| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Vikarion
Caldari
Chorus of Nephilim
   |
Posted - 2009.10.08 02:03:00 -
[1]
I just want to see if I have this straight.
You want them to surrender a hard-fought system to the Federation, in order to relieve the supply crisis that the Federation is largely responsible for. And you do it by insulting the megacorps.
Besides the fact that the Federation has a body count that outnumbers that of the Republic and State combined, there's also the fact that you probably won't get far insulting the very entities the State capsuleers fight to protect.
This leads me to suspect that this is simply a political ploy designed to either ensnare well-meaning State capsuleers into aiding the Federation war effort, or into painting themselves as evil monsters for the media. Very nice.
By the way, didn't your own CEO, Zagamesh, repeatedly call for the death of all Caldari who support the State? I believe he did, actually, or at least made similarly racist statements.
If you do want to improve the lot of the Intaki, leave them in the hands of Ishukone. They are far more benevolent in action and word than your own Federation, and the Intaki might actually be allowed a measure of independence under the State.
|
Vikarion
Caldari
Chorus of Nephilim
|
Posted - 2009.10.08 02:18:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Seriphyn Inhonores
Pff. My dear friend Aleria here attempted diplomacy, which no one else has done before. What do we normally get? Threats of violence, accusations of genocide...and so on...
At least give her that much!
Seriphyn Inhonores
EL-G Archigos
FDU Vice Commander
Diplomacy should consist of more than "Please surrender for the sake of our citizens, who we wish to get back to depriving of economic necessities."
Granted, it's more polite than an autocannon round to the face, but not exactly different in the general intent.
|
Vikarion
Caldari
Chorus of Nephilim
|
Posted - 2009.10.08 03:01:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Sumerio Rayej
On the subject of Intaki occupancy, why not let ownership of the system return to its rightful occupants - the Intaki themselves?
I am sure that Ishukone would love to, being the Liberals that they are, but that is not currently possible under Concord's rules for this war.
|
Vikarion
Caldari
Chorus of Nephilim
|
Posted - 2009.10.08 05:39:00 -
[4]
Here is a suggestion, which only the Federation seems to have a problem with: Let Ishukone have a shot at administering the system. There have been plenty of other systems occupied, and there is no reason to suppose that Intaki is filled with people oddly more loyal to the Federation than other low-security areas.
Let Ishukone, the State, and the Legion have a shot at it. The Legion is Intaki-friendly, the State has nothing against them, and they couldn't really do a worse job than the Federation has already done.
Oh, and for those talking about how all the Intaki on Intaki love the Federation with all their heart? That is largely due to the bit of an exodus the rest of them had to make to Syndicate, courtesy of your Federation. Just thought I should mention that.
|
Vikarion
Caldari
Chorus of Nephilim
|
Posted - 2009.10.08 06:01:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Zuzanna Alondra
Originally by: Vikarion
Oh, and for those talking about how all the Intaki on Intaki love the Federation with all their heart? That is largely due to the bit of an exodus the rest of them had to make to Syndicate, courtesy of your Federation. Just thought I should mention that.
They clearly didn't live on Intaki. The ones that really loved the Federation left Intaki Prime to live in high-sec... or then again that might be me being a bit bias again.
Oh...my.
I really do need to remember that tone doesn't cross cultures well.
|
| |
|