Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Dierdra Vaal
Caldari Eve University Ivy League
|
Posted - 2010.05.04 22:30:00 -
[1]
Overwhelmed by all the candidates? Can't decide who to vote for? Despair not!
Vote Match!
What? The Vote Match website presents the user with a list of statements ("PvP should be optional", "Trade orders should have a 1000 ISK minimum increment", etc), and compares the answers the user gives to the answers given by CSM candidates. Using this comparison the website then calculates a match percentage, neatly identifying and displaying which candidate represents the user's views the best.
How? Go to the website and click on the "Vote Match!" link. Fill in the 30 questions and we'll take care of the rest!
Cool! Yes, I think so too! So please if you run into people who do not yet know who to vote for, point them to this website . Spread the word!
http://match.eve-csm.com Director of Education :: EVE University
CSM1 delegate and CSM3 chairman
|
Lykouleon
|
Posted - 2010.05.04 22:38:00 -
[2]
Oooh, fun toy
Constructive criticism though: colors are a bit...much (wanted to stab mine out from the yellow banner)
Also, very disturbed that I matched up with Darius JOHNSON. Gonna go take a cold shower now
Quote: CCP Mindstar > Sorry - I've completely messed all that up. lets try again
|
Ashina Sito
Gallente Center for Advanced Studies
|
Posted - 2010.05.04 22:42:00 -
[3]
Overall I found the questions a bit lackluster this time around. Still this should help some people out. Thanks for the effort. My CSM Election Announcement
|
HeliosGal
Caldari
|
Posted - 2010.05.04 22:48:00 -
[4]
love some of the CSM candidates Signature - CCP what this game needs is more variance in PVE aspects and a little bit less PVP focus, more content more varied level 1-4 missions more than just 10 per faction high sec low sec and 00 |
Nicholas Barker
Black Nova Corp IT Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.05.04 22:56:00 -
[5]
Who the hell is Vuk Lau? we agree on 73% of things :S ------
0800-LAG-A-NODE
|
chatgris
Quantum Cats Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.05.04 23:14:00 -
[6]
That's a great tool! I especially like that I can review where the disagreements lie when picking between a few different candidates - much better than just the number, since some issues are not as important as others.
|
iP0D
|
Posted - 2010.05.04 23:20:00 -
[7]
Excellent.
Now it has to get put on a banner at the login screen until the elections end, in the news, andsoforth.
|
leJaro
Rery
|
Posted - 2010.05.05 00:26:00 -
[8]
my top was Dierdra Vaal (70%). Obviously rigged
|
Wu Jiaqiu
Minmatar Frenemy and Foerend Co.
|
Posted - 2010.05.05 00:40:00 -
[9]
75% TeaDaze
Thats my guy I guess. (Or girl)
|
Metalcali
|
Posted - 2010.05.05 00:59:00 -
[10]
Illectroculus Defined 85% TeaDaze 80%
Would go for Tea again but that support for converting T2 BPO's is a tough call. |
|
AkJon Ferguson
|
Posted - 2010.05.05 02:30:00 -
[11]
"CCP should spend more time fixing old content and less time introducing new content."
-Received the most 'Strongly Agree' and the most 'important question'
CCP, ffs remove head from nether regions and fix the bugs, the lag and ban the cheaters and macroers already. STOP INTRODUCING NEW BROKEN CRAP UNTIL YOU DO.
Once you've done that, go back to your harebrained schemes and pie in the sky ideas.
This idea that new toys attract new subscribers is poppy****. Do you know what attracts new subscribers? Satisfied current subscribers who LOVE the game because it WORKS and can't stop talking about how full of WIN it is.
|
Rawr Cristina
Caldari Omerta Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.05.05 02:55:00 -
[12]
Nice tool definately, not sure it covers all the issues though, top 5 matches:
mazzilliu (73%) TeaDaze (73%) Sokratesz (72%) Elise Randolph (70%) Omber Zombie (69%)
which make enough sense, however what makes no sense at all:
Ankhesentapemkah (63%) Mynxee (63%)
Darius JOHNSON (50%)
- Malyutka (The Virus) - |
Surfin's PlunderBunny
Minmatar Anti Fundie Patrol
|
Posted - 2010.05.05 02:59:00 -
[13]
Edited by: Surfin''s PlunderBunny on 05/05/2010 03:01:08 Darius JOHNSON (64%)... looks like I'll be voting Goon
*Edit: And where the hell is Cat?
Originally by: Xen Gin
Originally by: FOl2TY8
I know that some people like to have voluntary periods of abstinence.
Yeah, I use that excuse too.
|
Deus Ex'Machina
The-Machine
|
Posted - 2010.05.05 03:31:00 -
[14]
Nothing about multiple accounts ? :\ - Arkanon: EXPLAIN YOURSELF, EVILDOER! Sharkbait: Dude. - Bashing trolls since 2047. Which way does time go again? <_> |
Tsukiko Ishida
Khar-Selim
|
Posted - 2010.05.05 04:12:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Surfin's PlunderBunny *Edit: And where the hell is Cat?
Hopefully not running. As cute as the forum trolling from that pilot is, I don't want that anywhere near CSM.
|
Jerid Verges
Gallente The Society of Innovation The Last Stand
|
Posted - 2010.05.05 04:55:00 -
[16]
Interesting. I ran a "Strongly Disagree" for everything.
Scwarze apparently disagrees the MOST with everything on the list.(50% match) (He is also my least compadible when answering for real)
Centurax apparently agrees the MOST with everything on the list (17% match) (Ironically my most compatible)
Quick statistics: The most disagreed upon question presented among the CSM candidates was "The Core combat model of EVE lacks complexity and is too simple." Which is sort of sad, since Eve is pretty simple.
The most agreed upon question presented among the CSM candidates was "Bounty Hunting as a profession needs some love from CCP." And with how broken the Bounty system is its no surprise.
The most important question presented among the CSM candidates was "CCP should devote an expansion cycle to revamping the User Interface."
|
Kirra Liu
Echelon Holdings Echelon.
|
Posted - 2010.05.05 06:01:00 -
[17]
Originally by: Tsukiko Ishida
Originally by: Surfin's PlunderBunny *Edit: And where the hell is Cat?
Hopefully not running. As cute as the forum trolling from that pilot is, I don't want that anywhere near CSM.
Thus the reason why it's an open vote. I though am also curious as to where Cat is on there.
|
Vaal Erit
Science and Trade Institute
|
Posted - 2010.05.05 07:21:00 -
[18]
"Warp disruption fields should be usable in low sec."
They are usable in low sec, the focused script is basically the whole point of HICs. If you mean bubbles in low sec, that is pretty funny imo and you should call them bubbles because I've never heard anyone call them WDFs.
I got: Omber Zombie(77%) mazzilliu (70%) ALPHA12125 (69%) Helen Highwater (67%) TeaDaze (67%) .... Dierdra Vaal (55%)
Great tool OP, won't be voting for you though. Didn't know Omber Zombie was so cool, this tool definitely is switching my vote, was gonna go for Teadaze/Elise Randolph now gonna go Omber/teadaze.
Originally by: Jim Raynor EVE needs danger, EVE needs risks, EVE needs combat, even piracy, without these things, the game stagnates to a trivial game centering around bloating your wallet with no purpose. |
Cat o'Ninetails
Caldari Rancer Defence League
|
Posted - 2010.05.05 08:40:00 -
[19]
Originally by: Kirra Liu
Originally by: Tsukiko Ishida
Originally by: Surfin's PlunderBunny *Edit: And where the hell is Cat?
Hopefully not running. As cute as the forum trolling from that pilot is, I don't want that anywhere near CSM.
Thus the reason why it's an open vote. I though am also curious as to where Cat is on there.
am running lol but was away for the bank holiday weekend \o/ which had the effect of me not checking my evemails and thus missing the deadline
x
My Facebook! | Safety Dance |
Jowen Datloran
Caldari Science and Trade Institute
|
Posted - 2010.05.05 08:44:00 -
[20]
Very nice of you to make this tool this time around too, DV.
Though, it seems like OZ is the man to vote on.
---------------- Mr. Science & Trade Institute - EVE Online Lorebook
|
|
Rashmika Clavain
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.05.05 09:08:00 -
[21]
Edited by: Rashmika Clavain on 05/05/2010 09:09:58
An excellent tool! I got 65% for Dierdra Vaal, however I couldn't vote for this chap due to his support of:
"Invention and production should be made more profitable."
How exactly... in a player driven market? Ban the accounts of those undercutting the market? Jesus if you don't know how invention works, why should anyone vote you in when you want to do the above?
Hint: Invention IS perfectly profitable as it is now.
Ashina Sito made me laugh... vote for him to stop people scamming
So I guess I am voting for Manalapan... whoever that is
|
Eelis Kiy
Gallente Shadows Of The Federation
|
Posted - 2010.05.05 09:11:00 -
[22]
Great little tool for getting an idea of who to look into futher.
-----------------------------
>>where the frack is my ship?<< |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
|
Posted - 2010.05.05 09:24:00 -
[23]
Neat tool, but tbh, some of the questions are fairly ambivalently written û you should try to rewrite them to avoid multiple questions/statements per issue. It may not be all that serious, but the methodology is left wanting.
Eg. "The war-dec system is unbalanced in favour of the agressor and should be changed." There are three rather different things going on here: that the wardec system is unbalanced, that the aggressor is the favoured party, and that this needs to be changed. The only proper way to interpret this is if you agree with the statement as a whole, but that means that other, similar issues aren't being addressed.
It also leaves open the problem of which of the parts need to be addressed and how, which is probably a more pertinent question to most. If I think that the war-dec system should be changed, but not because it's unbalanced and unduly favours the aggressor, what should I vote? If I think the system is unbalanced and in favour of the aggressor but shouldn't be changed? What if I think it's unbalanced and should be changed, but so that it favours the aggressor more û then what? Etc.
So just a general tip for the next time: only test one statement at a time. If someone creates a compound issue like the one above, cut it down into different parts and have the candidate in question say that they're positive (or negative) to all of them. ——— “If you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡… you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.” — Karath Piki |
Bellum Eternus
Gallente Death of Virtue MeatSausage EXPRESS
|
Posted - 2010.05.05 09:37:00 -
[24]
Very interesting indeed! Ankh and I have about 43% in common lol. -
Originally by: Bellum Eternus That is the beauty of Eve, it's a crucible in which great minds are formed and the rest are ground to dust.
Bellum Eternus Inveniam viam aut faciam. |
Swiftgaze
Elysium Trading Company Elysium Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.05.05 09:39:00 -
[25]
Most of the questions didn't interest me at all, they merely reflect what you find important. VOTE CAT
ELYSIUM VOTES CAT |
Louis deGuerre
Gallente Amicus Morte Shock an Awe
|
Posted - 2010.05.05 11:21:00 -
[26]
Kinda expected Dierdra Vaal 107 % match, but...
Ankhe will be so pleased : Ankhesentapemkah (71%) Vuk Lau (70%) Esharan (70%) Meissa Anunthiel (70%) ... Dierdra Vaal (63%) ... Scwarze (45%)
It is evident many CSM candidates agree on many issues, which I hope bodes well for the next CSM.
So it shall be Ankhe or Cat.
Nice work Dierdra Vaal ! Sol: A microwarp drive? In a battleship? Are you insane? They arenÆt built for this! Clear Skies - The Movie
|
Dierdra Vaal
Caldari Eve University Ivy League
|
Posted - 2010.05.05 11:29:00 -
[27]
keep in mind that you shouldnt _just_ vote for your highest match. Do some research into what the candidates stand for, read their websites, talk to them, etc. Director of Education :: EVE University
CSM1 delegate and CSM3 chairman
|
Ankhesentapemkah
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.05.05 11:39:00 -
[28]
Thanks for putting this up again, Dierdra!
|
Musical Fist
Gallente Center for Advanced Studies
|
Posted - 2010.05.05 11:40:00 -
[29]
I saw something like this on Yahoo about the current UK elections, very nice.
Mine showed Centurax as 70% followed by Vuk 68% EEK!
Very nice eitherway :) This is so not my main
|
Suneai
Gallente The Scope
|
Posted - 2010.05.05 11:46:00 -
[30]
Quite a few of the candidates landed pretty close together on my results, top ones were;
Dierdra Vaal (68%) Axexut (64%) Darius JOHNSON (61%) Manalapan (61%) Meissa Anunthiel (59%) Avalloc (59%)
...On a random side note, the mess of colours and symbols on the result page is kind of painful to the eyes. Any chance of a more visually friendly layout?
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |