|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |
Stevakis
Deep Core Mining Inc.
   |
Posted - 2010.05.09 10:32:00 -
[1]
Great movie, got my vote! Truly represents the players instead of personal agenda, and has nice track record.
|
Stevakis
Deep Core Mining Inc.
|
Posted - 2010.05.09 11:05:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Space Pinata
Originally by: Stevakis
Great movie, got my vote! Truly represents the players instead of personal agenda, and has nice track record.
Have you actually read any of her opinions?
Like.. a single one of them?
I don't think the stuff posted about her is true. It comes from her direct competitors and if you read her track record documents, they do not show strong bias towards a carebear agenda. I see 0.0, PVP and FW issues amongst them. That proves that the accusations are false. I think Ankh can seperate her personal views and her csm role. That and I want someone that knows how FW works on the CSM. Her FW issues prove that she knows what she's talking about.
|
Stevakis
Deep Core Mining Inc.
|
Posted - 2010.05.09 12:24:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Cpt Branko
Originally by: Stevakis
I don't think the stuff posted about her is true.
Eve-search doesn't lie. Hell, you have screenshots of her "evil egg throwers need to get banned" crap in local.
Be rational. Ankh has been on the CSM twice. She hasn't raised any issues to ban PVP or people that gank. The suicide gank issue she raised is balanced. It asks for PVP means to deal with it, all PVE means have this listed as 'con'.
|
Stevakis
Deep Core Mining Inc.
|
Posted - 2010.05.10 09:17:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Dierdra Vaal
Originally by: Stevakis
Originally by: Cpt Branko
Originally by: Stevakis
I don't think the stuff posted about her is true.
Eve-search doesn't lie. Hell, you have screenshots of her "evil egg throwers need to get banned" crap in local.
Be rational. Ankh has been on the CSM twice. She hasn't raised any issues to ban PVP or people that gank. The suicide gank issue she raised is balanced. It asks for PVP means to deal with it, all PVE means have this listed as 'con'.
The suicide gank issue was only balanced because CSM1 would only support it if she changed her original, over the top proposal to something more balanced. Her original proposal would've essentially made it impossible for suicide ganking to exist.
So the issue isnt balanced because of her - its balanced because of the other CSM members (in CSM1).
It's fine if you want to vote for Ank - people have different ideas about the game and just because I dont agree with them does not make them inherently invalid. But do make sure you're informed properly.
It is impossible to inform myself properly with all the disinformation in this topic. Many accusations have been made against Ankh, and when I look into them, half of them are clearly false, and the other half are dubious at best. When I look at Ankhs campaign message, her videos and her explanations, I do not see a whiny carebear, I see an intelligent, highly motivated woman that participates in these elections due to an inner drive to contribute to the EVE community. I see someone willing to represent me, and does not hesistate to voice criticism to CCP when their policies and decissions are not in the interest of the players. I see a strong personality that goes against all odds. I greatly respect Ankh for being willing to keep up with it, despite the negativity thrown at her. Ankh just said your claim about the proposal is false. Do you have anything to back up your claim?
|
Stevakis
Deep Core Mining Inc.
|
Posted - 2010.05.10 11:08:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Crumplecorn
Ha ha, listening to a politician's propaganda.
I'd believe that sooner than the rambling of other politicians flinging mud in a campaign thread that isn't their own.
|
Stevakis
Deep Core Mining Inc.
|
Posted - 2010.05.10 12:59:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Dierdra Vaal
Originally by: Stevakis
Do you have anything to back up your claim?
Well I verified the chatlogs of that meeting, and it turns out the issue itself wasnt adjusted by the CSM as I originally thought (it was over 2 years ago), so I apologise for that.
However, what did happen was during the discussion with CCP when we talked about this issue, that Ank did suggest some measures that would make it very difficult or impractical (almost immediate concord response, much harder sec status hits, etc). Other CSM members did argue against such harsh measures. This was done as part of the discussion with CCP. Eventually we reached an agreement on slightly improving the sec status hit (on the short term). I guess I got the meetings mixed up in my memories :P
I find that very hard to believe, because the meeting minutes mention nothing of this, and because the meeting minutes make it sound as if CCP already had made up their mind (that being that the ganking was too much in favor of the aggressor and needed fixing) before the meeting. I also find this hard to believe, because Ankh just posted details that contradict your accusations, and your other accusation have just turned out to be false. That and if you look at Ankh's first video and her posts from earlier elections, you don't see her calling for CONCORD buffs, but for player-driven means of dealing with criminal players. Sorry. I believe Ankh's story here.
|
Stevakis
Deep Core Mining Inc.
|
Posted - 2010.05.10 13:01:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Digital Solaris
I hear with a bit of social engineering, you can make anyone* believe pretty much anything.
Ah, got it. Just repeat some lies and slander over and over in someone's campaign thread, and hope people believe that?
|
Stevakis
Deep Core Mining Inc.
|
Posted - 2010.05.11 08:17:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Sofia Roseburn
Nice propaganda piece, but there's evidence in this thread that directly contradicts a lot of what you've said.
Sorry but that so-called evidence has already been proven false most of the time. I rather believe a statement from her direct CEO than some professional mudflingers and trolls. Her CEO has a credible reputation.
|
Stevakis
Deep Core Mining Inc.
|
Posted - 2010.05.11 09:33:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Digital Solaris
Truth is, Marlakh's sudden involvement and statement, with the classic examples of nepotism here and there, sounds more like a crusade that is getting more and more desperate to keep her campaign on life support after going from vegetative state to persistent vegetative state when it only begs for a painless death without any suffering.
And as for you, it is apparent you would believe anything any one tells you to believe because it is so much simpler that way for you, isn't it?
If I look at the past times she and the other take care people ran for CSM, we saw the same smear on the campaign thread. All these people won the elections regardless. When on the CSM, Ankh, Erik and Z0D performed well, and time and again the whines and accusations from the griefing/ganking/0.0 crowd were proven false.
|
Stevakis
Deep Core Mining Inc.
|
Posted - 2010.05.11 13:00:00 -
[10]
None of you trolls ever had a dispute in corp chat, and never insulted anyone, of course? Care to make your logs public? 
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|