EVE Search - CSM 8: Xenuria Rising

Americe Zane wrote:

Xenuria wrote:

Americe Zane wrote:

Is there a way to see what your views are in a readable format? I don't like listening to audio, as it makes it harder to skim through.

Also, how will you try getting votes from people like me, who think all people going for political power are inherently corrupt?

Interesting question.

I would argue that corruption is not a one way condition. Somebody could be corrupt in favor of one thing or another and neither of those things has to be insidious or evil. I will also say that because I am on the autism spectrum it is considerably more difficult to corrupt me and it would probably take a much longer period of time before I became conditioned or biased to anybodies views that did not fit with my own.

You have a valid question but I feel that it's not one that can ever really be answered. (referring to corruption, not how I will get your vote)

I am a social outcast and that is in no small part due to my uncompromising honesty. As somebody with autism I say things like they are and call it like I see it. While I realize once under NDA there is alot I will be unable to share I can say that it's my goal to not let "knowledge" or New information "change" my core platform and system of reasoning. This is a very difficult task for a neuro-typical but not so difficult for an aspie.

Make no mistake, I will change if elected but only in so far as I have more influence and information by which to contribute to my logical decision making process.

I will also write up some short and sweat articles on my platform so that people can read.

Don't get me wrong about corruption, it isn't always towards evil. Though corruption is itself bad. I am also very cautious of people claiming to not be easily corruptible (because honestly, who claims they are easily corruptible?).

Honesty and perception should not be confused. You can state something "honestly" and still be wrong. But that is an old argument of what is truth.

As a skeptic, I find it a little alarming that you make a goal of new information and knowledge change your views. Unless I took what you wrote wrong, I see that as someone not able to change their minds when presented with information that contradicts a currently held belief. Someone like that should not be in the business of representing anyone.

I guess it all come down to my reservations on the CSM as a whole being fluff as well as a healthy distrust of people running for any political office.

Pretend for a moment I do decide to vote for CSM (might or might not happen), why would a vote for you be different that a vote for someone else? What will you bring to the CSM, what would you like to change and what do you see as things that are being done right?

I look forward to reading about your position.