| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |
TeaDaze
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
   |
Posted - 2010.05.20 12:02:00 -
[1]
That is a large increase in voter turnout!
It will be interesting to see how far that changes the cutoff point for getting elected...
TeaDaze.net |
TeaDaze
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
|
Posted - 2010.05.20 15:18:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Dierdra Vaal
btw this thread needs more blue graphs
Quick and Dirty
TeaDaze.net |
TeaDaze
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
|
Posted - 2010.05.21 13:34:00 -
[3]
I know a number of people with multiple accounts who split their votes between candidates they liked.
Of course there is a chance that splitting votes too much means none of your voted for candidates gets in, but that is the risk you take.
TeaDaze.net |
TeaDaze
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
|
Posted - 2010.05.21 15:51:00 -
[4]
Originally by: CCP Diagoras
<snip>
At last we get the official blue graphs!
Excellent, though now I have to find something else to joke about 
TeaDaze.net |
TeaDaze
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
|
Posted - 2010.05.21 23:25:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Konoch
The CSM is inherently flawed by the overwhelming influence of mega alliances and powerblocks. Unless CCP is willing do something to address this, more and more its going to become very clear that its a joke to even vote. While there was a spike in voting i believe that this was forced by the NC and SC conflict as people in both groups try to get their people on the council with the potential of affecting the war. I am sorry to see that my vote is inherently wasted.
Considering the actual results haven't been released I wouldn't cry mega alliance blob foul just yet.
In CSM4 only around 4 of the 9 delegates (or 6 of the 14 if you include the alternates) were from large alliances...
TeaDaze.net |
TeaDaze
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
|
Posted - 2010.05.24 10:55:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Nyphur
See that little spike at May 10th that lasted a few days? It could be a complete coincidence but May 10th was the day we did a big CSM candidate roundup at Massively in an effort to get more people voting. Maybe it had an effect!
I'm pretty certain that the Massively article helped with the increased voter turnout. For comparison my site went from 3000 to 8000 hits per day for the three days after that article (there was also a 3 day bump to about 4500 hits a day when the voting opened and a similar 5 day bump just before polls closed).
Many thanks for putting together the article 
TeaDaze.net |
TeaDaze
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
|
Posted - 2010.05.25 10:15:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Qujulome
I would support an Isk cost for running.
Not everyone who has isk is a worthy candidate just as not everybody without isk is a bad candidate.
If there was an isk cost it would have to be significant to have any impact (many billions) and the result would be that people such as myself wouldn't be able to take part...
TeaDaze.net |
TeaDaze
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
|
Posted - 2010.05.27 14:10:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Dlardrageth
Originally by: CCP Diagoras
Full results can now be read in this dev blog.
Since when is it "full results", when you don't list the votes for those candidates that didn't make CSM or alternate slots? Kinda weird... just saying... 
At the left of the forum open up Eve Insider / CSM / Results (need to be logged in).
Would be nice if the link was in the devblog but they were at least released.
TeaDaze.net |
| |
|