EVE Search - Mass-test feedback

All Channels

Test Server Feedback

Mass-test feedback - June 14

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)

CCP Habakuk C C P C C P Alliance 212	Posted - 2012.06.14 20:36:00 - [1] - Quote Hi! If you participated in the mass-test on the 14th of June, please reply in this thread to give your feedback, based on following template: Machine Info and Settings OS version: CPU: GPU: RAM: How many clients were you running at the same time? Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot, zoomed out (no brackets): Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: CCP Habakuk \| EVE Quality Assurance \| Team Gridlock Writing bug reports \| Mass tests

Mr Snow Times of Ancar Mature Decadence 0	Posted - 2012.06.14 20:52:00 - [2] - Quote Operating System: Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1 (7601.win7sp1_gdr.110622-1506) Language: English (Regional Setting: English) System Manufacturer: Hewlett-Packard System Model: HP xw8600 Workstation BIOS: Default System BIOS Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5430 @ 2.66GHz (4 CPUs), ~2.7GHz Memory: 8192MB RAM Available OS Memory: 8192MB RAM Page File: 5515MB used, 10865MB available Windows Dir: C:\Windows DirectX Version: DirectX 11 DX Setup Parameters: Not found User DPI Setting: Using System DPI System DPI Setting: 96 DPI (100 percent) DWM DPI Scaling: Disabled DxDiag Version: 6.01.7601.17514 32bit Unicode Card name: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Manufacturer: NVIDIA Chip type: GeForce GTX 560 How many clients were you running at the same time?:TWO Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High User Experience One Crash to desktop, had a slight freeze on audio and video 20 seconds before crash This was just after killing pos So was it fun...YES!!! Was getting 20-30 FPS Can you REMOVE all smartbombs from game next time.
Mrs Snow Times of Ancar Mature Decadence 0	Posted - 2012.06.14 20:52:00 - [3] - Quote Operating System: Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1 (7601.win7sp1_gdr.110622-1506) Language: English (Regional Setting: English) System Manufacturer: Hewlett-Packard System Model: HP xw8600 Workstation BIOS: Default System BIOS Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5430 @ 2.66GHz (4 CPUs), ~2.7GHz Memory: 8192MB RAM Available OS Memory: 8192MB RAM Page File: 5515MB used, 10865MB available Windows Dir: C:\Windows DirectX Version: DirectX 11 DX Setup Parameters: Not found User DPI Setting: Using System DPI System DPI Setting: 96 DPI (100 percent) DWM DPI Scaling: Disabled DxDiag Version: 6.01.7601.17514 32bit Unicode Card name: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Manufacturer: NVIDIA Chip type: GeForce GTX 560 How many clients were you running at the same time?:TWO Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High User Experience One Crash to desktop, had a slight freeze on audio and video 20 seconds before crash This was just after killing pos So was it fun...YES!!! Was getting 20-30 FPS Can you REMOVE all smartbombs from game next time.
bodyscrotum Flashpoint Industries Imperial Hull Tankers 0	Posted - 2012.06.14 20:54:00 - [4] - Quote Machine Info and Settings OS version: win 7 ultimate CPU:amd phemon II quad core GPU:nvidia gforce 4500 RAM: 4 gig How many clients were you running at the same time?4 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):low User Experience very laggy Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot, zoomed out (no brackets):15 Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets):10 On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 1 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? nope Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: overall good
Beetu Okiso Flashpoint Industries Imperial Hull Tankers 0	Posted - 2012.06.14 20:54:00 - [5] - Quote Machine Info and Settings OS version: Windows 7 CPU: Intel quad core q9300 2.5Ghz GPU: Nvidia 9800 Gtx + x2 RAM: 16gb How many clients were you running at the same time? 2 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): medium User Experience [list] Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot, zoomed out (no brackets): 40 fps Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 12 On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 4 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no [*] Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: pretty stable this time round
Ralf Mortimere Sternblumennacht The 99 Percent 0	Posted - 2012.06.14 20:58:00 - [6] - Quote Machine Info and Settings OS version: Win 7 Ultimate x86 CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505 GPU: ASUS EAHD 5850 RAM: 4 GB How many clients were you running at the same time? one Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): ultra User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot, zoomed out (no brackets): 3-6 Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 6-10 On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? crashed during pos fight Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
Jacob Straven Air Cascade Imminent 8	Posted - 2012.06.14 20:59:00 - [7] - Quote Machine Info and Settings OS version: Win 7 32 bit CPU: AMD Athlon II X4 640 3.2 Ghz GPU: Nvidia GTX 580 RAM: 4GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 2 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot, zoomed out (no brackets): 30 Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 17 On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 6 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? yes once each client Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Nice test, shame about the rule breakers though
Gaia Ma'chello V.I.C.E. Comic Mischief 13	Posted - 2012.06.14 21:00:00 - [8] - Quote Machine Info and Settings OS version: OSX 10.7.4 CPU: 2.66 GHz Intel Core i7 GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M 512 MB RAM: 8 GB 1067 MHz DDR3 How many clients were you running at the same time? One Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Low, missile effects off User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot, zoomed out (no brackets): 13 Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 7 On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? One crash before the test. Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: I started the test with missile effects on. At the POS bash my FPS was 7 zoomed out, 2 zoomed in. after the re-log and with them off, things were better as shown above. What is the point of cool graphics if we got to turn them off to play the game? On the jump to the gate camp my ship would not come out of "jump cloak" it was shown transparent. Also I saw no effects of trying to navigate, but others said my ship was moving. Also I could turn on modules. No one showed in the overview. I had to re-log to clear the bug. (Reported). On returning I did a little shooting until I got blown up. In trying to warp the pod to a planet I accidentally hit the "planet mode" button and got severe client lag. I decided to re-log again. On returning I was at my clone station, which I had not moved out of high sec. Rather than moving and getting a new ship, and as the test was close to done I logged.
Menaiya Zamayid Global Economy Experts Stellar Economy Experts 0	Posted - 2012.06.14 21:00:00 - [9] - Quote Hi! If you participated in the mass-test on the 14th of June, please reply in this thread to give your feedback, based on following template: Machine Info and Settings OS version: Windows 7 64 bit CPU: Intel i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67 GHZ GPU: Nvidia Geforce GTX 260 RAM: 9GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 2 to start with but closed the other one Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Maxed (everything turned on to HIGH and at 1980x1600 resolution in Windowed mode) User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot, zoomed out (no brackets): 14 Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 8 On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5 (first attempt) Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? None Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: It is very difficult to see the Tagging when broadcast. Perhaps put it to the left of the icon for the enemy ship?
Solaris Ecladia Brothers At Arms Hades. 17	Posted - 2012.06.14 21:01:00 - [10] - Quote Machine Info and Settings OS version: Windos 7 CPU: Intel i5 GPU: AMD/ATI 7500m RAM: 8gb How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Medium with post processing disabled User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot, zoomed out (no brackets): 42 Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 13 On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5, about the same, maybe a little worse at times. Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: All around? pretty good. hate the gate timers but esy enough to work around.
Stormera92 Elite Aeronautic Developer Syndicate Test Alliance Please Ignore 0	Posted - 2012.06.14 21:04:00 - [11] - Quote Machine Info and Settings OS version: Win 7 Ultimate x64 CPU: Core i5 2400 @3.1 GHz GPU: AMD HD6670 RAM: 4GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): low/medium User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot, zoomed out (no brackets): 40 Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 15 On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 2 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? nope Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: had the issue that I couldn-¦t see the thumbnails of the ships I locked
Edington Trent Black Thorne Corporation Black Thorne Alliance 29	Posted - 2012.06.14 21:05:00 - [12] - Quote Machine Info and Settings OS version: Win 7 64 bit CPU: AMD laptop 2 core, somewhere around 1.8 GHz GPU: Horrible 512MB integrated laptop card RAM: 4 GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): as low as possible User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot, zoomed out (no brackets): (didn't check) Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 8 On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 7 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Felt absolutely great. The eve graphics are really amazing even on low detail. No hangups and not even much lag to speak of. "Keep it dangerous, keep it risky. That sense of GÇ£here goesGÇ¥ every time you undock should never leave us."-á
Mictlancihuatl Midgard inc 0	Posted - 2012.06.14 21:06:00 - [13] - Quote Operating System: Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1 CPU: AMD Athlon II X2 6000+ 3Ghz GPU: Nvidia GT 460 RAM: 6GB Graphic setting high clients 1 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot, zoomed out (no brackets): 24 Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 18 On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 7
GazBoi08 The Scope Gallente Federation 0	Posted - 2012.06.14 21:06:00 - [14] - Quote Machine Info and Settings OS version: windows xp service pack 3 CPU: amd sempron processor 2800+ GPU: ASUS EAH4550 series RAM:4gb How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): medium User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot, zoomed out (no brackets): 15 Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets):6 On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 2 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: mass test went pretty smoothly nothing to add
Siriniris Catalina Operations and Logistics Division Supernova Federation 2	Posted - 2012.06.14 21:07:00 - [15] - Quote i7 3820 3.6 ghz ram 16GB Nvidia GTX580 Win7 ultimate 64 during the battle in Poitot (at the gates) had very nasty bug . My own ship was invisible. And only after 5-6 minutes it comes to normal. Bug was visual only. All modules worked fine, full control, no lag. No DCs Clients: 1 Graph setting was high, all brackets on, no lag So, except this weird invisible ship glitch and foul language in fleet, no other problems detected. FPS was also stable during all event.
Bashfulmerc Sigma-Six Symptom Inc. 0	Posted - 2012.06.14 21:08:00 - [16] - Quote OS version: Windows 7 x 64 CPU: AMD Athlon II x4 630 2.80 GHz GPU: NVIDIA 9100 RAM: 5.75 GB usable How many clients were you running at the same time? one Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): low User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot, zoomed out (no brackets): not verified Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): not verified On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) this would be about an 8. Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: was great improvement over last test. Excluding capitals great idea. Thank you. - Bash
Makeone FinFleet Raiden. 0	Posted - 2012.06.14 21:11:00 - [17] - Quote Machine Info and Settings OS version: Windows 8 Consumer Preview (64-bit) CPU: Intel i5 [email protected] GPU: GeForce 450 RAM: 8 GBytes How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): closer to high User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot, zoomed out (no brackets): 20 Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 15 On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? nope Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Test was great fun as always.
SquidWhiskers Shikkoken Flashpoint Industries Imperial Hull Tankers 0	Posted - 2012.06.14 21:11:00 - [18] - Quote Machine Info and Settings OS version: win 7 ultimate CPU:intel dual core 2.8ghz GPU:ati 6850 RAM: 4 gig How many clients were you running at the same time?1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):low User Experience very laggy..it froze twice but caught up eventually Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot, zoomed out (no brackets):20 Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets):15 On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 1 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: pretty good on the whole.. better than the last mass test
Servjen Industrial and Mining Enterprises 1	Posted - 2012.06.14 21:14:00 - [19] - Quote OS version: windows 7 CPU: intel core i5 430m 2.26ghz GPU: ati mobility radeon hd 5650 RAM: 4gb How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): medium User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot, zoomed out (no brackets): 4-5fps Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 1-2-3 fps On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 1 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no. but a some point, (during fleet jump) the client hang for a few moments Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: during the fleet battle at the gate the FPS was way worse than when at the pos shooting or during the npc shooting.
Nanami Sakura N.N Sakura Corporation 0	Posted - 2012.06.14 21:15:00 - [20] - Quote Machine Info and Settings OS version: Win XP SP3 CPU: AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual 3800+ GPU: AMD Radeon HD 6570 2GB RAM: 2GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): low User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot, zoomed out (no brackets): 18 Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 10 On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? Logserver crashed , Client are running Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
jolanai BRG Corp Acquisition Of Empire 0	Posted - 2012.06.14 21:23:00 - [21] - Quote CCP Habakuk wrote: Hi! If you participated in the mass-test on the 14th of June, please reply in this thread to give your feedback, based on following template: Machine Info and Settings OS version: 7 Ultimate 64bit (SSD) CPU: Core 2 quad extreme GPU: Radeon 4850 2GB RAM: 8GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Optimize for memory User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot, zoomed out (no brackets): 41.3 Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 28.5 On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 8 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: More cynos. Otherwise, great. :)
Kitty Bear Disturbed Friends Of Diazepam Dark Matter Coalition 0	Posted - 2012.06.14 21:27:00 - [22] - Quote Machine Info and Settings GÇóOS version: XP Pro SP3 GÇóCPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E8200 @ 2.66Ghz GÇóGPU: Radeon HD 4650 1GB GÇóRAM: 2Gb GÇóHow many clients were you running at the same time? 1 GÇóGraphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Medium mostly (HDR off) User Experience GÇóAverage FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot, zoomed out (no brackets): Didnt check FPS, but was fairly responsive. GÇóAverage FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): Didnt check FPS, but was fairly responsive. GÇóOn a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5. GÇóDid you experience any disconnects or crashes? None. GÇóDescribe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Seemed to extremely disorganised, and i was never really sure what was going off, or what i was meant to be doing. But still had fun.
yoshi smokeaganga MunchkinWarriors Omega Vector 1	Posted - 2012.06.14 21:27:00 - [23] - Quote machine info: OS: windows vista ultimate service pack 2 CPU: intel centrino duo (core2 duo) @ 1.83 GHz GPU: Nvidia Geforce Go 7400 RAM: 2 GB Number of clients: 1 Graphics settings: as low as possible User experience: FPS on gate (zoomed in) around 1.5-3 fps zoomed out: 3-5 fps combat fps: 1.5 crashes?: yes, frequent ui failures, got "entering space" while in middle of engagements off planet 1 even though I had been there for a while, misiles would stop firing (was fly9ing a drake), ui elements would disappear/reappear. Also mutiple "socket closed" errors. All unessential software on this computer was closed and unloaded prior to masstesting. Seemed to work best during the POS engagement, but outside of that I was completely combat ineffective due to the extreme frequent client issues and disconnects.
Alesha Virpio Caldari Provisions Caldari State 0	Posted - 2012.06.14 21:33:00 - [24] - Quote Machine Info and Settings OS version: Win7 64 CPU: Intel core i3 530 GPU: gtx 250 RAM: 4gb How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): low User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot, zoomed out (no brackets): 25 Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 14 On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: pretty okay
Carola Kessler Lost Sisters Of New Eden Freelancer Coalition 21	Posted - 2012.06.14 21:35:00 - [25] - Quote Machine Info and Settings GÇó OS version: W7 GÇó CPU: Intel i7 3820 CPU 3,60 Ghz GÇó GPU: Nvidia GTX 570 2560 Mbyte GÇó RAM: 16 Gbyte GÇó How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 GÇó Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high User Experience GÇó Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot, zoomed out (no brackets): 33 FPS GÇó Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 17 FPS GÇó On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 8 GÇó Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? none GÇó Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: as expected as usual a funny test and it was really interessting to watch and be part of it sofar my machine was doing good except at poitot gate massacre ^^
Fribain Magnusson Caldari Provisions Caldari State 0	Posted - 2012.06.14 21:36:00 - [26] - Quote Machine Info and Settings OS version: Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit CPU: AMD Athlon II X3 450 GPU: nvidia GTX 560 RAM: 16 GB How many clients were you running at the same time? One. Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot, zoomed out (no brackets): 20 Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 5 On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No disconnects or crashes, but nasty lag during the fights. Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Was in Fleet W. When my drake got destroyed during the gate camp battle, I got a BAD spike of lag. Before I could warp out to get another ship, I got podded. On the whole, it was fun and it seems a bit more responsive than the last mass test I was in.
Darth Behelzebhu Viziam Amarr Empire 0	Posted - 2012.06.14 21:45:00 - [27] - Quote Machine Info and Settings OS version: Windows Vista 64 CPU: intel core 2quad GPU: Nvidia Geforce GT120 2 of 1gb each RAM: 8gb How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): mostly high User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot, zoomed out (no brackets): 12 Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 5 On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? 1 Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
Deep Fried Death Corsair Tactical Inc. 0	Posted - 2012.06.14 21:48:00 - [28] - Quote os: winows 7 64 bit cpu: pentium r duel core t4300 @ 2.10 ghz gpu: nvidia geforce gt 220m ram: 4 gb running one client on medium average fps was 11 at poitot scale of one to ten for performence id say 3 i had one disconect it actually came after test was over and i got podded. large battles are cool in a slow slow way.
Machida Psyonic Legion 0	Posted - 2012.06.14 22:25:00 - [29] - Quote Machine Info and Settings OS version: Windows 7 64bit CPU: AMD A4-3300M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics 1.9GHz GPU: AMD Radeon(tm) HD 6480G RAM: 6GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot, zoomed out (no brackets): < 25 Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): < 10 On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 3 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? 1
MurKfaCe Corsair Tactical Inc. 0	Posted - 2012.06.14 23:21:00 - [30] - Quote os: windows 7 64 bit cpu: amd a8 3510 quad core with radeon hd graphics at 1.80 ghz ram: 6 gb average fps was about 10 durring the major engagement personally, ive never been involved in a major fleet engagement and it didnt go exactely how i expected but to see all of us at once in system was pretty bad @$$. i dont know if it was my rig but it also didnt perform like i thought it would either but again ive never been involved in something of this scale so i didnt have much to go on to make any real expectations. the one thing i didnt like was the organization surrounding what we were actually supposed to do. the second half of it i was completely lost so i just followed the crowd until i got destroyed. all in all though, i would definitely do it again n im looking forward to seeing what u guys come up with next. - MurKfaCe

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.