Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

masternerdguy
Gallente Etched Hull Innovative Enterprises Don't Feed the Bears
|
Posted - 2010.01.09 05:55:00 -
[1]
Edited by: masternerdguy on 09/01/2010 05:56:38 Hulkageddon is the kind of thing that makes EVE a fun game. In most MMOs everyone is safe to make money in their little world.....
NOT IN EVE
EVE has real risk and I like that. Hulkageddon is the stuff CCP loves, lets be honest. It builds publicity.
Did you know the average mining Hulk is fitted for almost 300m? Its terrifying. Especially with how inneficient and uneeded mining is to EVE's economy.
Mining on one's own as a noobie hulk often produces less isk/hour than a level 3 mission. With good mining skill support, you still make less than a level 4. Also, mining is the most unsafe profit generator you can do in hi sec.
It is not hard to gank a hulk. Here's how: You need a battleship that can drop out an alpha damage of about 3,000. This will melt most mining barges. Hulks are a bit tricky, since they have good resists and can tank. So take 2 BS for them.
1. To clarify, no miners! Your not special and you do not support EVE's economy. Almost all manufacturing is done with refined mission loot. Why? Because you can get large quantities of rare ores in total safety! For a miner to do it they have to go to low or null sec!
2. Everyone seems to think Hulkageddon is mean....it really isnt especially with how avoidable it is. Just don't mine without support. And no, an orca fitted for max profit is not support. Effective mining ops employ hired thugs in their corps flying dominixes to bring the pain on gankers.
3. IF you don't like it, you have the power to stop it. All you have to do is unite and defend yourselves. But instead your willing to let yourselves get ganked 1 by 1.
Defense: I really posted this to tell you how to defend urselves. 1. dont mine alone 2. fit your ship for tank not max cargo capacity. 3. carry combat drones. 4. RR fleet mates are your friends. 5. mine in obscure places.
|

Lord Windu
Echelon Solutions Echelon.
|
Posted - 2010.01.09 06:02:00 -
[2]
Yeah Hulkageddon really needed another thread. ------
|

Konoch
Caldari Azriel's Legion Free Worlds Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.01.09 06:19:00 -
[3]
Originally by: masternerdguy Edited by: masternerdguy on 09/01/2010 05:56:38 Hulkageddon is the kind of thing that makes EVE a fun game. In most MMOs everyone is safe to make money in their little world.....
NOT IN EVE
EVE has real risk and I like that. Hulkageddon is the stuff CCP loves, lets be honest. It builds publicity.
Did you know the average mining Hulk is fitted for almost 300m? Its terrifying. Especially with how inneficient and uneeded mining is to EVE's economy.
Mining on one's own as a noobie hulk often produces less isk/hour than a level 3 mission. With good mining skill support, you still make less than a level 4. Also, mining is the most unsafe profit generator you can do in hi sec.
It is not hard to gank a hulk. Here's how: You need a battleship that can drop out an alpha damage of about 3,000. This will melt most mining barges. Hulks are a bit tricky, since they have good resists and can tank. So take 2 BS for them.
1. To clarify, no miners! Your not special and you do not support EVE's economy. Almost all manufacturing is done with refined mission loot. Why? Because you can get large quantities of rare ores in total safety! For a miner to do it they have to go to low or null sec!
2. Everyone seems to think Hulkageddon is mean....it really isnt especially with how avoidable it is. Just don't mine without support. And no, an orca fitted for max profit is not support. Effective mining ops employ hired thugs in their corps flying dominixes to bring the pain on gankers.
3. IF you don't like it, you have the power to stop it. All you have to do is unite and defend yourselves. But instead your willing to let yourselves get ganked 1 by 1.
Defense: I really posted this to tell you how to defend urselves. 1. dont mine alone 2. fit your ship for tank not max cargo capacity. 3. carry combat drones. 4. RR fleet mates are your friends. 5. mine in obscure places.
When the prices of ships and modules go so high that you cant fit your pretty little HAC for less than it costs for a CNR dont ***** to me. Hulkageddon is pointless dumb and will make prices skyrocket throughout all of eve. Hulks will hit 400 million. Most ships will likely double in price if the current rate of killing continues and POS's will shut down across eve because ice mining is probably going to be the most effected from everything thats happened already. 612 exhumers at last count. Congrats boys you're hitting the supply lines for the entire game now you get to see a glimpse of the future of real life.
|

masternerdguy
Gallente Etched Hull Innovative Enterprises Don't Feed the Bears
|
Posted - 2010.01.09 06:24:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Konoch
When the prices of ships and modules go so high that you cant fit your pretty little HAC for less than it costs for a CNR dont ***** to me. Hulkageddon is pointless dumb and will make prices skyrocket throughout all of eve. Hulks will hit 400 million. Most ships will likely double in price if the current rate of killing continues and POS's will shut down across eve because ice mining is probably going to be the most effected from everything thats happened already. 612 exhumers at last count. Congrats boys you're hitting the supply lines for the entire game now you get to see a glimpse of the future of real life.
Miners are not the source of all minerals most mins come from missions.
I cannot stress this enough. Also, most ships are NOT made at ship assembly arrays in POSes. Also needs stress.
|

De'Veldrin
Minmatar Special Projects Executive The Obsidian Legion
|
Posted - 2010.01.09 06:30:00 -
[5]
Originally by: masternerdguy most mins come from missions.
40% is not most. It's not even half. It is some, or at best, a lot.
--Vel
Brand new year, same old attitude. |

Bane Loppknow
Pel Industries
|
Posted - 2010.01.09 06:31:00 -
[6]
I would like to point out that using combat drones on a suicide ganker in highsec is a very bad idea. Concord WILL pop them, all you need to do is survive long enough. By siccing your drones on them, all you've done is make it perfectly legal for anyone in their corp to come shoot you.
|

masternerdguy
Gallente Etched Hull Innovative Enterprises Don't Feed the Bears
|
Posted - 2010.01.09 06:34:00 -
[7]
Originally by: De'Veldrin
Originally by: masternerdguy most mins come from missions.
40% is not most. It's not even half. It is some, or at best, a lot.
lol 40%......hahahahaah Ok 40%, but lets take something into consideration.
Where do you get morphite in hi sec? How about zydrine?
Exactly. All the GOOD minerals come from missions. So what if you can provide 9 trillion veldspar if thats all you can provide.
Not to mention missions provide salvage for rig building.
|

Omara Otawan
|
Posted - 2010.01.09 06:35:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Bane Loppknow I would like to point out that using combat drones on a suicide ganker in highsec is a very bad idea. Concord WILL pop them, all you need to do is survive long enough. By siccing your drones on them, all you've done is make it perfectly legal for anyone in their corp to come shoot you.
Fail. You only made it legal for ONE person to shoot you, and that one person will have GCC as long as you have agression.
|

Akita T
Caldari Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
|
Posted - 2010.01.09 06:42:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Konoch When the prices of ships and modules go so high that you cant fit your pretty little HAC for less than it costs for a CNR dont ***** to me. Hulkageddon is pointless dumb and will make prices skyrocket throughout all of eve. Hulks will hit 400 million. Most ships will likely double in price if the current rate of killing continues and POS's will shut down across eve because ice mining is probably going to be the most effected from everything thats happened already. 612 exhumers at last count. Congrats boys you're hitting the supply lines for the entire game now you get to see a glimpse of the future of real life.
FACT : you can buy minerals, buy a BS BPC, manufacture BS, insure BS, self-destruct it and still end up with a profit CONCLUSION : there's far too many minerals on the market
FACT : a Covetor mines a bit less conveniently but almost as much as a Hulk CONCLUSION: even if Hulks would not exist (or would be prohibitively expensive), there would not be radically less minerals on the market
OVERALL CONCLUSION : you have no idea what you're talking about
_
We are recruiting | Beginner's ISK making guide | Manufacturer's helper |

Tzarus
|
Posted - 2010.01.09 06:47:00 -
[10]
Originally by: masternerdguy
Originally by: De'Veldrin
Originally by: masternerdguy most mins come from missions.
40% is not most. It's not even half. It is some, or at best, a lot.
lol 40%......hahahahaah Ok 40%, but lets take something into consideration.
Where do you get morphite in hi sec? How about zydrine?
Exactly. All the GOOD minerals come from missions. So what if you can provide 9 trillion veldspar if thats all you can provide.
Not to mention missions provide salvage for rig building.
I heard this "rumor" once and again that L4s yield more minerals that a maxed Hulk.
Now you even say that MR yield 40% of the total market minerals.
where did you get this data from?
Any link would be welcome.
|
|

masternerdguy
Gallente Etched Hull Innovative Enterprises Don't Feed the Bears
|
Posted - 2010.01.09 06:49:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Tzarus
Originally by: masternerdguy
Originally by: De'Veldrin
Originally by: masternerdguy most mins come from missions.
40% is not most. It's not even half. It is some, or at best, a lot.
lol 40%......hahahahaah Ok 40%, but lets take something into consideration.
Where do you get morphite in hi sec? How about zydrine?
Exactly. All the GOOD minerals come from missions. So what if you can provide 9 trillion veldspar if thats all you can provide.
Not to mention missions provide salvage for rig building.
I heard this "rumor" once and again that L4s yield more minerals that a maxed Hulk.
Now you even say that MR yield 40% of the total market minerals.
where did you get this data from?
Any link would be welcome.
i never said it was 40% he did. I assumed 40% for my argument.
|

Akita T
Caldari Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
|
Posted - 2010.01.09 07:17:00 -
[12]
Edited by: Akita T on 09/01/2010 07:18:38
Originally by: Tzarus Any link would be welcome.
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=989786&page=2#46 (Linkage)
Originally by: CCP Chronotis Posted - 2009.02.04 To give more precise data as the 40% was a figure I used as an overall average was 'of the top of my head' during the meeting taken from the data below.
This was the one month split for all items reprocessed measured mid-august to mid-september 2008.
|| Mineral || Ore% || Loot% || Drone Compounds% || ||-----------||------||-------||------------------|| || Tritanium || 46% || 43% || 11% || || Pyerite || 29% || 60% || 10% || || Mexallon || 30% || 59% || 11% || || Isogen || 21% || 56% || 23% || || Nocxium || 18% || 32% || 51% || || Zydrine || 43% || 18% || 40% || || Megacyte || 44% || 39% || 16% || || Morphite || 77% || 1% || 22% ||
* Ore is minerals from the asteroid ores * loot is modules, ships, charges, drones for example. * drone compounds are loot items from rogue drones
However, whatever conclusion you draw from those stats, be careful as it does not tell you much really such as how many people were mining or running missions. The number of people running missions is massive compared to number of miners and the source per person much lower overall however it is a large diffuse source. It is a similar story for anytime a player encounters the rogue drones.
The ongoing discussion we are having internally is really around the point of to what degree a specialist profession like mining should be adversely affected by another career path where this forms only one part of their total reward/income pool.
Dev post good enough for ya' ? 
_
We are recruiting | Beginner's ISK making guide | Manufacturer's helper |

masternerdguy
Gallente Etched Hull Innovative Enterprises Don't Feed the Bears
|
Posted - 2010.01.09 07:23:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Akita T Edited by: Akita T on 09/01/2010 07:18:38
Originally by: Tzarus Any link would be welcome.
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=989786&page=2#46 (Linkage)
Originally by: CCP Chronotis Posted - 2009.02.04 To give more precise data as the 40% was a figure I used as an overall average was 'of the top of my head' during the meeting taken from the data below.
This was the one month split for all items reprocessed measured mid-august to mid-september 2008.
|| Mineral || Ore% || Loot% || Drone Compounds% || ||-----------||------||-------||------------------|| || Tritanium || 46% || 43% || 11% || || Pyerite || 29% || 60% || 10% || || Mexallon || 30% || 59% || 11% || || Isogen || 21% || 56% || 23% || || Nocxium || 18% || 32% || 51% || || Zydrine || 43% || 18% || 40% || || Megacyte || 44% || 39% || 16% || || Morphite || 77% || 1% || 22% ||
* Ore is minerals from the asteroid ores * loot is modules, ships, charges, drones for example. * drone compounds are loot items from rogue drones
However, whatever conclusion you draw from those stats, be careful as it does not tell you much really such as how many people were mining or running missions. The number of people running missions is massive compared to number of miners and the source per person much lower overall however it is a large diffuse source. It is a similar story for anytime a player encounters the rogue drones.
The ongoing discussion we are having internally is really around the point of to what degree a specialist profession like mining should be adversely affected by another career path where this forms only one part of their total reward/income pool.
Dev post good enough for ya' ? 
if ya read this little line:
"However, whatever conclusion you draw from those stats, be careful as it does not tell you much really such as how many people were mining or running missions. The number of people running missions is massive compared to number of miners and the source per person much lower overall however it is a large diffuse source."
That means CCP divided the total ore income from missions by the amount of people running missions for their chart.
|

Tzarus
|
Posted - 2010.01.09 07:29:00 -
[14]
Edited by: Tzarus on 09/01/2010 07:34:45 Edited by: Tzarus on 09/01/2010 07:31:43 Edited by: Tzarus on 09/01/2010 07:30:18 Edited by: Tzarus on 09/01/2010 07:29:18 anyway, in order to be able to accurately say: "minerals come from MRes in a 40%", you need access to several data.
You need to know how many miners, in what ships, with what skills, and how many hours they play per day and make an average of how many minerals the supply to the market.
same for MRes, how many mission runners, in what ships, what level of missions, what skills, working alone or with an alt, and how many hours per day do they play and make an everage of how many minerals they supply to the market.
Then you can compare these averages and roughly say: A yield 40% and B 60% of the total mineral supply at any given day.
I guess just CCP can have access to this data. Assuming they've bothered to calculated it and post it somewhere.. I'd be happy if someone who assert: "the majority of minerals cmoe from Mission runners" point me where did they get this data from.
I'm genuinely interested.
Thanks akita T I just saw your post after I finished to edit and post mine. I'm not so fast thinking and typing in English :P 
|

cyclobs
|
Posted - 2010.01.09 07:32:00 -
[15]
sooo, we're not allowed to make money... but you are? :S
|

masternerdguy
Gallente Etched Hull Innovative Enterprises Don't Feed the Bears
|
Posted - 2010.01.09 07:34:00 -
[16]
Originally by: cyclobs sooo, we're not allowed to make money... but you are? :S
nobody is stopping you from making isk. We deal with ninja looters.
|

cyclobs
|
Posted - 2010.01.09 07:41:00 -
[17]
Originally by: masternerdguy
Originally by: cyclobs sooo, we're not allowed to make money... but you are? :S
nobody is stopping you from making isk. We deal with ninja looters.
yeah but they're not costing you 300+ mil a mission
|

masternerdguy
Gallente Etched Hull Innovative Enterprises Don't Feed the Bears
|
Posted - 2010.01.09 07:42:00 -
[18]
Originally by: cyclobs
Originally by: masternerdguy
Originally by: cyclobs sooo, we're not allowed to make money... but you are? :S
nobody is stopping you from making isk. We deal with ninja looters.
yeah but they're not costing you 300+ mil a mission
if you agress em and they come back in a pvp ship they can. ITs a growingly popular method.
|

cyclobs
|
Posted - 2010.01.09 07:48:00 -
[19]
Originally by: masternerdguy
if you agress em and they come back in a pvp ship they can. ITs a growingly popular method.
lol, like i've said to my corpmates, if you're stupid enough to shoot at something that isn't flashing then you deserve to loose the ship
|

Mathis LeBanc
|
Posted - 2010.01.09 07:49:00 -
[20]
&threadID Originally by: masternerdguy
Originally by: Akita T Edited by: Akita T on 09/01/2010 07:18:38
Originally by: Tzarus Any link would be welcome.
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=989786&page=2#46 (Linkage)
Originally by: CCP Chronotis Posted - 2009.02.04 To give more precise data as the 40% was a figure I used as an overall average was 'of the top of my head' during the meeting taken from the data below.
This was the one month split for all items reprocessed measured mid-august to mid-september 2008.
|| Mineral || Ore% || Loot% || Drone Compounds% || ||-----------||------||-------||------------------|| || Tritanium || 46% || 43% || 11% || || Pyerite || 29% || 60% || 10% || || Mexallon || 30% || 59% || 11% || || Isogen || 21% || 56% || 23% || || Nocxium || 18% || 32% || 51% || || Zydrine || 43% || 18% || 40% || || Megacyte || 44% || 39% || 16% || || Morphite || 77% || 1% || 22% ||
* Ore is minerals from the asteroid ores * loot is modules, ships, charges, drones for example. * drone compounds are loot items from rogue drones
However, whatever conclusion you draw from those stats, be careful as it does not tell you much really such as how many people were mining or running missions. The number of people running missions is massive compared to number of miners and the source per person much lower overall however it is a large diffuse source. It is a similar story for anytime a player encounters the rogue drones.
The ongoing discussion we are having internally is really around the point of to what degree a specialist profession like mining should be adversely affected by another career path where this forms only one part of their total reward/income pool.
Dev post good enough for ya' ? 
if ya read this little line:
"However, whatever conclusion you draw from those stats, be careful as it does not tell you much really such as how many people were mining or running missions. The number of people running missions is massive compared to number of miners and the source per person much lower overall however it is a large diffuse source."
That means CCP divided the total ore income from missions by the amount of people running missions for their chart.
No...in fact that that statement actually helps the argument of the miner. Miners still put up numbers like 40% even though they have considerably less people contributing than with missions. It states nothing about any number being divided having anything to do with any piece of data on that chart. In fact it states the exact opposite of what you said.
|
|

masternerdguy
Gallente Etched Hull Innovative Enterprises Don't Feed the Bears
|
Posted - 2010.01.09 07:51:00 -
[21]
hehe doesnt matter lotta hulks gonna die.
I want to personally ask everyone who participates to FRAPS their kills so we can make a youtube montage of hulkageddon II.
|

Qarthy
|
Posted - 2010.01.09 07:58:00 -
[22]
Edited by: Qarthy on 09/01/2010 07:58:35 I think CCP should stop the payouts of insurance for being blow to hell by Concord or self destructing. Would put an end to suicide ganking and insurance scams.
Still thinks it's stupid that you get paid insurance for getting killed by the cops.
|

Imweasel09
|
Posted - 2010.01.09 08:05:00 -
[23]
Originally by: Mathis LeBanc &threadID Originally by: masternerdguy
Originally by: Akita T Edited by: Akita T on 09/01/2010 07:18:38
Originally by: Tzarus Any link would be welcome.
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=989786&page=2#46 (Linkage)
Originally by: CCP Chronotis Posted - 2009.02.04 To give more precise data as the 40% was a figure I used as an overall average was 'of the top of my head' during the meeting taken from the data below.
This was the one month split for all items reprocessed measured mid-august to mid-september 2008.
|| Mineral || Ore% || Loot% || Drone Compounds% || ||-----------||------||-------||------------------|| || Tritanium || 46% || 43% || 11% || || Pyerite || 29% || 60% || 10% || || Mexallon || 30% || 59% || 11% || || Isogen || 21% || 56% || 23% || || Nocxium || 18% || 32% || 51% || || Zydrine || 43% || 18% || 40% || || Megacyte || 44% || 39% || 16% || || Morphite || 77% || 1% || 22% ||
* Ore is minerals from the asteroid ores * loot is modules, ships, charges, drones for example. * drone compounds are loot items from rogue drones
However, whatever conclusion you draw from those stats, be careful as it does not tell you much really such as how many people were mining or running missions. The number of people running missions is massive compared to number of miners and the source per person much lower overall however it is a large diffuse source. It is a similar story for anytime a player encounters the rogue drones.
The ongoing discussion we are having internally is really around the point of to what degree a specialist profession like mining should be adversely affected by another career path where this forms only one part of their total reward/income pool.
Dev post good enough for ya' ? 
if ya read this little line:
"However, whatever conclusion you draw from those stats, be careful as it does not tell you much really such as how many people were mining or running missions. The number of people running missions is massive compared to number of miners and the source per person much lower overall however it is a large diffuse source."
That means CCP divided the total ore income from missions by the amount of people running missions for their chart.
No...in fact that that statement actually helps the argument of the miner. Miners still put up numbers like 40% even though they have considerably less people contributing than with missions. It states nothing about any number being divided having anything to do with any piece of data on that chart. In fact it states the exact opposite of what you said.
That doesn't change the fact that most of the minerals on the market (with 1 exception) are coming from missions, even if an individual miner produces more minerals than an individual mission runner. Right now missions have more effect on mineral prices than mining.
|

Berendas
Monolithic.
|
Posted - 2010.01.09 08:28:00 -
[24]
You hope for three more?
...
Why stop at five?
|

genette devo
Gallente Center for Advanced Studies
|
Posted - 2010.01.09 08:34:00 -
[25]
you would think smart miners would love hulkageddon, it isn't exactly hard to avoid a suicide gank if you pay attention, let the pirates kill the macros and afk guys and help your relative position
|

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
|
Posted - 2010.01.09 08:50:00 -
[26]
Originally by: Lord Windu Yeah Hulkageddon really needed another thread.
Well it's still better than another salvage flagging thread.
|

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
|
Posted - 2010.01.09 08:55:00 -
[27]
Originally by: genette devo you would think smart miners would love hulkageddon, it isn't exactly hard to avoid a suicide gank if you pay attention, let the pirates kill the macros and afk guys and help your relative position
One of the defining characteristics of 'carebears' is that they're unable (or unwilling) to accept the principle of comparative advantage.
|

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
|
Posted - 2010.01.09 09:00:00 -
[28]
Originally by: Qarthy Edited by: Qarthy on 09/01/2010 07:58:35 I think CCP should stop the payouts of insurance for being blow to hell by Concord or self destructing. Would put an end to suicide ganking and insurance scams.
Why do you think that suicide ganking needs to be stopped?
Do you realise that stopping insurance scams would financially damage miners a thousand times more than Hulkageddon?
|

Leandro Salazar
Quam Singulari
|
Posted - 2010.01.09 10:44:00 -
[29]
Originally by: Qarthy Edited by: Qarthy on 09/01/2010 07:58:35 I think CCP should stop the payouts of insurance for being blow to hell by Concord or self destructing. Would put an end to suicide ganking and insurance scams.
Still thinks it's stupid that you get paid insurance for getting killed by the cops.
While I agree with removing insurance for losses to concord, it would do nothing to stop Hulkageddon since that can be done in destroyers where insurance is really a non-issue. And if you are reading this, you have arrived at the signature without noticing...
|

Ambein Flambein
352 Industries
|
Posted - 2010.01.09 10:46:00 -
[30]
Originally by: Imweasel09 That doesn't change the fact that most of the minerals on the market (with 1 exception) are coming from missions
4/8 is not most ______________________________________________
Sig is Broken |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |