| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
   |
Posted - 2010.03.16 17:54:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: Aarin Wrath
Originally by: Zewron
So how long does it take a 20 mil. SP+ char to make 30 mil. ISK? A WHOLE hour? Jesus.
Dude, sorry, I mean troll boy, shut up. Your missing the point completly.
Let me spell it out for you :
1. I have 70 million SP and am in a drake. I die, get podded. I am now out:
-1 drake
-fittings
-30 million for a new clone
2. You being a nub-troll have 10 million SP, you die, get podded. You are out:
-1 drake
-fittings
-3 million for a new clone.
I am punished, and deterred, from doing pvp again because of the high clone cost of my high sp character. You are not.
In effect, I loose the cost of a Drake just to replace my clone. wth
Stop getting podded all the time. But the time you have 100M SP you're supposed to be good enough to not lose a clone every time you lose a ship. they way you talk, anyone would think it was inevitable or something. Come to think of it, you should be losing ships less often too. PVP isn't expensive for you because of clone costs; it's expensive because you suck.
By the way, most people I know run +4s all the time. I certainly do. A pair of those will cost the same as one of Caymus' clones. Not to mention pirate implants.
tl,dr; man up, nancy.
|
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
|
Posted - 2010.03.17 12:44:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Aarin Wrath
Originally by: Chainsaw Plankton
and explain to me why 100m sp chars should have cheap clones? whining that flying a frigate loses you money isn't a very good reason imo.
Well how about you explain to us why 100m sp chars should have exponentially more expensive clones and not just "more expensive" clones that everyone else? 
Most things in EVE are exponentially more expensive for incremental advantages. Why should clones be different?
|
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
|
Posted - 2010.03.19 08:31:00 -
[3]
Originally by: b1zz
I see no choice there Ephemeron. You've stated three 'choices' that are the same: old toon, you are forbidden from progressing beyond this point. What you're really saying is that you want older toons to be brought back to younger toons.
The old toon isn't "forbidden". Using that word is dishonest. The player just has to make a choice about whether to accept the risk. Oh boo hoo you can't have all of the good and none of the bad? God damb, that's so sad! 
You might just as well say that players are "forbidden" from flying T2 ships or using faction modules because they're expensive.
|
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
|
Posted - 2010.03.23 18:42:00 -
[4]
Originally by: b1zz
No, no cookie for you.
PvE'ers get podded all the time, maybe even more so that PvP'ers, en-route to their missions. PvE'ers also PvP. Just another compulsory skill to train I'm afraid, and we don't want those.
|
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
|
Posted - 2010.04.04 13:27:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Mr Kidd
I can't believe THIS thread has gone on THIS long. Damn you high sp'ers are major whiners.
Most "high SPer" players think that the OP is a terrible crybaby who should learn2play.
Less than 3 months to go till my clone cost hits 20 mill. That extra 7 mill on top of the 130M HAC, 30-40M fittings and 50M in implants is gonna make a huge difference to me
How the hell am I supposed to generate an extra 49 million ISK this year? 
|
| |
|