Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 .. 13 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Delen Ormand
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
49
|
Posted - 2012.06.23 09:50:00 -
[31] - Quote
Xhaiden Ora wrote:Copine Callmeknau wrote:How is one meant to determine whether a mechanic is intended or not?
I think its pretty damn obvious this was not CCP's intention. Delen Ormand wrote:Wait, didn't the bankers make a shitload of money from fraud, then get bailed out with a shitload more money taken from the taxpayer and never really suffer any legal consequences for it? Essentially, yes. Following the op's logic you should just pat them on the back and tell em "Good game guys!". I mean, they were just using the game mechanics, right? -.-
What I meant was, they perpetrated fraud, brought the economy down, then got something better than a pat on the back - they got off pretty much scot-free, with the taxpayer carrying the can for them. Still, be a bit daft to compare punishments (or lack of) in the real world to a bit of white-collar Eve crime, so ignore me :) |

Ghost Xray
Hedion University Amarr Empire
48
|
Posted - 2012.06.23 09:51:00 -
[32] - Quote
Serptimis wrote:NickyYo wrote:Serptimis wrote:NickyYo wrote:Goons knew exactly what they were doing was exploiting.. hense the official goon thread they posted stated "We were waiting for the exploit to be been fixed before we posted this thread".
All the goon alts now on the forums crying, goon tears and the best tears, Goodbye goons!!
Time to quit and go back to second life, oh wait.. you was banned from that too? What a shocker you guys shot ya self in the foot with the one! They took advantage of a very poorly designed game mechanic, they didnt exploit an error in game coding Well they broke the EULA, they knew it was an exploit So thats that, and yes they did exploit an error in the game coding. Didnt CCP change FW to reward LP on value of kills made? And also designed the new valuation of items based on the value of average prices over 90 days. Wasnt that what these guys used? It may have been an error to design the game that way, but it was itentional
Riddle me this "Blue" guy.
Can I join RVB with alts on both sides? Can I then drive my Red guy into my Blue guy, say, 10,000 times in order to throw the stats/KB off? Would the CEO or whoever runs that show dismiss it? Or would they say, "hey guy, this isn't really why we have RVB. Go do that somewhere else."
I don't know if RVB care about KB stat padding or not.. doesn't matter. The point is RVB doesn't exist to let alts kill themselves.
Likewise, Faction Wars doesn't either. |

Xhaiden Ora
University of Caille Gallente Federation
139
|
Posted - 2012.06.23 10:09:00 -
[33] - Quote
Copine Callmeknau wrote:I could name a dozen things that are valid tactics yet equally an 'obvious exploit'
CCP pick and choose all the time
You seriously think CCP intended to flood the economy with billions of isk and drive down the value of LPs? =p |

Copine Callmeknau
Kangaroos With Frickin Lazerbeams Ninja Unicorns with Huge Horns
197
|
Posted - 2012.06.23 10:13:00 -
[34] - Quote
Xhaiden Ora wrote:Copine Callmeknau wrote:I could name a dozen things that are valid tactics yet equally an 'obvious exploit'
CCP pick and choose all the time You seriously think CCP intended to flood the economy with billions of isk and drive down the value of LPs? =p I don't pretend to know what they intended to do, but driving down the value of LP is the obvious consequence of reworking the LP store to give discounts.
Also if you believe the economy has been flooded with 'billion of isk' then you fail to understand how the LP store works. Billions of ISK flowed out of the economy, not into it There should be a rather awesome pic here |

Xhaiden Ora
University of Caille Gallente Federation
140
|
Posted - 2012.06.23 10:39:00 -
[35] - Quote
Copine Callmeknau wrote:I don't pretend to know what they intended to do, but driving down the value of LP is the obvious consequence of reworking the LP store to give discounts.
What they intended is the entire crux of the issue as what they intended determines whether or not this is an exploit. I sincerely do not believe they intended this otherwise there wouldn't be a problem. Obviously there's a problem. So it wasn't intended. Hence its an exploit. What CCP chooses to do about it is another matter but lets not pretend this is what CCP intended to happen.
Copine Callmeknau wrote: Also if you believe the economy has been flooded with 'billion of isk' then you fail to understand how the LP store works. Billions of ISK flowed out of the economy, not into it
Into certain wallets is likely a better way of putting it, yes. |

Copine Callmeknau
Kangaroos With Frickin Lazerbeams Ninja Unicorns with Huge Horns
197
|
Posted - 2012.06.23 10:50:00 -
[36] - Quote
Xhaiden Ora wrote:Copine Callmeknau wrote:I don't pretend to know what they intended to do, but driving down the value of LP is the obvious consequence of reworking the LP store to give discounts.
What they intended is the entire crux of the issue as what they intended determines whether or not this is an exploit. I sincerely do not believe they intended this otherwise there wouldn't be a problem. Obviously there's a problem. So it wasn't intended. Hence its an exploit. What CCP chooses to do about it is another matter but lets not pretend this is what CCP intended to happen. Copine Callmeknau wrote: Also if you believe the economy has been flooded with 'billion of isk' then you fail to understand how the LP store works. Billions of ISK flowed out of the economy, not into it
Into certain wallets is likely a better way of putting it, yes. I'm not saying it was intended, I'm saying it's impossible to know what CCP intend or don't intend, because GM's give contradictory responses when asked about these things and CCP in the past have approved activities as dubious as what the GS have done this last week Basically it's a crapshoot
Yes flowing into certain wallets is a better way of putting it, it's quite irrelevant though, money flows from one player to another on a daily basis. There should be a rather awesome pic here |

Cpt Roghie
13
|
Posted - 2012.06.23 10:52:00 -
[37] - Quote
NickyYo wrote:Goons knew exactly what they were doing was exploiting.. hense the official goon thread they posted stated "We were waiting for the exploit to be been fixed before we posted this thread".
All the goon alts now on the forums crying, goon tears and the best tears, Goodbye goons!!
Time to quit and go back to second life, oh wait.. you was banned from that too? What a shocker you guys shot ya self in the foot with this one!
Werent you supposed to quit? The amount of bulllshit comming out of you is incredible. Zzzzzzzz.
|

Talon SilverHawk
Patria o Muerte
479
|
Posted - 2012.06.23 10:57:00 -
[38] - Quote
Eugene Kerner wrote:NickyYo wrote:Serptimis wrote:NickyYo wrote:Goons knew exactly what they were doing was exploiting.. hense the official goon thread they posted stated "We were waiting for the exploit to be been fixed before we posted this thread".
All the goon alts now on the forums crying, goon tears and the best tears, Goodbye goons!!
Time to quit and go back to second life, oh wait.. you was banned from that too? What a shocker you guys shot ya self in the foot with the one! They took advantage of a very poorly designed game mechanic, they didnt exploit an error in game coding Well they broke the EULA, they knew it was an exploit So thats that, and yes they did exploit an error in the game coding. What they do happens every day in real life economy in some way.... in fact they may make things a little bit safer by showing us the flaws....the Spagetti-monster bless them
Yeah and in real life if they play the markets in a way not intended the FSA comes down hard and fines them. They should have just told CCP about the flaw in their plan, not used it then told them.
Tal
|

Dave stark
Martyr's Vengence Test Alliance Please Ignore
38
|
Posted - 2012.06.23 11:08:00 -
[39] - Quote
was it spotted on sisi before it went live? yes. did it go live anyway? yes.
i fail to see how it wasn't intended. |

Cpt Roghie
13
|
Posted - 2012.06.23 11:12:00 -
[40] - Quote
Talon SilverHawk wrote:Eugene Kerner wrote:NickyYo wrote:Serptimis wrote:NickyYo wrote:Goons knew exactly what they were doing was exploiting.. hense the official goon thread they posted stated "We were waiting for the exploit to be been fixed before we posted this thread".
All the goon alts now on the forums crying, goon tears and the best tears, Goodbye goons!!
Time to quit and go back to second life, oh wait.. you was banned from that too? What a shocker you guys shot ya self in the foot with the one! They took advantage of a very poorly designed game mechanic, they didnt exploit an error in game coding Well they broke the EULA, they knew it was an exploit So thats that, and yes they did exploit an error in the game coding. What they do happens every day in real life economy in some way.... in fact they may make things a little bit safer by showing us the flaws....the Spagetti-monster bless them Yeah and in real life if they play the markets in a way not intended the FSA comes down hard and fines them. They should have just told CCP about the flaw in their plan, not used it then told them. Tal
Eve =/= Real life. Zzzzzzzz.
|
|

Xhaiden Ora
University of Caille Gallente Federation
143
|
Posted - 2012.06.23 11:27:00 -
[41] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:was it spotted on sisi before it went live? yes. did it go live anyway? yes.
i fail to see how it wasn't intended.
If it was really intended it wouldn't be being investigated. Simple as that. Argue all you want, but CCP's actions reveal that this was not intended. |

Dave stark
Martyr's Vengence Test Alliance Please Ignore
39
|
Posted - 2012.06.23 11:29:00 -
[42] - Quote
Xhaiden Ora wrote:Dave stark wrote:was it spotted on sisi before it went live? yes. did it go live anyway? yes.
i fail to see how it wasn't intended. If it was really intended it wouldn't be being investigated. Simple as that. Argue all you want, but CCP's actions reveal that this was not intended. then CCP should stop releasing content before it has been tested/finished.
let's assume it wasn't intended; goons are now being investigated for CCP dropping the ball. i guess if blizz/activision can get away with poor treatment like that, CCP can too. |

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Industrial Complex Cosmic Consortium
1573
|
Posted - 2012.06.23 11:29:00 -
[43] - Quote
Copine Callmeknau wrote:I could name a dozen things that are valid tactics yet equally an 'obvious exploit'
Such as webbing freighters on undock and bumping them to prevent them docking, cancelling warp or getting away? Or perhaps fitting Titans in such a way that they can blow moving interceptors out of the sky? Some problems can be fixed (such as halving the tracking on XL turrets), others can't (such as the mechanics behind docking, warping and being able to stop a warp).
When you find yourself thinking, "when CCP see me doing this, they're sure to nerf it," or "I can't believe they didn't think of this," that should be a clue that what you are doing is likely to be classed as an exploit. The FW reward system was intended to reward people for engaging in PvP in the FW environment, not to reward people for blowing up ridiculously overvalued freighter loads of goods in hisec, far away from FW fleets. I don't expect anyone actually believes that the design intent of FW was to have players blowing up their own freighters in hisec.
The people involved were clever to work this system out to efficiently. They were too full of their own egos though, and ruined the gig for everyone.
Day 0 advice for new players: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=77176 |

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Industrial Complex Cosmic Consortium
1573
|
Posted - 2012.06.23 11:30:00 -
[44] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:then CCP should stop releasing content before it has been tested/finished.
Be careful what you wish for. Day 0 advice for new players: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=77176 |

Ghost Xray
Hedion University Amarr Empire
52
|
Posted - 2012.06.23 11:34:00 -
[45] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:was it spotted on sisi before it went live? yes. did it go live anyway? yes.
i fail to see how it wasn't intended.
Actually, I don't think it was. I had posted the question "if you say this was all done in the interest of helping out EvE and the community, then why not do the "proof of concept" on Sisi."
And the response was "not possible". And while I agree the market manipulation wasn't possible as the market doesn't exists there, generating crap loads of LP and presenting to the devs with "See, in 15 minutes I just earned 1 BILLION LP's. Are you sure you guys got this stuff right?"
So, no, it wasn't spotted on Sisi. And even if the market did exist and everything was doable on Sisi, they wouldn't have done it there anyway.
As they already stated, the point wasn't to QA the system design, the point was to get rich, filthy space rich. And, then try and shut down the operation by telling CCP about so that nobody else got space rich, because "that would be damaging". |

Dave stark
Martyr's Vengence Test Alliance Please Ignore
39
|
Posted - 2012.06.23 11:40:00 -
[46] - Quote
Ghost Xray wrote:Dave stark wrote:was it spotted on sisi before it went live? yes. did it go live anyway? yes.
i fail to see how it wasn't intended. Actually, I don't think it was. I had posted the question "if you say this was all done in the interest of helping out EvE and the community, then why not do the "proof of concept" on Sisi." And the response was "not possible". And while I agree the market manipulation wasn't possible as the market doesn't exists there, generating crap loads of LP and presenting to the devs with "See, in 15 minutes I just earned 1 BILLION LP's. Are you sure you guys got this stuff right?" So, no, it wasn't spotted on Sisi. And even if the market did exist and everything was doable on Sisi, they wouldn't have done it there anyway. As they already stated, the point wasn't to QA the system design, the point was to get rich, filthy space rich. And, then try and shut down the operation by telling CCP about so that nobody else got space rich, because "that would be damaging".
"Much of what we believed to be true could not be tested on SISI."
clearly the issue had already been identified, but was untested. it was spotted on sisi. |

The Chronophage
Garoun Investment Bank Gallente Federation
11
|
Posted - 2012.06.23 11:41:00 -
[47] - Quote
This happens IRL all the time. Bankers fix the system in such a way that the man on the street can't get a shot at the riches, lobbyist ensure that GE pays no taxes while the rest of us turn into peasants, Facebook insiders sell overprices shares to the public and BP pays a few million for permanently destroying the fisheries in the Gulf while still continuing to pump oil.
Smart people game the system even better than the people in charge of the system. The only way for us to stay in the game is to keep up. This is what makes EvE real.
|

Gun Gal
Dark Club
12
|
Posted - 2012.06.23 11:43:00 -
[48] - Quote
Beekeeper Bob wrote:Exploit is Exploit....No matter how you color it But i doubt anything serious will happen, CCP loves *snip* CCP It-¦s not allowed to insult CCP and it-¦s Member, so i fixed your post! See Forum Rules for further Information
ISD Dosnix
Please take this tissue and wipe the goon goo from your lips, its kinda revolting |

Ursula Thrace
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
51
|
Posted - 2012.06.23 11:47:00 -
[49] - Quote
Constable Chang wrote:In an MMO something is an exploit if the people who make the game say it is. Its really that simple.
constable hit the nail on the head.
Eve Online Original Intro |

Ghost Xray
Hedion University Amarr Empire
52
|
Posted - 2012.06.23 11:53:00 -
[50] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:Ghost Xray wrote:Dave stark wrote:was it spotted on sisi before it went live? yes. did it go live anyway? yes.
i fail to see how it wasn't intended. Actually, I don't think it was. I had posted the question "if you say this was all done in the interest of helping out EvE and the community, then why not do the "proof of concept" on Sisi." And the response was "not possible". And while I agree the market manipulation wasn't possible as the market doesn't exists there, generating crap loads of LP and presenting to the devs with "See, in 15 minutes I just earned 1 BILLION LP's. Are you sure you guys got this stuff right?" So, no, it wasn't spotted on Sisi. And even if the market did exist and everything was doable on Sisi, they wouldn't have done it there anyway. As they already stated, the point wasn't to QA the system design, the point was to get rich, filthy space rich. And, then try and shut down the operation by telling CCP about so that nobody else got space rich, because "that would be damaging". "Much of what we believed to be true could not be tested on SISI." clearly the issue had already been identified, but was untested. it was spotted on sisi.
The issue was spotted by reading the dev blogs about how they were going to reward LPs. It could have been demonstrated (at least the raping of the LP reward system anyway) and shown to CCP, but again, they didn't see the value in that.
Again, it was about "abusing", "exploiting", "cheating", "working" (whatever verb suits you) the situation for individual profit. |
|

Alexandra Delarge
The Korova
96
|
Posted - 2012.06.23 11:56:00 -
[51] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:was it spotted on sisi before it went live? yes. did it go live anyway? yes.
i fail to see how it wasn't intended. This |

Dave stark
Martyr's Vengence Test Alliance Please Ignore
40
|
Posted - 2012.06.23 12:00:00 -
[52] - Quote
Ghost Xray wrote:Dave stark wrote:Ghost Xray wrote:Dave stark wrote:was it spotted on sisi before it went live? yes. did it go live anyway? yes.
i fail to see how it wasn't intended. Actually, I don't think it was. I had posted the question "if you say this was all done in the interest of helping out EvE and the community, then why not do the "proof of concept" on Sisi." And the response was "not possible". And while I agree the market manipulation wasn't possible as the market doesn't exists there, generating crap loads of LP and presenting to the devs with "See, in 15 minutes I just earned 1 BILLION LP's. Are you sure you guys got this stuff right?" So, no, it wasn't spotted on Sisi. And even if the market did exist and everything was doable on Sisi, they wouldn't have done it there anyway. As they already stated, the point wasn't to QA the system design, the point was to get rich, filthy space rich. And, then try and shut down the operation by telling CCP about so that nobody else got space rich, because "that would be damaging". "Much of what we believed to be true could not be tested on SISI." clearly the issue had already been identified, but was untested. it was spotted on sisi. The issue was spotted by reading the dev blogs about how they were going to reward LPs. It could have been demonstrated (at least the raping of the LP reward system anyway) and shown to CCP, but again, they didn't see the value in that. Again, it was about "abusing", "exploiting", "cheating", "working" (whatever verb suits you) the situation for individual profit.
every thing people do in this game is for individual profit. they simply logged in, and played the game and made money, like every other player. just because CCP made this method of making money faster than another method of making money doesn't make it an exploit, or cheating, or abusing.
|

Lili Lu
290
|
Posted - 2012.06.23 12:04:00 -
[53] - Quote
It appears the proper tactic would have been to alert CCP to the problem. If CCP failed to do anything to correct it once alerted then use the problem to your advantage.
Unfortunately it appears these goon spacefriends used the problem to their advantage, then alerted CCP to the problem.
The problem here being the market basis formula and lp reward ratios.
Regardless one poster above, I can't remember who, identified another huge flaw in the new FW design. The advantages for acheiving each tier are massive. In a game with usually 5% advantages per level (with skills) who thought a 100% advantage per level or whatever the damn advantage is for each tier was a good idea. That and no reward at all for defensive plexing. I can understand wanting to favor offensive plexing and incentivize attainment of each tier, but the design here seems extreme.
Soundwave doesn't have to hope the system is broken, it is broken. |

Ghost Xray
Hedion University Amarr Empire
55
|
Posted - 2012.06.23 12:13:00 -
[54] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:
every thing people do in this game is for individual profit. they simply logged in, and played the game and made money, like every other player. just because CCP made this method of making money faster than another method of making money doesn't make it an exploit, or cheating, or abusing.
Ah, see, this is where you are confused.
"... CCP didn't make this method of making money..." at all. The intent of Faction War loyalty rewards isn't to make money, at least not excessively. The intent is to give people a little incentive to bother with it since you can't fund Faction War PVP with the traditional "moon goo", "abusive landlord", what have you.
And I believe this is why action was taken. Because they broke the intent and abused Faction Wars.
Unless you think making alts in all factions and killing yourself over and over is fun, then this whole things reeks of "lame emergent game play"
|

Ghost Xray
Hedion University Amarr Empire
55
|
Posted - 2012.06.23 12:19:00 -
[55] - Quote
Lili Lu wrote:It appears the proper tactic would have been to alert CCP to the problem. If CCP failed to do anything to correct it once alerted then use the problem to your advantage.
Unfortunately it appears these goon spacefriends used the problem to their advantage, then alerted CCP to the problem.
The problem here being the market basis formula and lp reward ratios.
Regardless one poster above, I can't remember who, identified another huge flaw in the new FW design. The advantages for acheiving each tier are massive. In a game with usually 5% advantages per level (with skills) who thought a 100% advantage per level or whatever the damn advantage is for each tier was a good idea. That and no reward at all for defensive plexing. I can understand wanting to favor offensive plexing and incentivize attainment of each tier, but the design here seems extreme.
Soundwave doesn't have to hope the system is broken, it is broken.
Yeah, and I agree here. CCP got themselves into a bad spot trying to polish this turd that is "Faction Wars". And that's why it's been largely unused and ignored.
But I do applaud them in trying to think of something to get more people shooting each other instead of shooting NPC's and rocks. |

Dave stark
Martyr's Vengence Test Alliance Please Ignore
40
|
Posted - 2012.06.23 12:29:00 -
[56] - Quote
Ghost Xray wrote:Dave stark wrote:
every thing people do in this game is for individual profit. they simply logged in, and played the game and made money, like every other player. just because CCP made this method of making money faster than another method of making money doesn't make it an exploit, or cheating, or abusing.
Ah, see, this is where you are confused. "... CCP didn't make this method of making money..." at all. The intent of Faction War loyalty rewards isn't to make money, at least not excessively. The intent is to give people a little incentive to bother with it since you can't fund Faction War PVP with the traditional "moon goo", "abusive landlord", what have you. And I believe this is why action was taken. Because they broke the intent and abused Faction Wars. Unless you think making alts in all factions and killing yourself over and over is fun, then this whole things reeks of " lame emergent game play"
telling me i'm confused, then telling me CCP didn't make it. then who did? the pixies?
seriously though; CCP did make the method, and people used it. i'm sure CCP didn't intend for FW to have this kind of result. at the end of the day though, it has happened. CCP should have just gone "ok, we had a few teething problems with it, it's now fixed, carry on." we all make mistakes and CCP made one by releasing FW in the state it was. goons shouldn't be punished for CCP releasing FW in the state they did.
also if you justify some thing's legitimacy by how fun it is; ban all miners. clearly they're all cheating because they're making money by doing some thing boring. |

Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
308
|
Posted - 2012.06.23 12:30:00 -
[57] - Quote
EvEa Deva wrote:Goons will get a wee wee slap im sure, would suck if they all rage quit 
Explain people what is the Wee Wee Slap first so they know how painful it can be:
You put someone in some closed room, no windows, no light, no water no food and no toilets and you make them listen this for 48h NON STOP brb |

Cpt Roghie
13
|
Posted - 2012.06.23 12:39:00 -
[58] - Quote
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:EvEa Deva wrote:Goons will get a wee wee slap im sure, would suck if they all rage quit  Explain people what is the Wee Wee Slap first so they know how painful it can be: You put someone in some closed room, no windows, no light, no water no food and no toilets and you make them listen this for 48h NON STOP
Oh yes Im sure that's sufficient punishment for doing something that was working as intended. I mean, why else put it up on TQ? Zzzzzzzz.
|

Florio
Miniature Giant Space Hamsters
45
|
Posted - 2012.06.23 12:40:00 -
[59] - Quote
Yes, it is CCP's fault: why the hell do they employ an economist in any case?
It is also an exploit if CCP decides it is, given that it's their game and the definition of an exploit is subjective.
In the past, CCP have called something that bypasses "Rules As Intended" as an exploit and I expect they will be consistent in this case.
And they should call it an exploit and they should get every last bit of profit back, as failing to do so would cause me, and many others I am sure, to leap towards the point of no return where you think "What's the frakkin' point? No amount of work or organisation could ever allow me to catch up with that amount of wealth." And that's where people just unsub.
Accordingly I'd disagree that this is a wonderful example of the colourful sandbox which will get more people to play the game. It'll put off any potential players (as well as any non-goon-butt-licker existing player).
Please don't get me wrong, I'm not saying this because I don't like Goons. Yes we all know they're generally a bunch of mom's-basement socially-deficient children, but ever since I read Mittani's first leaked eloquent address to them back in the BoB days I knew that Goon leadership would turn the rabble into a force to be reckoned with. Anyway, I have no particular hostility to them. |

Ghost Xray
Hedion University Amarr Empire
56
|
Posted - 2012.06.23 12:48:00 -
[60] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:
telling me i'm confused, then telling me CCP didn't make it. then who did? the pixies?
seriously though; CCP did make the method, and people used it. i'm sure CCP didn't intend for FW to have this kind of result. at the end of the day though, it has happened. CCP should have just gone "ok, we had a few teething problems with it, it's now fixed, carry on." we all make mistakes and CCP made one by releasing FW in the state it was. goons shouldn't be punished for CCP releasing FW in the state they did.
also if you justify some thing's legitimacy by how fun it is; ban all miners. clearly they're all cheating because they're making money by doing some thing boring.
I don't think anyone was really punished. There are some quibbles about "they took more they were supposed to" from someone who is still filthy space rich doesn't really make that much of a difference. They just didn't get to keep their ill gotten goods.
Had these dudes been banned you'd have a point.
And regarding miners... no, they shouldn't be banned, but they shouldn't get to be trillionaires for mining in high sec either (And I think Goons and co. are actively making sure that is the case). I'll chalk that up with "lame emergent game play" as well. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 .. 13 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |