| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 36 post(s) |
NickSuccorso
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
Atlas Alliance
   |
Posted - 2009.11.08 03:38:00 -
[1]
 Quote:
Sup Atlas we've told you a billion times our old space was complete ****. We were not kidding and it looks to only be getting worse. :)
Yeah but who could have imagined it would end up like this. Goddamn.
Quote:
if we're paying billions for our jump bridges, will we at least no longer have to keep the damned things loaded with ozone?
Hey, speaking of which, can someone explain why alliances that live in places like Branch and Omist will have to pay out the ass even harder to maintain their jump bridge route to civilization, please? Maybe we can do something about this? Maybe give the bridges better range or something? Maybe jump bridges don't need to be so expensive?
Also, regarding that blog, would it have been so hard to start it with giant bold letters stating that "these figures are examples only, and don't necessarily represent the final number of blah blah alksthahsgd", if this stuff was open to tweeking after feedback?
YES OR NO: Due to the increased risk and logistics effort required, 0.0 should be more - not as - profitable (in raw isk/h) than highsec L4 mission running.
|
NickSuccorso
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
Atlas Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.11.09 08:43:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Tesal
Here is what is missing in this. You will still have access to neighboring systems, that will still have the same true sec, and you will still be able to rat in them just as you did before, its just that you won't have Sov there, and you will have to fight people if they show up. You won't be under a cyno jammer with jump bridges all the time, you are going to have to venture out. Once you are out there, people will kill you.
So...why bother changing the sov system at all then, if the big alliances are still gonna use large amounts of territory other than their "official" holdings? Just because it isn't marked on the influence map, and doesn't have a cyno jammer, doesn't mean that some little empire alliance that wants to reach for the stars is going to challenge for it. They'd just get crushed, and they know it, because damnit we need to use this lousy space anyway because there isn't enough room in our super upgraded home systems to support everyone. Granted the hypothetical person is only going to make 20 million isk/hour after 2 hours of grooming, but he's going to take that because it beats sitting docked in station spinning his Rifter with his BS5 character.
|
NickSuccorso
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
Atlas Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.11.10 02:31:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Honest Smedley
Military experts agree; not all threadnaught equally.
As of post 2741, page 92:
Top 20 Alliances Posting
------------------------
744 GoonSwarm
262 (unaffiliated)
112 Atlas Alliance
48 Morsus Mihi
41 Curatores Veritatis Alliance
30 Against ALL Authorities
24 Wildly Inappropriate.
23 Triumvirate.
22 Pandemic Legion
14 The Initiative.
13 Vertigo Coalition
12 Ushra'Khan
11 The Star Fraction
11 R.A.G.E
10 Systematic-Chaos
10 Shadow of xXDEATHXx
10 Paxton Federation
9 Solyaris Chtonium
9 Aeternus.
8 Intrepid Crossing
Top 20 Corporations Posting
------------------------
538 GoonFleet
87 Merch Industrial
59 Ars ex Discordia
49 Di-Tron Heavy Industries
41 Koshaku
24 Atlas Alliance
24 Arcana Imperii Ltd.
22 Mothership Connection Inc.
21 Danke fuer den Fisch
21 Agent-Orange
20 sniggerdly
20 D00M.
18 4S Corporation
17 Free-Space-Ranger
17 Ace Adventure Corp
16 Ultrapolite Socialites
16 The Collective
15 The Scope
14 Miner Tech
14 Deep Core Mining Inc.
Top 20 Pilots Posting
------------------------
82 Korodan
56 Vivian Azure
56 Kepakh
51 EdFromHumanResources
47 Qlanth
45 Vadinho
43 Zahorite
41 Hertford
41 Destrim
37 Tesal
34 Sally Bestonge
31 gambrinous
29 Pointfive
23 Bobby Atlas
22 Mrs Trzzbk
22 Kanatta Jing
21 Tamahra
21 Itzena
19 Marlona Sky
19 Herschel Yamamoto
That is all.
Look at all those 0.0 alliances that wholly agree with each other that something is very wrong with this expansion right now.
|
NickSuccorso
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
Atlas Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.11.10 03:16:00 -
[4]
Originally by: ep1k
Edited by: ep1k on 10/11/2009 03:09:36
I sure wish a ccp dev was on that top poster list.
After their performance in the first quarter of this thread?
|
NickSuccorso
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
Atlas Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.11.10 05:21:00 -
[5]
Quote:
So for your own sake your families and childrens well being please do a better job. O and perhaps listen to the people that pay the bills.
I'm sure CCP is very happy that you're taking an interest in their corporate budget, but this ranks up there with "I'm going to cancel all 14 of my accounts if this isn't fixed RIGHT NOW" in the pantheon of really bad arguing. Other than that, your post actually makes me pretty disappointed in everyone's effort in this thread. This is at least as big as the other issues there, barring T20 and moongate, yet isn't garnering near the amount of outraged keyboard mashing.
|
NickSuccorso
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
Atlas Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.11.10 08:45:00 -
[6]
Quote:
Sov in 0.0 is badly broken. It has to be fixed. Waiting is not an option I am afraid. The people claiming they will quit eve over this are outnumbered by the people actually quitting eve under the current system. The supernaps, the moon gold, the cap ships, pos wars and so on are strangling the game. This is a huge risk by CCP. But to stay where we are now will mean we die. If we move forward there is a chance.
I think I can shorten this and add an appropriate amount of invective so that it translates into troll, a language Goons can understand.
You must die so that EvE can live. Now die!
People keep saying this as if current 0.0 alliance members in this thread aren't in agreement that the current sovereignty system and moon gold is out of whack. Everybody knows that **** needs to change, and everybody has known that it's coming. We all welcome the change, and the original vision of 0.0 filling up with many alliances reaching for the brass ring while territories and pos responsibilities shrink makes us smile. We don't like how they plan to go about it right now, because it's going to strangle these small alliances, and make very little change to the territorial situation in 0.0.
|
NickSuccorso
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
Atlas Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.11.10 19:31:00 -
[7]
Quote:
And you know why it doesnt work? Because due to all r64 **** people got lazy. I dont need to do anything, the afk-ISK-from-thin-air will fund me everything: from SOV, to POS to stations to ships. Atm all 0.0 alliances get reality check: suddenly they HAVE to participate in making isk. You know what would be perfect? Moon mining being changed to manual mode.
Also its funny how everything is compare dto lv4 missions yet almost noone from people whining here runs them. Most of whiners still go on auto9matic moon goo. Again: change it to manual and give 2x lv4 income per hour. Happy? Of course no, because suddenly your income will be able to be both disrupted and will be much lesser. And will not be AFK.
R64 income goes into helping pay for alliance upkeep, not personal wallets. If there's an alliance out there that you can show me that supplies there people's PVP ships, please show me who it is.
|
NickSuccorso
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
Atlas Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.11.10 20:09:00 -
[8]
Quote:
From alies i know? TRI (prolly back again due to dyspro), PL, most (if not all) of NC, im quite sure -A- and you do it too. It is called "ship reimbursement program" which de facto is moving alliance isk (in form of assets) to players wallets (hands).
Pretty sure nobody gives 100% reimbursement on everything, nor do they shower members with ships at no cost.
|
| |
|