EVE Search - CCP can you make an event?

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

CCP can you make an event?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
XirtamVotf	Posted - 2004.11.07 23:53:00 - [1] I think that if CCP can get an organized battle with over 200 players on the test server it would serve the EVE community best for fleet battles. The lag , non loading, anf modules not working is really hurting the playability of fleet engagements. Can you schedule an event on the test server before Shiva is released so we can see how it affects client side, and have the dves in there and watch ? Removed the all-caps title. -Omniscience
XirtamVotf	Posted - 2004.11.07 23:53:00 - [2] I think that if CCP can get an organized battle with over 200 players on the test server it would serve the EVE community best for fleet battles. The lag , non loading, anf modules not working is really hurting the playability of fleet engagements. Can you schedule an event on the test server before Shiva is released so we can see how it affects client side, and have the dves in there and watch ? Removed the all-caps title. -Omniscience
1man army	Posted - 2004.11.07 23:58:00 - [3] I totally agree. -----------------
1man army	Posted - 2004.11.07 23:58:00 - [4] I totally agree. -----------------
Amthrianius	Posted - 2004.11.07 23:58:00 - [5] Signed. ---------------
Amthrianius	Posted - 2004.11.07 23:58:00 - [6] Signed. ---------------
Sassinak	Posted - 2004.11.07 23:58:00 - [7] Edited by: Sassinak on 08/11/2004 00:02:48 Originally by: XirtamVotf I think that if CCP can get an organized battle with over 200 players on the test server it would serve the EVE community best for fleet battles. The lag , non loading, anf modules not working is really hurting the playability of fleet engagements. Can you schedule an event on the test server before Shiva is released so we can see how it affects client side, and have the dves in there and watch ? Hey man, Its a good idea, but its not gonna be possible tbh, the Test cluster is no where near the power of the TQ cluster so its not really gonna proove anything i dont think, but I can tell you the ui is more repsonsive that ever ive seen. Its just that 200 players in one place at one time is an awful lot really, we just gotta hope technology evolves to cater for it in the future.. Other than that, if we can organise an event for 200 people to slug it out, it would still be hella fun Sass Arcane Technologies
Sassinak	Posted - 2004.11.07 23:58:00 - [8] Edited by: Sassinak on 08/11/2004 00:02:48 Originally by: XirtamVotf I think that if CCP can get an organized battle with over 200 players on the test server it would serve the EVE community best for fleet battles. The lag , non loading, anf modules not working is really hurting the playability of fleet engagements. Can you schedule an event on the test server before Shiva is released so we can see how it affects client side, and have the dves in there and watch ? Hey man, Its a good idea, but its not gonna be possible tbh, the Test cluster is no where near the power of the TQ cluster so its not really gonna proove anything i dont think, but I can tell you the ui is more repsonsive that ever ive seen. Its just that 200 players in one place at one time is an awful lot really, we just gotta hope technology evolves to cater for it in the future.. Other than that, if we can organise an event for 200 people to slug it out, it would still be hella fun Sass Arcane Technologies
RapierX	Posted - 2004.11.08 00:07:00 - [9] Backing CA here OMG
RapierX	Posted - 2004.11.08 00:07:00 - [10] Backing CA here OMG
Kawasakii	Posted - 2004.11.08 00:13:00 - [11] The only other solution would be jump gates that only allow so many people in a given system ..when its to its limit then the lock the system down til a few die or leave..hell i would be the first to make room so not a long wait there then only joking about the gates btw .. as many have said it would be nice if things could be tested and solutions found
Kawasakii	Posted - 2004.11.08 00:13:00 - [12] The only other solution would be jump gates that only allow so many people in a given system ..when its to its limit then the lock the system down til a few die or leave..hell i would be the first to make room so not a long wait there then only joking about the gates btw .. as many have said it would be nice if things could be tested and solutions found
Shimatu	Posted - 2004.11.08 00:15:00 - [13] Originally by: Kawasakii The only other solution would be jump gates that only allow so many people in a given system ..when its to its limit then the lock the system down til a few die or leave..hell i would be the first to make room so not a long wait there then only joking about the gates btw .. as many have said it would be nice if things could be tested and solutions found ahem. yes. sorry about suggesting that the other day. i just started rambling... and thats where i ended up :P 3-I's T2 sales can be found HERE
Shimatu	Posted - 2004.11.08 00:15:00 - [14] Originally by: Kawasakii The only other solution would be jump gates that only allow so many people in a given system ..when its to its limit then the lock the system down til a few die or leave..hell i would be the first to make room so not a long wait there then only joking about the gates btw .. as many have said it would be nice if things could be tested and solutions found ahem. yes. sorry about suggesting that the other day. i just started rambling... and thats where i ended up :P 3-I's T2 sales can be found HERE
Blacklight	Posted - 2004.11.08 00:34:00 - [15] Whatever they need to do to test server load and make improvements gets my full support. Do it on TQ for all I care just move 200 of us to a system and let us go at it with all the devs there and logs running and whatever it takes. More importantly I'd just like to see someone from CCP post somewhere to tell us what their position is on all this and where their "lagbuster" project is at. Some feedback would be nice guys! Eve Blacklight Style
Blacklight	Posted - 2004.11.08 00:34:00 - [16] Whatever they need to do to test server load and make improvements gets my full support. Do it on TQ for all I care just move 200 of us to a system and let us go at it with all the devs there and logs running and whatever it takes. More importantly I'd just like to see someone from CCP post somewhere to tell us what their position is on all this and where their "lagbuster" project is at. Some feedback would be nice guys! Eve Blacklight Style
Mark A	Posted - 2004.11.08 00:39:00 - [17] Signed. My understanding is the test server should be able to support at least a couple of hundred players, which is enough to see if it all goes wrong in a 100 vs 100 battle. If the devs set it up, I'll be there. ____________________________________
Mark A	Posted - 2004.11.08 00:39:00 - [18] Signed. My understanding is the test server should be able to support at least a couple of hundred players, which is enough to see if it all goes wrong in a 100 vs 100 battle. If the devs set it up, I'll be there. ____________________________________
Sergeant Spot	Posted - 2004.11.08 00:55:00 - [19] Interesting idea. Suggestion: How about a player formed event? Announced in advance, with a specific suugestion to CCP that the watch their servers, and look for ways to improve things. As many players don't like losing important ships, use alts. Call it "The Day of the Alts" or "Leming Alts". Here is the idea: Announce weeks in advance, that everyone in Eve invited to move an alt to Torrinos. Also suggestio that they have that alt move his clone spawn there. Then, on a Saturday at a good time for Euro and America, hundred of noob ships jump into EC-P8R for a kill fest. My suggestion: 2nd Saturday after Shiva is launched. This will give CCP two weeks to deal with the initial bugs, which will be certain to need some time to fix. I'll bring an Ibis of DOOM, and if pks in Battleships attend, no problem. Will be interesting to see 200 noob ships rush a Battleship.
Sergeant Spot	Posted - 2004.11.08 00:55:00 - [20] Interesting idea. Suggestion: How about a player formed event? Announced in advance, with a specific suugestion to CCP that the watch their servers, and look for ways to improve things. As many players don't like losing important ships, use alts. Call it "The Day of the Alts" or "Leming Alts". Here is the idea: Announce weeks in advance, that everyone in Eve invited to move an alt to Torrinos. Also suggestio that they have that alt move his clone spawn there. Then, on a Saturday at a good time for Euro and America, hundred of noob ships jump into EC-P8R for a kill fest. My suggestion: 2nd Saturday after Shiva is launched. This will give CCP two weeks to deal with the initial bugs, which will be certain to need some time to fix. I'll bring an Ibis of DOOM, and if pks in Battleships attend, no problem. Will be interesting to see 200 noob ships rush a Battleship.
Sassinak	Posted - 2004.11.08 00:56:00 - [21] Originally by: Kawasakii The only other solution would be jump gates that only allow so many people in a given system ..when its to its limit then the lock the system down til a few die or leave..hell i would be the first to make room so not a long wait there then only joking about the gates btw .. as many have said it would be nice if things could be tested and solutions found Only problem with that is its open to major exploits, IE like in Planet side people would want to take a region so they would just pile 40380984830408 poeple into it vs the 35 defenders and force a region lock. Then they could happily nuke all the bases and take em over... I see the exact same thing happening with that method. Sass Arcane Technologies
Sassinak	Posted - 2004.11.08 00:56:00 - [22] Originally by: Kawasakii The only other solution would be jump gates that only allow so many people in a given system ..when its to its limit then the lock the system down til a few die or leave..hell i would be the first to make room so not a long wait there then only joking about the gates btw .. as many have said it would be nice if things could be tested and solutions found Only problem with that is its open to major exploits, IE like in Planet side people would want to take a region so they would just pile 40380984830408 poeple into it vs the 35 defenders and force a region lock. Then they could happily nuke all the bases and take em over... I see the exact same thing happening with that method. Sass Arcane Technologies
Sassinak	Posted - 2004.11.08 00:58:00 - [23] Originally by: Mark A Signed. My understanding is the test server should be able to support at least a couple of hundred players, which is enough to see if it all goes wrong in a 100 vs 100 battle. If the devs set it up, I'll be there. Support a couple of hundred players sure, support a couple hundred players over the same gate.. I dunno man, but it will be fun to try Sass Arcane Technologies
Sassinak	Posted - 2004.11.08 00:58:00 - [24] Originally by: Mark A Signed. My understanding is the test server should be able to support at least a couple of hundred players, which is enough to see if it all goes wrong in a 100 vs 100 battle. If the devs set it up, I'll be there. Support a couple of hundred players sure, support a couple hundred players over the same gate.. I dunno man, but it will be fun to try Sass Arcane Technologies
Mark A	Posted - 2004.11.08 01:02:00 - [25] Edited by: Mark A on 08/11/2004 01:13:17 Originally by: Sassinak Originally by: Mark A Signed. My understanding is the test server should be able to support at least a couple of hundred players, which is enough to see if it all goes wrong in a 100 vs 100 battle. If the devs set it up, I'll be there. Support a couple of hundred players sure, support a couple hundred players over the same gate.. I dunno man, but it will be fun to try One way to find out... ;) Either way it'll provide some useful test data if half the fleet CTDs like in Curse earlier this evening on TQ. ____________________________________
Mark A	Posted - 2004.11.08 01:02:00 - [26] Edited by: Mark A on 08/11/2004 01:13:17 Originally by: Sassinak Originally by: Mark A Signed. My understanding is the test server should be able to support at least a couple of hundred players, which is enough to see if it all goes wrong in a 100 vs 100 battle. If the devs set it up, I'll be there. Support a couple of hundred players sure, support a couple hundred players over the same gate.. I dunno man, but it will be fun to try One way to find out... ;) Either way it'll provide some useful test data if half the fleet CTDs like in Curse earlier this evening on TQ. ____________________________________
Kreep13	Posted - 2004.11.08 01:09:00 - [27] I'm all for it
Kreep13	Posted - 2004.11.08 01:09:00 - [28] I'm all for it
Stained	Posted - 2004.11.08 01:20:00 - [29] STOP IN THE NAME OF LOVE, BEFORE YOU BREAK MY HEART ___________________________________________________________________ Hair is Over-rated.
Stained	Posted - 2004.11.08 01:20:00 - [30] STOP IN THE NAME OF LOVE, BEFORE YOU BREAK MY HEART ___________________________________________________________________ Hair is Over-rated.
Tozz	Posted - 2004.11.08 01:24:00 - [31] omg i do agree with CA for ones... If that makes any help for delv... CCP do really need to get the shi* togheter before shiva tbh... the war¦s aint goona be less.
Tozz	Posted - 2004.11.08 01:24:00 - [32] omg i do agree with CA for ones... If that makes any help for delv... CCP do really need to get the shi* togheter before shiva tbh... the war¦s aint goona be less.
Dentali	Posted - 2004.11.08 02:00:00 - [33] Edited by: Dentali on 08/11/2004 02:03:42 Signed. Quote: I don't have the resources to change the nodes, only server guys have it, and this is not big enough problem to contact them. However, we know about this node problems, and we'll just have to deal with each case when they file in a petition.You should however, know by know that the servers do not handle big fleet battles like this one, so please keep it the battles smaller until you know the servers can handle it. However, if I recall correctly, the devs mention in the Fanfest that Shiva should be more capable in handling big battles than Castor. Best regards, GM Aeryn. So is said.
Dentali	Posted - 2004.11.08 02:00:00 - [34] Edited by: Dentali on 08/11/2004 02:03:42 Signed. Quote: I don't have the resources to change the nodes, only server guys have it, and this is not big enough problem to contact them. However, we know about this node problems, and we'll just have to deal with each case when they file in a petition.You should however, know by know that the servers do not handle big fleet battles like this one, so please keep it the battles smaller until you know the servers can handle it. However, if I recall correctly, the devs mention in the Fanfest that Shiva should be more capable in handling big battles than Castor. Best regards, GM Aeryn. So is said.
Shiwan Khan	Posted - 2004.11.08 02:49:00 - [35] Originally by: Dentali Edited by: Dentali on 08/11/2004 02:03:42 Quote: GM Aeryn. Aeryn Sun is a GM?
Shiwan Khan	Posted - 2004.11.08 02:49:00 - [36] Originally by: Dentali Edited by: Dentali on 08/11/2004 02:03:42 Quote: GM Aeryn. Aeryn Sun is a GM?
Krapz	Posted - 2004.11.08 02:52:00 - [37] OMG. weird. It's a super idea. can everyone get together around 0200 Eve time on Wednesday? Doesn't really matter to me who wins or loses, it's all funny money anyways. But it would be neat to see how many ppl we can get together for a nice little scuffle. Maybe we can keep with tradition and do this over at U-Q? Let's just see how much participation we can get first, may take us some time to get the numbers up, no sense in having a 10 vs 10, since that's not really the goal anyways... maybe a 30 vs 30 would be a good start the first time out. The more, the merrier. All corps welcome of course, and bring all your friends, and cool mods and ships :) -- Insert cool graphics sig here --
Krapz	Posted - 2004.11.08 02:52:00 - [38] OMG. weird. It's a super idea. can everyone get together around 0200 Eve time on Wednesday? Doesn't really matter to me who wins or loses, it's all funny money anyways. But it would be neat to see how many ppl we can get together for a nice little scuffle. Maybe we can keep with tradition and do this over at U-Q? Let's just see how much participation we can get first, may take us some time to get the numbers up, no sense in having a 10 vs 10, since that's not really the goal anyways... maybe a 30 vs 30 would be a good start the first time out. The more, the merrier. All corps welcome of course, and bring all your friends, and cool mods and ships :) -- Insert cool graphics sig here --
Aneu Angellus	Posted - 2004.11.08 08:00:00 - [39] Originally by: Shiwan Khan Originally by: Dentali Edited by: Dentali on 08/11/2004 02:03:42 Quote: GM Aeryn. Aeryn Sun is a GM? Not afaik, but i do know GM Aeryn is evil, he/she gave me a 5min block from local, how rude. ________________ Aneu Angellus Vengeance Of The Fallen - WolfPack Military Captain
Aneu Angellus	Posted - 2004.11.08 08:00:00 - [40] Originally by: Shiwan Khan Originally by: Dentali Edited by: Dentali on 08/11/2004 02:03:42 Quote: GM Aeryn. Aeryn Sun is a GM? Not afaik, but i do know GM Aeryn is evil, he/she gave me a 5min block from local, how rude. ________________ Aneu Angellus Vengeance Of The Fallen - WolfPack Military Captain
Nom Anor	Posted - 2004.11.08 11:59:00 - [41] Wouldn't things be easier if SiSi was mirrored to Entropy? TBH Entropy's totally useless atm as it's running same version as TQ. Entropy = way bigger cluster than sisi afaik.
Nom Anor	Posted - 2004.11.08 11:59:00 - [42] Wouldn't things be easier if SiSi was mirrored to Entropy? TBH Entropy's totally useless atm as it's running same version as TQ. Entropy = way bigger cluster than sisi afaik.
Gunship	Posted - 2004.11.09 19:53:00 - [43] Signed CCP Petition!
Gunship	Posted - 2004.11.09 19:53:00 - [44] Signed CCP Petition!
Joshua Calvert	Posted - 2004.11.09 19:59:00 - [45] Why don't the GM's just get 200 players together in a remote system on the TQ server with everyone running logserver and then get them to re-enact a fight. They then reimburse all losses as repayment for helping make the servers better? LEEEEERRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY!
Joshua Calvert	Posted - 2004.11.09 19:59:00 - [46] Why don't the GM's just get 200 players together in a remote system on the TQ server with everyone running logserver and then get them to re-enact a fight. They then reimburse all losses as repayment for helping make the servers better? LEEEEERRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY!
FastMick	Posted - 2004.11.10 06:55:00 - [47] Signed. This is the main problem with the game in 0.0 atm.
FastMick	Posted - 2004.11.10 06:55:00 - [48] Signed. This is the main problem with the game in 0.0 atm.
Damo Pendragon	Posted - 2004.11.10 13:48:00 - [49] This is a requirement to a lot of people's continued play in my opinion! Signed!
Damo Pendragon	Posted - 2004.11.10 13:48:00 - [50] This is a requirement to a lot of people's continued play in my opinion! Signed!

Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.