| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Cyrus Doul
Caldari Cosmic Vacum Cleaners Opticon Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.05.23 01:28:00 -
[1]
I hear the term chest beating going on around a lot here. Other then making it sound like we are playing internet submarines as gorillas instead of humans (though that's not always a bad thing, the gallente are french after all). It came to me that if chestbeating were to be a math equation is it able to be negitive? Or always positive?
Say the NC chestbeat about themselves, thats positive right? Now say the SC chestbeat about the NC, Is that still positive for the NC? And if so is that equally negative to the SC? Now what if a third party chestbeats about both people equally? Say someone in providence who does not care either way? Is that two positive beats? Or do they cancel out and equal no beats?
Finally take a situation where the NC chest beat about how they kick the SC rear in some engagement, and then the SC instead of complaining actually helps the NC chestbeat about it. that would give you something like
{Pecentage of NC created chestbeats out of total chestbeats = NC chestbeats / total chestbeats)
now if you were going to type that into a calculator it would say that whoever The Wrong Alliance is wins every time because the calculator always reads error
|

Grarr Dexx
Amarr GK inc. Panda Team
|
Posted - 2010.05.23 01:36:00 -
[2]
I wish your fingers would divide by zero so you would stop posting.
I hope that's enough of a metaphor to convey my feelings to you. ___
|

Sandwich PvP
Caldari The Maverick Navy IT Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.05.23 01:43:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Sandwich PvP on 23/05/2010 01:42:44 Your assuming that all chest-beating is equal? Due to the amount of variation in the act of chest-beating, I would have to assume that you cannot quantify it with a straight-line equation. You will need to setup a non-linear equation factoring in the quality, quantity, and assertiveness of each chest-beating incident as well as a study on the relative effect that the post may have on the enemy morale.
The only fight worth fighting is the one you should lose. |

Cyrus Doul
Caldari Cosmic Vacum Cleaners Opticon Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.05.23 01:47:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Sandwich PvP Edited by: Sandwich PvP on 23/05/2010 01:42:44 Your assuming that all chest-beating is equal? Due to the amount of variation in the act of chest-beating, I would have to assume that you cannot quantify it with a straight-line equation. You will need to setup a non-linear equation factoring in the quality, quantity, and assertiveness of each chest-beating incident as well as a study on the relative effect that the post may have on the enemy morale.
Yes that would work if the situation had more then two parties chest beating in it. I do know that this is CAOD and that never happens but if you were looking at it from a theoretical perfect situation standpoint as physicists like to when they want to ignore things such as friction or air drag it would work. Since every SC pro NC cheast-beat would be equally anti SC would it not?
|

dastommy79
Caldari Di-Tron Heavy Industries Atlas Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.05.23 01:50:00 -
[5]
I miss mvn. You guys complete me I role play ewok
|

Titanium Warlord
Minmatar Vanguard Venture Vanguard Venture Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.05.23 06:45:00 -
[6]
A chestbeating equation would be interesting but a damage control equation would be far far funnier 
|

cheese monkey
Minmatar D00M. RED.OverLord
|
Posted - 2010.05.23 11:00:00 -
[7]
Edited by: cheese monkey on 23/05/2010 11:01:15 above average chest beat = W universal chest beat = Y below average chest beat = Z
basically in every thread use this system.
X = chestbeating
X = (W+Y+Z)%
2X if agree 2 parties agree Divide 2 if both disagree x0.3 if there are 3 parties
????
|

Hemp Invader
Gallente GK inc. Panda Team
|
Posted - 2010.05.23 11:20:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Grarr Dexx I wish your fingers would divide by zero so you would stop posting.
10 / 0 = infinity. Thank you Grarr for making him post even more stupid threads.
|

Garreth Vlox
Minmatar Hysterical Dementia DEFI4NT
|
Posted - 2010.05.23 11:48:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Hemp Invader
Originally by: Grarr Dexx I wish your fingers would divide by zero so you would stop posting.
10 / 0 = infinity. Thank you Grarr for making him post even more stupid threads.
nice try but 10/0 = nothing, it is an equation that can not be solved.
|

Brutus Duran
Minmatar Destructive Influence IT Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.05.23 11:53:00 -
[10]
You're overlooking the stacking penalty of chest-beating. If you do it too much, the effect is negated.
|

Grarr Dexx
Amarr GK inc. Panda Team
|
Posted - 2010.05.23 11:58:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Hemp Invader
Originally by: Grarr Dexx I wish your fingers would divide by zero so you would stop posting.
10 / 0 = infinity. Thank you Grarr for making him post even more stupid threads.
You flunked maths 1? Nice. ___
|

Hemp Invader
Gallente GK inc. Panda Team
|
Posted - 2010.05.23 13:11:00 -
[12]
Apparently i flunked english 101 since i had to look up "to flunk" in the dictionary, but fortunatly i found a link for you: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Division_by_zero Facts in COAD...in this thread...nevah
|

Dyzzy Dyvyl
Gallente ANZAC ALLIANCE IT Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.05.23 16:29:00 -
[13]
Edited by: Dyzzy Dyvyl on 23/05/2010 16:30:45
Originally by: cheese monkey Edited by: cheese monkey on 23/05/2010 11:01:15 above average chest beat = W universal chest beat = Y below average chest beat = Z
basically in every thread use this system.
X = chestbeating
X = (W+Y+Z)%
2X if agree 2 parties agree Divide 2 if both disagree x0.3 if there are 3 parties
????
liking the mathematicial theory missing sum info though.
also there are sum right numptys in eve so lets start with the basics getting the wording right and we can build on that
GIVEN cheatbeating is WYZ = X TO PROVE X x2 = is a given if both partys agree construction (hypothesis) - proof E.G. mathematical theory techniques of cheats beating
X = chestbeating
X = (W+Y+Z)%
2X if agree 2 parties agree Divide 2 if both disagree x0.3 if there are 3 parties
in a proof, thease parts - the "hypothesis" and the "proof," are eustomarily devloped with speical reference to a chestbeat (formal extension)
anyone want to add to that
ôWise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.ö |

RS Murphy
Amarr League of Gentlemen
|
Posted - 2010.05.24 05:43:00 -
[14]
Edited by: RS Murphy on 24/05/2010 05:43:37
Originally by: Hemp Invader Dumb Stuff
"In mathematics, a division is called a division by zero if the divisor is zero. Such a division can be formally expressed as a / 0 where a is the dividend. Whether this expression can be assigned a well-defined value depends upon the mathematical setting. In ordinary (real number) arithmetic, the expression has no meaning."
In your own link! idiot
Don't try to mathz if you're crap at it.
|

FatFreddy
Minmatar ANZAC ALLIANCE IT Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.05.24 06:46:00 -
[15]
Once you nerds have the math down, remember we also need a questionnaire to assess psychological impact. Everybody loves filling out internet questionnaires.
|

Ocih
Amarr The Program Vanguard.
|
Posted - 2010.05.24 08:10:00 -
[16]
I fail at chest beating. They nerfed it before I had a chance to train up the skills. I only have fist shaking 4  |

Pudgy McFudge
Caldari GoonWaffe SOLODRAKBANSOLODRAKBANSO
|
Posted - 2010.05.24 08:19:00 -
[17]
Why beat chests when there is all this meat? |

Cyrus Doul
Caldari Cosmic Vacum Cleaners Opticon Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.05.24 17:37:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Pudgy McFudge Why beat chests when there is all this meat?
THis is why i love goonswarm. and no i wont give you all my isk.
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |