| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 .. 13 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
332
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 15:26:00 -
[121] - Quote
Does this whole thing come under "The Presumption of Safety"
Did these 5 players honestly believe they would be allowed to get away with the use of such an exploit free and clear?
Do members of Goonswarm now " rush to the forums and loudly bleat out their indignation and horror at encountering loss or danger."?
Have Goonswarm now become like "Those howling about the unfairness of Hulkageddon and the demands from entitled easymoders that the rules be changed to make EVE safer are particularly deserving of scorn because of the wealth of information and tactics used daily to avoid death in Hulkageddon."?
The risks of there actions were well documented, CCP has shown time and again that the destruction of your own belongings to get rich is not what EvE is about.
They have also shown what happens to those who deliberately exploit a bug. http://community.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&bid=626
Was the Mittani right "It is this combination of ignorance and entitlement that threatens EVE."? Did these players think they were above the rules?
I think The Mittani sums up these players actions well with "signs that this kind of passive, ignorant, and entitled player is infecting the playerbase and beginning to make demands that CCP change the nature of EVE itself to accommodate their stupidity."
So all I can say is that they did the crime and should do the time. That punishment is in the POS bug and is a precedent that should be followed.
Exerts from Sins of a Solar Spymaster #79: The Presumption of Safety by The Mittani http://www.tentonhammer.com/eve/spymaster/79 Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|

Pr1ncess Alia
Perkone Caldari State
226
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 15:29:00 -
[122] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote: The game mechanics involved were clearly twisted in ways CCP don't approve of, and their developer on the spot has already stated they would be in their rights to punish on breach of the rules.
For my part, I think its creative abuse for sure. The market manipulation/exploit was cunning. I don't really like the lp-duping/double-counting thing though (that was obviously broken as all hell) - and the admission of keyboard macro abuse during the cash out is distasteful. But yeah, CCP is in a bind here.
If they punish the goons appropriately the goonswarm is going to go mental. Threadnaughts and summer of tears etc. Threats of negative PR -mass unsubs - and all that, hell goons might even show up and shoot the jita monument (once the wardec 1.1 change strips them of all unwanted opposition in hisec).
If they don't punish appropriately (returning the loots, letting off the perpetrators with the lightest of slaps) then everyone else will be thinking that goons are treated with kid gloves and let off for things that other players would be ban-hammered mercilessly for.
Goons are already the CCP poster children for emergent gameplay (ie griefing hisec) and lauded in the gaming press and development conferences by CCP officials - and if they don't get an appropriate punishment for an exploit on this truly staggering scale then :shrug: I guess a lot of players may be considering their subscriptions anyway, Eve as a sandbox economic simulation becomes a lot less attracive for many when its clear that the largest alliance in the space has already rigged the game beyond any significant chance they will ever lose their position of absolute dominance.
So this is probably the "great war" we've all been missing the last few years, and its not a clash of spaceships in 0.0, its not propaganda and plots laid at BBQ's in 2006, its not about the CSM and stacking the player council and its not about G19 macro's hammering out LP offer accepts for 28 hours straight,
Its pretty much a war for the soul of Eve Online and at the end of it we'll know whether its truly CCP the developer or Goons the the something awful forums mega-alliance, that calls the shots in this game universe. I think its probably the first time in the history of massively multiplayer online gaming that there has been a war of this scale and significance - and once again Eve Online is the forerunner of some truly emergent gameplay on levels of metagaming that would make other games crawl up in a corner and cry themselves to sleep.
Still lets all keep watching. After all, this time next year the goon economic cabal might be dictating terms to the president of Iceland!
I think both you and goons need to get over goons.
They may be the loudest, they may even be the best organized... but they are a tiny tiny fraction of the people that play this game. They will cry and kick dirt around until something else grabs their attention or steals the spotlight from them.
This isn't a court of law, CCP isn't going to rue the day they messed with goons, they aren't caught in some tricky predicament where their only move left is to say "gee goons, you got us this time, you win the game". It's their game, their stuff and they are going to manage it in the way that is most fair to all players AND healthiest for the game's success.
As for the rest of the players: Even if you spent a month trying to convince people to care you will still have an infinitesimal percentage of the playerbase even knowing this drama exists... the number that actually care and will talk with their wallets? Negligible. I see and hear no sentiments that ppl want bans passed out... what ppl that do care usually first say "meh, impressive" and then continue with one of two things "they should let goons keep the stuff" and "they should reverse the damage goons made".
Either way, I'm not getting the feeling that CCP is going to have ppl unsubbing if they DO take away a goons exploited assets. If they don't, there might be a blip on the radar on ppl in FW that quit, but my guess is most would just lose interest in FW. So, not so much CCP losing income/players over this, but if they don't reverse the damage they could lose FW which they just decided to try and invest in.
We are approaching year 10 of this game. This is old hat for CCP. Nerds tried to break their game and got smacked. It really is that simple. Nothing is going to snowball from this, there will be no internet movement to save the goons exploited assets and what little there might be is the same, tired out crap, they pull time and time again.
However, I will point out that if this is completely unprecedented and unjust, goons might want to consider finding another videogame? Because that would happen in reality right?? (LOlololol).
Goons need to remember it's them logging in to CCP's servers every morning to get their epic nerd fix. Not the other way around. If they had ANY true conviction, they'd have all left years ago. They are trolling (because that's all they do) and I'm not sure they even know it anymore.
It's beyond people not trusting the boy calling wolf. Most have cotton in their ears now, they don't even care about the crazy/delusional kid screaming outside, because that's all he's done for 7 years.
Malacath Azaria wrote:CCP were told during testing that something like this could happen & they blatantly ignored everyone. In doing this, they condoned the action wether they intended to or not.
In other news, how's business?
Before I forget.... What hair bleach do you use?
Oh dear. So they didn't just ignore it. They BLATANTLY ignored it. ooooooo
They didn't condone crap and you know it. They didn't condone it by not catching it and they CERTAINLY didn't condone it because you say they did. |

Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
332
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 15:29:00 -
[123] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Frying Doom wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Frying Doom wrote:The people who did that were smaller offenders and didn't smear CCP's face in it. The LP scam is worse than the POS guys ever did. The insurance fraud helped depress mineral prices for years though, as did the drone regions through gunmining. PA also helped make sure nocx never rose much above 900. These three things have probably had more of an effect on the economy as a whole (and as a result the profitability of the miners as a profession) than anything else we've talked about so far. Possibly but the people involved didn't go out of there way to make CCP look incompetent. So what you're saying is that it's not the size of the operation, nor the effect it has on the economy, but how embarassed CCP got? I'm saying you pull a tiger by the tail, it will not just ignore you. You make it public, you make it a bigger thing. Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|

Antisocial Malkavian
Aliastra Gallente Federation
165
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 15:30:00 -
[124] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Antisocial Malkavian wrote:
Guess CCP got tired of being taken advantage of?
Not real good for CCP's public face. They get accused of supporting a large alliance over the War dec thing and now a week later members of the same alliance are rubbing there face in it. They really didn't need this one now.
Summer's the only time Ive seen them CARE about their "public" face rather than telling ppl to HTFU
http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears
you will be harvested |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
2511
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 15:35:00 -
[125] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote: Last I checked, G15/G19 were on the allowed list, as long as the user was still at the keyboard.
I imagine CCP will be able to reach their own conclusions (by analyzing how the macro's functioned over time) as to whether users were at the keyboard or not. As I said in the substantive post this is a partisan argument and there isn't likely to be much valid argumentation coming from people in the perpetrator's alliance.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom Epic Inferno Wardec Test, Sign up and shoot Goons for free! |

Antisocial Malkavian
Aliastra Gallente Federation
166
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 15:36:00 -
[126] - Quote
Andreus Ixiris wrote:Almost everything Goons do is - self-avowedly, no less - an attempt to show people that all actions they take have consequences, and not neccessarily ones they'll like, either.
I'm amused that Goons are reacting so negatively to the undesirable consequences that actions they took precipitated.
Yeah this is pretty funny
http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears
you will be harvested |

Antisocial Malkavian
Aliastra Gallente Federation
166
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 15:40:00 -
[127] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:Lord Zim wrote: Last I checked, G15/G19 were on the allowed list, as long as the user was still at the keyboard.
I imagine CCP will be able to reach their own conclusions (by analyzing how the macro's functioned over time) as to whether users were at the keyboard or not. As I said in the substantive post this is a partisan argument and there isn't likely to be much valid argumentation coming from people in the perpetrator's alliance.
I liked the rumor trolling tho Cause apparently the new rule makes it.... not trolling too? http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears
you will be harvested |

Lord Zim
932
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 15:43:00 -
[128] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:Lord Zim wrote: Last I checked, G15/G19 were on the allowed list, as long as the user was still at the keyboard.
I imagine CCP will be able to reach their own conclusions (by analyzing how the macro's functioned over time) as to whether users were at the keyboard or not. As I said in the substantive post this is a partisan argument and there isn't likely to be much valid argumentation coming from people in the perpetrator's alliance. You said it was "admission of keyboard macro abuse". You've got no idea how it was used, so I guess you've just started or reinforced a rumor. |

Prandax Xeon
Rapier Innovations
10
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 15:47:00 -
[129] - Quote
I say this whole thing is unfair and the Goons need to show CCP who they are dealing with. On the count of 3 all Goons need to unsubscribe to show CCP how unfair this is. We all know CCP only cares about money, so ---
1
2
3 - all goons hit ctr-Q and unsubscribe!!!!!!!!!!!!! How is a Wyvern like an Ibis?-á Neither have a drone bay!-á-á |

Antisocial Malkavian
Aliastra Gallente Federation
166
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 15:49:00 -
[130] - Quote
Prandax Xeon wrote:I say this whole thing is unfair and the Goons need to show CCP who they are dealing with. On the count of 3 all Goons need to unsubscribe to show CCP how unfair this is. We all know CCP only cares about money, so ---
1
2
3 - all goons hit ctr-Q and unsubscribe!!!!!!!!!!!!!
or "burn it down" like I keep hearing
http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears
you will be harvested |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
2511
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 15:50:00 -
[131] - Quote
Wisdom Divine wrote:This argument is not partisan.
The way CCP is handling this, it seems the scale of the operation had precedence over the legality of the operation.
A true sandbox can only be concerned about legality, not scale.
Sometimes you need to sit back and have a dispassonate look at the absurdity of some of these statements. CCP is a games company that run an MMO for profit. They are not some kind of Stanford Prison Experiment style academic study on the psychology of sandbox behaviour. This is a game first and foremost. If some of the players are cheating at the game they need to be stopped so the rest of the players can enjoy the game on the assumption that the game rules are preserved by the organizer.
If you guys really want to do the academic experimentation thing you should probably write up an abstract and pitch for funding.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom Epic Inferno Wardec Test, Sign up and shoot Goons for free! |

SavageBastard
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 15:52:00 -
[132] - Quote
Wisdom Divine wrote:This argument is not partisan.
The way CCP is handling this, it seems the scale of the operation had precedence over the legality of the operation.
A true sandbox can only be concerned about legality, not scale.
It is partisan in that by creating "two sides" Jade can put itself as the center of attention of one of them. |

Alexandra Delarge
The Korova
96
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 15:53:00 -
[133] - Quote
I'm not sure if this is relevant but maybe CCP should have read some of the comments when they first announced the changes to FW a few months ago.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1273664#post1273664
|

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
2511
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 15:55:00 -
[134] - Quote
[quote=Lord ZimYou said it was "admission of keyboard macro abuse"..[/quote]
Mainly because your guy has admitted he used a keyboard macro to automate the collection of loyalty store payouts.
Protip : when I collected my loyalty store items I needed to click the button manually for 15mins straight - it was hellishly boring - somebody automating this process gains an advantage over me!
The eula is pretty explicit on this case and you've already lost this argument in the other thread.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom Epic Inferno Wardec Test, Sign up and shoot Goons for free! |

Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
333
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 15:57:00 -
[135] - Quote
Maybe they did and decided other things needed fixing first. After all who would try to exploit a known bug. You would have to be a fool wouldn't you. Imagine what the egg on you face would look like if you got caught.
Or gloated about it in General discussion. Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|

Lord Zim
933
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 15:59:00 -
[136] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:Lord Zim wrote: You said it was "admission of keyboard macro abuse".. Mainly because your guy has admitted he used a keyboard macro to automate the collection of loyalty store payouts. Protip : when I collected my loyalty store items I needed to click the button manually for 15mins straight - it was hellishly boring - somebody automating this process gains an advantage over me! The eula is pretty explicit on this case and you've already lost this argument in the other thread. You mean the argument where you assumed it was an automatic loop which went for 14 hours straight, which would be banned by the EULA, instead of making things like one keypress pressing F1, F2, F3 etc, which is allowed? |

Lord Zim
933
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 16:08:00 -
[137] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Maybe they did and decided other things needed fixing first. Last I checked, misc ccp devs were saying that the days of "it's time to launch, nevermind its state just launch it and we'll fix it later" were over. Which would mean that they should've delayed the launch until they reworked the mechanic until it was no longer gameable. |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
2512
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 16:14:00 -
[138] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Jade Constantine wrote:Lord Zim wrote: You said it was "admission of keyboard macro abuse".. Mainly because your guy has admitted he used a keyboard macro to automate the collection of loyalty store payouts. Protip : when I collected my loyalty store items I needed to click the button manually for 15mins straight - it was hellishly boring - somebody automating this process gains an advantage over me! The eula is pretty explicit on this case and you've already lost this argument in the other thread. You mean the argument where you assumed
I mean precisely what I said. I don't need a goonswarm forum spin-doctor to reinterpret my posts. (and nor frankly does anyone else actually wanting an open discussion).
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom Epic Inferno Wardec Test, Sign up and shoot Goons for free! |

stoicfaux
1130
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 16:17:00 -
[139] - Quote
Xython wrote:Beekeeper Bob wrote:Exploit is Exploit....No matter how you color it But i doubt anything serious will happen, CCP loves the Goonies too much....  Please explain to me how using a poorly but intentionally designed game mechanic to it's breaking point is an Exploit. Go ahead, I'll wait. If your answer is logically equivalent to "because Goons" we reserve the right to laugh at you.
When it potentially imbalances the game, thus potentially affecting CCP's income from the game. Business rules trump game rules, in other words.
So, as well thought out and as well implemented as it was, the market/FW/LP manipulation sounds like it is simply too egregious and too game imbalancing for CCP to ignore. Should the innovators/perpetrators be heavily punished? Nah. Should their hard-won/ill-gotten gains be removed? I hate to say it, but probably yes. =/
You can tell me what is and isn't Truth when you pry the tinfoil from my cold, lifeless head.
|

Varesk
Mafia Redux Black Legion.
100
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 16:17:00 -
[140] - Quote
They didnt exploit anything, they used the game that CCP gave us to the fullest extent. CCP just ignored the feedback threads about what would happen. CCP was caught with their pants around their ankles and bent over the desk. They are doing the only thing CCP knows how to do, which is remove legally gained assets and silence the players via moderation or forum bans.
CCP really ****** this expansion up with the "revamp" to faction warfare and the new Inventory. Its sorta funny since they had 6 months to work on it. Considering Crucible was done in 4-6 weeks.
Maybe its time for CCP to start only doing one expansion a year and make sure its 100 percent ready for TQ. Hire some people to actually QA the patch, instead of using SiSi and not reading the feedback threads.
This summers expansion, not the worse by far but close, is just another notch in CCPs belt for delivering expansions with more problems than actual fixes. |

Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
333
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 16:23:00 -
[141] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Frying Doom wrote:Maybe they did and decided other things needed fixing first. Last I checked, misc ccp devs were saying that the days of "it's time to launch, nevermind its state just launch it and we'll fix it later" were over. Which would mean that they should've delayed the launch until they reworked the mechanic until it was no longer gameable. If they did that we would never see anything and it would end up being like the United Sates Government procurement programs, they would spend lots of money and we would never see anything.
As it was a known bug, people should have had enough brains not to touch it. The documentation on it was public but so was the bug.
They exploited a known bug and should be punished for it. Saying but CCP left it there is hardly a valid excuse. Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|

Lord Zim
935
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 16:25:00 -
[142] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Jade Constantine wrote:Lord Zim wrote: You said it was "admission of keyboard macro abuse".. Mainly because your guy has admitted he used a keyboard macro to automate the collection of loyalty store payouts. Protip : when I collected my loyalty store items I needed to click the button manually for 15mins straight - it was hellishly boring - somebody automating this process gains an advantage over me! The eula is pretty explicit on this case and you've already lost this argument in the other thread. You mean the argument where you assumed I mean precisely what I said. I don't need a goonswarm forum spin-doctor to reinterpret my posts. (and nor frankly does anyone else actually wanting an open discussion). Yeah, well, see, the problem with your assumption is that for it to be "automating this process to gain an advantage over you", it would have to be the "press once, go make dinner" type of macro. As this quote shows:
Aryth wrote:G19 macro you hold down. You have to pay attention due to FW fluctuations and such. This was also over WEEKS, not days. We were in motion within 8 hours of patch. it's perfectly legal as CCP themselves have stated, as it requires the user be at the keyboard.
So uh, yes, I definitely "lost" that argument. |

Pr1ncess Alia
Perkone Caldari State
226
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 16:26:00 -
[143] - Quote
Varesk wrote:
They didnt exploit anything, they used the game that CCP gave us to the fullest extent. CCP just ignored the feedback threads about what would happen. CCP was caught with their pants around their ankles and bent over the desk. They are doing the only thing CCP knows how to do, which is remove legally gained assets and silence the players via moderation or forum bans.
CCP really ****** this expansion up with the "revamp" to faction warfare and the new Inventory. Its sorta funny since they had 6 months to work on it. Considering Crucible was done in 4-6 weeks.
Maybe its time for CCP to start only doing one expansion a year and make sure its 100 percent ready for TQ. Hire some people to actually QA the patch, instead of using SiSi and not reading the feedback threads.
This summers expansion, not the worse by far but close, is just another notch in CCPs belt for delivering expansions with more problems than actual fixes.
outside of goonswarm and inventory fix's aside.... the latest patches have been resounding successes across the eve community
The people playing, not exploiting, FW are loving it.
Maybe it's time you realize the game grows, expands and there will be mistakes. Goons being crybabies is evidence of their inability to deal with this (or insistence to troll it) ... the game itself and the development process seems to be a green light for 99% of the game.
Or maybe goons just need to learn how to play? I mean, this latest stunt was about 75% stupid and ill conceived and 25% in game savy and I'm pretty sure the "CCP isn't perfect therefore they've poisoned the games foundation"
and what are you on about "legally gained assets"? If we needed any more proof you have no idea what you are talking about...
let me guess. You're a big time lawyer in RL and your firm will be contacting Iceland through the UN to address this violation of international rights?
|

Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
333
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 16:26:00 -
[144] - Quote
Varesk wrote:
They didnt exploit anything, they used the game that CCP gave us to the fullest extent. CCP just ignored the feedback threads about what would happen. CCP was caught with their pants around their ankles and bent over the desk. They are doing the only thing CCP knows how to do, which is remove legally gained assets and silence the players via moderation or forum bans.
CCP really ****** this expansion up with the "revamp" to faction warfare and the new Inventory. Its sorta funny since they had 6 months to work on it. Considering Crucible was done in 4-6 weeks.
Maybe its time for CCP to start only doing one expansion a year and make sure its 100 percent ready for TQ. Hire some people to actually QA the patch, instead of using SiSi and not reading the feedback threads.
This summers expansion, not the worse by far but close, is just another notch in CCPs belt for delivering expansions with more problems than actual fixes.
As this was explained so heavily during the last CSM election as CSM 6's baby, if you don't like it, don't vote for people who were on CSM 6. Find someone who represents you better and fight for them. Or just make up crackpot conspiracy theories lol. Oh wait they can be counted as rumors, so don't do that  Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|

Wisdom Divine
State Protectorate Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 16:45:00 -
[145] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:Wisdom Divine wrote:This argument is not partisan.
The way CCP is handling this, it seems the scale of the operation had precedence over the legality of the operation.
A true sandbox can only be concerned about legality, not scale. Sometimes you need to sit back and have a dispassonate look at the absurdity of some of these statements. CCP is a games company that run an MMO for profit. They are not some kind of Stanford Prison Experiment style academic study on the psychology of sandbox behaviour. This is a game first and foremost. If some of the players are cheating at the game they need to be stopped so the rest of the players can enjoy the game on the assumption that the game rules are preserved by the organizer. If you guys really want to do the academic experimentation thing you should probably write up an abstract and pitch for funding.
Nice strawman you have going there.
When somebody is punished for an otherwise legal action only because of its scale, it wasn't cheating. It wasn't breaking the rules. It was punishing success.
I have no beef with either Goons or anti-Goons. Perhaps that is why I can see something you failed to. It's not just players who cheat. Devs can cheat too. It has happened at least once before.
CCP vowed it won't happen again. That's why rules should be the same for everyone. Clear rules keep check on both players and devs.
Judging legality is a very good way to have clear rules.
Judging scale not so much. If CCP is indeed choosing scale over legality in the FW fiasco, it's a backward step to the times CCP vowed to never happen again.
|

Pr1ncess Alia
Perkone Caldari State
226
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 16:51:00 -
[146] - Quote
Wisdom Divine wrote:Jade Constantine wrote:Wisdom Divine wrote:This argument is not partisan.
The way CCP is handling this, it seems the scale of the operation had precedence over the legality of the operation.
A true sandbox can only be concerned about legality, not scale. Sometimes you need to sit back and have a dispassonate look at the absurdity of some of these statements. CCP is a games company that run an MMO for profit. They are not some kind of Stanford Prison Experiment style academic study on the psychology of sandbox behaviour. This is a game first and foremost. If some of the players are cheating at the game they need to be stopped so the rest of the players can enjoy the game on the assumption that the game rules are preserved by the organizer. If you guys really want to do the academic experimentation thing you should probably write up an abstract and pitch for funding. Nice strawman you have going there. When somebody is punished for an otherwise legal action only because of its scale, it wasn't cheating. It wasn't breaking the rules. It was punishing success. I have no beef with either Goons or anti-Goons. Perhaps that is why I can see something you failed to. It's not just players who cheat. Devs can cheat too. It has happened at least once before. CCP vowed it won't happen again. That's why rules should be the same for everyone. Clear rules keep check on both players and devs. Judging legality is a very good way to have clear rules. Judging scale not so much. If CCP is indeed choosing scale over legality in the FW fiasco, it's a backward step to the times CCP vowed to never happen again.
you used that word again, legal action
how is it legal? What laws are these things covered under? What jurisdiction are we in for this discussion?
or would you mean "Permitted by the EULA of the game, which also states CCP can pretty much change their minds on any of those rules because they own and operate the game, including complete ownership of any virtual goods in your wallet or assets window"
I agree, mine is a bit of a mouthful... but much more technically correct than your "legal actions" crap
at what point will Goons be lawyering up? Since this is a legal matter and all. |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
2512
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 16:53:00 -
[147] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Aryth wrote:G19 macro you hold down. You have to pay attention due to FW fluctuations and such. This was also over WEEKS, not days. We were in motion within 8 hours of patch. it's perfectly legal as CCP themselves have stated, as it requires the user be at the keyboard. So uh, yes, I definitely "lost" that argument.
As I said, only CCP can be counted on to look at the pattern of macro use in this case and decide if it was consistant with giving the user an advantage in acquiring wealth in game. I'm hardly likely to count the words of the perpetrator of this exploit as somehow being sufficient to decide the whole of the story now am I?
I doesn't matter if Aryth was afk for 28 hours or 2 mins. If that macro was running to automate the collection of lp store offers that cost a normal player 2 clicks each then he was gaining an unfair advantage by macro. Its pretty astonishing you cannot see the problem with your argument - but then again - :goons:
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom Epic Inferno Wardec Test, Sign up and shoot Goons for free! |

Antisocial Malkavian
Aliastra Gallente Federation
166
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 16:58:00 -
[148] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Jade Constantine wrote:Lord Zim wrote: You said it was "admission of keyboard macro abuse".. Mainly because your guy has admitted he used a keyboard macro to automate the collection of loyalty store payouts. Protip : when I collected my loyalty store items I needed to click the button manually for 15mins straight - it was hellishly boring - somebody automating this process gains an advantage over me! The eula is pretty explicit on this case and you've already lost this argument in the other thread. You mean the argument where you assumed I mean precisely what I said. I don't need a goonswarm forum spin-doctor to reinterpret my posts. (and nor frankly does anyone else actually wanting an open discussion).
Including sreegs in the now-locked thread lol
Quote:Lord Zim wrote: Frying Doom wrote: Maybe they did and decided other things needed fixing first.
Last I checked, misc ccp devs were saying that the days of "it's time to launch, nevermind its state just launch it and we'll fix it later" were over. Which would mean that they should've delayed the launch until they reworked the mechanic until it was no longer gameable.
last I checked because CCP made the mistake of allowing the exploit into the game didnt make it right to exploit that exploit. http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears
you will be harvested |

Mortimer Civeri
Aliastra Gallente Federation
121
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 17:10:00 -
[149] - Quote
Varesk wrote: They didnt exploit anything, they used the game that CCP gave us to the fullest extent. CCP just ignored the feedback threads about what would happen. This right here ladies, gentlemen, and Jade Constantine, is the entire crux of the debacle. CCP was warned in the discussion of the Dev Blog, and in the testing threads, that this might happen. CCP could have come right out and stated, when it hit TQ, that there might be a potential exploit by gaming the LP rewards for kills, and anybody caught doing that would be punnished. People warned CCP, and it is now left cleaning up the masive mess, which could have been avoided with a few simple words.
"I don't know which is worse, ...that everyone has his price, or that the price is always so low." Calvin
|

Lord Zim
935
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 17:13:00 -
[150] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Aryth wrote:G19 macro you hold down. You have to pay attention due to FW fluctuations and such. This was also over WEEKS, not days. We were in motion within 8 hours of patch. it's perfectly legal as CCP themselves have stated, as it requires the user be at the keyboard. So uh, yes, I definitely "lost" that argument. CCP have stated NOTHING yet in relation to this macro lp store collection issue. So please stop lying and making things up. I'm not lying or making things up, you're the one who's interpreting and assuming what the nature of the keyboard macro is, and by essence start a rumor.
Jade Constantine wrote:I doesn't matter if Aryth was afk for 28 hours or 2 mins. If that macro was running to automate the collection of lp store offers that cost a normal player 2 clicks each then he was gaining an unfair advantage by macro. Its pretty astonishing you cannot see the problem with your argument - but then again - :goons: Sounds to me like you've pretty much made up your mind. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 .. 13 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |