| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Marko Riva
Adamant Inc.
   |
Posted - 2010.01.18 10:51:00 -
[31]
We never needed it and it's also a decent way to keep animated gifs away but I'll agree that we've outgrown the small filesize restriction, especially when you want to use png which is a very reasonable/logical request.
As long as the 400x120 stays and people who start to use annoying gifs get clubbed to death I see no reason to not support this.
-----------
I think, therefore I'm single.
New projectile damage PDF
Alliance creation service |
|
Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises
Otherworld Empire
|
Posted - 2010.01.24 20:15:00 -
[32]
Supported for the sake of transparent PNG's
Secure 3rd party service |
|
Metalcali
|
Posted - 2010.01.25 10:15:00 -
[33]
Supported |
Maxsim Goratiev
Imperial Tau Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.01.25 12:58:00 -
[34]
 Originally by: Allen Ramses
Supported. And see sig. 100 (?) characters is really limiting. 255 is understandable and appropriate. The current one is not. I'd also like to push for a signature divider.
divider, we need one! and yes, ou should be able to load 75k sigs or even more. We should be able to use some fancy-ish grafics and png
|
Serpents smile
|
Posted - 2010.01.27 15:40:00 -
[35]
supported.
|
Dorotent
|
Posted - 2010.01.27 15:46:00 -
[36]
Against. It's not a game feature so it's very low priority. And it's not central to forum functionality, so it's very low priority. And lastly, huge annoying sigs are a bug, not a feature.
|
Fengo Marr
Tenacious Tendencies
|
Posted - 2010.01.27 15:53:00 -
[37]
Edited by: Fengo Marr on 27/01/2010 15:55:12
Supported!
Edit: Originally by: Dorotent
Against. It's not a game feature so it's very low priority.
I hardly think it will take a lot of time to alter one tiny policy...
|
Wyke Mossari
Gallente
Staner Industries
|
Posted - 2010.01.29 14:41:00 -
[38]
Opposed, I don't want to be bothered by other players spam.
|
Andrea Griffin
|
Posted - 2010.02.05 18:14:00 -
[39]
Originally by: Wyke Mossari
Opposed, I don't want to be bothered by other players spam.
Do what I do and disable forum signatures. It makes the forums much more readable. It isn't the size of the file, it's all the people that feel a deep need to have 3-4 lines of pointless quotes plus an extra 200+ vertical pixels of e-peen.
|
Bagehi
Association of Commonwealth Enterprises
Gentlemen's Club
|
Posted - 2010.02.05 18:24:00 -
[40]
Edited by: Bagehi on 05/02/2010 18:26:22
Edited by: Bagehi on 05/02/2010 18:24:27
Originally by: Lord Arshavir
If your connection is unable to handle a 75k image, how do you view pron?
This a very good question. As long as they don't allow blinking gifs, larger files should be allowed.
Originally by: Dorotent
Against. It's not a game feature so it's very low priority. And it's not central to forum functionality, so it's very low priority. And lastly, huge annoying sigs are a bug, not a feature.
Highly doubt it would take more than a few minutes of time to make the change - that would hardly impact anything else the programmers are working on.
Fix Local |
McFly
Interstellar eXodus
|
Posted - 2010.03.01 12:28:00 -
[41]
Originally by: Chribba
Supported for the sake of transparent PNG's
even chribba's on our side. now we can't lose \o/
--
my sig got nerfed again, csm thread to get forum sig limitations lifted a bit |
Di Mulle
|
Posted - 2010.03.02 00:56:00 -
[42]
Supported, as long forums also provide an option to switch off signatures and whatever crap comes with it all together.
|
Razin
The xDEATHx Squadron
Legion of xXDEATHXx
|
Posted - 2010.03.02 01:09:00 -
[43]
Originally by: Naviworks CEO
Not supported, It's a forum, the images are not needed now, nor do they need to be larger.
It's a good thing then that EVE forums allow you to turn off all images and sigs.
...
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |