|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |

Galgacus
|
Posted - 2010.04.22 21:09:00 -
[1]
Originally by: Jeremey Edited by: Jeremey on 22/04/2010 21:00:58 First part of new video from Ellatan on testserver, reproducing the exploit and scenario that were used by Pandemic Legion's The Monkeysphere to kill players on Tranqulity.
Very interesting. o__O
|

Galgacus
|
Posted - 2010.04.22 21:15:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Squall5668 well then why didnt you add huhu to you buddy list 
As someone said on youtube, " Verified not to be a logonski by the fact that Huhuhu IS IN ANOTHER CHANNEL ON THE SCREEN, THUS ONLINE"
|

Galgacus
|
Posted - 2010.04.22 21:26:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Jeremey Second part of Ellatan's video published by him.
That's pretty awesome. Appearing in local chat on command, without speaking either.
|

Galgacus
|
Posted - 2010.04.22 21:33:00 -
[4]
Originally by: James Tritanius
Originally by: sih noh Edited by: sih noh on 22/04/2010 21:28:29 http://www.isxgames.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3691&highlight=scanner explanation of what monkey does, from a victim youl have to decipher the rusglish
hello everyone! i have a problem with bot killers. i believe not only me. the problem is: then hostile enter the system bot run on NotWhiteListPilot to SSpot(pos in my example). If bot arrive to SSpot while hostile in local, bot switch to wait some time in ss after hostile leave local. But if hostile leave local while bot IN Warp to SS, bot didn't switch to WAIT and warp to NEXT belt or even FIRST Belt in list. So what we have summary: Hostile enter system, warp to any belt and logoff in warp. Bot run to SS cause Hostile enter the system. Arrive to SS and as local is clear it warp to next belt. hostile login back on belt. looking: if bot not in belt, logoff for a 1-2 min again. bot arrive in next belt from SS and back to SS then hostile login back. and again back to next belt from SS cause Hostile is logedoff and bot don't switch to Wait timer. so in 1-10 tries bot will warp directly to the belt with botkiller and if they use scanner in first enter and know the group of belts where the bot was then they enter, they can kill bot in 1-3 tries. :cry:
Lemme guess, you didn't read the thread?
I was thinking the same thing.
|

Galgacus
|
Posted - 2010.04.22 21:40:00 -
[5]
Slightly OT; but this thread where people complain about being banned using a macro is amusing reading whilst we wait for more vids.
|

Galgacus
|
Posted - 2010.04.23 01:06:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Cartune
Originally by: Deus Ex'Machina
Originally by: Jigglepants Edited by: Jigglepants on 22/04/2010 23:45:03 :SIREN: PL LEAK INCOMING :SIREN: Quote: ****
PL: MENACES TO SOCIETY? YOU BE THE JUDGE
One of those guys is Bono, yet another is a GM alt. Those who resemble stick together eh?
nothing here, faux news. tourney sweepers, l33tist goony haxr, & GM shooting **** in a privy convo. status quo. move along
That's a tiny bit controversial. "Marked for deletion", Adida?
|

Galgacus
|
Posted - 2010.04.23 01:14:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Phosphorus Palladium
Originally by: Ellatan Deruimte First internet media mention, hopefully it will bring more attention to the problem and get it fixed sooner.
Nice article. But give CCP a little break here. The exploit has just been proven so obviously CCP does not have a fix ready right away. I am pretty sure they are working on it.
Their logs show nothing. Local had the correct entries at the time of the deaths in question. Move along.
|

Galgacus
|
Posted - 2010.04.23 01:49:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Phosphorus Palladium
Originally by: Grath Telkin Its easy to find out who used it, they've openly fraps'd themselves purposely hacking the SiSi client, and then posted the evidence in this thread.
Pretty sure thats a clear cut case.
Don't be silly. Part of bughunting is reproducing the bug. You should thank huhuhu for his efforts.
That is IF you are realy intersted in exploits not being abused on TQ.
lol, of course he is. 
|

Galgacus
|
Posted - 2010.05.01 16:32:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Jowen Datloran Edited by: Jowen Datloran on 01/05/2010 16:18:46
Originally by: Gunnanmon
Originally by: Lady Karma
Originally by: MatrixSkye Mk2
Tell me, Lady Karma, are you:
1) Purposefully misinforming and derailing from the issues? Or
2) Are really that lacking in brain power?
3) Causing me to cry
All of the above
are you are really that, is a sentence structure I lack the brain power to understand.
pwnt
Is there still space around the illiteracy impaired table? I can see it is getting a bit crowded over there.
When in Rome...
BTW - Isn't "illiteracy impaired" a double negative?
|
|
|
|