| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Orree
Dynaverse Corporation
Sodalitas XX
   |
Posted - 2010.05.03 23:13:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: Deja Thoris
Edited by: Deja Thoris on 28/04/2010 23:26:12
I don't support this. In its current incarnation eve isnt reaady for it.
It works in wormholes since there are limited and hard to find entries and exits.
With a proposal like this with eve in its current form it would just be local full of cloaky ***gots screaming "boom headshot!!!" every time someone enters local because the game offers no intel tools other than a half baked directional scanner.
Edit: Where the heck is the thumb down!?
While I'm not opposed to the greater concept of "no local" in 0.0 or low sec, I agree with Deja on this.
:thumbsdown:
----------
"How much easier it is to be critical than to be correct." ---Benjamin Disraeli |
Orree
Dynaverse Corporation
Sodalitas XX
|
Posted - 2010.05.04 18:08:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Ephemeron
Originally by: Orree
While I'm not opposed to the greater concept of "no local" in 0.0 or low sec, I agree with Deja on this.
:thumbsdown:
OK lets separate the pussies from hardcore people with new regions.
Nobody will force you into big scary no-local space, just don't let your fear get in the way of other people's fun
LOL..yeah. Here's me FULL OF FEAR!!!!!111!!!1  
I said I support the concept of it because I agree it would be fun (read: I'm not scared). I simply said I do not think the game in its current state will support a reasonable implementation of what is being requested.
Nice poo-flinging, though. That was impressive.
----------
"How much easier it is to be critical than to be correct." ---Benjamin Disraeli |
Orree
Dynaverse Corporation
Sodalitas XX
|
Posted - 2010.05.04 19:33:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Orree on 04/05/2010 19:34:05
I don't believe I even discussed that possibility in any way. It wasn't proposed in the OP.
I doubt seriously CCP would ever do it, but I certainly wouldn't care if they did.
The OP put forth the notion that all 0.0 and low-sec should have delayed local because it works in W-space. That's about as fallacious an argument as you're likely to find on the subject of delayed local in 0.0/low-sec. That is what I have commented about. Nothing more.
Dial back the froth, take a chill pill and quit assuming things about me. You don't know me, what I like or what I want. To the extent I think it's necessary and germane to the topic at hand, I'll provide such information.
----------
"How much easier it is to be critical than to be correct." ---Benjamin Disraeli |
| |
|