| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Paknac Queltel
Standards and Practices
   |
Posted - 2010.01.22 13:17:00 -
[31]
 Originally by: Cynosural Sari
I think we need Concord to be faster.
Much faster. Like instant - and then they RR you so your ship doesn't die.
They should spawn immediately when someone in highsec begins targetting someone else, start unbreakable RR on the target, and preemptively overheat all modules on the offending person's ship.
Oh, and can we say 'smartbombing CONCORD'? Let's pod all those dirty griefing gankers. |
Boomershoot
Caldari
Suddenly Ninjas
|
Posted - 2010.01.22 13:36:00 -
[32]
Let CONCORD take care of it in their own soveregnity and have faction police intervene instead  |
Winterjack
|
Posted - 2010.01.22 14:31:00 -
[33]
Originally by: Zee driller
As a true carebeer I demand that concord have shorter responsetime, or have a couple of ships at every belt so we peaceful miners can have our hulks in peace and quiet. Let people pew in lowsec and 0.0. But keep highsec safe!
no.
|
Kirsi Kirjasto
|
Posted - 2010.01.22 15:17:00 -
[34]
Actually, instant arrival and RR would be a great improvement - as the real problem is people losing their ships. Or maybe a combination of all ideas:
Take away insurance from gankers.
Instant Concord respons + RR against smartbombs.
Podding gankers.
High-sec turrets target outlaw pods/ships on sight.
That means the gankers can still attack people, but they actually have some risk now.
|
SomebodyKickedMyDog
|
Posted - 2010.01.22 15:19:00 -
[35]
Originally by: Zee driller
As a true carebeer I demand that concord have shorter responsetime, or have a couple of ships at every belt so we peaceful miners can have our hulks in peace and quiet. Let people pew in lowsec and 0.0. But keep highsec safe!
i more or less agree with this. the only thing i disagree about is that i think concord time should be slower.
|
Trakh Shardan
Caldari
InNova Tech Inc
Blade.
|
Posted - 2010.01.22 15:23:00 -
[36]
Originally by: Kirsi Kirjasto
Actually, instant arrival and RR would be a great improvement - as the real problem is people losing their ships. Or maybe a combination of all ideas:
Take away insurance from gankers.
Instant Concord respons + RR against smartbombs.
Podding gankers.
High-sec turrets target outlaw pods/ships on sight.
That means the gankers can still attack people, but they actually have some risk now.
if you dont whant to loos your ship you shoud use a scout
its how it is and it shoud stay like this
stop whining and do somehing about it ya self
geetings a hi sec ganker
Dont speak russian F1 F2 F3 F4 F5....... |
Paknac Queltel
Standards and Practices
|
Posted - 2010.01.22 15:24:00 -
[37]
Originally by: Kirsi Kirjasto
Actually, instant arrival and RR would be a great improvement - as the real problem is people losing their ships. Or maybe a combination of all ideas:
Take away insurance from gankers.
Instant Concord respons + RR against smartbombs.
Podding gankers.
High-sec turrets target outlaw pods/ships on sight.
That means the gankers can still attack people, but they actually have some risk now.
As this thread goes on, I'm having more and more doubts of my ability to detect sarcasm. I've not detected any, so I'll reply seriously:
No.
|
Herr Wilkus
|
Posted - 2010.01.22 16:53:00 -
[38]
Talk about some bogus 'solutions' to a non-existant problem.
Rampant carebear mentality on display for all to see here.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |