| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Triladir
Gallente
SPORADIC MOVEMENT
Cult of War
   |
Posted - 2009.11.03 06:02:00 -
[31]
 Quote:
I just cant wait to try to kill all the freighters that are gonna be going into low/null sec since the upgrade platform is 750k m3 and can only be moved in a freighter YARRRR!!
Not going to happen... It'll be heavily escorted from the minute it jumps through to the low-sec gate, then it'll be webbed for a quick warp to a pos where a titan will be waiting with a jump bridge for it... You wont get much of an opportunity for gankage if they play their cards well...
|
Tippia
Raddick Explorations
|
Posted - 2009.11.03 06:49:00 -
[32]
Originally by: SmackaDoom
I just cant wait to try to kill all the freighters that are gonna be going into low/null sec since the upgrade platform is 750k m3 and can only be moved in a freighter 
And you have it on authority that these things cannot be built in place in 0.0, I take it?
———
“If you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡…
you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.”
— Karath Piki |
Mahke
Aeon Of Strife
|
Posted - 2009.11.03 06:57:00 -
[33]
Originally by: Taedrin
Originally by: Domoso
Lets see, less money in a system means money is more valuable, means goods get cheaper. This is bad how?
Level 4 mission bounties will become better sources of income compared to other professions such as mining. This will make high sec even more profitable compared to low sec/0.0.
Thanks to insurance the value of isk creates a floor for the value of minerals.
Non-basic-mineral deflation actually increases the relative value of minerals because of that link.
Also, I'm guessing CCP wants a sink for isk because upgrades for ratting for those already there and people moving from missions to ratting will be a tremendous isk faucet (ratting is more inflationary than missions because the ratio of isk to other stuff is higher) that they want to preemptively match with a new sink.
|
Tom Sasaki
|
Posted - 2009.11.03 11:36:00 -
[34]
Originally by: ThaDollaGenerale
Originally by: Ex Mudder
If claiming a system costs 280 Million ISK a month, and there are perhaps 1000 systems to claim, will the ensuing drain of 3 trillion or so ISK per year have a significant impact on Eve's money supply?
Obviously you've never seen an alliance's wallet fat with moon goo money.
Well very few people are a member of goons or PL.. and seeing as you control most of the moons ingame you'd know all about it.
:)
|
Venkul Mul
Gallente
|
Posted - 2009.11.03 12:41:00 -
[35]
Originally by: Gnulpie
Because the isk faucets are already very large and ccp introduced another faucet with the sleeper tags in wormholes. More sinks are necessary.
Not really, Gnulpie, the WH tags changed nothing, what matter is the number of players farming the isk faucet, not the number of faucets.
If you take 1.000 players running missions and move them to exploring wormholes the straight isk produced stay about the same or are even reduced as the total number of people working the faucets is still the same.
The total number of player has a way greater impact.
Originally by: Daedalus II
Mission runners get richer as their isk faucets get more valuable. It will cost less isks to buy items as each isk is valued higher. I don't think there will be any change to the other professions that just shuffle isk and items around.
Again, not something granted.
The isk would increase the purchasing power but the modules, salvage and LP will lose isk value.
So probably it will balance out.
|
Domoso
|
Posted - 2009.11.03 15:56:00 -
[36]
Originally by: Taedrin
Originally by: Domoso
Lets see, less money in a system means money is more valuable, means goods get cheaper. This is bad how?
Level 4 mission bounties will become better sources of income compared to other professions such as mining. This will make high sec even more profitable compared to low sec/0.0.
Absolutely. Activities that actually generate isk into the system will become more profitable. Those that require isk will become less profitable since there will be less isk to pay for their services/goods.
|
Dretzle Omega
Caldari
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
|
Posted - 2009.11.03 16:29:00 -
[37]
Originally by: Khemul Zula
Then take into account that the money entering the market can be increased at the same time. And the fact that we don't really have accurate enough numbers on how much of an impact either claiming or upgrading could have on the money supply. Not really enough information to say.
This ^^
People in this thread seem to be making drastic claims at the perceived increase in ISK sinks for maintaining system sovereignty, but we have no idea of the actual numbers.
Upgrading a system could even mean stuff like better rats to shoot at with better bounties, increasing the ISK faucet. We have a general idea that we can "upgrade a system" and that it costs ISK to maintain sovereignty to these systems. It's too early to make any kind of guess work involving ISK faucets/sinks, etc.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |