EVE Search - ccp is giving Ankhesentapemkah free votes

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Jita Park Speakers Corner

ccp is giving Ankhesentapemkah free votes

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
mazzilliu Caldari Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2010.05.05 13:16:00 - [1] Historically the candidate at the top of the page got a boost in votes just because for some reason lots of people vote for the first option. guess who is at the top of the page this time around? http://www.eveonline.com/council/voting/candidatesview.asp CCP should randomize the order candidates appear in for a fair election. if she wins by less than a large margin then this can probably be blamed as a cause. p.s. vote for me instead http://www.eveonline.com/council/voting/Vote.asp?c=309 MAZZILLIU FOR CSM 2010
Sheer Fantasy	Posted - 2010.05.05 13:25:00 - [2] Let's see... vote for you or get a sexually transferred disease? The STD wins...
Ankhesentapemkah Gallente	Posted - 2010.05.05 13:36:00 - [3] Funny that there was no whining about this the past 4 elections, but now that it's ANKH at the top of the list, there are two hate threads about already, plus a whole lot of QQ at scrapheap challenge.
Maxsim Goratiev Gallente Imperial Tau Syndicate Sodalitas XX	Posted - 2010.05.05 13:42:00 - [4] Edited by: Maxsim Goratiev on 05/05/2010 13:43:34 I doubt that is the case. Any normal person, even if he read and heard nothing about CSM, will base there vote on character portrait, country of origin and what is written there. IF soeobody does not care to read, tehy would no care to vote. If there is indeed a bunch of ******s that vote for the first candidate on the list without reading, and they do represent a significant portion of eve population, they get what they deserve.
mazzilliu Caldari Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2010.05.05 13:45:00 - [5] Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah Funny that there was no whining about this the past 4 elections, but now that it's ANKH at the top of the list, there are two hate threads about already, plus a whole lot of QQ at scrapheap challenge. fully expected you to come in all holy complaining that you would get a free advantage MAZZILLIU FOR CSM 2010 CHECK OUT MY CAMPAIGN VIDEO http://www.eveonline
Dee Tearant	Posted - 2010.05.05 14:06:00 - [6] Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah Funny that there was no whining about this the past 4 elections, but now that it's ANKH at the top of the list, there are two hate threads about already, plus a whole lot of QQ at scrapheap challenge. Any reason you have hidden your corp and alliance tags from the forums? Not trying to appear as independent whilst being in a large alliance I hope.
Omber Zombie Gallente Frontier Technologies	Posted - 2010.05.05 14:10:00 - [7] Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah Funny that there was no whining about this the past 4 elections, but now that it's ANKH at the top of the list, there are two hate threads about already, plus a whole lot of QQ at scrapheap challenge. good to see you were paying attention at CSM2 when this issue was raised... (it also came up in discussions at csm3) ---------------------- My Blog
ElvenLord 4S Corporation Morsus Mihi	Posted - 2010.05.05 14:34:00 - [8] Originally by: mazzilliu stufz better click here
RuleoftheBone Minmatar The Littlest Hobos Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2010.05.05 15:06:00 - [9] Edited by: RuleoftheBone on 05/05/2010 15:08:46 Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah Funny that there was no whining about this the past 4 elections, but now that it's ANKH at the top of the list, there are two hate threads about already, plus a whole lot of QQ at scrapheap challenge. Hi...would you care to further comment on your qualifications to judge and represent pvp, combat, nullsec, sov mechanics< and the fact that you feel anyone who dares question your opinion is made of sewage? In addition would you care to clarify your anti-CCP stance given the huge number of anti-EvE comment you make? And finally-when you are NOT selected for CSM will you rage-quit and return to Puzzle Pirates for good in order to leave your mark there? Thank you for your time. lightning bolt lightning bolt lightning bolt editAlso would you care to comment regarding rumors circulating you are using a macro of some sort to spam mail pilots in Jita and other locations within EvE with your CSM false agenda?
Rawr Cristina Caldari Omerta Syndicate	Posted - 2010.05.05 15:26:00 - [10] should be randomized every time the page loads tbh - Malyutka (The Virus) -

Rodneh	Posted - 2010.05.05 15:56:00 - [11] Originally by: Rawr Cristina should be randomized every time the page loads tbh That's us told.
Sokratesz Rionnag Alba Against ALL Authorities	Posted - 2010.05.05 16:00:00 - [12] Nah, vote for me instead! VOTE SOKRATESZ for an unforgiving, unique and exciting EVE!
Herschel Yamamoto Agent-Orange Nabaal Syndicate	Posted - 2010.05.05 16:32:00 - [13] Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah Funny that there was no whining about this the past 4 elections, but now that it's ANKH at the top of the list, there are two hate threads about already, plus a whole lot of QQ at scrapheap challenge. Sure there was whining. I've complained multiple times. It's a terrible system.
Malcanis Vanishing Point. The Initiative.	Posted - 2010.05.05 16:42:00 - [14] Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah Funny that there was no whining about this the past 4 elections, but now that it's ANKH at the top of the list, there are two hate threads about already, plus a whole lot of QQ at scrapheap challenge. Because it's only you that's so blatantly clueless about aspects of the game you dont even trouble to hide your desire to ruin.
AterraX Caldari	Posted - 2010.05.05 17:02:00 - [15] Don't worry I voted for none of you 2, as i don't think you are any good for EVE either of you. Problem solved. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Fact of EVE forums: They will always come an anounomys alt-toon and question someones character...
T'Amber www.shipsofeve.com	Posted - 2010.05.05 17:03:00 - [16] Originally by: mazzilliu CCP should randomize the order candidates appear in for a fair election. if she wins by less than a large margin then this can probably be blamed as a cause. Welcome to Eve. Where all the players love tears, But the devs love them even moar. That guy in her video has extremely awesome eyes. -T'amber POLITICS:SIMULATORÖ
mazzilliu Caldari Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2010.05.05 18:33:00 - [17] Originally by: T'Amber Originally by: mazzilliu CCP should randomize the order candidates appear in for a fair election. if she wins by less than a large margin then this can probably be blamed as a cause. Welcome to Eve. Where all the players love tears, But the devs love them even moar. That guy in her video has extremely awesome eyes. -T'amber the players dont have to deal with ankhasdafsa going to their offices ccp is trolling themselves lolololol MAZZILLIU FOR CSM 2010 CHECK OUT MY CAMPAIGN VIDEO http://www.eveonline
meragon	Posted - 2010.05.05 20:14:00 - [18] Troll this, troll that. Damn girl your just obsessed with that word. Maybe your CSM Candidate election is Trolling too.
Goumindong SniggWaffe	Posted - 2010.05.05 20:19:00 - [19] Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah Funny that there was no whining about this the past 4 elections, but now that it's ANKH at the top of the list, there are two hate threads about already, plus a whole lot of QQ at scrapheap challenge. What are you talking about. The non-randomized order was complained about as soon as it went live in the first election -- A discussion on EVE, Combat, Gangs, and Balance
Extreme Eye of God Systematic-Chaos	Posted - 2010.05.05 20:29:00 - [20] I personally brought the "+1000 bonus votes" issue to CCP's attention 2 months ago. CCP responded that this matter will be under investigation. I am glad that it is Ankh this time that was placed on top rather than some other candidates. Time will prove my/our case about with how many votes difference Ankh will become chairman. . .

Ashina Sito Gallente Center for Advanced Studies	Posted - 2010.05.05 20:33:00 - [21] Originally by: mazzilliu Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah Funny that there was no whining about this the past 4 elections, but now that it's ANKH at the top of the list, there are two hate threads about already, plus a whole lot of QQ at scrapheap challenge. fully expected you to come in all holy complaining that you would get a free advantage You could have done the same thing. An election is about gaming the process to get elected. Darius Johnson will win, has enough goons to vote him in just on that. T'Amber has been running the SoE lotto's and that developed a name within Eve. They just missed making the CSM4 and was an alternate. Tea Daze has the Agony PvP angle. I could go on. I do want to say that just because people have some sort of an advantage, whatever that advantage, does not make them a bad candidate that is winning by gaming the system. In the end it is the players that make the choice to who is elected. The first in the list will result in more votes but, those votes would not catapult someone into being elected. They would still have to reach a decent number of voters on their own merit. The same as anyone else. The last election the minimum number of votes needed to get a seat on the CSM was roughly 740. I placed in the middle of the pack with 350 or so votes. I doubt that by being at the top of the list I would have gained enough votes to get a seat. Ironically I was actually the last on the list for CSM4. I submitted 2 hours before the deadline. It took 3 weeks to get a response from CCP about a concern I had. I went for it anyway since time was running out. They got to me 3 days after the submission deadline and we dealt with the issue. In any case, there has been 4 elections so far and no one seems to have brought up this issue. There is nothing to be done about it now. If you want it changed for CSM 6 fine, make it happen. Otherwise, HTFU. My CSM Election Announcement
Extreme Eye of God Systematic-Chaos	Posted - 2010.05.05 20:47:00 - [22] Originally by: Ashina Sito Originally by: mazzilliu Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah Funny that there was no whining about this the past 4 elections, but now that it's ANKH at the top of the list, there are two hate threads about already, plus a whole lot of QQ at scrapheap challenge. fully expected you to come in all holy complaining that you would get a free advantage You could have done the same thing. An election is about gaming the process to get elected. Darius Johnson will win, has enough goons to vote him in just on that. T'Amber has been running the SoE lotto's and that developed a name within Eve. They just missed making the CSM4 and was an alternate. Tea Daze has the Agony PvP angle. I could go on. I do want to say that just because people have some sort of an advantage, whatever that advantage, does not make them a bad candidate that is winning by gaming the system. In the end it is the players that make the choice to who is elected. The first in the list will result in more votes but, those votes would not catapult someone into being elected. They would still have to reach a decent number of voters on their own merit. The same as anyone else. The last election the minimum number of votes needed to get a seat on the CSM was roughly 740. I placed in the middle of the pack with 350 or so votes. I doubt that by being at the top of the list I would have gained enough votes to get a seat. Ironically I was actually the last on the list for CSM4. I submitted 2 hours before the deadline. It took 3 weeks to get a response from CCP about a concern I had. I went for it anyway since time was running out. They got to me 3 days after the submission deadline and we dealt with the issue. In any case, there has been 4 elections so far and no one seems to have brought up this issue. There is nothing to be done about it now. If you want it changed for CSM 6 fine, make it happen. Otherwise, HTFU. fyi Darius no long runs for CSM . .
Avalloc	Posted - 2010.05.05 20:55:00 - [23] I'm curious to know just how much Ankh has been playing EVE for the past 6 months. She only started showing up in my addressbook noticeably since CCP announced they were abolishing term limits. In other words when she knew she could/would run for CSM again.
Issler Dainze Minmatar Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord	Posted - 2010.05.05 21:04:00 - [24] Originally by: Avalloc I'm curious to know just how much Ankh has been playing EVE for the past 6 months. She only started showing up in my addressbook noticeably since CCP announced they were abolishing term limits. In other words when she knew she could/would run for CSM again. It does feel like she is just back for the CSM. I mean if you are serious about puzzle pirates it doesn't leave much time for any other games....... Issler
Halt Fitzwit	Posted - 2010.05.05 21:18:00 - [25] Since I am a bit daft and had no idea on who to vote, I just voted for Ankh since she was at the top of the page ...what can I say, some of us are slower than others
Jan Forjeu	Posted - 2010.05.05 22:06:00 - [26] I, too, saw the shiny avatar yelling internet-girl-id-like-to-**** exploding on my screen when I pressed the vote button. But then I remembered I hated her socks of and tasted a little sick in my mouth.
Caoim Fearghul Caldari The First Church of the Azure Carrot The Dominion Empire	Posted - 2010.05.05 22:30:00 - [27] Originally by: Issler Dainze Originally by: Avalloc I'm curious to know just how much Ankh has been playing EVE for the past 6 months. She only started showing up in my addressbook noticeably since CCP announced they were abolishing term limits. In other words when she knew she could/would run for CSM again. It does feel like she is just back for the CSM. I mean if you are serious about puzzle pirates it doesn't leave much time for any other games....... Issler As a former corp mate of Ankh, I can safely say that in the last six months she has moved some POS fuel and *****ed about EVE being a POS. Apart from that her contribution to corp operations and activities was nonexistent. She was not involved in a single alliance operation even as providence was burning. I find her claims of having "experienced" 0.0 during her time with CVA to be wonderfully ironic. Prodesse Non Nocere
TeaDaze Agony Unleashed Agony Empire	Posted - 2010.05.06 16:16:00 - [28] Originally by: mazzilliu CCP should randomize the order candidates appear in for a fair election. It seems CCP have now implemented this Originally by: mazzilliu guess who is at the top of the page this time around? Ironically, it was you when I last visited the page Vote TeaDaze for CSM5!
Cinori Aluben Minmatar Gladiators of Rage Systematic-Chaos	Posted - 2010.05.06 16:41:00 - [29] Glad to see CCP was listening! Mazz did you call your iceland hookups? ;) --- Cinori Aluben -- CSM 2010!! "Fix the Little Things First!" http://www.littlethingsfirst.com
Richard Christy	Posted - 2010.05.06 16:42:00 - [30] Originally by: TeaDaze Originally by: mazzilliu CCP should randomize the order candidates appear in for a fair election. It seems CCP have now implemented this Yip, looks like the whining got something changed. Maybe the CSM has some sway after all.



Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.