| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |
Weaselior
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
3412
   |
Posted - 2012.06.14 14:12:00 -
[1] - Quote
Interesting changes, though I'd like a little more clarity on when these are coming: it's hard to tell if these are inferno 1.x things or Winter 1. |
Weaselior
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
3425
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 16:42:00 -
[2] - Quote
CCP Phantom wrote:A clarification about the time line.
This blog is an update on what we are doing this summer (therefore the title 'Ship balancing summer update') to be released this winter and later.
Thanks, this timeline is much appreciated. |
Weaselior
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
3425
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 16:56:00 -
[3] - Quote
We are having some discussions about the ORE Frig: can you assure us that if we have no mining skills you won't be saddling us with ore frig skills to replace the mining cruisers? Many people would prefer not to have such stuff on their character board. |
Weaselior
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
3425
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 16:56:00 -
[4] - Quote
Selissa Shadoe wrote:
Amusingly your sig has the quote 'GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥' .. which is what a lot of industrial/miner ppl on here are trying to do :)
He doesn't mean on the forums. |
Weaselior
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
3425
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 17:03:00 -
[5] - Quote
I would appreciate hulk miners still having an incentive to fill their lows with expanded cargoholds and their rigs with cargohold optimizations, or give them mining rigs that reduce tank, or rigs that increase ore bay size and reduce tank.
Basically, anything that dangles shinies in front of miners encouraging them to forgo tank entirely for that little extra yield. |
Weaselior
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
3426
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 17:16:00 -
[6] - Quote
yeah im not sure why anyone thinks we'd be upset about this: the people who would fly the tanked barges are flying battleships right now
this just gives us new reasons to mock our victims
hell they'll probably take a skiff and fit it for max yield and in doing so make it still paper thin |
Weaselior
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
3426
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 17:20:00 -
[7] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:yeah im not sure why anyone thinks we'd be upset about this: the people who would fly the tanked barges are flying battleships right now
this just gives us new reasons to mock our victims
hell they'll probably take a skiff and fit it for max yield and in doing so make it still paper thin
this reminds me: CCP please make it possible to fit a skiff for max yield and utterly ruin the tank
you know you'll enjoy the killmails as much as I will |
Weaselior
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
3429
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 18:57:00 -
[8] - Quote
Tanaka Sekigahara wrote:I Love Boobies wrote:I wonder how many people are gonna complain about barges with battleship sized EHP, especially with large ore holds? I am sure there is going to be a tear or two over them.  Seemed rather clear you got either the Battlrship like EHP, or the jetcan sized ore-hold, not both.But yes, Pirate/Goon tears incoming. Also, with huge cargohold, now one can truly "AFK" mine, as opposed to haveing to swap the crap into a can every 3 minutes.
one might suppose if those "tears" were actually coming they'd be in the thread by now
soz m8 not everyone cries as delightfully as miners |
Weaselior
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
3438
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 23:21:00 -
[9] - Quote
Jada Maroo wrote:Since there's an excess of t1 frigate hulls, why can't we have a cloaky ewar frigate and a ganky ewar frigate? Or a frigate sized logi?
because the current t2 ewar frigates are the most useless ships in the game |
| |
|