EVE Search - Standards for Pirate Categorization

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Crime and Punishment

Standards for Pirate Categorization

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Droidster	Posted - 2004.12.14 00:11:00 - [1] Edited by: Droidster on 14/12/2004 00:37:24 If you do not think pirates should be categorized then WHY ARE YOU READING THIS POST? Since there seems to be some confusion about what is a pirate and what is not, I volunteer the system I use to categorize corporations in my own notes: Non-Pirate (NP): - kills noobs/alts only in their alliance territory - kills vets only if on KOS or at war or in fair duel - kills only pirates Pirates: Scum Level A (SLA) - accepts ore/corp thieves as members Scum Level B (SLB) - kills noobs in .4 camps, griefs Scum Level C (SLC) - kills anybody in 0.0 for fun Scum Level D (SLD) - kills any vet in 0.0 for fun Scum Level E (SLE) - kills only for money Honor Qualifier: + keeps deals (does not lie) - breaks deals (lies) In my experience the majority of vet pirates tend to be SLC+. The second-most common type seems to be SLB-. Note that there are additional criteria involved for a corp to reach SLA. Basically an SLA means they have NO standards, whereas an SLB has shown some kind of standards somehow. SLA implies SLA-. There is no such thing as SLA+ (that would be an SLB). SLDs often call themselves "PvP" corps, but if they kill outside their territory I class them with the pirates. I consider mercs SLE+ generally because I have no way to know whether I am on their hitlist. The way this system helps me is that if an A,B,C shows up in the system I will hide, but if it is a D or E I will continue on the assumption they will ignore me or I can buy them off. _____________________________________________ I am motivated by various things, mostly ISK.
Droidster	Posted - 2004.12.14 00:11:00 - [2] Edited by: Droidster on 14/12/2004 00:37:24 If you do not think pirates should be categorized then WHY ARE YOU READING THIS POST? Since there seems to be some confusion about what is a pirate and what is not, I volunteer the system I use to categorize corporations in my own notes: Non-Pirate (NP): - kills noobs/alts only in their alliance territory - kills vets only if on KOS or at war or in fair duel - kills only pirates Pirates: Scum Level A (SLA) - accepts ore/corp thieves as members Scum Level B (SLB) - kills noobs in .4 camps, griefs Scum Level C (SLC) - kills anybody in 0.0 for fun Scum Level D (SLD) - kills any vet in 0.0 for fun Scum Level E (SLE) - kills only for money Honor Qualifier: + keeps deals (does not lie) - breaks deals (lies) In my experience the majority of vet pirates tend to be SLC+. The second-most common type seems to be SLB-. Note that there are additional criteria involved for a corp to reach SLA. Basically an SLA means they have NO standards, whereas an SLB has shown some kind of standards somehow. SLA implies SLA-. There is no such thing as SLA+ (that would be an SLB). SLDs often call themselves "PvP" corps, but if they kill outside their territory I class them with the pirates. I consider mercs SLE+ generally because I have no way to know whether I am on their hitlist. The way this system helps me is that if an A,B,C shows up in the system I will hide, but if it is a D or E I will continue on the assumption they will ignore me or I can buy them off. _____________________________________________ I am motivated by various things, mostly ISK.
Liu Kaskakka	Posted - 2004.12.14 00:15:00 - [3] Edited by: Liu Kaskakka on 14/12/2004 00:19:51 m'kay .. Edit: I bet in a few months time everyone refers to the 'Droidster' system when they are talking about pirates. Carebear 1: "He was an SLC" Carebear 2: "No, he was definitely an SLB!"
Liu Kaskakka	Posted - 2004.12.14 00:15:00 - [4] Edited by: Liu Kaskakka on 14/12/2004 00:19:51 m'kay .. Edit: I bet in a few months time everyone refers to the 'Droidster' system when they are talking about pirates. Carebear 1: "He was an SLC" Carebear 2: "No, he was definitely an SLB!"
Zarquon Beeblebrox	Posted - 2004.12.14 00:28:00 - [5] I think this post is a IYRI .... Ignore you read it. -- Lady Beeblebrox Teddybears movies
Zarquon Beeblebrox	Posted - 2004.12.14 00:28:00 - [6] I think this post is a IYRI .... Ignore you read it. -- Lady Beeblebrox Teddybears movies
Sleazy Cabbie	Posted - 2004.12.14 00:40:00 - [7] John Ashcroft, is that you?!??
Sleazy Cabbie	Posted - 2004.12.14 00:40:00 - [8] John Ashcroft, is that you?!??
Daakkon	Posted - 2004.12.14 00:45:00 - [9] I would be in B and E I thinks www.dark-cartel.com
Daakkon	Posted - 2004.12.14 00:45:00 - [10] I would be in B and E I thinks www.dark-cartel.com

Pandora Panda	Posted - 2004.12.14 00:57:00 - [11] Just because you ate paint chips as a child doesnt mean that you have to subject us to your idiocy. Also, this is a DFP/A+/-12^3 post. Dumbass ****** post type A (trolling with a side order of idiocy), positive for time-wasting, with a -12 modifier to my IQ after having read it 3 times. -------------------------------------------- CONCORD: Kneecapping Pilots for Misdemeanors Since 2003
Pandora Panda	Posted - 2004.12.14 00:57:00 - [12] Just because you ate paint chips as a child doesnt mean that you have to subject us to your idiocy. Also, this is a DFP/A+/-12^3 post. Dumbass ****** post type A (trolling with a side order of idiocy), positive for time-wasting, with a -12 modifier to my IQ after having read it 3 times. -------------------------------------------- CONCORD: Kneecapping Pilots for Misdemeanors Since 2003
Droidster	Posted - 2004.12.14 01:10:00 - [13] Originally by: Pandora Panda Just because you ate paint chips as a child doesnt mean that you have to subject us to your idiocy. Thanks for setting me straight about what a troll I am. I am going to go back to paint chips now if it is ok with you? _____________________________________________ I am motivated by various things, mostly ISK.
Droidster	Posted - 2004.12.14 01:10:00 - [14] Originally by: Pandora Panda Just because you ate paint chips as a child doesnt mean that you have to subject us to your idiocy. Thanks for setting me straight about what a troll I am. I am going to go back to paint chips now if it is ok with you? _____________________________________________ I am motivated by various things, mostly ISK.
theRaptor	Posted - 2004.12.14 01:28:00 - [15] woot I am SLC. Nah not really, cause I claim all 0.0 systems. Therefore if I shoot you its because I am protecting my territory. Nothing personal. --------------------------------------------------
theRaptor	Posted - 2004.12.14 01:28:00 - [16] woot I am SLC. Nah not really, cause I claim all 0.0 systems. Therefore if I shoot you its because I am protecting my territory. Nothing personal. --------------------------------------------------
Soren	Posted - 2004.12.14 02:12:00 - [17] Originally by: Daakkon I would be in B and E I thinks I'd have thought you like the D in the A. _________________________________________________________
Soren	Posted - 2004.12.14 02:12:00 - [18] Originally by: Daakkon I would be in B and E I thinks I'd have thought you like the D in the A. _________________________________________________________
Nervar	Posted - 2004.12.14 03:07:00 - [19] Original Author's post is herby categorized as a: P.o.i.n.t.l.e.s.s a.n.d w.a.s.t.e o.f f.o.r.u.m s.p.a.c.e +A -------------------------------------------------> What I look forward to is continued immaturity followed by death.
Nervar	Posted - 2004.12.14 03:07:00 - [20] Original Author's post is herby categorized as a: P.o.i.n.t.l.e.s.s a.n.d w.a.s.t.e o.f f.o.r.u.m s.p.a.c.e +A -------------------------------------------------> What I look forward to is continued immaturity followed by death.

Ryctor	Posted - 2004.12.14 03:24:00 - [21] Edited by: Ryctor on 14/12/2004 03:27:12 stupid reply key
Ryctor	Posted - 2004.12.14 03:24:00 - [22] Edited by: Ryctor on 14/12/2004 03:27:12 stupid reply key
Candy	Posted - 2004.12.14 03:36:00 - [23] Let's say, HYPOTHETICALLY, a player were to, say, kill absolutely anyone they can as well as scam, grief, and thieve, but doesn't lie... unless doing it would get them more money. How, uhm, would you classify this uhh hypothetical player, completely out of curiosity. -------------------------------------------
Candy	Posted - 2004.12.14 03:36:00 - [24] Let's say, HYPOTHETICALLY, a player were to, say, kill absolutely anyone they can as well as scam, grief, and thieve, but doesn't lie... unless doing it would get them more money. How, uhm, would you classify this uhh hypothetical player, completely out of curiosity. -------------------------------------------
Droidster	Posted - 2004.12.14 03:41:00 - [25] Edited by: Droidster on 14/12/2004 03:46:42 Originally by: Candy Let's say, HYPOTHETICALLY, a player were to, say, kill absolutely anyone they can as well as scam, grief, and thieve, but doesn't lie... unless doing it would get them more money. How, uhm, would you classify this uhh hypothetical player, completely out of curiosity. SLB- But you are SLC+ Candy. Haven't lied to me yet _____________________________________________ I am motivated by various things, mostly ISK.
Droidster	Posted - 2004.12.14 03:41:00 - [26] Edited by: Droidster on 14/12/2004 03:46:42 Originally by: Candy Let's say, HYPOTHETICALLY, a player were to, say, kill absolutely anyone they can as well as scam, grief, and thieve, but doesn't lie... unless doing it would get them more money. How, uhm, would you classify this uhh hypothetical player, completely out of curiosity. SLB- But you are SLC+ Candy. Haven't lied to me yet _____________________________________________ I am motivated by various things, mostly ISK.
Shiwan Khan	Posted - 2004.12.14 04:24:00 - [27] can you say hateful nub that wants to apply the label "pirate" to people because he has fallen victim to SLA, SLB, SLC, SLD, and SLE?
Shiwan Khan	Posted - 2004.12.14 04:24:00 - [28] can you say hateful nub that wants to apply the label "pirate" to people because he has fallen victim to SLA, SLB, SLC, SLD, and SLE?
Tomahawk Bliss	Posted - 2004.12.14 04:37:00 - [29] Originally by: Droidster Originally by: Pandora Panda Just because you ate paint chips as a child doesnt mean that you have to subject us to your idiocy. Thanks for setting me straight about what a troll I am. I am going to go back to paint chips now if it is ok with you?
Tomahawk Bliss	Posted - 2004.12.14 04:37:00 - [30] Originally by: Droidster Originally by: Pandora Panda Just because you ate paint chips as a child doesnt mean that you have to subject us to your idiocy. Thanks for setting me straight about what a troll I am. I am going to go back to paint chips now if it is ok with you?



Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.