EVE Search - New Blog: Upgrading and Upkeep of Sovereign Solar Systems in Dominion

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE Information Portal

New Blog: Upgrading and Upkeep of Sovereign Solar Systems in Dominion

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 36 post(s)
KeratinBoy GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2009.11.10 20:41:00 - [1] Dear CCP, There have been a lot of words about your proposed changes. Mostly, they point out the proposed changes will have the opposite effect to the aim of the design document. Or, to put it succinctly, Jade Constantine thinks the proposed changes are a good idea. Jade. Constantine. The ISK/hour question is a good one. Why do people move to dangerous places when they can stay at home? The money. Always and forever. What, precisely, is the problem with nullsec being more profitable than empire for the individual? Things still need exporting and importing. Quite frankly, who cares if empire mission farmers get huffy if ratting in nullsec makes better money? Either they dip their toe in 0.0 or they stick with farming missions to pimp dat raven, at the same rate they have been doing for years. Or is the Dominion trailer a HD advert for rescuing that Damsel in 5.1?
KeratinBoy GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2009.11.10 23:02:00 - [2] Originally by: Tesal YES OR NO: Have you ever been caught beating your wife? Fixed that silly question for you.
KeratinBoy GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2009.11.10 23:09:00 - [3] Originally by: Dante Edmundo Which hand you talking about? Pimp, duh. Originally by: Tesal Originally by: KeratinBoy Originally by: Tesal YES OR NO: Have you ever been caught beating your wife? Fixed that silly question for you. ANSWER THE QUESTION: YES OR NO, Dominion is a Sov nerf but a resource buff. Originally by: KeratinBoy Originally by: Tesal YES OR NO: Have you ever been caught beating your wife? Fixed that silly question for you. P.S., this forum is a bag of **** on the coding level. Fix with haste (AHAHAHAHAHA) tia.
KeratinBoy GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2009.11.10 23:14:00 - [4] Originally by: Tamahra YES OR NO: Have you ever been caught beating your wife? I get to reframe, you do not. :smugbert:
KeratinBoy GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2009.11.11 00:22:00 - [5] Originally by: Cailais Originally by: Halaxi However, what would the incentive be for these new alliances to try? Like you, I would like to here from some aspiring 0.0 corps/alliances - what incentive do you see to basing out of 0.0, with the proposed pros and cons, rather than basing in Empire and taking day trips into 0.0? Hal. The incentive is simple: to have their name on the map. That's the only incentive, perhaps the only real reason to be in .0 fighting for sov. It's an epeen, kudos thing. Currently the large Alliances have taken all of that space. The current mechanics make it very hard to capture any of it which de-incentivizes (sic) fledgling alliances from even trying. In stark terms this is a 0.0 're-set'. C. Hubris, Cailais is thy name. Tell me, what other subjects do you feel qualified to speak about re the motives of more than one hundred thousand people?
KeratinBoy GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2009.11.11 01:35:00 - [6] Originally by: ServantOfMask i concede the other point but CVA chose their spot. It's self-inflicted pain nothing else. yes they deserve recognition for what they accomplished BUT that does not entitle them to special treatment. they over-extended themselves by exploiting a broken sov system and should have realized it wouldn't last when rumors of a sov change started. instead they engaged goonswarm in a race of how many outposts an alliance can dump onto the map. So, the devs stated that this expansion would help smaller alliances in crappier space and chose CVA as their example. Looking at the proposed changes, CVA get surprised without lube. And you see nothing wrong with that disconnect?
KeratinBoy GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2009.11.11 02:07:00 - [7] You agree we are getting shafted then? Look, every 0.0 holding alliance, irrespective of personal feelings, has stated why the upcoming changes are bad. Paying through the nose for, well, the same experience is something none of us are inclined to do. What if, along with these changes, CCP decided to charge players through the nose for, well, the same experience? Can you people get it through your heads yet that this is NOT GOOD?

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.