| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
cosmoray
Bella Vista Holdings Corp
   |
Posted - 2009.10.11 00:24:00 -
[1]
Lucky AC grabbed the Titan prints or EBANK would most liekly failed on the spot.
It seems that most of the directors were just trying to milk the system.
With Anastasia I bet there are many people would have done the same, and taken what they think is theirs no matter what the consequences.
I am torn about Anastasia having a place on Thieves of Eve's list if the NET result is zero. EBANK owed Anastasia approximately 10B and so took equivalent assets. Not sure if this counts as a scam.
Also if Anastasia's previous crime was just "being useless", it doesn't look like he was involved in any of the previous conspiracy so probably feels along with most investors and just wants his cash back.
My position was different I took money back from Evn7289 who was in league with Xabier. Both scammed together, I lost money from Xabier but got it back from Evn7289. I am not worried about my position on the list.
|
cosmoray
Bella Vista Holdings Corp
|
Posted - 2009.10.11 17:02:00 -
[2]
A lot of arguments going on in this thread.
To me, it looks like the thoroughness of the audit is helping to weed out some of the bad stuff.
The final results of the audit should help to show the "true current picture" of EBANK.
Can't really do anything until the board analyses the audit and submits their plan.
Going to hold off until then.
|
cosmoray
Bella Vista Holdings Corp
|
Posted - 2009.10.11 18:45:00 -
[3]
I have a question about the database screenshot.
On the right hand side where the new deposits have been made pink (transactions 81-91).
On transaction 80 the balance is 219B
On transaction 91 the balance is 309B
On transaction 91 the balance is back 221B
Have you gone back in and adjusted the values, taking out the 90B in deposits?
|
cosmoray
Bella Vista Holdings Corp
|
Posted - 2009.10.12 00:44:00 -
[4]
 Originally by: Motivated Prophet
Originally by: LaVista Vista
Originally by: Skarii TuThess
The point that many people are trying to make is that they are not being told anything and they are not being given any choice. If people want to wothdraw early and risk losing any extra ISK found in an audit then it is there choice to do so surely?
In my opinion, the success of the recovery comes down to how close to 100% we give back to the customers.
Of course, people might be able to make the ISK back faster themself. But we are cheating customers by giving them a buy-back offer that's not representative of the value of EBANK at present. And before a full overview is had over EBANK, we can't make a fair offer.
Pricing that sort of uncertainty is one thing at which the crowd (or "free market", if you prefer) is especially talented.
This may already be your plan, and if so, congratulations, but what about an exchange? Buyers step up by submitting a full API key to you. They then place bids--1 million EBank ISK for X real ISK, up to a maximum of Y real ISK. Sellers select from the bids (keeping in mind they may not choose the highest for various reasons), and choose "sell". For the next 24 hours, the API feed of the buyer is pulled; if they transfer the correct amount of ISK to the correct person, their EBank account gets appropriately credited. If not, the outstanding transaction is canceled; no harm, no foul. The buyer gets a red tick on his record (nothing too terrible; he might have simply been out riding bikes that day), and the seller is welcome to try again with another buyer.
I'd certainly inject a few billion into such a system, assuming I were getting the right price, of course.
Here, I'll even start it off: for all of those saying "X proves that EBank thinks EBank ISK is worthless", I'll buy your EBank ISK (EBI) for 50 million EBI per 1 billion ISK, minimum quantity 1B EBI. Just send me an EVEMail*. If you don't take me up on it, that proves that you don't think EBI is worthless.
MP
I had already offered 20% on account balance. There were similar offers also in the high teens, low twenties.
I also had investors with up to 200B available so in theory we could have bought 1T in account balances.
Not one person took us up on this offer. At that time there was a clear difference in what the market priced the risk at, and what the customers wanted.
After the next EBANK report comes out, we shall see what the market prices the risk at.
|
cosmoray
Bella Vista Holdings Corp
|
Posted - 2009.10.12 19:01:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Tesal
Edited by: Tesal on 12/10/2009 18:52:59
Edited by: Tesal on 12/10/2009 18:32:58
Originally by: LaVista Vista
Originally by: Tesal
Does General Exception also share an IP? If so, I think you can safely say it was a fake transfer.
Yes.
Who brought *Mr Horizontal* into EBank?
*Edit
**crickets chirping sound**
Mr H was on the original BOD.
I think the idea for EBANK started floating around in 2007, at which point Furybank was still running but the concern was with a one man operation.
At that time Ricdic did have a 'good' MD reputation and tried to gather a group of players with similar high MD reps or who had required skills to run a bank (including website, database design etc.).
|
cosmoray
Bella Vista Holdings Corp
|
Posted - 2009.10.13 02:45:00 -
[6]
Edited by: cosmoray on 13/10/2009 02:50:38
At the end of the day this is a game, and it is not gainst CCP rules to scam.
If people start publishing personal data (IP addresses and e-mails) on CCP forums without permission, that could be taken that you are trying to get retribution in real life.
You might find yourself being banned pretty quickly.
CCP TOS (#18):
You may not communicate, post or publicize any subscriberÆs personal information within the EVE Online game world or website
If someone posted my personal information on any server I would report this to the server provider, and if they didn't act I would take them to court.
|
cosmoray
Bella Vista Holdings Corp
|
Posted - 2009.10.20 20:12:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Edward Gruberman
So has Ray given us our monthly news update yet, or was it to say there will be further updates in the future at some point?
I read on the EBANK's website that they had adopted the Mayan calendar, which is 260 days per year.
No new updates will be available until February after the sacrifices and the solar eclipse in Peru.
|
| |
|