EVE isn't one of them.
Think outside the box.
|

Jdestars
Stars Research systems Incorporation
3
|
Posted - 2012.06.18 19:26:00 -
[73] - Quote
why the market burn .. not cause of the "hulkalacon" , Spring additional effects are which have influenced never really the supplies of the market (large part of trade are in station , stockpill never move )
if you show the mineral graph you can see one thing : its the biggest volume in sell
In Jita for trita there are more than 15b of trita in sell with the maximun mass stack that server can be do
some mechanical in price ordre has been used for modify median calculation to erradicate external macro & tool effect based on it this mechanical has been tested in raw planetary last year and replace this year and some ppl use in trading of mineral in other scale ;)
Leader economic in fanfest predicate the growing wave in market , We help him to realize these predictions by using the basic mechanism of the trade : (median ,average calculation ,distribution function) possible only if "we" ( trader) have the stock control And enough of isk to maintain it |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
1256
|
Posted - 2012.06.18 19:33:00 -
[74] - Quote
sm1thy wrote:too many ppl don't really grasp the concept of PLEX.
It is an item a player sells to another player. It may be a way to keep content or discontent ppl in the game, thus maintaining a bigger player base. BUT It is as profitable to ccp as having everyone pay their subscription as usual. Go find out for yourself.
There may be games, mmo's, where companies charge unfairly for content. EVE isn't one of them.
Think outside the box. Oh, the irony. PLEX is actually marginally more profitable for CCP than a paid subscription.
Not that I agree with the "CCP are forcing us to sell PLEX" tinfoil hattery, but the reason their tinfoil hattery is misguided is a little less simplistic.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Hakaru Ishiwara
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
234
|
Posted - 2012.06.18 21:29:00 -
[75] - Quote
Simi Kusoni wrote:sm1thy wrote:too many ppl don't really grasp the concept of PLEX.
It is an item a player sells to another player. It may be a way to keep content or discontent ppl in the game, thus maintaining a bigger player base. BUT It is as profitable to ccp as having everyone pay their subscription as usual. Go find out for yourself.
There may be games, mmo's, where companies charge unfairly for content. EVE isn't one of them.
Think outside the box. Oh, the irony. PLEX is actually marginally more profitable for CCP than a paid subscription. Not that I agree with the "CCP are forcing us to sell PLEX" tinfoil hattery, but the reason their tinfoil hattery is misguided is a little less simplistic. Looking at the PLEX RL currency face value, I disagree on the PLEX profit margin verses the margin on the reoccurring charge plans available.
Put any of the PLEX sales offerings up against any of the subscription plans and CCP makes out nicely with the PLEX sales from a margin perspective.
What am I missing? 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284286 |

Jiji Hamin
Aliastra Gallente Federation
75
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 18:57:00 -
[76] - Quote
Simi Kusoni wrote:Olleybear wrote:Am I really reading these responses correctly? People have been saying for years that mining needs a buff to be a valid profession in Eve. The reason is you can run lvl 4 missions in hi-sec or belt rat in 0.0 and bring in more minerals in addition to the bounty paid and the salvage collected. So, drone regions get a change and start paying bounties and mission runners have meta 0 loot removed. These two things, in addition to hulkageddon having some effect on mining, and apparantly the war on botting has reduced the supply of minerals, has made mining a profitable profession and mining appears to be needed more by the player base now.... ...and people are complaining because they are getting exactly what they wanted? Whats next? Someone figures out the isk / hr a hulk pilot is now bringing in? We are going to start hearing, "Nerf hi-sec mining! People can make tons of isk mining in hi-sec with little risk while us poor 0.0 and low-sec people have to run gate camps to get our minerals to market.".  Gate camps? JFs... Hell, can even just bridge a regular freighter. But yeah, the people complaining are the ones who see the Eve economy as a real economy, or they are new to the game and they don't realise there was a time when ships were genuinely valuable. In a game economy cheap and readily available gear is not always a good thing, being able to grind out the money for a drake in an hour in high sec is silly. I sincerely hope CCP mess with the economy some more.
truth! this isn't "stagflation" and it isn't the economy being mismanaged. the eve community has systematically treated miners like ****, and as a combat pilot let me say that giving industry a central role in the game again will be nothing but a good change. miners are finally being handed the keys to the economy again like they should have had and people are bitching and moaning now that combat pilots don't get the best PvE, the only PvP AND complete control over the game and its politics. Adding moon resources to mining will be a glorious day indeed. combat pilots generate isk, and currently there is too much isk and not enough anything else, because there are too many combat toons around in 0.0 generally acting like the game revolves around them and assuming everything will always be handed to them. want to make money? find a way to generate something other than isk, like LPs or sleeper loot or switch to mining outright if making isk is what's more important. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |