EVE Search - Suicide ganking a violation of EULA?

All Channels

Crime and Punishment

Suicide ganking a violation of EULA?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Asuri Kinnes Caldari The Bastards The Bastards.	Posted - 2009.11.07 15:43:00 - [31] Originally by: Drakkan Koran You haven't had your playing experience ruined, you've had it enhanced. Enhanced in a negative way from your current perception, sure. Though isn't it great that such things can be done? Aren't you tempted by the mischief? You've come to talk to 'us'. I think you find 'us' attractive. Come to the darkside, we have cookies. :) As stated, suicide bombing has been around for a long time, if it was considered an exploit then that exploit would have been patched by now. #1 - Confirming we have cookies... and they are good! #2 - Confirming I was tempted... /blush... #3 - Suicide ganking has been nerfed (at least 3 times that I know of, maybe more - only been in game 2 years) - Various agility buffs have been given to ships, concord's response time has been improved and Warp to Zero brought into the game (long time ago). CCP is about balance. Carrying hundreds of millions of isk (or billions) in an untanked ship isn't designed to be safe. Hell, have you seen some of the ads CCP is running lately? "Hunting should always be this easy" is one of the tag lines...
soldieroffortune 258 Gallente Trinity Council Initiative Mercenaries	Posted - 2009.11.07 19:03:00 - [32] This has to be a troll . . . . . Please re-size your signature to a maximum of 400 x 120 with the file size not exceeding 24000 bytes.Applebabe
nafiy gnaw	Posted - 2009.11.07 19:53:00 - [33] I really, really loled at the thread title. If suicide ganking is a violation of EULA, 90% of the EvE player base would be banned by now
Lana's Alt Minmatar Republic Military Skool	Posted - 2009.11.08 00:03:00 - [34] Originally by: nafiy gnaw I really, really loled at the thread title. If suicide ganking is a violation of EULA, 90% of the EvE player base would be banned by now Only 90%?? Go look at the posters previous threads.. Either a dedicated troll (yes they exist) or just doesn't get eve.. I prefer to believe people arent that stupid, therefor dedicated troll is my vote. Istvaan Shogaatsu: As with most such situations the answer is simple: rob them first.
Toriessian Amarr Void Engineers	Posted - 2009.11.08 00:10:00 - [35] Originally by: Intense Thinker Originally by: Toriessian Originally by: Intense Thinker I get off when concord blows my ship up... right after I get in the mood by blowing someone else' ship up Does that make reading/posting about suicide ganking some odd form of literotica? Only when there are plenty of tears I can use for lube Note: Corpses acquired by Intense Thinker may be a little icky.
JordanParey Minmatar Suddenly Ninjas	Posted - 2009.11.08 03:27:00 - [36] Originally by: Lt Forge Put your little BPOs in passworded cans, d1ckweeds.. Not true, you can repackage cans that have been passworded, all the stuff inside pops out.
so bald	Posted - 2009.11.08 22:45:00 - [37] Originally by: JordanParey Originally by: Lt Forge Put your little BPOs in passworded cans, d1ckweeds.. Not true, you can repackage cans that have been passworded, all the stuff inside pops out. Its actually simpler than that, passworded cans only work when anchored, if they are inside a hauler that blows up they will just float in space for everyone to loot
Eos Canon Caldari Provisions	Posted - 2009.11.09 00:13:00 - [38] Originally by: Toriessian Tank your haulers. Concord is there to punish criminal acts not prevent them. If your willing to deal with the punishment you can commit the crime. Agreed 100% Adapt or Die
Schwa88 Red Federation	Posted - 2009.11.09 03:03:00 - [39] inb4 hammertim... sh*t
Jane Rottenscotch	Posted - 2009.11.09 04:35:00 - [40] Edited by: Jane Rottenscotch on 09/11/2009 04:35:20 i was looking up this suicide griefing stuff and its disgusting, look at this junk http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2m-BO8yJ47A whoever does this is stupid and has no life and takes the fun out of the game for the rest of us
Grimpak Gallente Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group	Posted - 2009.11.09 11:11:00 - [41] Originally by: Jane Rottenscotch Edited by: Jane Rottenscotch on 09/11/2009 04:35:20 i was looking up this suicide griefing stuff and its disgusting, look at this junk http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2m-BO8yJ47A whoever does this is stupid and has no life and takes the fun out of the game for the rest of us define "rest", cuz for me, it was rather funny tbh. --- Quote: The more I know about humans, the more I love animals. ain't that right.
niger plaze	Posted - 2009.11.09 13:08:00 - [42] Edited by: niger plaze on 09/11/2009 13:08:33 Originally by: Jane Rottenscotch Edited by: Jane Rottenscotch on 09/11/2009 04:35:20 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2m-BO8yJ47A whoever does this is stupid and has no life.. i do have life. but i have to agree, i'm not the sharpets spoon :/
Cadaverous Stench	Posted - 2009.11.09 14:03:00 - [43] Originally by: Mistress Jita Stop me if I'm wrong here but isn't concords purpose to stop people from killing other people in highsec? You're wrong. If they wanted to stop people from killing others in highsec space, they would have simply made the people invincible to PvP attacks in highsec space, but they did not.
Captain Tardbar State Protectorate	Posted - 2009.11.09 17:21:00 - [44] I don't have a link, but I'm pretty sure a CCP person came out and said as long as the suicide ganker does not avoid the Concordoken, then its legit.
Brechan Skene	Posted - 2009.11.10 01:28:00 - [45] Edited by: Brechan Skene on 10/11/2009 01:29:55 Originally by: Mistress Jita It's common knowledge that doing ANYTHING to evade concord game mechanics is a violation of the EULA. Yes according to previous evidence, it is against the Eula. Originally by: Mistress Jita Stop me if I'm wrong here but isn't concords purpose to stop people from killing other people in highsec? So by suicide ganking, you are using a very simple loophole for concord. Kill before they show up. Concord punishes, it does not protect. They are not a preemptive force they are a reactive force Originally by: Mistress Jita Even if the attacker just sits there waiting for concord after, their purpose was to go around concord mechanics by simply popping someone as fast as they can. They knew they weren't "allowed" to attack anyone in highsec. They knew concord would show up to pop them. They still did it anyway, for the purpose of circumventing concord mechanics and getting to kill someone in highsec. How is this not considered evading concord? How is warping away from concord, any different than suicide ganking a victim before concord can even get there? CCP have already upgraded the response time of concord they no longer take a short cut through McQuafes for a burger, fries and a large Quafe before attending your ganking Originally by: Mistress Jita To be honest I don't care what the trolls have to say, I'm hoping for a response from a dev so that I can understand CCP's logic behind allowing one customer to ruin another paying customers game experience with no penalty at all. And no there is NO penalty, a suicide ganker INTENDS to be killed by concord. Then why did you ask the question in the first placeIf all you wanted was a CCP reply why did you not do a petition They do exist for a reason though Also why did you ask this question, "stop me if I'm wrong here but isn't concords purpose to stop people from killing other people in highsec", if you had no intention of listening to any answer

Pages: 1 [2] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.