EVE Search - Breaking News: Noob FC Looses MH Cap Fleet

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

Breaking News: Noob FC Looses MH Cap Fleet

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Metal Dude Gallente Destructive Influence IT Alliance	Posted - 2010.03.28 17:40:00 - [31] Edited by: Metal Dude on 28/03/2010 17:40:52 Originally by: Ugleb All Ushra'Khan members are blunty reminded of the TOTAL CAOD BAN we currently have in place precisely because of threads such as this. Funnily enough, I'm writing a Council Update with a reminder about that very ban right now. How timely. I look forwards to your reading it. Again. Between CCPÆs posting rules and Alliance CAOD bans, is there really need for CAOD anymore? I remember when CAOD used to be a fun place where people could express their opinions, have heated conversations, encourage responses and consequences of instigating PVP, using propaganda as a tool for war. There used to be 3-4 new pages of posts a day and it was an extension of the game itself. Now, itÆs just a waste of bandwidth. The truth will set you free
BlueMajere Caldari Shut Up And Play WE FORM VOLTRON	Posted - 2010.03.28 17:47:00 - [32] Originally by: DangerosoDavo Edited by: DangerosoDavo on 28/03/2010 08:15:59 and the fight was back on, but C H got outnumberd as the rest of the voltron cynoed and bridged in 1. m8 u r liar we were not there, wat is this voltron u speak of? 2. f the nc they are babbies we wuld nevur help them.
Boppi Amarr Blue Republic	Posted - 2010.03.28 17:55:00 - [33] Originally by: Ugleb All Ushra'Khan members are blunty reminded of the TOTAL CAOD BAN we currently have in place precisely because of threads such as this. Funnily enough, I'm writing a Council Update with a reminder about that very ban right now. How timely. I look forwards to your reading it. Again. All cool guys have CAOD-alts anyway. ___________________________ 1st lol umad? omgwtf! cu on teh battlefield hurfblurf post with ur main derp Toasting in an epic bread hurr
Charlemeign Gallente BESTIAL CARNAGE	Posted - 2010.03.28 18:03:00 - [34] wtf o_O I need to get back to pakkonen BESTI Merc Service
Major PewPew Gallente The Dark Horses WE FORM VOLTRON	Posted - 2010.03.31 17:17:00 - [35] Originally by: Bobbeh Originally by: Pasha Cracken Edited by: Pasha Cracken on 28/03/2010 04:31:22 ... We snickered when we learned that one was a wyvern class supercarrier, how could they NOT kill ità.. ... Now i might have agreed if it was a Hel, Maybe even a Nyx. But i fail to see your logic, in the ease of killing a ship with mid 90% resists in its shields and 3mil shields. its Regen passively can tank 5k dps. Now you might be refering to the whole jumping in and fleet bonus gets reset thing well thats cool cept it only adds 300k shields 10% of the overall. Then i came to my senses and realized you think that this whole situation is important..... Wyverns and Aeons are best tanked SC's so take what you thought you knew and apply that. Also remember that if there are multiple Regular Carriers on the field they are more than likely RR'ing with the Sc's... Soo Really what we have here is a Case of you thought you were important, smart, witty, and Since that wrongful assumption has come to realize your not... Please stop posting wow...umad about something?
Xikorita Gallente Agony Unleashed Agony Empire	Posted - 2010.03.31 17:28:00 - [36] Originally by: Metal Dude I remember when CAOD used to be a fun place where people could express their opinions, have heated conversations, encourage responses and consequences of instigating PVP, using propaganda as a tool for war. There used to be 3-4 new pages of posts a day and it was an extension of the game itself. Now, itÆs just a waste of bandwidth. I am playing for about an year and have never seen this caod you described =(
Mr Adebisi Minmatar ElitistOps	Posted - 2010.04.01 01:12:00 - [37] what is it with stupid pubbies and misspelling 'lose' as 'loose' ????
Deja Thoris Amarr Invicta. Cry Havoc.	Posted - 2010.04.01 03:53:00 - [38] This thread is complete bull**. The battlereport from MS is below. Yes they got jumped but they had no supercarriers on the field at the time. I suggest the bull** about SC's tackled is to get the NC to form up a jesus blob a little quicker. Anyway the BR.... ------------ We get pinged by a small neutral group that got their POS sieged by NC in Pakkonen and wanted to know if we'd lend a hand. Initial sieging group wasn't that large, but NC are good at scheduled form-ups, so we figure they may be a bit larger. CH gang is ~40 rr BS and a dozen support. We watch for a bit, get sidetracked trying to go fight a nearby Rooks & Kings gang (who mostly just see us and say yeah right), and eventually get word NC has shown up at the POS. ~20 dreads, 4 carriers, and a few dozen support (~10 BS). Two NC gangs reported incoming, but they're both a few jumps out still, so in we go. We land on the hostile capital group and tackle dreads and carriers. One carrier jumps out and we melt the other Thanatos. Quickly switch to the Chimera and apply the same to him. Before we can get through the third one, however, the first NC gang jumps in and the system turns to sludge. Local hits ~160 and we're cycling guns to apply any damage. Everything... slows.... way.... down. We've got a hostile archon in low armor but need to turn attention to subcaps for a bit. Lock up targets and slam half a dozen battleships down. System is complete sludge, but generally we can alpha out battleships, though whoever gets the final blow is out of the fight for a while of course. After scouring half a dozen of the local battleships we catch a couple of the enemy logistics and pop these then go back to the enemy archon. Second hostile group arrives and cyno goes up. Local well over 200 now. We figure they'll be stuck on the gridload and stay on the archon. Hostile carriers do eventually make it in, though they're as lagged out as we are. We kill the archon and they.. warp out. We burn back into better range on the dreads and start working on a moros but the system is still sludge. Pop a couple enemy subcaps but they give a warp-in to the hostile dread fleet and all the carriers warp back in and start repping and lending fighters. At this point we decide we're unlikely to break much more and align out. Kill a couple tackle that get to close, lose a dominix that is too far, and leave the field. Total Kills / Losses pretty light considering how many ships involved, but that's sadly par for the course with larger lowsec battles. Kills: 3 Carrier, 7 BS, 1 BC, 2 Logistic, 1 Bomber, 1 Cruiser, 1 Inty Losses: 3 BS
Nemulus Gallente The Darkness Within Death Rhubarb	Posted - 2010.04.01 11:04:00 - [39] Nice BR and seems to go with the KB stats, wish people would just do what the CH guy did and do the truth not trolls/flaming :(. You can get the truth on here its sifting thro all the cr*p to get to it that is annoying. Nem
Typherian Minmatar Legio Invicta Apotheosis of Virtue	Posted - 2010.04.05 13:39:00 - [40] What is it with UK and posting lots of BS to feel important. Let your -A- masters do the talking. Anyway yeah that BR has no mention of SCs so I wonder why the starting claim mentioned failed tackles on SCs... and I really don't call the BR losses obliterated. Mildly stung maybe. Thanks for the BR to clear up some of the UK sludge.

titanstory Amarr Section XIII Cursed Alliance	Posted - 2010.04.05 14:09:00 - [41] Edited by: titanstory on 05/04/2010 14:09:13 Originally by: Pasha Cracken Summery: noob fc looses 10 caps to cry havoc bs gang. To so called node crash your report is terrible, 3 cap killed and you said it was a cap fleet.. you'r more terrible than me m8, stop posting.
Orree Gallente Dynaverse Corporation Sodalitas XX	Posted - 2010.04.05 15:09:00 - [42] Originally by: Metal Dude Edited by: Metal Dude on 28/03/2010 17:40:52 Originally by: Ugleb All Ushra'Khan members are blunty reminded of the TOTAL CAOD BAN we currently have in place precisely because of threads such as this. Funnily enough, I'm writing a Council Update with a reminder about that very ban right now. How timely. I look forwards to your reading it. Again. Between CCPÆs posting rules and Alliance CAOD bans, is there really need for CAOD anymore? I remember when CAOD used to be a fun place where people could express their opinions, have heated conversations, encourage responses and consequences of instigating PVP, using propaganda as a tool for war. There used to be 3-4 new pages of posts a day and it was an extension of the game itself. Now, itÆs just a waste of bandwidth. Well, I think that there is definitely a need, but I agree with you that CAOD in its current form is a really sad and pathetic place and 95% (being generous, I know) of what passes for posts here is complete drivel. We did finally get a great battle report post in this thread from Deja Thoris (of Cry Havoc, a group which can usually be depended upon to not crap things up around here). So, at least it wasn't a total waste of time. ---------- "How much easier it is to be critical than to be correct." ---Benjamin Disraeli


Pages: 1 [2] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.