| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Silver Tongues
   |
Posted - 2009.12.28 15:10:00 -
[31]
 Originally by: Mahke
Originally by: CCP Abathur
Assault Frigates are on our "to do" list post-1.1.
Second mid for retribution (or enough other buffs to make it an absolute monster for gang work since it can't tackle and thats kind crucial for frigates) and rocket fix please  .
Although to be honest with the great new faction frigs its not quite as necessary as before.
Fix rockets! But please don't change the Retribution slot layout (unless an extra mid is given without taking from highs/lows, with a slight PG/CPU change to compensate). While it cannot tackle, it can play a fun role as a Sniper AF. 50KM lock range, 46KM optimal with 3.8KM Falloff (max skills). Extra high slot can be used for things like a small RR to help patch up your fellow gang mates. Isn't part of the fun of EVE is being able to take a gang out that surprises the hell out of the enemy?
Yes most Frigates main roles is to tackle, but not the Retribution and I love it for that reason. It's not a solo ship, it forces small gang work, so please don't change it too much!
|
Lady Australia
|
Posted - 2009.12.29 08:51:00 -
[32]
It is good to see some ccp feedback in the forums again (thanks abathur),
but yeah seriously, rockets and AF, need love please, as soon as lagfest 1.1 is fixed up :)
(coming from another caldari pilot who had to x-train to be useful) 
|
Duchess Starbuckington
|
Posted - 2009.12.29 12:27:00 -
[33]
Originally by: Lady Australia
caldari pilot who had to x-train to be useful)
You're either flying with the wrong people or completely and utterly inept.
|
Vixisti
Shadows Of The Federation
|
Posted - 2009.12.31 01:37:00 -
[34]
Most AF's are fine, have a niche roll and are flown by many people. One or two may need a tweak but please don't break the game again trying to fix something that really isn't broken.
|
Roemy Schneider
Vanishing Point.
|
Posted - 2009.12.31 17:48:00 -
[35]
Originally by: Thenoran
Originally by: CCP Abathur
Sounds to me like Santa forgot to visit someone's house...
He didn't forget, he used the avoidance system made by CCP!
oh? it's not just for game design meetings?
-
putting the gist back into logistics |
DeadDuck
Amarr
Cutting Edge Incorporated
RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.01.01 10:31:00 -
[36]
Well I REALLY hope that at the same time they take a look at AF's they will also take a look at missile damages... The proposed AB bonus was a laugh with the current state of missiles  .
God is my Wingman |
thisisnotmikaldrey
|
Posted - 2010.01.01 15:43:00 -
[37]
Originally by: Roemy Schneider
Originally by: Thenoran
Originally by: CCP Abathur
Sounds to me like Santa forgot to visit someone's house...
He didn't forget, he used the avoidance system made by CCP!
oh? it's not just for game design meetings?
avoidance system is also broken. i managed to set an avoided system as a waypoint and got my shiny claymore popped by the faction police. :/
just another broken feature 
|
Gerard Deneth
Caldari
Pavlov Labs GmBH
|
Posted - 2010.01.07 23:11:00 -
[38]
Originally by: thisisnotmikaldrey
avoidance system is also broken. i managed to set an avoided system as a waypoint and got my shiny claymore popped by the faction police. :/
just another broken feature
The avoidance system tells the autopilot to avoid systems while going FROM A to B. If you deliberately set B to be somewhere you're set to avoiding, it assumes that for some reason you want to specifically go there.
IE it saves you from inadvertant acts of stupidity. Not deliberate ones.
Or rather would you it tell you that for some reason Jita is 192168100 jumps away from you no matter what system you are in?
----------------------------
The Game's always changing under your feet; don't start moaning when you get a toe caught in the gears. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |