EVE Search - CA claim u-q??

All Channels

Corporations and Alliances Summit

CA claim u-q??

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Bad'Boy	Posted - 2004.12.14 15:29:00 - [1] Edited by: Bad'Boy on 14/12/2004 15:32:23 looks like they building POS there?? nice B.A.D.B.O.Y.: Biomechanical Android Designed for Battle and Online Yelling "Bad Boys,Bad Boys, what you gonna do, what you gonna do when WE come for yoU"
Bad'Boy	Posted - 2004.12.14 15:29:00 - [2] Edited by: Bad'Boy on 14/12/2004 15:32:23 looks like they building POS there?? nice B.A.D.B.O.Y.: Biomechanical Android Designed for Battle and Online Yelling "Bad Boys,Bad Boys, what you gonna do, what you gonna do when WE come for yoU"
AvanCade	Posted - 2004.12.14 18:22:00 - [3] You should have a look at it, looks pretty
AvanCade	Posted - 2004.12.14 18:22:00 - [4] You should have a look at it, looks pretty
Chowdown	Posted - 2004.12.14 18:48:00 - [5] Old Bessies got a nasty temper. New Shinra Kill system, please be patient were still ironing out the finer points!!
Chowdown	Posted - 2004.12.14 18:48:00 - [6] Old Bessies got a nasty temper. New Shinra Kill system, please be patient were still ironing out the finer points!!
Nepereta	Posted - 2004.12.15 00:43:00 - [7] Congrats, I hope you enjoyed setting it up.
Nepereta	Posted - 2004.12.15 00:43:00 - [8] Congrats, I hope you enjoyed setting it up.
Elenia Kheynes	Posted - 2004.12.15 02:15:00 - [9] Poor Enslaver will now have to mine very hard with his alt to keep it running Dear friendly customer... Can I have your money ?
Elenia Kheynes	Posted - 2004.12.15 02:15:00 - [10] Poor Enslaver will now have to mine very hard with his alt to keep it running Dear friendly customer... Can I have your money ?
kessah	Posted - 2004.12.15 02:19:00 - [11] a truly claimed system. nice job guys. -------------------------------------------------------- Im Your Huckleberry ;-)
kessah	Posted - 2004.12.15 02:19:00 - [12] a truly claimed system. nice job guys. -------------------------------------------------------- Im Your Huckleberry ;-)
agentsmitty	Posted - 2004.12.15 06:09:00 - [13] expensive safespot!!!!!!!!11
agentsmitty	Posted - 2004.12.15 06:09:00 - [14] expensive safespot!!!!!!!!11
Sabahl	Posted - 2004.12.15 06:44:00 - [15] Originally by: agentsmitty expensive safespot!!!!!!!!11 We're prepared to pay for this one. Tactically it's so superior to HED-GP it's obscene.
Sabahl	Posted - 2004.12.15 06:44:00 - [16] Originally by: agentsmitty expensive safespot!!!!!!!!11 We're prepared to pay for this one. Tactically it's so superior to HED-GP it's obscene.
The Enslaver	Posted - 2004.12.15 07:17:00 - [17] Originally by: Elenia Kheynes Poor Enslaver will now have to mine very hard with his alt to keep it running Tholarim uses teh whip :( Btw, what you XF guys think about our second Catch POS? -------- FireFoxx80: If you think you can do a better job, go find yourself a datacentre to host a box, get a copy of Visual Studio, and STFU.
The Enslaver	Posted - 2004.12.15 07:17:00 - [18] Originally by: Elenia Kheynes Poor Enslaver will now have to mine very hard with his alt to keep it running Tholarim uses teh whip :( Btw, what you XF guys think about our second Catch POS? -------- FireFoxx80: If you think you can do a better job, go find yourself a datacentre to host a box, get a copy of Visual Studio, and STFU.
Specops	Posted - 2004.12.15 08:35:00 - [19] Edited by: Specops on 15/12/2004 08:41:11 Edited by: Specops on 15/12/2004 08:39:45 Well I say GJ to you. Originally by: Lallante Well kids, XETIC built their POS. CA came in equal numbers, and XETIC AND SA sat in their billion ISK safespot and talked smack. CA waited 30mins (during which time they ganked 4 Indies that flew into them: Containing Over a Billion ISK in Station parts!!!), went back to U-Q. XETIC /SA followed and then took an almighty beating at the B-3 Gate. 25 : 18 BSs were there (CA in the minority). CA's support ships were outnumbered 2:1. We believe the end score was roughly 6/7 : 3 in CA's favour, with a lot of SA BCs going down too. Hahaha, Your POS was really helpful wasnt it.... We came, killed indies containing structures of a HIGHER VALUE than your POS in total, and then beat your fleet outnumbered. Waste of space, Waste of Money, Waste Of Time. Enough About XETIC, POS's are bad too. Its a shame a lot in your alliance would agree with Lallante on your 2 Bil isk Safespots. http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=131377&page=1
Specops	Posted - 2004.12.15 08:35:00 - [20] Edited by: Specops on 15/12/2004 08:41:11 Edited by: Specops on 15/12/2004 08:39:45 Well I say GJ to you. Originally by: Lallante Well kids, XETIC built their POS. CA came in equal numbers, and XETIC AND SA sat in their billion ISK safespot and talked smack. CA waited 30mins (during which time they ganked 4 Indies that flew into them: Containing Over a Billion ISK in Station parts!!!), went back to U-Q. XETIC /SA followed and then took an almighty beating at the B-3 Gate. 25 : 18 BSs were there (CA in the minority). CA's support ships were outnumbered 2:1. We believe the end score was roughly 6/7 : 3 in CA's favour, with a lot of SA BCs going down too. Hahaha, Your POS was really helpful wasnt it.... We came, killed indies containing structures of a HIGHER VALUE than your POS in total, and then beat your fleet outnumbered. Waste of space, Waste of Money, Waste Of Time. Enough About XETIC, POS's are bad too. Its a shame a lot in your alliance would agree with Lallante on your 2 Bil isk Safespots. http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=131377&page=1
Arud	Posted - 2004.12.15 09:20:00 - [21] also having a pos in uq is alot more expensive and riskier than having one in hed, longer route and generaly just more dangerous system
Arud	Posted - 2004.12.15 09:20:00 - [22] also having a pos in uq is alot more expensive and riskier than having one in hed, longer route and generaly just more dangerous system
Nepereta	Posted - 2004.12.15 10:16:00 - [23] HED has a very short supply chain. Although tbh these things are laughably easy to fuel( I assume the thing is 100% full already + a few big secure cans) after that you need a hauler every 2-3 days. I will suspect the Eve World Plum pudding is now in danger as the allainces start a POS building race to claim space.
Nepereta	Posted - 2004.12.15 10:16:00 - [24] HED has a very short supply chain. Although tbh these things are laughably easy to fuel( I assume the thing is 100% full already + a few big secure cans) after that you need a hauler every 2-3 days. I will suspect the Eve World Plum pudding is now in danger as the allainces start a POS building race to claim space.
AvanCade	Posted - 2004.12.15 11:03:00 - [25] Originally by: Arud also having a pos in uq is alot more expensive and riskier than having one in hed, longer route and generaly just more dangerous system We like to live on the edge ;) But we beat SA to it, didnt we ? :)
AvanCade	Posted - 2004.12.15 11:03:00 - [26] Originally by: Arud also having a pos in uq is alot more expensive and riskier than having one in hed, longer route and generaly just more dangerous system We like to live on the edge ;) But we beat SA to it, didnt we ? :)
Arud	Posted - 2004.12.15 11:48:00 - [27] Originally by: AvanCade Originally by: Arud also having a pos in uq is alot more expensive and riskier than having one in hed, longer route and generaly just more dangerous system We like to live on the edge ;) But we beat SA to it, didnt we ? :) heheh damn you dont think though we were even looking into it, in my opinion xetic beat us for claiming hed first, from a logical standpoint it makes alot of sense... uq not as much but still nice job
Arud	Posted - 2004.12.15 11:48:00 - [28] Originally by: AvanCade Originally by: Arud also having a pos in uq is alot more expensive and riskier than having one in hed, longer route and generaly just more dangerous system We like to live on the edge ;) But we beat SA to it, didnt we ? :) heheh damn you dont think though we were even looking into it, in my opinion xetic beat us for claiming hed first, from a logical standpoint it makes alot of sense... uq not as much but still nice job
DeMundus	Posted - 2004.12.15 12:43:00 - [29] Originally by: Arud Originally by: AvanCade Originally by: Arud also having a pos in uq is alot more expensive and riskier than having one in hed, longer route and generaly just more dangerous system We like to live on the edge ;) But we beat SA to it, didnt we ? :) heheh damn you dont think though we were even looking into it, in my opinion xetic beat us for claiming hed first, from a logical standpoint it makes alot of sense... uq not as much but still nice job .. I heard u planned to put one up just the day b4 we decided to and somehow u pushed it off for a coupple of days:) Good timing for us;)
DeMundus	Posted - 2004.12.15 12:43:00 - [30] Originally by: Arud Originally by: AvanCade Originally by: Arud also having a pos in uq is alot more expensive and riskier than having one in hed, longer route and generaly just more dangerous system We like to live on the edge ;) But we beat SA to it, didnt we ? :) heheh damn you dont think though we were even looking into it, in my opinion xetic beat us for claiming hed first, from a logical standpoint it makes alot of sense... uq not as much but still nice job .. I heard u planned to put one up just the day b4 we decided to and somehow u pushed it off for a coupple of days:) Good timing for us;)

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.