EVE Search - 0utbreak in my CSM elections? It's more likely than you think

All Channels

Jita Park Speakers Corner

0utbreak in my CSM elections? It's more likely than you think

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
ALPHA12125 Gallente 0utbreak	Posted - 2010.05.01 14:18:00 - [1] Having played this game for over 5 years I have seen it change completely and not always for the best. As the CEO of Outbreak I represent a unique focus, an independent focus, free from alliance influence. Eve is slowly turning black and white and losing its variety, but this does not represent the true nature of the game we love. A vote for me isn't a vote for the carebear agenda, it isn't a vote for the alliance agenda. It is a vote for the third way: a return to the true essence, blowing st up and having fun. The main focus of my term will be pushing forward the heart of this game, the pvp element, and making sure that fights happen more often and not less. Some of the issues I want to address: CCP needs to write down the role of each ship/ship class in the game and what concept they want to do with it. This needs to be reviewed every expansion to see whether the role is gimped or overpowered with the new features (case in point dramiel/tempest/black ops) Introduce a fast balancing cycle for ships once a month. This is for smaller stat changes that do not need to be included in expansions. (changes to modules, guns, bonuses) Introduce ways to make EvE more regional again (rebalance range of jump ships or cost per jump, etc.) Change the current Aggro Timer to include mass of the ship Aggressed ships cannot be stored inside a carrier ECM Nerf Old Cyno Effect yay \o/ Vote for Alpha Vote for PEWPEW**
Promethian child Amarr 0utbreak	Posted - 2010.05.01 15:56:00 - [2] Heres to more carnage
Raven God 0utbreak	Posted - 2010.05.01 16:42:00 - [3] Good luck to you m8!
Tregaron Minmatar 0utbreak	Posted - 2010.05.01 20:23:00 - [4] fans of outbreak vote here :)
Ziggy Stardustt 0utbreak	Posted - 2010.05.01 20:24:00 - [5] hallowed be the pew.
Bryan Havoc Project Nemesis	Posted - 2010.05.01 20:26:00 - [6] I support any initiative to bring back the old cyno effect.
WadeWilson82 Amarr Soloers United	Posted - 2010.05.01 20:37:00 - [7] Aye!
Hirana Yoshida Behavioral Affront	Posted - 2010.05.01 21:09:00 - [8] Depends. All good points you have there, quite the eve buzz-word collection actually, but do you have any substance? Vision for 0.0? Vision for Low-sec? Do you really have what it takes to cater to the needs of all Eve or just a portion of it? Sell me your product!
Solomunio Kzenig Amarr InterSun Freelance	Posted - 2010.05.03 10:12:00 - [9] Edited by: Solomunio Kzenig on 03/05/2010 10:12:05 Would vote for old cyno effect.....oh and Hi Prom.
Samuel Caldara	Posted - 2010.05.04 00:27:00 - [10] Edited by: Samuel Caldara on 04/05/2010 00:28:09 Edited by: Samuel Caldara on 04/05/2010 00:27:47 Some ideas are good, yes... But ECM? ECM already got destroyed by the nerf bat. The way it is now could even be considered slightly underpowered. I like everything else though..
ALPHA12125 Gallente 0utbreak	Posted - 2010.05.04 00:56:00 - [11] Originally by: Hirana Yoshida Depends. All good points you have there, quite the eve buzz-word collection actually, but do you have any substance? Vision for 0.0? Vision for Low-sec? Do you really have what it takes to cater to the needs of all Eve or just a portion of it? Sell me your product! For 0.0 i would like to see a more regionalized EvE. Conflicts need to scale down again. Big conflicts with 10 and more alliances on each side should still be possible but not be the norm. Smaller alliances need the ability to fight without getting drawn into big north/south ideological issues. Rebalancing Jumprange and Jumpcost will help reduce the projected power of large alliances and force them to decide which conflict they want to interfere and not be able to move their capitalblob onto all smaller fights within 2 regions of their HQ. Changes to local with an revamp of the scanner would also help making EvE a better place again. Lowsec needs a boost as well. Ideally i would like to see a dedicated industry branch that is only available in lowsec. Implant production springs to mind here. As seen in WH-Space people are not totally adverse to risk as long as they have enough reward and can have some fun getting the reward. The knowledge gained there should be used to make Lowsec more attractive.
Lucrezia Romanova	Posted - 2010.05.04 12:36:00 - [12] Quote: Introduce ways to make EvE more regional again (rebalance range of jump ships or cost per jump, etc.) ^^^^ I very much support this notion. The current Jump range takes all strategy out of warfare and turns it into the tactical slugfest it currently is. Force Projection capabilities are a key factor in strategic warefare. As it is now every major power block in eve can project a decisive force to nearly any point in the universe at nearly any given time.
ALPHA12125 Gallente 0utbreak	Posted - 2010.05.04 23:25:00 - [13] Originally by: Samuel Caldara Edited by: Samuel Caldara on 04/05/2010 00:28:09 Edited by: Samuel Caldara on 04/05/2010 00:27:47 Some ideas are good, yes... But ECM? ECM already got destroyed by the nerf bat. The way it is now could even be considered slightly underpowered. I like everything else though.. Nerf might be the wrong word. Biggest problem i have with ecm is the drones and that they are too powerful. Another thing that needs looked at is the eccm as they are currently not in line with other counter measures.
Krugerrand 0utbreak	Posted - 2010.05.05 13:25:00 - [14] I support this product and/or service.
Cannery Canoule	Posted - 2010.05.05 13:43:00 - [15] Of all the issues you plan to address what, for you, is the biggest priority?
ALPHA12125 Gallente 0utbreak	Posted - 2010.05.05 20:36:00 - [16] Originally by: Cannery Canoule Of all the issues you plan to address what, for you, is the biggest priority? The biggest priority for me is making eve more regional again and limiting the projected power of capital ships. So rebalancing of capital ships is on top.
Duncan Tanner Gallente 0utbreak	Posted - 2010.05.05 22:53:00 - [17] Bump for great ideas.
Ro' LoPok 0utbreak	Posted - 2010.05.05 23:16:00 - [18] Yay \0/ Cast your votes now: http://www.eveonline.com/council/voting/Vote.asp?c=347
Promethian child Amarr 0utbreak	Posted - 2010.05.05 23:21:00 - [19] There better be cake if you win.
Promethian child Amarr 0utbreak	Posted - 2010.05.06 11:40:00 - [20] Edited by: Promethian child on 06/05/2010 11:43:20 The campaign video did it for me http://www.0utbreak-eve.com/vote4mecauseimawsome/
Lia Biatch	Posted - 2010.05.06 21:46:00 - [21] Always respected OB, you got my vote
Princess Jinmei	Posted - 2010.05.06 21:52:00 - [22] Same always had respect for OB and what they mean to the game. All the details in your bullet points are things that have been needed to be sorted for a long time in this game and its about time they were tbh. You also have my vote and lets hope the real things that are important to this game are finally fixed not just mindless blobs with no skill / knowlegde of ship fittings, REAL PVP that sit there day after day to x up into a 800 man fleet become something of the past. And the game brings out and shows the truely talented pvper's PJ
SXyWhile Gallente Echo Roaming Industries	Posted - 2010.05.06 23:24:00 - [23] Edited by: SXyWhile on 06/05/2010 23:25:00 You have my vote!
Princess Jinmei	Posted - 2010.05.07 00:54:00 - [24] Originally by: Promethian child Edited by: Promethian child on 06/05/2010 11:43:20 The campaign video did it for me http://www.0utbreak-eve.com/vote4mecauseimawsome/ OMG just looked at that link, LOL! Alpha12125 for CSM5!
Emo Gallente	Posted - 2010.05.07 15:24:00 - [25] i support alpha.
Uncle henk	Posted - 2010.05.07 21:34:00 - [26] Hm you got my vote!
Lord Aftermath The Aftermath.	Posted - 2010.05.07 23:40:00 - [27] My vote has been cast in favor of this candidate.
Jenna Drake	Posted - 2010.05.07 23:45:00 - [28] +1 ALPHA!!!
Triss Merrigold	Posted - 2010.05.08 22:16:00 - [29] Would you say it may be beneficial to increase the amount of 0.0space/regions as well as change jump range in order to further increase a more regional approach?
ALPHA12125 Gallente 0utbreak	Posted - 2010.05.11 15:18:00 - [30] Originally by: Triss Merrigold Would you say it may be beneficial to increase the amount of 0.0space/regions as well as change jump range in order to further increase a more regional approach? While adding new space might seem the right way it does not tackle the issue but only delays it. One year down the line you will have the same problems we have now. 0.0 isnt crowded as it is currently and large alliances wont grow fast enough to make use of their vast space.

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.