|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 36 post(s) |
Dramaticus
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.11.06 22:52:00 -
[1]
Originally by: Mr McAlt
but the amount of isk you can make will increase much, much more.
no, it wont.
Please don't use RL pictuers of players in Sig without permission. - WeatherMan |
Dramaticus
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.11.06 23:04:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Hykke I think CCP forgot to add the "Asteroid belt beakon" upgrade, that spawns 5 more asteroid belts per level, available for public mining and ratting.
As well as the "Concord communication jammer" that lowers the actual security rating of the system by -0.3 per level, causing nasty rats to appear in the belts
yes more battlecruiser/cruiser spawns to plow through
wait no there should not be a single goddamn battlecruiser/cruiser/frigate rat in 0.0 unless its faction.
Please don't use RL pictuers of players in Sig without permission. - WeatherMan |
Dramaticus
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.11.06 23:36:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Normin Bates
Originally by: Kalissa The bigger alliances will be crying buckets over those sov changes.
Nice!
Yea. All the rich & lazy alliances are being thrust out of their comfort zone. Hence the buckets of tears.
Gee...they will have to think/work a bit more and not hold multiple regions. Sucks to be a bloated alliance with piles of empty systems right now huh?
this hurts smaller 0.0 alliances and anyone who wants to try and make inroads into 0.0 much more fyi
Please don't use RL pictuers of players in Sig without permission. - WeatherMan |
Dramaticus
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.11.07 23:06:00 -
[4]
Originally by: CCP Chronotis
Originally by: Salsbury Y'know, I have to admit that watching all this smack-talk about CCP from the people who don't like the changes is pretty funny. Epic pwnage by CCP!
It seems to me that the whole intent of CCP was to stir things up, reduce unused system sprawl, and make alliances really consider whether a system will be profitable to keep around. In this regard, I think they've already succeeded admirably.
In the 100+ posts I've read on this thread, one striking deficiency that I've noticed is the lack of almost any mention of cooperation, banding together, and INCREASING alliance inter-operation. This is, in fact, core to the design of what CCP is trying to accomplish. Getting more people out to 0.0, building new relationships between corps, encouraging renting out of sub-systems in alliance space, etc.
I've seen lots of people saying "small alliances won't be able to survive!" Well, start banding together with other smaller alliances, and become larger.
I've seen LOTS AND LOTS of funny PvP'ers whining that they simply won't be able to shoot enough stuff to pay the bills, while at the same time saying "mining is a **** profession" and the like. Well, it's time for you to learn how to cooperate with other players. You need to start getting some mining & industry going in your systems, to leverage those belts, rather than simply ignoring them, or ratting, then flying away. (You might even want to train some new skills, so you can produce some wealth in ways other than simply shooting stuff. You might be surprised.)
If it helps you to reframe the idea of cooperation, think of it as different strategic wings of a fleet. You've got some who are doing PvE ratting, protecting those who are helping to harvest those rocks and provide you with resources to build with/sell. You need to balance your skills & strengths to achieve the larger objective. One person can't do it all. That's the whole point of having fleets, corps, and alliances.
Think bigger than what you can do alone. Think about what you can accomplish together.
excellent clarity of vision I must say!
It is true and something we said from outset that unbalanced alliances who are 95% PvP/Fleet and 5% industry will be most affected by this as we are reducing their dependency on passive point sources and introducing greater active resource density to allow for passive income to take over.
The alliances who will benefit most are those who have or aim to have balanced compositions of people with different playstyles or even act as enforcers or protectors of the space with multiple rental agreements if they wish and we will add tools as we call the treaty system to help facilitate that.
your vision ****ing sucks and so do your changes hope im making that clear
Please don't use RL pictuers of players in Sig without permission. - WeatherMan |
Dramaticus
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.11.08 01:01:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Marlona Sky
Originally by: Qlanth If anyone knows about holding 0.0 space its Triumvirate.
Oh wait!
We hold what we want, not take space just for the sake of taking it to make our sovereignty on the map bigger.
having **** space lets darknesss worry about more important things like third party transactions
Please don't use RL pictuers of players in Sig without permission. - WeatherMan |
|
|
|