|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
mjgvjbk
Rio Tinto Jnr
Bluescope Mining
22
   |
Posted - 2012.06.30 03:59:00 -
[1] - Quote
I'd like to know when the Devs are coming to Australia, I'd like to show them Belanglo State Forest and just incase no one knows why read this What should happen to eve devs
I'm not really sure Hilmar P+¬tursson understands what customer service really means. Maybe he should read
the complete idiots guide to managing 101
At the end of the day everyone seems to be blaming the devs but lets face it the devs get told what to do, now most coders have an idea how something should work but unless they actually play eve then its not going to really work out too well. The only person that needs a cold water enema is Hilmar P+¬tursson, like crucible he fuked that up too and now inferno he's ultimately responsible the buck stops with him.
So Hilmar P+¬tursson puker up ginger and touch ya toes its cold water enema time. |
mjgvjbk
Rio Tinto Jnr
Bluescope Mining
22
|
Posted - 2012.07.01 03:57:00 -
[2] - Quote
Grady Eltoren wrote:CCP DEVS: I submitted a bug report for "Probe launching no longer makes a noise post Inferno 1.1" Your response was... "This is working as intended, and is a FEATURE" Wow - really? Why would you get RID of audio feedback and probe sounds in general???  
lol what can you say to something like that but 
either the customer service wombat don't know or don't care, but as its ccp and it's post inferno anything thats broken not working or just plain stupid is actually a feature  |
mjgvjbk
Rio Tinto Jnr
Bluescope Mining
25
|
Posted - 2012.07.05 05:47:00 -
[3] - Quote
Knowledgeminer wrote:Steijn wrote:No, looting is still a PITA and still has a massive delay as it removes each individual item from containers then places them into your hold. EVE has a memory leak/corruption bug or something that causes everything to become more and more sluggish over time and seems to affect looting in particular. .
Its now known as a feature 
ccp guard
|
mjgvjbk
Rio Tinto Jnr
Bluescope Mining
25
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 23:46:00 -
[4] - Quote
Edward Perry wrote:
I know that someone worked hard on this, and managers approved it. So there is probably a lot of support for this new idea. But you really need to listen to us players.
The Coca Cola Company had the best selling soft drink in the World, so they decide to go ahead and change the recipe so they can gain more market share that they were losing to Pepsi. What occurred during the New Coke reformulation was a disaster and the Coke Company rapidly brought back the original formula and called it GÇ£Classic CokeGÇ¥.
So some designer had a great idea and some manager signed off on it, now both are working on a new government project called work for the dole in some remote area of Alaska
If eve was an animal it would now be placed on the endangered animals watch list.  |
mjgvjbk
Rio Tinto Jnr
Bluescope Mining
27
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 09:25:00 -
[5] - Quote
Panhead4411 wrote:I just don't understand how CCP Soundwave told us they'd put out a fix every week until this had the same functionality as the old...then everyone went on vacation, and nothing gets patched for almost 2 months?
Oh, and then there was the quote that came from the June 1st CSM meeting....where CCP soundwave said "[The unified inventory] is a feature that people aren't liking and we're just going to throw everything at it until they like it,"....how's that work when everyone who created the aforementioned broken system, who should be doing these 'weekly fixes' and be included in the 'throw everything at it'....take the next two months for vacation?
How can CCP as a company justify granting vacation to someone who has obviously NOT done their job, let alone done it well, and is currently needed to fix the pile of stinking poo they left before they ran off on vacation? I don't know too many companies who operate successfully when following this mindset.
Well here is a copy and paste from the CSM meeting
"Two step brought up the Unified Inventory, stating that while most players thought it was better than before, the main issue was still performance."
Look like none of these F-ers can read |
mjgvjbk
Rio Tinto Jnr
Bluescope Mining
27
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 21:15:00 -
[6] - Quote
Scaugh wrote:mjgvjbk wrote:Panhead4411 wrote:I just don't understand how CCP Soundwave told us they'd put out a fix every week until this had the same functionality as the old...then everyone went on vacation, and nothing gets patched for almost 2 months?
Oh, and then there was the quote that came from the June 1st CSM meeting....where CCP soundwave said "[The unified inventory] is a feature that people aren't liking and we're just going to throw everything at it until they like it,"....how's that work when everyone who created the aforementioned broken system, who should be doing these 'weekly fixes' and be included in the 'throw everything at it'....take the next two months for vacation?
How can CCP as a company justify granting vacation to someone who has obviously NOT done their job, let alone done it well, and is currently needed to fix the pile of stinking poo they left before they ran off on vacation? I don't know too many companies who operate successfully when following this mindset. Well here is a copy and paste from the CSM meeting "Two step brought up the Unified Inventory, stating that while most players thought it was better than before, the main issue was still performance." Look like none of these F-ers can read This would be funny it is wasn't so true. The Uni. Inv. (as CCP call it) is not a preformance issue. It is unsuited for large scale and I mean large scale container/item use. My main along with my other accounts (which i've since unsubbed) have quite possible 100+ containers of BPC's in a single station which I bungle into contracts for sale. Unless the BPC icon starts to show the number of runs on it i'm afraid I've no other choice than to have contaiers for each ship type and the number of runs. for example - BPC rifters of 1,5,10 & 30 runs = 4no. containers. CCP Soundwave has not kept his promise on updating the Uni Ini. till it works. It is now time to let this account go by the wayside as well i think. Enough of the talking. its actions that they understand. Edit: Considering V1.2 is about to be released. I'm sure 1.1 feedback will no longer be commented upon.
I totally agree with you my friend, CCP are in we don't give a **** mood and all CSM are concerned about is keeping there RL names a secret.. Both ccp and csm are all in there little bubbles and only give a frig about what concerns themselves and to hell with everyone else. This will also be my last post as no real point continuing to make posts telling ccp eve is broken as we continue to get lame ass posts from ccp saying, "this bug is working as intended"
|
|
|
| |
|