EVE Search - Yaharr! I'm running for the CSM and I have some plans for piracy

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Crime and Punishment

Yaharr! I'm running for the CSM and I have some plans for piracy

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Lubomir Penev interimo	Posted - 2010.05.04 14:22:00 - [61] Originally by: mazzilliu Originally by: Nomad Storm Originally by: mazzilliu Add battleship spawns to belts in lowsec. No vote for you ok, re-worded and refined the ideas in the OP Too late, already obvious you're just after free fanfest holidays. For any lowsec dweller thinking mazzilliu would do anything for you just watch her voting history in CSM 3, like when she voted against fixing a bug that only affect people with low sec status. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/CSM_Meeting_Minutes_3.006#Travelling_through_Concord_Space_no_longer_randomly_gives_GCC_.28Larkonis.29 (yes, Larkonis did really bring up pirate issues...) I voted mazzilliu for CSM 3 and for sure won't do it again. -- 081014 : emoragequit, char transfered to a friend, 090317 : back to original owner blog
KinkyRefine	Posted - 2010.05.04 14:59:00 - [62] The simplest idea I had to get more people to move to lowsec was with the next T3 item. Have something that can only be found it lowsec, a light weight alloy or something. It doesn't have to be mined, it could be found in special combat drone sites. (There could be some sort of RP reason why the drones only live in lowsec) Giving people a potentially very profitable reason to go there, but also a very risky one.
Andrea Griffin	Posted - 2010.05.04 15:25:00 - [63] Originally by: Vladimir Norkoff Try and get the sentry guns to do damage dependent on sig radius. That way Interceptors get hit for a little, while Cap ships get hit for a whole hell of alot. Ideally scaled to the point where every ship class can stay on the gate for about the same amount of time. This is a terrible idea. We want MORE people in low sec space, not less, and if interceptors with their fast locking can sit at a gate for even 30 seconds you will see low sec become more vacant than ever. The only reason some people enter low sec at all is because they are relatively safe from gate camps when flying frigates, and this would eradicate that safety net.
Le Skunk Low Sec Liberators	Posted - 2010.05.04 22:21:00 - [64] Edited by: Le Skunk on 04/05/2010 22:23:33 Originally by: Lubomir Penev Originally by: mazzilliu Originally by: Nomad Storm Originally by: mazzilliu Add battleship spawns to belts in lowsec. No vote for you ok, re-worded and refined the ideas in the OP Too late, already obvious you're just after free fanfest holidays. For any lowsec dweller thinking mazzilliu would do anything for you just watch her voting history in CSM 3, like when she voted against fixing a bug that only affect people with low sec status. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/CSM_Meeting_Minutes_3.006#Travelling_through_Concord_Space_no_longer_randomly_gives_GCC_.28Larkonis.29 (yes, Larkonis did really bring up pirate issues...) I voted mazzilliu for CSM 3 and for sure won't do it again. Also of note is that it appears mazillu voted NO in the csm "Fix Logofski" one of, if not the, biggest pains for lowsec pirates everywhere. SHOCK HORROR As such I wonder why you think you should be voted for by lowsec pirates and why you claim to have "carried the baton for larkonis" when he got hoofed when you appear to have voted against some of the things he cared most about. SKUNK TLDR: Your past voting has pretty much unanimously gone AGAINST LOW SEC PIRATES so you aint getting the votes. (o)
Lady Karma	Posted - 2010.05.05 01:04:00 - [65] Originally by: Le Skunk Also of note is that it appears mazillu voted NO in the csm "Fix Logofski" one of, if not the, biggest pains for lowsec pirates everywhere. SHOCK HORROR As such I wonder why you think you should be voted for by lowsec pirates and why you claim to have "carried the baton for larkonis" when he got hoofed when you appear to have voted against some of the things he cared most about. SKUNK TLDR: Your past voting has pretty much unanimously gone AGAINST LOW SEC PIRATES so you aint getting the votes. Isn't keeping loggoffski and station hugging deagro a pirates dream these days? If you bothered to look up the origins of her corp, you might understand where she is coming from. It's not about hugging stations or sensor boosted hics on gates. Those things kill low sec, because it's pointless to fight on stations with current deagro timers, and why would empire dwellers want to come to low sec when its all camps. Blob the gate, blob jumps in logg offs happen. No fun for anyone. Bring back belt piracy. Juicy Battleships in belts/missions being killed solo by cruisers, you remember those days Skunk? I can.
Herzog Wolfhammer Gallente Aliastra	Posted - 2010.05.05 02:21:00 - [66] Things are far worse for low sec than most people think. People are using wormholes to completely bypass them, linger out in 0.0 for weeks at a time, and get back to empire. I have been to 0.0 numerous times and have not touched low sec more than twice in a year.
Cpt Branko Retired Pirate Club	Posted - 2010.05.05 02:32:00 - [67] Originally by: Herzog Wolfhammer Things are far worse for low sec than most people think. People are using wormholes to completely bypass them, linger out in 0.0 for weeks at a time, and get back to empire. I have been to 0.0 numerous times and have not touched low sec more than twice in a year. So low sec is somehow bad because you don't need to go through it to get to 0.0 and you know this because you don't go to lowsec. Cool story, bro. Sig removed, inappropriate link. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint
Herzog Wolfhammer Gallente Aliastra	Posted - 2010.05.05 06:20:00 - [68] Originally by: Cpt Branko Originally by: Herzog Wolfhammer Things are far worse for low sec than most people think. People are using wormholes to completely bypass them, linger out in 0.0 for weeks at a time, and get back to empire. I have been to 0.0 numerous times and have not touched low sec more than twice in a year. So low sec is somehow bad because you don't need to go through it to get to 0.0 and you know this because you don't go to lowsec. Cool story, bro. Yes. Exactly. The gank pipelines and gauntlets are pointless. 0.0 is everything the residents there say it is. Most players cannot get there alone to harvest the sites. Wormholes fixed that. There is no need to put up with low sec. The zombies can mill about the shopping mall until they rot, waiting for the occasional live one to swarm all over, but the agile they will never notice. All one needs it time. People not caught up in killmail addictions, corp politics or the demands of being an alliance pet, have all the time in the world. The only thing that will stop them is if CCP changes the game mechanic to cause un-fleeted ships piloted by un-corped pilots to explode instantly on un-dock.
Cpt Branko Retired Pirate Club	Posted - 2010.05.05 06:51:00 - [69] Originally by: Herzog Wolfhammer The gank pipelines and gauntlets are pointless. 0.0 is everything the residents there say it is. Most players cannot get there alone to harvest the sites. Wormholes fixed that. There is no need to put up with low sec. The zombies can mill about the shopping mall until they rot, waiting for the occasional live one to swarm all over, but the agile they will never notice. It's nice to hear how things work in your imaginary world. Sig removed, inappropriate link. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint
AterraX Caldari	Posted - 2010.05.05 08:51:00 - [70] This might be relevant: http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1294830 TL:DR version: mazzilliu offer services for PLEX...aka you pay, she bugs the CSM. mazzilliu sponge-BoB's for free travels, drinks and parties...her own words. mazzilliu try and inflate her efforts by taking credit for other peoples work. This post is a gold mine: http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1294830&page=2#40 Here are her own words: http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1294830&page=1#27 C&P have more brains than to fall for empty words... ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Fact of EVE forums: They will always come an anounomys alt-toon and question someones character...

Cyan Cure	Posted - 2010.05.05 12:51:00 - [71] So mazzilliu, you're going to run for CSM so you can have easier time making money while pirating and rack up KB kills? I personaly don't really see a problem, i've had a chance to do pirating during my play time and i never found it lacking. It isn't easy to find a prey, sometimes it takes a day to get a kill, sometimes you have to use tricks and meta game to get kills, money is a huge problem too. I have never found these things bad, because aren't they part of the charm of being an outlaw? The sole fact that player piracy exists in this game is a stample on the whole sandbox concept. It's an activity players developed by themselves, using the rules the game has. If CCP starts making moves for piracy, it'll turn the whole thing into just a game feature. Even if it's just a small step, it'll cross a very thin line. It can easily ruin the image and uniqueness of being a pirate.
mazzilliu Caldari Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2010.05.05 13:39:00 - [72] Edited by: mazzilliu on 05/05/2010 13:39:28 Originally by: Cyan Cure So mazzilliu, you're going to run for CSM so you can have easier time making money while pirating and rack up KB kills? I personaly don't really see a problem, i've had a chance to do pirating during my play time and i never found it lacking. It isn't easy to find a prey, sometimes it takes a day to get a kill, sometimes you have to use tricks and meta game to get kills, money is a huge problem too. I have never found these things bad, because aren't they part of the charm of being an outlaw? The sole fact that player piracy exists in this game is a stample on the whole sandbox concept. It's an activity players developed by themselves, using the rules the game has. If CCP starts making moves for piracy, it'll turn the whole thing into just a game feature. Even if it's just a small step, it'll cross a very thin line. It can easily ruin the image and uniqueness of being a pirate. I want to put more stuff in lowsec belts because that's the most fun I've had while pirating- in the belts. Gate piracy and station camping is okay but I don't want to change that- they are fine as they are, you can get kills under current mechanics no problem. Originally by: Le Skunk Also of note is that it appears mazillu voted NO in the csm "Fix Logofski" one of, if not the, biggest pains for lowsec pirates everywhere. SHOCK HORROR As such I wonder why you think you should be voted for by lowsec pirates and why you claim to have "carried the baton for larkonis" when he got hoofed when you appear to have voted against some of the things he cared most about. SKUNK TLDR: Your past voting has pretty much unanimously gone AGAINST LOW SEC PIRATES so you aint getting the votes. this is an unfair statement because the issue itself was terrible. If something was proposed that fixed logging off in a better way I would have voted for it. also, voting is open so please vote for me :) http://www.eveonline.com/council/voting/Vote.asp?c=309 MAZZILLIU FOR CSM 2010 CHECK OUT MY CAMPAIGN VIDEO http://www.eveonline
Le Skunk Low Sec Liberators	Posted - 2010.05.05 13:55:00 - [73] Edited by: Le Skunk on 05/05/2010 14:00:04 Originally by: Lady Karma Originally by: Le Skunk Also of note is that it appears mazillu voted NO in the csm "Fix Logofski" one of, if not the, biggest pains for lowsec pirates everywhere. SHOCK HORROR As such I wonder why you think you should be voted for by lowsec pirates and why you claim to have "carried the baton for larkonis" when he got hoofed when you appear to have voted against some of the things he cared most about. SKUNK TLDR: Your past voting has pretty much unanimously gone AGAINST LOW SEC PIRATES so you aint getting the votes. Isn't keeping loggoffski and station hugging deagro a pirates dream these days? If you bothered to look up the origins of her corp, you might understand where she is coming from. It's not about hugging stations or sensor boosted hics on gates. Those things kill low sec, because it's pointless to fight on stations with current deagro timers, and why would empire dwellers want to come to low sec when its all camps. Blob the gate, blob jumps in logg offs happen. No fun for anyone. Bring back belt piracy. Juicy Battleships in belts/missions being killed solo by cruisers, you remember those days Skunk? I can. No logofski isn't a pirates dream. Its 100% a pirates nightmare. Any attempt to defend logofski basically eliminates you of any chance of getting my (8 lol) votes and I would suspect from what contacts with other pirate corps you wont get theres either. The fact is Maz voted against sensible measures to limit the effectiveness of logofski. Thats the end of it as far as im concerned. Added to this other people in this thread have pointed out other failings she has, both specifically to pirates/outlaws (voting against fixing the global timer bug in highsec) and generally taking the ** out of her voters (amusing the first time but the joke gets tired). As to your points. They are riddled with errors. Firstly, the main culprit for logofski is the freighter pilot**. Thats a fact. And the freighter pilot will log offski on the gate no matter how big the "blob" is on the other side. He will log off if he sees a blinky battlecruiser on the other side of the gate. The only way to kill the logofski freighter is in fact to BRING AN EVEN BIGGER BLOB and nuke it in 60 seconds. Logofski encourages blobbing and prevents the solo pilot or small gang getting a freighter kill. Oh and as for your "CATCH EM IN DA BELTS LIKE REAL PIRATES" crap - how often do you see a freighter in a belt? Lowsec is fine. Look at a good pirate corps killboard and youll find a 30 man corp will be getting more kills then a 2000 man alliance in 0.0. The things breaking lowsec are: Logofski Logofski Logofski Cloak-Mwd Moms in Lowsec Jump Freighters 30km Station Undock Bubbles By far the most important one is Logofski. With cloak-mwd a close second. The rest can be dealt with. I get tired of 0.0 idiots (i was in lowsec in my caracal in 2006 so i know what im talking about) whittering on about "fixing lowsec" when it can be done in a stroke by fixing the top two, and a damn good way to being fixed by dealing with the top one - the indefensible PULL THE PLUG OUT OF THE WALL technique. SKUNK (o)
mazzilliu Caldari Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2010.05.05 13:58:00 - [74] I never voted to keep loggoffski. Read what i posted again. The details of the issue were terrible and not better than what we have now. next time around we can try again with an issue that had better details, and i would vote for that. MAZZILLIU FOR CSM 2010 CHECK OUT MY CAMPAIGN VIDEO http://www.eveonline
Le Skunk Low Sec Liberators	Posted - 2010.05.05 14:09:00 - [75] Originally by: mazzilliu I never voted to keep loggoffski. Read what i posted again. The details of the issue were terrible and not better than what we have now. next time around we can try again with an issue that had better details, and i would vote for that. The issue you voted NO against, despite being the baton carrier of larkonis (who incidentaly despite being "corrupt" did have pirates best intentions in mind and voted YES) had a number of workable suggestions. You said NO to the lot of them. **************************** ISSUE Suggestions: * A player who logs out but recieves agression before his ship disappears will recieve a full 15 minute agression timer and will not disappear in that time. Unless a player logs off at an obvious spot or in an area where probes are already present it is unlikely for him to be probed within 60 seconds. * When a player logs out he will become 'anchored' to that point in space and will ALWAYS warp back to that point and his emergency warp point will remain constant. ************************** Both of these are entirely workable and just. The "warp back into the point you logged out on" is an UTTER NO BRAINER. Why wouldn't you go back to the same spot you logged out on. Why would an innocent player whos connection crashed want to MOVE the spot they logged out on. After all - they dont even know whats on the other side do they because their client "crashed" before loading system.** You voted NO to the most pressing concern for low sec pirates. Fact. So dont expect any votes from this section. Good luck though im sure you'll manage with votes from other areas. SKUNK (o)
AterraX Caldari	Posted - 2010.05.05 16:42:00 - [76] Originally by: mazzilliu this is an unfair statement because the issue itself was terrible. If something was proposed that fixed logging off in a better way I would have voted for it. also, voting is open so please vote for me :) http://www.eveonline.com/council/voting/Vote.asp?c=309 I just voted...and NOT for you ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Fact of EVE forums: They will always come an anounomys alt-toon and question someones character...
mazzilliu Caldari Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2010.05.05 18:26:00 - [77] my ideal logoff solution: -make it so you can be targetted while emergency warping in all cases -make it so you cant warp out of bubbles while ewarping, and you stop e-warping if a bubble is dropped on you in all cases. -also cut your agility by half(or double it, whatever makes you warp off half as fast) -if you're aggressed while logged off you become aggressed and you disappear 15 minutes after the last shot. let's kill the people trying to log off at gates, and people logging out from belts. but not people who have already safespotted and aren't going to get caught if they were to stay logged in. Even if you crash on a gate or something like that, the act of jumping is a risk in itself. MAZZILLIU FOR CSM 2010 CHECK OUT MY CAMPAIGN VIDEO http://www.eveonline
Vladimir Norkoff Income Redistribution Service	Posted - 2010.05.05 21:30:00 - [78] Originally by: Andrea Griffin We want MORE people in low sec space, not less, and if interceptors with their fast locking can sit at a gate for even 30 seconds you will see low sec become more vacant than ever. The only reason some people enter low sec at all is because they are relatively safe from gate camps when flying frigates, and this would eradicate that safety net. I'm going to go ahead and disagree with you if that's alright. Gatecampers don't camp to kill frigates. They camp to kill mission runners, haulers, and the occasional solo PvP ship. They camp to kill idiots and the unlucky. And since people still gatecamp, those targets are still obviously coming thru. It's the paranoid and risk-averse that use frigs. And those people will always avoid lowsec whenever possible. Nothing will ever change that (except turning lowsec into hisec). The idea here is to make things a bit less one-sided for the victims. Note that a proper gatecamp will ALWAYS be one-sided. That is the point after all. But if the camping ships get dropped down a bit in size, the the victim gets a slightly better chance at survival (or at least taking somebody down with him). There's a bit of a difference between... 1) a camp of 3 BS, 2 BCs, and a triple sebo'd HIC, and... 2) a camp of 1 BS, 3 Cruisers, and a pair of Interceptors. Which would you rather run into? Right now we pretty much only have the first option. Taxman IX: Risky Venture
Herzog Wolfhammer Gallente Aliastra	Posted - 2010.05.06 00:44:00 - [79] Originally by: Cpt Branko Originally by: Herzog Wolfhammer The gank pipelines and gauntlets are pointless. 0.0 is everything the residents there say it is. Most players cannot get there alone to harvest the sites. Wormholes fixed that. There is no need to put up with low sec. The zombies can mill about the shopping mall until they rot, waiting for the occasional live one to swarm all over, but the agile they will never notice. It's nice to hear how things work in your imaginary world. As a fellow subscriber to this GAME, it's your imaginary world too, and I hope things are going well for you too.
Viper ShizzIe Habitual Euthanasia Dystopia Alliance	Posted - 2010.05.06 03:21:00 - [80] It's pretty obvious mazzilliu doesn't actually play this game and is just after another free trip to Iceland. Vote for Elise Randolph for your voice to be heard~

Frug Omega Wing	Posted - 2010.05.06 23:46:00 - [81] Oh my. - - - - - - - - - Do not use dotted lines - - - - - - If you think I'm awesome say BOOO BOOO!! - Ductoris Neat look what I found - Kreul Whisper/PrismX 4 emperor
Griznatle Caldari Advocates of Sin	Posted - 2010.05.07 00:19:00 - [82] Just voted, not for mazz, unless I can come with to Iceland for free. I gotta pay a visit to the petition department and remove the "cntrl", "c", and "p" button cause im tired of copypasta replys. oh, on the other hand, did you read my sig? CanihazurBumpBump?
Murrior Amarr Thundercats RAZOR Alliance	Posted - 2010.05.07 01:58:00 - [83] Edited by: Murrior on 07/05/2010 01:58:11 Originally by: Le Skunk Originally by: mazzilliu I never voted to keep loggoffski. Read what i posted again. The details of the issue were terrible and not better than what we have now. next time around we can try again with an issue that had better details, and i would vote for that. The issue you voted NO against, despite being the baton carrier of larkonis (who incidentaly despite being "corrupt" did have pirates best intentions in mind and voted YES) had a number of workable suggestions. You said NO to the lot of them. You don't have to both bold and underline what she voted moron, we aren't 5 years old. You are saying it yourself, he had pirates best interest in mind and proposed a terrible 'fix' to it that would affect the whole of eve and only be to the pirate's advantage. Did you even consider the fact of bigs fights that disconnecting happens often? So I would disconnect, and then have to wait 15 **ing minutes till I can get back to the game just so you ty lowsec s don't loose your precious shuttle kills. p.s. r/etard*
Wesley Hawkins Minmatar Red Federation	Posted - 2010.05.07 04:57:00 - [84] Couldn't be assed to read 3+ pages but didnt snigg go 0.0 alliance like 3 years ago now.. YARRR! Mynxee, That is all.
mazzilliu Caldari Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2010.05.07 06:41:00 - [85] Originally by: Wesley Hawkins Couldn't be assed to read 3+ pages but didnt snigg go 0.0 alliance like 3 years ago now.. YARRR! lowsec wasn't worth staying in. MAZZILLIU FOR CSM 2010 CHECK OUT MY CAMPAIGN VIDEO
JC Dragon	Posted - 2010.05.07 08:39:00 - [86] Why should I vote for a member of an alliance of cheaters. Minxee is better prospect for lowsec than a 0.0 cheating alliance puppet csm.
Gajana Caldari Combined Imperial Fleet	Posted - 2010.05.07 09:22:00 - [87] Hey at least she's a girl, can have fun with ppl, actually listens to ppl and is able to modify her views based on sensible opinions (as opposed to male big e-peen douche thing) getting vote from me :) Mazz, what about attracting more girls to EVE world? It would make EVE nicer as well as more balanced [and beautiful] place
Sergeant Justice The Darkest Red	Posted - 2010.05.07 09:39:00 - [88] Edited by: Sergeant Justice on 07/05/2010 09:40:02 +2 to mazz basically because every single other candidate is totally ******ed Edit: didn't read about anyone, just C&P really, hurr. Recruitment Poast!
Raimo Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED	Posted - 2010.05.07 10:31:00 - [89] Originally by: mazzilliu -Add more entrances to 0.0. This means more passers by, and more ships carrying goodies for pirates to shoot at. Currently there are only a few chokepoints, that are often camped and people are extremely wary to carry things through there. Opening up more passes makes people feel safer, and through the twisted logic of EVE piracy, ends up killing more people as more of them are willing to pass through. Too often alliance members try to hitch a ride for their cargo on a jump freighter, because putting it in a hauler is deemed too risky. I like this. I'd also emphasize more lowsec entrances to NPC 0.0 for making NPC 0.0 roaming and logistics easier for soloers/ small gangs as I'd love to see more small gang/ solo friendly areas without sentries or gate guns as well, see this: (Currently I'm for enabling bubbles, so basically just more NPC 0.0/ modified current NPC space with more easier routes to empire really) http://www.scrapheap-challenge.com/viewtopic.php?t=32429 (But I'm ok with a simple low sec boost too) Your other ideas seem ok as well. ----------------------------------------------- www.eve-arena.com
AterraX Caldari	Posted - 2010.05.07 11:52:00 - [90] Edited by: AterraX on 07/05/2010 11:51:46 Originally by: Gajana Hey at least she's a girl, can have fun with ppl, actually listens to ppl and is able to modify her views based on sensible opinions (as opposed to male big e-peen douche thing) getting vote from me :) Mazz, what about attracting more girls to EVE world? It would make EVE nicer as well as more balanced [and beautiful] place You think all guys think with their wand? EVE is not about fluffy-fuzzy-cuddly Hello Kitty. You have just given a prime example of why mazz is no good for EVE. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Fact of EVE forums: They will always come an anounomys alt-toon and question someones character...



Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.