Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 [30] 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 106 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 48 post(s) |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
4127
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 10:18:00 -
[871] - Quote
If CCP remove the profits of this venture from Goons, will they also retroactively remove the profits from the guy who posted about how he built tens of thousands of battleships, insured them and then destroyed them for a profit? (this was before the insurance nerf)
How about the people who made obscene profits (possibly totally even more than 5Tn) from the horribly botched P.I. introduction?
What about the BoB members who used to rake in billions a week using titans to bridge freighter-loads of NPC goods from Delve for unbelievable profits? Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |
uuj Oramara
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 10:19:00 -
[872] - Quote
Sizeof Void wrote:Kmelx wrote:CCP Sreegs wrote: By way of explanation we addressed the manipulation issue but haven't yet completed the investigation into the scope of the abuse. Once that happens I'm pretty sure some people are going to be a bit less smug about the money they made that one time when there was a bank error in their favor and then lost again when the bank fixed the glitch.
Empty threats, best threats! Keep in mind that CCP Sreegs is the one who disqualified Hydra and OB from ATX. He is also the one who routinely seizes ISK and assets, and applies the ban hammer, to RMT accounts. He would not be my first choice of CCP devs to accuse of making empty threats.
|
Talon SilverHawk
Patria o Muerte
475
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 10:19:00 -
[873] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Talon SilverHawk wrote:When did the huge distinction appear ? At the very beginning. Unless everyone else who slow-clapped in this thread is also involved. Also the **** didn't "hit the fan" when the NPC alts started wagging their fingers at the "general membership."
Nope I saw 4 or 5 pages of Goons jerking off over this, not allot of NPC alts till CCP came in to comment .
Tal
|
Blawrf McTaggart
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1131
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 10:19:00 -
[874] - Quote
whats goin on in this thread |
Destination SkillQueue
Are We There Yet
2441
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 10:20:00 -
[875] - Quote
Imryn Xaran wrote:CCP Sreegs wrote:Ituhata Saken wrote:Dearest Market-Interested Space Tycoons,
At downtime today we made an adjustment to the average price of some items in order to curb a situation whereby the average price of an item could be manipulated in order to create a disparity between the value of an item in Isk and its value in Loyalty Point payouts. There will be additional changes in how this system works in the future. We will be monitoring for attempted manipulation of the LP market and will reverse any proceeds deemed to have been obtained through manipulative means. We are watching you. DonGÇÖt be That Guy. By way of explanation we addressed the manipulation issue but haven't yet completed the investigation into the scope of the abuse. Once that happens I'm pretty sure some people are going to be a bit less smug about the money they made that one time when there was a bank error in their favor and then lost again when the bank fixed the glitch. IGÇÖd be interested to hear how you are twisting this into being an GÇ£abuseGÇ¥. As far as I can see the mechanics being used here are working exactly the way you guys designed them to work. The fact that you have now decided to change the way some of those mechanics work is irrelevant. Also IGÇÖm a bit worried to see that although the investigation isnGÇÖt yet complete you already seem to have decided what the outcome will be. I would HOPE that a full investigation would highlight what have to be enormous flaws in your design and QA processes that allowed this system to be implemented, and I would HOPE that the resulting recommendations would strongly suggest that additional testing and QA processes were needed to emphasise the testing of GÇ£edgeGÇ¥ or GÇ£limitingGÇ¥ cases. I EXPECT your investigation will gloss over the failures of CCP employees (as usual) and place the blame on the players who in this case are obviously smarter than all of you guys put together. IsnGÇÖt it about time you guys at CCP realised that this isnGÇÖt a game? This is your lively GÇôhood and you should probably start to act with a bit more professionalism when it comes to the changes you make to it.
It's a clear case of abuse, but the consequenses are still up in air. Outsmarting the devs isn't a defense. It's what every exploiter or abuser does succesfully. The only thing in question is what are the consequenses. To me this is similar to the infinite tracking abuse that happened in specific wormholes some time ago. The mechanics worked as they were designed, but created a situation where you could break the system and gain excessive benefits because of it. I believe the consequense was removal of assets CCP thought was fair to remove. I suspect something similar will happen here.
The people who did this also acted against how CCP has adviced people act in similar situations. IIRC it was posted at least in one of the forum exploit devblogs made by Sreegs. The basic gist of it was, that you're supposed to report it to CCP in detail with reproduction steps and not use the exploit once you have discovered it for any reason. A specific example of what not to do was to report it, but continuing to use it. What actually will happen to them is up to CCP to decide based on the actual details of the case, but there are clear precedences where people who acted in similar fashion have suffered from CCP actions against them. |
Lord Zim
903
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 10:21:00 -
[876] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:If CCP remove the profits of this venture from Goons, will they also retroactively remove the profits from the guy who posted about how he built tens of thousands of battleships, insured them and then destroyed them for a profit? (this was before the insurance nerf)
How about the people who made obscene profits (possibly totally even more than 5Tn) from the horribly botched P.I. introduction?
What about the BoB members who used to rake in billions a week using titans to bridge freighter-loads of NPC goods from Delve for unbelievable profits? Ban all the things. |
Capqu
Love Squad Confederation of xXPIZZAXx
3
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 10:25:00 -
[877] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Malcanis wrote:If CCP remove the profits of this venture from Goons, will they also retroactively remove the profits from the guy who posted about how he built tens of thousands of battleships, insured them and then destroyed them for a profit? (this was before the insurance nerf)
How about the people who made obscene profits (possibly totally even more than 5Tn) from the horribly botched P.I. introduction?
What about the BoB members who used to rake in billions a week using titans to bridge freighter-loads of NPC goods from Delve for unbelievable profits? Ban all the things.
XxD memes r funny |
Alain Kinsella
120
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 10:29:00 -
[878] - Quote
Thank you for a couple hours of interesting reading. corestwo had been acting even slyer than usual in -lounge so I figured something was still up. :-)
I'm not going to weigh in on either side. I made it very clear a while back that I've had my experience with SA back in SL, and the rest of y'all can duke it out this time. :-p
I *am* waiting to see what Screegs will say though. *That* will be a popcorn moment for sure, forget this here. I may have come here from Myst Online, but that does not make me any less bloodthirsty than the average Eve player.
Just more subtle.
|
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
4127
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 10:32:00 -
[879] - Quote
Alain Kinsella wrote: I *am* waiting to see what Screegs will say though. *That* will be a popcorn moment for sure, forget this here.
Truth right here
Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |
Graic Gabtar
The Lemon Party
281
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 10:34:00 -
[880] - Quote
I'm imagining the most popular GoogleGäó search performed in Iceland today was "What is an outlier?" EVE shall be purged by fire - please Gods let them ALL burn in Jita. |
|
Skippermonkey
Tactical Knightmare
1061
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 10:35:00 -
[881] - Quote
Well, seeing as you are likely to lose most of the isk you 'earnt' my advice to go Jita and mess up the Price of plex just for fun before they take it all the isk away from you and leave oyu with negative wallets My homeboys tried to warn me But that butt you got makes me so horny |
Vokanic
Nemitronix Inc
14
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 10:48:00 -
[882] - Quote
Graic Gabtar wrote:I'm imagining the most popular GoogleGäó search performed in Iceland today was "What is an outlier?"
You could have saved 90% of the people reading this thread the trouble by explaining it. Then again, this *is* an entertaining thread, so why stop that by educating the masses. |
Vile rat
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1370
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 10:53:00 -
[883] - Quote
If the people who figured this out, then told CCP while waving huge flags that read "FIX THIS OR THE ECONOMY IS SCREWED" get punished, then the only stupid thing they did was actually be dumb enough to inform CCP about the issue. |
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1402
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 10:53:00 -
[884] - Quote
Singulis Pacifica wrote:
Without the Goons, this would not have been discovered for a while. And clever players would have found out eventually, by accident or on purpose. Regardless, it would likely be abused over a longer period of time as the Goons are honest enough to publicize their findings in a relatively short time-frame (within a month upon release on the live servers).
It's funny because right yesterday I was chatting with Corestwo on SCC-Lounge when I told him CCP should not have released moving averages based content. In fact I found another way to manipulate a similar principle Inferno mechanic (you call it "clever player") that is not the FW LP stuff and was talking about it before this thread was written. But I am not going to "publicize" my findings, I just create an in game ticket.
Singulis Pacifica wrote: Should the Goons be punished? Ban their accounts? Possibly. CCP has the right and ability to do whatever she deems fit.
Well CCP labelled it as "abuse", it means they did not like it. This trumps every EULA foggy clause (that can be twisted as CCP wants anyway). In fact I would not be suprised if they came up with the "against the spirit of the game" clause, even if tbh the spirit of this game is to screw up the next guy and then smack talk him in public.
Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |
Graic Gabtar
The Lemon Party
281
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 10:56:00 -
[885] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote:By way of explanation we addressed the manipulation issue but haven't yet completed the investigation into the scope of the abuse. Once that happens I'm pretty sure some people are going to be a bit less smug about the money they made that one time when there was a bank error in their favor and then lost again when the bank fixed the glitch. Vile rat wrote:If the people who figured this out, then told CCP while waving huge flags that read "FIX THIS OR THE ECONOMY IS SCREWED" get punished, then the only stupid thing they did was actually be dumb enough to inform CCP about the issue. It seems positions are now clear.
EVE shall be purged by fire - please Gods let them ALL burn in Jita. |
Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1161
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 10:56:00 -
[886] - Quote
Skippermonkey wrote:Well, seeing as you are likely to lose most of the isk you 'earnt' my advice to go Jita and mess up the Price of plex just for fun before they take it all the isk away from you and leave oyu with negative wallets
it's called 'restraint' a rogue goon |
Skippermonkey
Tactical Knightmare
1061
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 11:00:00 -
[887] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Skippermonkey wrote:Well, seeing as you are likely to lose most of the isk you 'earnt' my advice to go Jita and mess up the Price of plex just for fun before they take it all the isk away from you and leave oyu with negative wallets it's called 'restraint' However you think this is going to play out, CCP arent going to let you keep all that money, so you best have fun with it while you still have it My homeboys tried to warn me But that butt you got makes me so horny |
Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1161
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 11:01:00 -
[888] - Quote
Skippermonkey wrote:However you think this is going to play out, CCP arent going to let you keep all that money, so you best have fun with it while you still have it
you're aware that this only involved 5 dudes, not the entire GSF, right?
also since when do you determine CCP's position? a rogue goon |
Kinis Deren
EVE University Ivy League
55
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 11:02:00 -
[889] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Kinis Deren wrote:I wonder why CCP aren't heralding yet another "awesome player driven event by Goonswarm!" this time? Will heads roll at CCP over this? That would be a sad turn of events, IMHO. Did Mittens and co just throw CCP "under the bus" for a bit of post Fanfest/CSM election fiasco payback or is this a deflection strategy over the Inferno 1.1 war dec change drama. /me adjusts tinfoil hat How many alts could you create with the profit to influence the outcome of, say, CSM8? This was not done by "Goonswarm." This was done by a cabal of extremely rich and extremely knowledgeable Goonswarm members using their own capital. There is a huge distinction here.
So noted and I stand corrected.
Does that mean Goonswarm is officially distancing itself from the actions of the members involved? |
Sweetss
Rim Worlds Republic Solar Citizens
7
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 11:03:00 -
[890] - Quote
Whats funny is that Goons try to verbally beat down everyone else, creating their own cute little term for them (pubbies), yet in actual fact they are pubbies who roleplay being moronic idiots. They post a thread about ruining everyones life and then all respond to each other congratualting themselves and calling each other sociopaths etc. (aka that lame Vile Rat ponce's response at the start).
Outside of EvE they are no doubt about as sociopathic as my pet hamster Terrence. Mittani being the biggest role-playing pubbie there is. He absolutely LIVES his little sociopathic image. Quite the "sad little nobody" ego. |
|
OUTLAW RIOT P0LICE
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 11:03:00 -
[891] - Quote
If you need to launder some of those shiny Stabber Fleets or anything please contract them to me, k thanks, much appreciated. |
Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1161
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 11:03:00 -
[892] - Quote
Kinis Deren wrote:Does that mean Goonswarm is officially distancing itself from the actions of the members involved?
You're reading too much into this. We don't have to distance ourselves from their actions. a rogue goon |
Vile rat
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1370
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 11:03:00 -
[893] - Quote
Kinis Deren wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:Kinis Deren wrote:I wonder why CCP aren't heralding yet another "awesome player driven event by Goonswarm!" this time? Will heads roll at CCP over this? That would be a sad turn of events, IMHO. Did Mittens and co just throw CCP "under the bus" for a bit of post Fanfest/CSM election fiasco payback or is this a deflection strategy over the Inferno 1.1 war dec change drama. /me adjusts tinfoil hat How many alts could you create with the profit to influence the outcome of, say, CSM8? This was not done by "Goonswarm." This was done by a cabal of extremely rich and extremely knowledgeable Goonswarm members using their own capital. There is a huge distinction here. So noted and I stand corrected. Does that mean Goonswarm is officially distancing itself from the actions of the members involved?
Distancing ourselves? Is this some silly legalese garbage where somebody can't point to something that happened and say "holy **** that was awesome" ? |
Vile rat
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1370
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 11:04:00 -
[894] - Quote
Sweetss wrote:Whats funny is that Goons try to verbally beat down everyone else, creating their own cute little term for them (pubbies), yet in actual fact they are pubbies who roleplay being moronic idiots. They post a thread about ruining everyones life and then all respond to each other congratualting themselves and calling each other sociopaths etc. (aka that lame Vile Rat ponce's response at the start).
Outside of EvE they are no doubt about as sociopathic as my pet hamster Terrence. Mittani being the biggest role-playing pubbie there is. He absolutely LIVES his little sociopathic image. Quite the "sad little nobody" ego.
No you don't understand, Aryth is really a sociopath. Not even because of this either. |
Skippermonkey
Tactical Knightmare
1061
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 11:06:00 -
[895] - Quote
Vile rat wrote:If the people who figured this out, then told CCP while waving huge flags that read "FIX THIS OR THE ECONOMY IS SCREWED" get punished, then the only stupid thing they did was actually be dumb enough to inform CCP about the issue. We'd be much more convinced of your 'best intentions' if they figoured out the exploit and immediately informed CCP.
Instead, you (rather impressively may i add) exploited the game mechanics to basically create your own isk printing press.
Dont act like you are some white knights here to save EVE from all that is broken. My homeboys tried to warn me But that butt you got makes me so horny |
Skippermonkey
Tactical Knightmare
1061
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 11:07:00 -
[896] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Skippermonkey wrote:However you think this is going to play out, CCP arent going to let you keep all that money, so you best have fun with it while you still have it you're aware that this only involved 5 dudes, not the entire GSF, right? also since when do you determine CCP's position?
yes
anymore questions?
edit - i dont dictate CCPs position. I thought that was already pretty clear
sreegs wrote:By way of explanation we addressed the manipulation issue but haven't yet completed the investigation into the scope of the abuse. Once that happens I'm pretty sure some people are going to be a bit less smug about the money they made that one time when there was a bank error in their favor and then lost again when the bank fixed the glitch underlined and bolded for you My homeboys tried to warn me But that butt you got makes me so horny |
Fix Lag
299
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 11:07:00 -
[897] - Quote
"Yeah we'll just take the money they earned legitimately...because there was too much of it."
Sounds legit Sreegs |
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1402
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 11:08:00 -
[898] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:If CCP remove the profits of this venture from Goons, will they also retroactively remove the profits from the guy who posted about how he built tens of thousands of battleships, insured them and then destroyed them for a profit? (this was before the insurance nerf)
IIRC that guy seems to have "fallen" into RMT of that ISK so in a certain way... it's been removed even if not for the insurance fraud.
Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |
Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1161
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 11:09:00 -
[899] - Quote
Skippermonkey wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:Skippermonkey wrote:However you think this is going to play out, CCP arent going to let you keep all that money, so you best have fun with it while you still have it you're aware that this only involved 5 dudes, not the entire GSF, right? also since when do you determine CCP's position? yes anymore questions?
So you're saying that you determine CCP's position on these matters? a rogue goon |
Pisov viet
Kaesong Kosmonauts Test Alliance Please Ignore
57
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 11:09:00 -
[900] - Quote
Skippermonkey wrote:Vile rat wrote:If the people who figured this out, then told CCP while waving huge flags that read "FIX THIS OR THE ECONOMY IS SCREWED" get punished, then the only stupid thing they did was actually be dumb enough to inform CCP about the issue. We'd be much more convinced of your 'best intentions' if they figoured out the exploit and immediately informed CCP. Instead, you (rather impressively may i add) exploited the game mechanics to basically create your own isk printing press. Dont act like you are some white knights here to save EVE from all that is broken. No isk was printed. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 [30] 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 106 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |