| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
TeaDaze
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
   |
Posted - 2010.04.13 11:25:00 -
[1]
A recent dev blog stated that deep safes are going to be removed along with any items outside this new "Wall".
We the undersigned disagree with the planned removal of existing deep safes (and related destruction of property) and request that CCP re-evaluate this decision with input from the players.
Alternative methods for finding deep safes etc can be discussed, but the focus here is to show CCP that the players disagree with further limiting the sandbox.
Please reply to this thread and tick the "support this topic" box to register your dissatisfaction.
Vote TeaDaze for CSM5!
|
TeaDaze
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 11:36:00 -
[2]
Supporting this of course.
Would be nice for CCP to take player feedback seriously and hopefully following the CSM procedure will allow that...
Vote TeaDaze for CSM5!
|
TeaDaze
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 14:48:00 -
[3]
 Originally by: Drake Draconis
If you can't create a deep safe without forcing the game to "quit" or "disconnecting" or "logging off" then honestly In my eyes its abuse.
But that's just me.
Currently you can make deep safes without using the logoff/logon trick, there are actually a few methods (which CCP might be removing as part of this, but they haven't specified) but only the logoff/logon one was available to anyone.
I guess in your eyes it can't be classed as abuse any more 
In seriousness this heavy handed nerfbatting is not required and the reasons used to justify it are utterly ridiculous.
Vote TeaDaze for CSM5!
|
TeaDaze
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
|
Posted - 2010.04.15 10:57:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Marlona Sky
Wow. The tears this thread is generating is pure win. Shame you guys quickly rage post and failed to read how CCP is re-evaluating this. Instead you just blindly rage on. 
With all due respect, until CCP actually state what they are planning to change it is valid for people to state their dissatisfaction with the original dev blog.
It is however a shame that so many people saying /signed neglected to click the "Support" box when posting
Originally by: Gunnanmon
Originally by: TeaDaze
We the undersigned disagree with the planned removal of existing deep safes (and related destruction of property) and request that CCP re-evaluate this decision with input from the players.
We do?
We in this context being the people who indicated their support of this thread.
If you don't have a problem with the original implementation including deleting player property then you don't fit into the "we" here, no harm no foul.
Vote TeaDaze for CSM5!
|
TeaDaze
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
|
Posted - 2010.04.15 18:57:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Marlona Sky
You should change your OP then. Right now if people read it, it is deceiving that CCP has not considered anything.
Until something more than "we are thinking about it and will update the dev blog at some point" comes out then the OP will remain as is.
Originally by: Marlona Sky
Then again, I am enjoying all these emo tears form people threatened to have their super safe spots nerfed and the playing field leveled.
It doesn't level the playing field at all. People who used recent techniques to make off axis safes which are within the new space wall will still have an advantage over players who can only warp between celestials. And there are many many other "unfair" areas that are remaining untouched
Implying that deep safes are utterly unbalancing the game for the majority of players are frankly absurd 
I don't class people saying signed as emo rage or tears, but we'll agree to disagree there
Vote TeaDaze for CSM5!
|
| |
|