EVE Search - [CCCNP] A new era for conflict resolution.

All Channels

Intergalactic Summit

[CCCNP] A new era for conflict resolution.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Lord Murkon Amarr SPCS	Posted - 2010.05.17 23:42:00 - [61] Edited by: Lord Murkon on 17/05/2010 23:44:05 Originally by: ChipMo Just to clarify this case has not been brought by The Star Fraction, nor does it concern Archbishops actions towards them. It is Revan Neferis of The Archaeus of Blood who is seeking to resolve her grievances with Archbishop, one way or another. We may be able to offer a choice of arbitrators to hear the case if Archbishop will not be satisfied with myself as a neutral party, I can perhaps offer you a list of candidates. Mr ChipMo, I have been asked by his lordship the honorable Archbishop to let you know that he understands this claim is brought by the known slaver and Amarr Empress supporter Revan Neferis and not the Star Fraction. As the plaintiff has claimed his lordship has stalked, lied and disparaged the character of plaintiff he wishes me to point out that the only times he has mentioned the plaintiff is in the form of her being a third party in relation to claimed activities of the Star Fraction. Those occasions of mention have only repeated claims made by the plantiff herself that she is a konwn slaver, she is a supporter of the Amarr Empress, and that she is a member of a known pirate alliance The Final Stand. My friend the honorable Archbishop has thus concluded that the fears of the plaintiff that she is being stalked are some form of psychotic paranoia and he suggests she receive psychiatric care perhaps involving another hospitalization. As a disclaimer he does note that he has no evidence she has been hospitalized already however there have been multiple occurances of her disappearing for months on end then returning with a completely different focus in life. Archbishop reminded me of when she left last time (hating Amarr) and now returns a supporter of the Empress thus even I have concluded something happened to her. Given her absence from posting and the sudden change in direction of her allegience his lordship concluded perhaps she had been hospitalized in a secure psychiatric institution where IGS posting wasn't permitted. To this end his lordship the honorable Archbishop has reaffirmed to me his decision to decline participation in these proceedings as he believes it would only feed what he perceives to be a psychiatric paranoia in the plaintiff. Thus it is for her own good if he doesn't respond to her or have any interactions with her. Again as a disclaimer he wishes to state he has no evidence she is suffering from paranoia however given the claims of stalking it seems possible to him. As the conditions for setting a court date are defined by ChipMo as... Originally by: ChipMo "If both parties involved in a common dispute agree to abide by the ruling of the CCCNP we will set a court date." ...and as there has been no agreement to any conditions or to abide by any ruling by the honorable Archbishop a court date can not be set thus this claim is required to be summarily dismissed by ChipMo without a hearing. Any type of trial in absentia would clearly be a violation of the rules of the court as described by ChipMo and would thus reflect poorly on the courts reputation. Disclaimer: In posting this I am doing a favor for a personal friend of mine the honorable religious man Archbishop and I do not represent the SPCS or any other organization. Thank you for your time, Lord Murkon SPCS - Serving the pathetic Minmatar and lessor races by the grace of God
Revan Neferis Amarr The Archaeus of Blood The Final Stand.	Posted - 2010.05.17 23:49:00 - [62] Trial in absentia was acknowledged and the case taken by the court. If the case is retrieved now after acknowledgement I require the reparations for my time here and immediate ceasing of this court activity as it bears no ways to proceed with what you state you would. Trial in absentia is my right as the liar, stalker, madman disgusting waste of skin answering by the alias archbishop has waived his right to defend himself. With no more , Jasmine will speak on my behalf. Proceed with the case or scrap this court. A crime is doesn't need agreement to be committed neither to be judged. It's my final word in the matter. Revan Neferis Thrice-Illustrious Sovereign Sani Sabik Watch Neferis Resort VII: Auctoramentum Gladiatorum
Lord Murkon Amarr SPCS	Posted - 2010.05.18 00:02:00 - [63] Originally by: ChipMo ChipMo's Civil Court of New Providence[/center] Got a dispute? Need an impartial venue and arbitrator to oversee its resolution? Why not give the CCCNP a call. The CCCNP is an independent court which wields only the power invested in it by the parties of the dispute. We can currently offer Civil Courts for diplomatic resolutions, trade and resource disputes, thefts, aggression resolution and any number of minor disputes you and your adversaries may wish to settle out side of violence. How does it work? If both parties involved in a common dispute agree to abide by the ruling of the CCCNP we will set a court date. Ideally these will be held in space where each party is represented by themselves, proxy, or lawyer. Each party is also encouraged to bring along a sizeable group of supporters to view and validate the proceedings. For reference to all (in any case) please review the yellow bolded sections above which are taken directly from ChipMo's initial posting in this thread. In any case brought by one individual if the other individual does not agree to participate a key criteria for setting a court date can not be met. If no court date can be set there can be no "trial" and thus no "verdict in absentia". Thank you, Lord Murkon SPCS - Serving the pathetic Minmatar and lessor races by the grace of God
Revan Neferis Amarr The Archaeus of Blood The Final Stand.	Posted - 2010.05.18 00:13:00 - [64] Edited by: Revan Neferis on 18/05/2010 00:13:12 Originally by: Lord Murkon If no court date can be set there can be no "trial" and thus no "verdict in absentia". Thank you, Lord Murkon Shut up worm. Originally by: ChipMo Originally by: Revan Neferis I ask for a trial in absentia. I proceed with the case with or without the coward spineless liar. Truth fears not Justice. Jasmine , we go on. This case will have a verdict. Revan Neferis Thrice-Illustrious Sovereign Sani Sabik We can facilitate this. It is your ISK though, and your case. If you wish to proceed on his last recorded statement by proxy, that is your right and we can do so. It was acknowledged. The verdict in absentia shall happen. It shall happen or this court will pay me for my time and close doors for scamming and false advertise. Revan Neferis Thrice-Illustrious Sovereign Sani Sabik Watch Neferis Resort VII: Auctoramentum Gladiatorum
Jasmine Constantine Gallente Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction	Posted - 2010.05.18 00:56:00 - [65] Reposting these submissions on behalf of "Archbishop" legal representation. Originally by: Lord Murkon I have been asked to post on behalf of his lordship the honorable Archbishop by him as a friend as he doesn't wish to have any dealings with the plaintiff. Archbishop has not addressed Revan Neferis directly nor has he asked any comment from her. Archbishop has asked me to relay that he believes public evidence here in IGS supports all statements he has made about the Star Fraction associating with known slaver and Amarr Empress supporter Revan Neferis namely that the Star Fraction has engaged in conduct by these associations and participation in events sponsored by the slaver and supporter Revan Neferis. He also believes that these associations, using logic used by the Star Fraction against other entities as an excuse to declare war and commit acts of violence, makes the Star Fraction complete hypocrites. Finally the honorable Archbishop has asked me to relay that it would be inappropriate for ChipMo to hear any case involving the known slaver and Amarr Empress supporter Revan Neferis. The reason for this is ChipMo's recent participation in her latest "event" where by associating with a known slaver and supporter of the Amarr Empress he seems to contradict the claimed ideology of the Star Fraction and their claims that they oppose slavers and feel justified shooting those who support slavers. ChipMo has not shot himself (as far as we know). Thus his lordship respectfully declines to participate in the claim made by the individual Revan Neferis. He also has asked me to suggest she seek psychiatric therapy as he believes her last hospitalization helped in that she now at least supports the Amarr Empire now but is still having delusions of granduer and thoughts of blood worshiper. It is his hope that more psychiatric hospitalizations will help her recover more fully. Please note: As a disclaimer his lordship says he has no direct knowledge that Revan Neferis was hospitalized... but given she was gone several months and returned suddenly supporting the empire... it's a logical conclusion that some psychiatric intervention took place. Still he makes no claims about her psychiatric stability (or instability as it were). Buy Justice!
Jasmine Constantine Gallente Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction	Posted - 2010.05.18 00:58:00 - [66] Reposting these submissions on behalf of "Archbishop" legal representation. Originally by: Lord Murkon I have been asked by his lordship the honorable Archbishop to let you know that he understands this claim is brought by the known slaver and Amarr Empress supporter Revan Neferis and not the Star Fraction. As the plaintiff has claimed his lordship has stalked, lied and disparaged the character of plaintiff he wishes me to point out that the only times he has mentioned the plaintiff is in the form of her being a third party in relation to claimed activities of the Star Fraction. Those occasions of mention have only repeated claims made by the plantiff herself that she is a konwn slaver, she is a supporter of the Amarr Empress, and that she is a member of a known pirate alliance The Final Stand. My friend the honorable Archbishop has thus concluded that the fears of the plaintiff that she is being stalked are some form of psychotic paranoia and he suggests she receive psychiatric care perhaps involving another hospitalization. As a disclaimer he does note that he has no evidence she has been hospitalized already however there have been multiple occurances of her disappearing for months on end then returning with a completely different focus in life. Archbishop reminded me of when she left last time (hating Amarr) and now returns a supporter of the Empress thus even I have concluded something happened to her. Given her absence from posting and the sudden change in direction of her allegience his lordship concluded perhaps she had been hospitalized in a secure psychiatric institution where IGS posting wasn't permitted. To this end his lordship the honorable Archbishop has reaffirmed to me his decision to decline participation in these proceedings as he believes it would only feed what he perceives to be a psychiatric paranoia in the plaintiff. Thus it is for her own good if he doesn't respond to her or have any interactions with her. Again as a disclaimer he wishes to state he has no evidence she is suffering from paranoia however given the claims of stalking it seems possible to him. Buy Justice!
Jasmine Constantine Gallente Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction	Posted - 2010.05.18 01:04:00 - [67] It is my opinion before the CCCNP that "lord murkon" has taken part in the legal process by making representation on the part of the apparent Amarrian Cleric "archbishop" and has provided sufficient argumentation to signify an intent to contest the charge of my client Revan Neferis and by leaving such comments on the record here will provide a basis for legal judgement. He has repeated many examples of defaming, incorrect, scandalously deceitful and generally worthless slander here and should certainly be sufficient to hear the case. While it is clear that "archbishop" himself appears penniless and unable to stake isk on his own defense it should be possible to issue a condemnation of his behaviour and reputation that will serve as a warning to those undertaking involvement and interaction with this person in the future. Hence I wish to proceed to a hearing in absentia of the principle and intend to present these words of his proxy (recorded above) as partial evidence during the proceedings. Buy Justice!
Lord Murkon Amarr SPCS	Posted - 2010.05.18 01:10:00 - [68] Edited by: Lord Murkon on 18/05/2010 01:12:33 Originally by: Jasmine Constantine Reposting these submissions on behalf of "Archbishop" legal representation. Perhaps you missed the comment I made about posting a message from the honorable Archbishop as a personal friend. POSTING BY LORD MURKON INDICATING HE IS MERELY PASSING WORD ALONG AS A FRIEND In case you don't want to go back a page: I have been asked to post on behalf of his lordship the honorable Archbishop by him as a friend as he doesn't wish to have any dealings with the plaintiff. I am not his legal representation rather I merely was passing on a message from him as a friend and nothing more. To the best of my knowledge he has no legal representation as he is not a participant in this claim. Thank you, Lord Murkon SPCS - Serving the pathetic Minmatar and lessor races by the grace of God
Jasmine Constantine Gallente Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction	Posted - 2010.05.18 01:15:00 - [69] Originally by: Lord Murkon I am not his legal representation rather I merely was passing on a message from him as a friend and nothing more. To the best of my knowledge he has no legal representation as he is not a participant in this claim. And I submit to the court that by representing "archbishop" here you are taking a part in the process and your postings shall be entered into the record of the court as your principle's plea in this matter. You cannot expect to grandstand in public on the court's time and not have your words responded too. So lets see what CCCNP has to say about it. If these statements are admissable then I will continue with the prosecution. Buy Justice!
Lord Murkon Amarr SPCS	Posted - 2010.05.18 02:16:00 - [70] Originally by: Jasmine Constantine Originally by: Lord Murkon I am not his legal representation rather I merely was passing on a message from him as a friend and nothing more. To the best of my knowledge he has no legal representation as he is not a participant in this claim. And I submit to the court that by representing "archbishop" here you are taking a part in the process and your postings shall be entered into the record of the court as your principle's plea in this matter. You cannot expect to grandstand in public on the court's time and not have your words responded too. So lets see what CCCNP has to say about it. If these statements are admissable then I will continue with the prosecution. First Jasmine I'm glad you've retracted your claim I'm "legal representation" and now consider me only "participating in the process" (whatever that means). I've posted a few comments from a friend who doesn't want to have anything to do with you or your client. Still I feel you have wasted your time here and we don't want that. Likewise I don't want you to be confused at all. Thus I'll remind you of ChipMo's stated rules for the CCCNP. Originally by: ChipMo If both parties involved in a common dispute agree to abide by the ruling of the CCCNP we will set a court date. Then I will point you to the comment I relayed on the last page by my friend Archbishop regarding the CCCNP. Originally by: Lord Murkon Thus his lordship respectfully declines to participate in the claim made by the individual Revan Neferis. I hope that clarifies matters for you. I will note the criteria to set a court date requires that both parties agree to accept the decision of the CCCNP and that criteria clearly hasn't been met here. Alot of people I'm sure believe this is a Star Fraction/CCCNP court and would expect ChipMo to just ignore his rules and hold an absentia trial. After all this is his CEO's girlfriend and cousin he'd be deciding the case for. I myself give everyone the benefit of the doubt thus personally I will wait to see if ChipMo is indeed neutral and will follow his own rules before personally deciding my opinion of the CCCNP. Following the rules though the criteria isn't met and a court date can't be set. There is no provision in his rules for a trial in absentia either. Sorry. Lord Murkon SPCS - Serving the pathetic Minmatar and lessor races by the grace of God
Revan Neferis Amarr The Archaeus of Blood The Final Stand.	Posted - 2010.05.18 02:30:00 - [71] Edited by: Revan Neferis on 18/05/2010 02:30:36 Originally by: Lord Murkon Following the rules though the criteria isn't met and a court date can't be set. There is no provision in his rules for a trial in absentia either. Sorry. Lord Murkon Originally by: ChipMo Originally by: Revan Neferis I ask for a trial in absentia. I proceed with the case with or without the coward spineless liar. Truth fears not Justice. Jasmine , we go on. This case will have a verdict. Revan Neferis Thrice-Illustrious Sovereign Sani Sabik We can facilitate this. It is your ISK though, and your case. If you wish to proceed on his last recorded statement by proxy, that is your right and we can do so. He already accepted worm. Aren't you just stupid by default or also can't you read? Revan Neferis Thrice-Illustrious Sovereign Sani Sabik Watch Neferis Resort VII: Auctoramentum Gladiatorum
Jasmine Constantine Gallente Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction	Posted - 2010.05.18 02:34:00 - [72] Originally by: Lord Murkon There is no provision in his rules for a trial in absentia either. Since when did you get appointed judge? Sit down and shut up and wait for a decision you pointless mook! As long as your spineless master doesn't dare show his deceitful face here you'll be taken as his representative and council and thats all. I'm arguing your involvement in this thread constitutes your master's acceptance of the court authority to make a judgement and we'll wait and see if the Civil Court agrees. Buy Justice!
Lord Murkon Amarr SPCS	Posted - 2010.05.18 02:41:00 - [73] Originally by: Revan Neferis Originally by: Lord Murkon Following the rules though the criteria isn't met and a court date can't be set. There is no provision in his rules for a trial in absentia either. Sorry. Lord Murkon Originally by: ChipMo Originally by: Revan Neferis I ask for a trial in absentia. I proceed with the case with or without the coward spineless liar. Truth fears not Justice. Jasmine , we go on. This case will have a verdict. Revan Neferis Thrice-Illustrious Sovereign Sani Sabik We can facilitate this. It is your ISK though, and your case. If you wish to proceed on his last recorded statement by proxy, that is your right and we can do so. He already accepted worm. Aren't you just stupid by default or also can't you read? Revan Neferis Thrice-Illustrious Sovereign Sani Sabik I can read clearly his rules in the first posting of this thread. What he accepted really doesn't matter. His rules are clear to all. If he wants to backpedal on them and change them so he can hold a one-sided trial for his CEO's lover it would show everyone in Eve that the CCCNP is just a Star Fraction/CCCNP propoganda court and never intended to be neutral. We will see what ChipMo does. He'll either follow his own rules or he'll ignore them and create another Star Fraction hypocrisy moment for history and destroy the credibility of the CCCNP as a neutral court in the process. As I said I myself will wait to see what he does before making my own judgement on the neutrality of his court. As for you however I have no problem speaking to you personally and I won't even call you names (why all the anger?). I wanted to ask you if your slaves are cared for by SPCS standards or not? I've read about some of your slave "events" in the past and I am concerned you may not be treating your slaves humanely in accordance with the directives of our late Emperor. Given you now claim to support the Amarr Empress I was just curious how you treat your slaves. Lord Murkon SPCS - Serving the pathetic Minmatar and lessor races by the grace of God
Revan Neferis Amarr The Archaeus of Blood The Final Stand.	Posted - 2010.05.18 02:51:00 - [74] Originally by: Lord Murkon Originally by: Revan Neferis Originally by: Lord Murkon Following the rules though the criteria isn't met and a court date can't be set. There is no provision in his rules for a trial in absentia either. Sorry. Lord Murkon Originally by: ChipMo Originally by: Revan Neferis I ask for a trial in absentia. I proceed with the case with or without the coward spineless liar. Truth fears not Justice. Jasmine , we go on. This case will have a verdict. Revan Neferis Thrice-Illustrious Sovereign Sani Sabik We can facilitate this. It is your ISK though, and your case. If you wish to proceed on his last recorded statement by proxy, that is your right and we can do so. He already accepted worm. Aren't you just stupid by default or also can't you read? Revan Neferis Thrice-Illustrious Sovereign Sani Sabik I can read clearly his rules in the first posting of this thread. What he accepted really doesn't matter. His rules are clear to all. If he wants to backpedal on them and change them so he can hold a one-sided trial for his CEO's lover it would show everyone in Eve that the CCCNP is just a Star Fraction/CCCNP propoganda court and never intended to be neutral. We will see what ChipMo does. He'll either follow his own rules or he'll ignore them and create another Star Fraction hypocrisy moment for history and destroy the credibility of the CCCNP as a neutral court in the process. As I said I myself will wait to see what he does before making my own judgement on the neutrality of his court. As for you however I have no problem speaking to you personally and I won't even call you names (why all the anger?). I wanted to ask you if your slaves are cared for by SPCS standards or not? I've read about some of your slave "events" in the past and I am concerned you may not be treating your slaves humanely in accordance with the directives of our late Emperor. Given you now claim to support the Amarr Empress I was just curious how you treat your slaves. Lord Murkon Jasmine, I believe that this is enough to conclude my case, Archbishops representant just charged me with the same lies and defamations and addressed me personally here inside this court. Archbishop is using his voice to advocate and i demand this trial to start as it was already acknowledged by the Court acc with Chipmos words. Revan Neferis Thrice-Illustrious Sovereign Sani Sabik Watch Neferis Resort VII: Auctoramentum Gladiatorum
Archbishop Amarr PIE Inc.	Posted - 2010.05.18 03:00:00 - [75] Originally by: Jasmine Constantine As long as your spineless master doesn't dare show his deceitful face here you'll be taken as his representative and council and thats all. I'm arguing your involvement in this thread constitutes your master's acceptance of the court authority to make a judgement and we'll wait and see if the Civil Court agrees. Jasmine, I'm quite happy to show my face here to register my official refusal to take part in this Star Fraction Court of Horrors (aka: CCCNP). For the record: I DO NOT AGREE TO PARTICIPATE IN, ABIDE BY THE RULINGS OF, ACCEPT ANY JURISDICTIONAL CLAIM OR RIGHT OF OR BY NOR DO I AGREE TO HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE CCCNP OR ANY CLAIM BROUGHT AGAINST ME BY ANY INDIVIDUAL OR ORGANIZATION VIA THE CCCNP. Signed: ARCHBISHOP. I hope that clears it up for you. I have also instructed my friend Lord Murkon to not bother making any other posts attempting to clarify my position as this clearly states it and he's kind of muddled it. Just to note I fully expect ChipMo to ignore his own rules and render a big victory verdict for the plaintiff in this case since it's Jade's girlfriend and your his cousin and all. Ignoring your own rules and principles when they're inconvenient is typical Star Fraction methodology after all so this is what I and most people expect. I'd be totally surprised if he didn't and I think everyone else would be too. We'll see if he's really neutral. Anyway I have slaves to give a religious lecture to. Have a nice day. Archbishop PIE WEBSITE ARCHBISHOP PORTAL
Revan Neferis Amarr The Archaeus of Blood The Final Stand.	Posted - 2010.05.18 03:09:00 - [76] Originally by: Archbishop I'd be totally surprised if he didn't He already did. My claim is more than substantial and I don't need to ask the criminal who shot me if he allows me to sue him. Your notion is ridiculous. Neither do I care about your acknowledgement. I recognise the Court and the charge is mine and so it shall be done. And if you are not here even better, spare me from your displeasing disgusting presence. Revan Neferis Thrice-Illustrious Sovereign Sani Sabik Watch Neferis Resort VII: Auctoramentum Gladiatorum
Lord Murkon Amarr SPCS	Posted - 2010.05.18 03:11:00 - [77] Originally by: Revan Neferis Jasmine, I believe that this is enough to conclude my case, Archbishops representant just charged me with the same lies and defamations and addressed me personally here inside this court. Archbishop is using his voice to advocate and i demand this trial to start as it was already acknowledged by the Court acc with Chipmos words. Revan Neferis Thrice-Illustrious Sovereign Sani Sabik What lies and defamations? As I understand it you own slaves (or did). My question was do you (or did you) follow SPCS guidelines. My question was purely personal (as indicated) as SPCS CEO and has nothing to do with Archbishop or your claim against him here. Do you or do you not have slaves? If you don't please let me know and I'll happily withdraw the question and stand corrected. If you do you could answer the question YES or NO. As you know the SPCS standards are voluntarily guidelines and I frequently ask slave owners if they follow them. Lord Murkon SPCS - Serving the pathetic Minmatar and lessor races by the grace of God
Revan Neferis Amarr The Archaeus of Blood The Final Stand.	Posted - 2010.05.18 03:17:00 - [78] Originally by: Lord Murkon Do you or do you not have slaves? If you don't please let me know and I'll happily withdraw the question and stand corrected. Originally by: Revan Neferis It's known by all that at Posted - 2010.01.01 06:59:00 - [191] a public declaration of me was made regarding the case: "No more souls are required. And from this day on every slave reaching my hands will be released " Revan Neferis Thrice-Illustrious Sovereign Sani Sabik Withdraw your question and apologise. Than ask the other worm to do the same. Revan Neferis Thrice-Illustrious Sovereign Sani Sabik Watch Neferis Resort VII: Auctoramentum Gladiatorum
Lord Murkon Amarr SPCS	Posted - 2010.05.18 03:19:00 - [79] Edited by: Lord Murkon on 18/05/2010 03:20:14 Originally by: Revan Neferis Originally by: Lord Murkon Do you or do you not have slaves? If you don't please let me know and I'll happily withdraw the question and stand corrected. Originally by: Revan Neferis It's known by all that at Posted - 2010.01.01 06:59:00 - [191] a public declaration of me was made regarding the case: "No more souls are required. And from this day on every slave reaching my hands will be released " Revan Neferis Thrice-Illustrious Sovereign Sani Sabik Withdraw your question and apologise. Than ask the other worm to do the same. Revan Neferis Thrice-Illustrious Sovereign Sani Sabik I didn't know that. Yes I will stand corrected and now acknowledge you do not have slaves any longer. Thank you. Lord Murkon SPCS - Serving the pathetic Minmatar and lessor races by the grace of God
Revan Neferis Amarr The Archaeus of Blood The Final Stand.	Posted - 2010.05.18 03:26:00 - [80] Originally by: Lord Murkon I didn't know that. Yes I will stand corrected and now acknowledge you do not have slaves any longer. Thank you. Lord Murkon Now shusssssssh out of my way, insignificant. My charge against archbishop remains. Revan Neferis Thrice-Illustrious Sovereign Sani Sabik Watch Neferis Resort VII: Auctoramentum Gladiatorum
Lord Murkon Amarr SPCS	Posted - 2010.05.18 03:43:00 - [81] Originally by: Revan Neferis Originally by: Lord Murkon I didn't know that. Yes I will stand corrected and now acknowledge you do not have slaves any longer. Thank you. Lord Murkon Now shusssssssh out of my way, insignificant. My charge against archbishop remains. Revan Neferis Thrice-Illustrious Sovereign Sani Sabik It appears he has apologized over in that Murder at the Memorialthread. I know he didn't want any contact with you so it looks like he told Jasmine. I have some other questions for you though Revan if you have the time. What prompted you to release your slaves? It seems a radical shift for you and I'm wondering what caused it. Lord Murkon SPCS - Serving the pathetic Minmatar and lessor races by the grace of God
Revan Neferis Amarr The Archaeus of Blood The Final Stand.	Posted - 2010.05.18 03:57:00 - [82] Originally by: Lord Murkon It appears he has apologized over in that Murder at the Memorialthread. I know he didn't want any contact with you so it looks like he told Jasmine. I dont care where he apologised and to who. I was clear about what i request. A formal public apology to ME. Nothing else is acceptable and i wont go around worthless threads. Originally by: Lord Murkon I have some other questions for you though Revan if you have the time. What prompted you to release your slaves? It seems a radical shift for you and I'm wondering what caused it. Lord Murkon This I'll answer because I want. This is the answer. Jade Constantine on 22/12/2009 02:57:59 a camera drone tracks the unmistakable figure of Jade Constantine broadcasting from the flagbridge of a Proteus Class strategic cruiser in orbit around a sullen ember-hued worldlet in Lasleinur system. Jade is dressed in a simple unadorned emerald kimono, belted in gold and barefoot against a full screen holotank of the dust nebula and starlight beyond "My love. Please stop this. Neither imperial mandate nor demonstration of power, nor anger nor hurt nor frustration nor pangs of rage have a place to eclipse the simple truth of vows pledged and wine tasted and custom's of our people. I ask you as your lover and confidante, your companion and soulmate in eternity. Please end this, release all the slaves taken and allow me to bring them home to their people. The Matari bloodline is not your enemy. And there is no need for this. Nobody should die in the name of our love. For all that is noble in the heritage of your faith, show generosity of spirit and demonstrate an example to your fallen kinsmen elsewhere across space." It was my gift to her. Revan Neferis Thrice-Illustrious Sovereign Sani Sabik Watch Neferis Resort VII: Auctoramentum Gladiatorum
Jasmine Constantine Gallente Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction	Posted - 2010.05.18 04:21:00 - [83] Edited by: Jasmine Constantine on 18/05/2010 04:21:38 Originally by: Revan Neferis Originally by: Lord Murkon I didn't know that. Yes I will stand corrected and now acknowledge you do not have slaves any longer. Thank you. Lord Murkon Now shusssssssh out of my way, insignificant. My charge against archbishop remains. Revan Neferis Thrice-Illustrious Sovereign Sani Sabik I consider this is an admission of guilt on the major substance of damage claims against my client and will ask the court to consider punitive declaration of censure appropriate to the scale and volume of lies told by the nationalist worm using the alias "archbishop". Though the cowardice of this creature has prevented his staking isk, material or presence thus far it is possible for a verdict to include a stern reproof for his dishonest nature and apparent obsessional stalking of my client up to and including salacious drooling commentary on her relationships and the contents of her underwear closets. I call upon the court to deliver a clear message to this kind of degenerate purveyor of petty slander and delusional filth - if Amarrian's want to pretend to be clergymen they are free to do so, but should contain their lurid fantasies to the pages of altarboyz magazine rather than mispackaging them as meaningful political comment on galnet. Buy Justice!
Corporate Thief Caldari Code Triage	Posted - 2010.05.18 05:21:00 - [84] Pardon my intrusion, but I was under the impression that this was a thread on the subject of a new service in Providence, not an actual courthouse? --- Originally by: CCP Shadow Off-topic posts dealing with sexual orientation have been removed. Please keep this discussion on-topic. Thanks. -- Shadow
Unlimited Chaos	Posted - 2010.05.18 10:41:00 - [85] Originally by: Corporate Thief Pardon my intrusion, but I was under the impression that this was a thread on the subject of a new service in Providence, not an actual courthouse? yeah ehehe, they can't even abide by there own rules, its quite the farce... but then.... thats anarchy for you, little nobodys wanting to seem signifi****.
Merdaneth Amarr Angel Wing.	Posted - 2010.05.18 11:30:00 - [86] Originally by: Revan Neferis Trial in absentia is my right as the liar, stalker, madman disgusting waste of skin answering by the alias archbishop has waived his right to defend himself. If mr. ChipMo gives you that right, then is certainly is your right. But it is still mr. ChipMo right to give. I merely note that asserting authority over parties who did not agree to fall under that authority in the first place is not what I expected from a court of arbiters, let alone an anarchist court of arbiters. Originally by: Revan Neferis Proceed with the case or scrap this court. A crime is doesn't need agreement to be committed neither to be judged. It's my final word in the matter. I agree with you. In case of a trial (and not a arbiter hearing) it is most likely that one of the parties does not desire to agree or want to commit to be judged. The authority to do so and to inflict punishment or consequences (even to unwilling participants) is enforced by the state. A state does not need agreement from its citizens to exert power over them. I didn't know mr. ChipMo is using his court as the prelude to set up an authorative state in Providence. In fact, I doubt it is his intention. Then again, those statist memes and principles are quite useful now, are they? ____ The Illusion of Freedom \| The Truth about Slavery
Merdaneth Amarr Angel Wing.	Posted - 2010.05.18 12:04:00 - [87] Originally by: Jasmine Constantine It is my opinion before the CCCNP that "lord murkon" has taken part in the legal process by making representation on the part of the apparent Amarrian Cleric "archbishop" and has provided sufficient argumentation to signify an intent to contest the charge of my client Revan Neferis and by leaving such comments on the record here will provide a basis for legal judgement. He has repeated many examples of defaming, incorrect, scandalously deceitful and generally worthless slander here and should certainly be sufficient to hear the case. You mean that publicly speaking on an issue is in itself sufficient to recognize a specific judicial authority and accept its authority Your version of political anarchism is quite, quite odd. Perhaps you and your sisters should reduce all your rules simply to 'might makes right' since other than that I can see little consistency in the application of your philosophy. ____ The Illusion of Freedom \| The Truth about Slavery
Rodj Blake Amarr PIE Inc.	Posted - 2010.05.18 12:21:00 - [88] By the way Revan, how did your case at the Theology Council go? Originally by: Revan Neferis For crimes against the Empire and against My own, I shall adress you to the supreme Amarr Theology Council and Privy Council. You shall answer for arbitrary use of power and treason of highest degree. Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori.
Archbishop Amarr PIE Inc.	Posted - 2010.05.18 12:37:00 - [89] Originally by: Merdaneth You mean that publicly speaking on an issue is in itself sufficient to recognize a specific judicial authority and accept its authority Your version of political anarchism is quite, quite odd. Perhaps you and your sisters should reduce all your rules simply to 'might makes right' since other than that I can see little consistency in the application of your philosophy. Apparently they believe that my asking a friend to pass a few messages along means more then it is Merdaneth. It is what it is... a friend doing me a favor... certainly not some bizarre "acceptance" as portrayed by Jasmine. To make that clear though I have now spoken and indicated I refuse to be judged by the CCCNP thus the key criteria of ChipMo's court that both parties be willing to accept judgement clearly has not been met. Perhaps though Merdaneth is correct and this raises a few questions... Is the real intention of the Star Fraction/CCCNP to set up some "state court" where you don't need two parties willing to be arbitrated to have a court date? Is the Star Fraction going to then act as the "enforcer" police arm of the new Star Fraction/CCCNP court and met out punishment to those found "guilty" just as they punished I-RED at the memorial a couple of weeks ago for alleged "crimes" involving slavery? Perhaps by creating a "court" they can use to get one sided judgements against others they hope to use it as a PR tool to make more palatable their acts of random violence? Is the Star Fraction/CCCNP court going to cut backroom deals with people in ways that contradict it's rules when it's convenient for them? For example in this case the rules by ChipMo clearly state both parties must be willing to abide by the judgement of the CCCNP before a court date will be set. Then ChipMo apparently agreed to modify those rules for his CEO's lover "on the fly" and hold an absentia trial of sorts. Has a backroom deal been cut here and why is the CCCNP seeming to violate it's own rules? As I see it Merdaneth may be right on target. Setting up a "state" as the Star Fraction is apparently trying to do requires a "court" to enforce the laws it lays down. Obviously they feel having "judgements" by a "court" will in some way improve the PR value of their actions and make them in some way legal. Now the only question remains will ChipMo do what is correct or what is expected by his Star Fraction masters? If he does what is correct he will follow the letter of his rules and announce no court date can be set as both parties fail to agree to abide by a CCCNP decision. He will tell the plaintiff that the rules require both parties must agree to abide and that hasn't been met here. He will apologize to the plaintiff but state "rules are rules" and summarily dismiss her claim. Or... He will prove to all this is really a Star Fraction/CCCNP court and completely violate the rules he put on the first page of this thread. He will prove his court isn't neutral by holding a "trial" even when his own base criteria for the CCCNP haven't been met. He will prove he cut a backroom deal with the lover of his CEO and hear a case with only one side to it in complete opposition to his own stated rule of being an arbitrator with two willing sides agreeing to be arbitrated. He will then issue what I expect to be a verdict against me that his masters from the Star Fraction will then attempt to use against me in another of their famous PR campaigns. In doing so ChipMo will thus be verifying his court never intended to be neutral, never intended to follow it's own rules and really is just an arm of the Star Fraction and a new attempt at PR damage control. What will ChipMo do... the Eve cluster awaits. Archbishop PIE WEBSITE ARCHBISHOP PORTAL
Archbishop Amarr PIE Inc.	Posted - 2010.05.18 12:44:00 - [90] Edited by: Archbishop on 18/05/2010 12:45:30 Originally by: Rodj Blake By the way Revan, how did your case at the Theology Council go? Originally by: Revan Neferis For crimes against the Empire and against My own, I shall adress you to the supreme Amarr Theology Council and Privy Council. You shall answer for arbitrary use of power and treason of highest degree. Good question Rodj I was wondering that as well... perhaps Revan could post the court transcript. Then again with her reputation for erratic behavior (hates Amarr, loves Amarr, supports Tetrimon, supports Blood worship), delusions of grandeur (thrice illustrious grand poobah sovereign of the kichen sink) and what not they probably didn't let her within 10 systems of the councils. That would explain why she asked her lover to create a special court just for her... she obliged getting ChipMo to form the Star Fraction/CCCNP... where she can hold all the one sided trials she likes and get special verdicts just for her! As I don't expect ChipMo to follow his own rules and not set a court date I can't wait to see what this one-sided charade of a kangaroo court presents. Perhaps I should send some dancing animals and clowns to attend the "trial"? I must say... if ChipMo actually follows his rules and refuses to hear this case even I will have to take note of that fact. He will have proved this isn't some Star Fraction kangaroo court and that it actually may be neutral and fair. I don't expect that to happen though but I could be surprised. Archbishop PIE WEBSITE ARCHBISHOP PORTAL

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.