| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Sajeera
   |
Posted - 2009.11.20 02:12:00 -
[1]
Must give the props to Nozh for achieving something that many great leaders failed at:
To unite all 0.0 ...... against himself 
|
Sajeera
|
Posted - 2009.11.20 15:00:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Ash Bringer
Ok I'll tell the truth about motherships
Take out RR capabilities of Super carriers.
So;
1- Carriers still will be usefull
2- There wont be any EW resistant Super Spider Tanks that doesnt die.
3- Scarrier + Titan combo will not be the ultimate combo. Actually there wont be such a combo but just coincidence.
4- Dreads will be happy as they can still pawn carriers (triaged or not)
5- Scarriers will be happy. Still moving and pawning capitals and still have huge buffer to remote rep from carriers
6- Carriers will be happy, still usefull
7- Support will be happy. still can jam or kill carriers.
Magic rule take out the Remote reps from motherships.
Agree here, everybody is happy and it solves lots of the current problems
While on this, equalize their dps by changing their bonuses, so we dont have DPS supercarrier that actually can DPS 25% better than the rest thus making them obsolete.
Imagine what it will be if all the dreadnoughts has the same range but one of them has 25% better DPS while the rest has some questionable bonuses on shield or armor resistances.
If the new supercarrires main role will be anti-capital dps so be it, just don't let one of them to surpass the rest by such a huge margin in doing its main job.
|
Sajeera
|
Posted - 2009.11.20 22:10:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Sajeera on 20/11/2009 22:10:28
Originally by: Jack Gilligan
Edited by: Jack Gilligan on 20/11/2009 22:08:53
I think the mods have target painted this thread.
1308, pg 44
Target painters don't work on reinforced threads 
[1312]
|
Sajeera
|
Posted - 2009.11.20 23:45:00 -
[4]
Originally by: KeratinBoy
What's odd about it is that the other thread only has 50 pages.
Many posts never made it to eve-search, and by "many" i don't mean 20 or 30...
|
Sajeera
|
Posted - 2009.11.21 03:01:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Sajeera on 21/11/2009 03:01:58
Edited by: Sajeera on 21/11/2009 03:01:46
Originally by: Tarron Sarek
Originally by: Promethian child
I will not play a game run by a bunch of stasi bastards nvm paying for it.
I would delete your post simply because of that.
I'm perfectly fine with forum mods doing their job btw. Some of the crap which gets posted here isn't worth the hard-drive space it occupies.
If you feel masochistic enough and want to read it all up, go to EVE-Search.
Actually you cant read it on eve-search too. For some reason today eve-search started to make its updates with around 30-40 mins delay aswell as failing to retrieve many of the posts.
Either CCP blocked or delayed the updates which eve-search makes, or they just made Chribba "an offer he cant refuse".
And yes i posted this before and it got deleted.
[1438]
|
Sajeera
|
Posted - 2009.11.21 03:40:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Kraken Kill
Ok checked out the changes on Sisi- From what ive heard the fighter bombers still need target painting to do damage.
The Phoenix still sufferes massively with the explo radius of cruise and torps requiring target painting..........
The nag is still nerfed to the stoneage.
The titan is still ineffective other than to jump bridge.
There will be no fighter bombers dude. They said they are reverting all the changes, at the moment motherships on SiSi are the same from TQ just with buffed HPs and jump range.
|
Sajeera
|
Posted - 2009.11.21 04:13:00 -
[7]
Right from the dev blog:
This means NO CHANGES WILL BE MADE TO MOTHERSHIPS IN DOMINION. Since they are part of the original rebalancing effort, the DEPLOYMENT OF FIGHTER BOMBERS WILL ALSO BE POSTPONED
|
| |
|