Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

defc0n
Gallente The 8th Order
|
Posted - 2010.04.22 19:28:00 -
[1]
Interesting thread.
Goes to show that history repeats itself over and over again, and its a shame that money has to be involved each time. 
For all the people who have lost isk to siig (especially all you ex-adurians), i am trully sorry for you. All you can really do now is accept what happened and move on. You could always try to harass Siigari of course, but siig has been playing this game long enough to know ways to evade you so you will just waste your time trying. Consider this a lesson learnt on who you can trust with your isk and who you cant :(
Also, to all the siig haters, commenting from his pvp skills to his isk spending habits, you probably couldnt kill him on an honoured 1vs1 fight and you certainly wouldnt fly the ships he flies in the places he flies them.
Anyways, i think that Siig makes this game more interesting and fun with all his antics and the drama they bring (from the observers point of view), and im pretty sure there is more to come in the (near) future 
|

defc0n
Gallente The 8th Order
|
Posted - 2010.04.22 21:30:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Larkonis Trassler
Originally by: defc0n Interesting thread.
Goes to show that history repeats itself over and over again, and its a shame that money has to be involved each time. 
For all the people who have lost isk to siig (especially all you ex-adurians), i am trully sorry for you. All you can really do now is accept what happened and move on. You could always try to harass Siigari of course, but siig has been playing this game long enough to know ways to evade you so you will just waste your time trying. Consider this a lesson learnt on who you can trust with your isk and who you cant :(
Also, to all the siig haters, commenting from his pvp skills to his isk spending habits, you probably couldnt kill him on an honoured 1vs1 fight and you certainly wouldnt fly the ships he flies in the places he flies them.
Anyways, i think that Siig makes this game more interesting and fun with all his antics and the drama they bring (from the observers point of view), and im pretty sure there is more to come in the (near) future 
Siigari alt detected.
haha larkonis you are still whining over that lol thread of yours?
get over it mate. life goes on 
|

defc0n
Gallente The 8th Order
|
Posted - 2010.04.22 21:42:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Lady Spank
Or perhaps one of the few mates he hasn't yet ripped off.
I think it's worrying that Siigari deserves props for using GTC to afford exorbitant internet spaceships to the detriment of his real life financial situation. I won't judge him on it and it's his choice; however, such a thing should not be applauded.
First off lady spank, you dont know of his financial situation. You just speculate like the other morons on these forums about what he has and doesnt have.
I also think that you are mistaken by saying that im "one of the few mates he hasn't yet ripped off". I've known him a long enough time to know how he plays, and ive lent him isk before which he repayed back on time and vice versa.
|

defc0n
Gallente The 8th Order
|
Posted - 2010.04.22 22:22:00 -
[4]
We can all defend or blame siig on a large number of issues..
Regardless, the fact of the matter is all this drama and rambling on about who he is, what he has etc will not change things... its pointless. People get scammed and manipulated in Eve all the time and so people should focus not on what you lose but how you deal with it.
Also that IRL scam comment sounds a bit farfetched. You have proof for that or just more stories? lol
|

defc0n
Gallente The 8th Order
|
Posted - 2010.04.22 22:33:00 -
[5]
o\
He actually paid RL money? Sigh... Thats something i would never do in a game.
The problem is people are too trusting, you must spend time with people before investing/lending/trading money with anyone when it goes to this lengths.
Torus doesnt know siigari long enough, thats the problem, and i see this must be one of the reasons this thread was started in the first place correct?
|
|
|