| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Andrea Roche
State War Academy Caldari State
163
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 20:55:00 -
[61] - Quote
Tarryn Nightstorm wrote:Andrea Roche wrote:Black ops are OP as hell. Look at Burn Eden stats using them and how efficient they are and how very rarelly they lose a back ops ship! Sorry but their stats speaks miles on how good they are already, nevermind buffing them further!
Enough said! Obvious troll is far too obvious. 1/10. Keep practising!
lol its not so obvious if you keep getting it wrong! 
|

Tarryn Nightstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
525
|
Posted - 2012.07.22 06:31:00 -
[62] - Quote
I get it wrong that you're a useless troll/mindless fanboi/girl, O great NPC-corp generic forum-alt?
No, I think not.
Next! In irae, veritas. |

Andrea Roche
State War Academy Caldari State
163
|
Posted - 2012.07.22 08:26:00 -
[63] - Quote
Tarryn Nightstorm wrote:I get it wrong that you're a useless troll/mindless fanboi/girl, O great NPC-corp generic forum-alt?
No, I think not.
Next!
do you even know what a fanboi is? you are not too clever are you
 |

Lady Spank
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
2371
|
Posted - 2012.07.22 09:14:00 -
[64] - Quote
Counterpoints to a discussion will always be read as trolling in the minds of imbeciles. (a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â) |

Hemmo Paskiainen
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
345
|
Posted - 2012.07.22 09:32:00 -
[65] - Quote
Lady Spank wrote:Counterpoints to a discussion will always be read as trolling in the minds of imbeciles. Exept when his counterpoints were stupid, one sided and an obvius brainfart... CCP FIX BLACK OPS FFS |

Andrea Roche
State War Academy Caldari State
163
|
Posted - 2012.07.22 10:19:00 -
[66] - Quote
Hemmo Paskiainen wrote:Lady Spank wrote:Counterpoints to a discussion will always be read as trolling in the minds of imbeciles. Exept when his counterpoints were stupid, one sided and an obvius brainfart... Anyhow, reported it anyway so this litter wont derail this topic... Damn trolls, ccp need to make a cave section here and implement prinesses ingame so they can kidnap them and hide in the caves!!
my point still the same my friend. grated i have used BE as an example but as you well know there are many entites that use them differently and some more like the standard way of using them. At the end, most of them are successful at it and not all ships within the same class must be as good as the others. Eve just does not work like that and never has. Not even now with all the new buffs there are still many ships that are ignored simply cos they are not suited for a particular strategy or are not as good as the others.
In the end you got to ask a few questions and you got to be frank about it to yourself and recognize these:
Are there ships in every class that are used more than others cos they simply do not suit a particular strategy? Yes, stats prove it Are black ops effective? Yes, stats prove it Are there multiple AND effective types of strategies while using black ops? Yes, stats prove it Are they effective as herassment tool? Yes, stats prove it Do we have sufficient long term infomation to show these stats are acurate? They have been effective for more than 4 years. So yes
You cant just scream/demand buff this or buff that when you see how good they are. Granted they are not the easiest thing to deal with BUT i believe thats the price you got to pay for been able to hot drop on cyno jammed system, snipe and kill an oponents in seconds.
Its not a troll but fact! |

Master Tron
Axis.
5
|
Posted - 2012.07.22 13:42:00 -
[67] - Quote
Razor Rocker wrote:Master Tron wrote:As a everyday black ops pilot this ship needs more love. You have my support on this matter.
Black Ops should have:
- Larger Fuel Bay - Bridge recons and t3 amount should be lower - Increased ly
Does Black Ops needs Covert cloak ?
My answer is NO, as they are atm is perfect. Having covert cloak makes them too powerful. agree completely with this. Covert Ops cloaks are not needed, although it be nice not to erase the scan res penalty from cloaking devices. Having to have 1-2 cloaky haulers and BO with cargo expanders for a deep insertion (lol) seems rather silly to me. the dps and tank of the BO is fine. But I'd love to see people using BO more. Another neat perk, which I think will probably make them OP, is having each have an ewar bonus. So a redeemer with a neuting bonus, panther with a web bonus and sin with a pointing range bonus. This would eliminate the need for recons on the fleet. in the end, improve the BO in nearly any way and ill be happy.
This is amazing idea (I agree), they still are T2 ships, meaning they should have bonus. At the moment they seems to be just T1 battleships what can just use jump drive nothing else. |

Bootleg Jack
Potters Field
196
|
Posted - 2012.07.22 15:55:00 -
[68] - Quote
Andrea Roche wrote:Bootleg Jack wrote:Ironic the "Black Ops" ship, which Black Ops implies bad assed is in actuality nothing more than a kind of jump gate industrial.
Tank sucks... Cloak sucks... DPS sucks...
See, it is a jump gate industrial with a bad assed name.
you defenetly dont know what you are talking about regarding black ops.
lol, enlighten us, are you saying the cloak is ok?
Or maybe you think it has great DPS?
Or the tank, *snicker*, is that good?
Shields base: Widow = 5312 Scorp = 6641 Scorp Navy = 9961 Rattlesnake 12750
The tank is less than the base T1 ship by nearly 20%.
It is outclassed as a fighting ship in all cases with ships of similar size. I'm an American, English is my second language... |

Soi Mala
Whacky Waving Inflatable Flailing Arm Tubemen
122
|
Posted - 2012.07.22 16:04:00 -
[69] - Quote
Bootleg Jack wrote:Andrea Roche wrote:Bootleg Jack wrote:Ironic the "Black Ops" ship, which Black Ops implies bad assed is in actuality nothing more than a kind of jump gate industrial.
Tank sucks... Cloak sucks... DPS sucks...
See, it is a jump gate industrial with a bad assed name.
you defenetly dont know what you are talking about regarding black ops. lol, enlighten us, are you saying the cloak is ok? Or maybe you think it has great DPS? Or the tank, *snicker*, is that good? Shields base:
Widow = 5312 Scorp = 6641 Scorp Navy = 9961 Rattlesnake 12750 The tank is less than the base T1 ship by nearly 20%. It is outclassed as a fighting ship in all cases with ships of similar size.
Which is why they travel in gangs. Also, they have backup from the recon that's cynoing. Add the element of surprise and you have surprise buttsechs.
Maybe you'd rather have a brawling dps tankmachine that can warp cloaked? |

l0rd carlos
Friends Of Harassment
41
|
Posted - 2012.07.22 16:14:00 -
[70] - Quote
Hi Guys. I am part of a small lowsec corp and we sometimes use blackops to break gatecamp that would not be possible to attack in other ways (because of scouting and ~100AU warp) And they work great for that! Yes, the fuelbay is not that big, but we drop a container with more fuel before bridging, so that solves that problem. Tank is a little bit meh .. but if we can we also bridge logistics.
I totaly agree on the DPS part, it is low. But would it be good for the game if they would make more damage?
Maybe we should have 2 different kind of Blackops, one with large fuel bay and cover cloak and one with DPS/Tank Bonus?
|

Andrea Roche
State War Academy Caldari State
163
|
Posted - 2012.07.22 20:27:00 -
[71] - Quote
Bootleg Jack wrote:Andrea Roche wrote:Bootleg Jack wrote:Ironic the "Black Ops" ship, which Black Ops implies bad assed is in actuality nothing more than a kind of jump gate industrial.
Tank sucks... Cloak sucks... DPS sucks...
See, it is a jump gate industrial with a bad assed name.
you defenetly dont know what you are talking about regarding black ops. lol, enlighten us, are you saying the cloak is ok? Or maybe you think it has great DPS? Or the tank, *snicker*, is that good? Shields base:
Widow = 5312 Scorp = 6641 Scorp Navy = 9961 Rattlesnake 12750 The tank is less than the base T1 ship by nearly 20%. It is outclassed as a fighting ship in all cases with ships of similar size.
i will enlighten you. You dont need to cloak in order to warp around. Many people has lived without them for ages and the killboard is full of such examples. You dont need that much dps believe it or not. The reason is very simple. Black ops jump, kill and warp out in literally seconds! You dont need more DPS when you kill targets very fast. You just never have experinced what is like been jumped by 6/7 or more black ops. Believe me son, its totally one sided. If 10 or more when there is 6 of you or so, you will all die! |

Andrea Roche
State War Academy Caldari State
163
|
Posted - 2012.07.22 20:28:00 -
[72] - Quote
l0rd carlos wrote:Hi Guys. I am part of a small lowsec corp and we sometimes use blackops to break gatecamp that would not be possible to attack in other ways (because of scouting and ~100AU warp) And they work great for that! Yes, the fuelbay is not that big, but we drop a container with more fuel before bridging, so that solves that problem. Tank is a little bit meh .. but if we can we also bridge logistics.
I totaly agree on the DPS part, it is low. But would it be good for the game if they would make more damage?
Maybe we should have 2 different kind of Blackops, one with large fuel bay and cover cloak and one with DPS/Tank Bonus?
Can you provide us with killboard examples of such battles to se you composition plz. thx |

l0rd carlos
Friends Of Harassment
42
|
Posted - 2012.07.22 22:13:00 -
[73] - Quote
Andrea Roche wrote: Can you provide us with killboard examples of such battles to se you composition plz. thx
Yes, sure.
http://spam.eve-kill.net/?a=kill_related&kll_id=13283419 That was a gatecamp with multiple Battlecuisers, a T3 warped right before we bridged in. At leat one of them jumped with GCC into highsec. The neares gate is 100 AU away. The Battlereport/Related kills is messed up, because we reshiped and made a camp on the same gate. Even with this big blob it took some time to kill the BCs. T3 with clovert subsystem dont do much damage.
http://spam.eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=13282454
Personaly i think it's fun to bridge with the Blackops, but because of the low dps we often blob the enemies and i start to feel sorry for them. In the time we kill a couple of BCs, their friends can undock in Battleships and start killing us. So it's kinda risky. Maybe we just need more proteus :D
BOs are a specialized Ship for a tiny part of PvP, that does not mean that they are underpowered. |

xxxTRUSTxxx
Galactic Rangers
80
|
Posted - 2012.07.23 08:34:00 -
[74] - Quote
Bootleg Jack wrote:Andrea Roche wrote:Bootleg Jack wrote:Ironic the "Black Ops" ship, which Black Ops implies bad assed is in actuality nothing more than a kind of jump gate industrial.
Tank sucks... Cloak sucks... DPS sucks...
See, it is a jump gate industrial with a bad assed name.
you defenetly dont know what you are talking about regarding black ops. lol, enlighten us, are you saying the cloak is ok? Or maybe you think it has great DPS? Or the tank, *snicker*, is that good? Shields base:
Widow = 5312 Scorp = 6641 Scorp Navy = 9961 Rattlesnake 12750 The tank is less than the base T1 ship by nearly 20%. It is outclassed as a fighting ship in all cases with ships of similar size.
there is a reason for the lower tank, that i get. but no covert cloaking device for a covert ship <<<< Fix Please |
|

CCP Ytterbium
C C P C C P Alliance
783

|
Posted - 2012.07.23 11:31:00 -
[75] - Quote
Back from vacation and thought this thread could use some dev love.
Yes, Black Ops definitely need some attention; the main problem with them is the lack of role focus. Some (like the Redeemer or Window) are trying to achieve a purpose directly on the battlefield, similar with recons by having an electronic warfare or damage related bonus. On top of that, they also are trying to fulfill a fleet support role with their cyno capability, which is quite in contradiction with the previous one.
And they aren't great at both: their raw HP is quite lower than tech 1 battleships (and tech 2 resistance boosts aren't stellar either), have less turret and missile hardpoints than tech 1 counterparts and remain more expensive to run, which doesn't make them appealing for direct engagement purposes. They also lack autonomy in their support role, as they are quite short ranged, fuel hungry and this issue is amplified by their small fuel bay forcing them to rely on other ships to resupply frequently during an operation.
The current plan is to take one these two listed roles out of the Black Ops ship class and reshape them to do the remaining one well. If they are disruption ships using EW, they should have more presence on the battlefield for their pricetag. If they are support tools for surprise attacks and small gang movement into enemy space, then they should have the proper bay, range and tools to do so accordingly.
The role dropped out of the Black Ops would then be moved to a new class in the tech 2 battleship range to replace for the loss.
We acknowledge some entities out there are using Black Ops with great effect when backed up with the proper organization, structure and out-of-the-box thinking to make use of them in unorthodox situations. While we don't want to take that away, Black Ops should be more effective without such heavy commitment into them (a statistic query we ran at the beginning of this year shown there are more Titan than Block Ops pilot on TQ). They should be great force multiplier tools for small groups to take on larger ones by surprise, and should be able to do so relatively well without relying on a dedicated support structure.
So, when would this be coming out? Unfortunately, not for a while. As explained in the various blogs before, our current priority is to fix tech 1 ships as a whole before moving to more advanced hulls. That is because we need a solid frame of reference to rely on and compare hulls to before we can move to more delicate and complex ships, like Black Ops or tech 3 hulls.
Also don't forget this is just our long term plan for now, and things may change in the future. In all cases they are not forgotten, but will take time to get to.
Hope that helps! |
|

Alpheias
Euphoria Released Verge of Collapse
698
|
Posted - 2012.07.23 11:33:00 -
[76] - Quote
CCP Ytterbium wrote:
Black Op Window
Sound pretty kick ass.
I'd kill kittens and puppies and bunnies I'd maim toddlers and teens and then more |

Darek Castigatus
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
109
|
Posted - 2012.07.23 11:41:00 -
[77] - Quote
CCP Ytterbium wrote:Back from vacation and thought this thread could use some dev love.
Yes, Black Ops definitely need some attention; the main problem with them is the lack of role focus. Some (like the Redeemer or Window) are trying to achieve a purpose directly on the battlefield, similar with recons by having an electronic warfare or damage related bonus. On top of that, they also are trying to fulfill a fleet support role with their cyno capability, which is quite in contradiction with the previous one.
And they aren't great at both: their raw HP is quite lower than tech 1 battleships (and tech 2 resistance boosts aren't stellar either), have less turret and missile hardpoints than tech 1 counterparts and remain more expensive to run, which doesn't make them appealing for direct engagement purposes. They also lack autonomy in their support role, as they are quite short ranged, fuel hungry and this issue is amplified by their small fuel bay forcing them to rely on other ships to resupply frequently during an operation.
The current plan is to take one these two listed roles out of the Black Ops ship class and reshape them to do the remaining one well. If they are disruption ships using EW, they should have more presence on the battlefield for their pricetag. If they are support tools for surprise attacks and small gang movement into enemy space, then they should have the proper bay, range and tools to do so accordingly.
The role dropped out of the Black Ops would then be moved to a new class in the tech 2 battleship range to replace for the loss.
We acknowledge some entities out there are using Black Ops with great effect when backed up with the proper organization, structure and out-of-the-box thinking to make use of them in unorthodox situations. While we don't want to take that away, Black Ops should be more effective without such heavy commitment into them (a statistic query we ran at the beginning of this year shown there are more Titan than Block Ops pilot on TQ). They should be great force multiplier tools for small groups to take on larger ones by surprise, and should be able to do so relatively well without relying on a dedicated support structure.
So, when would this be coming out? Unfortunately, not for a while. As explained in the various blogs before, our current priority is to fix tech 1 ships as a whole before moving to more advanced hulls. That is because we need a solid frame of reference to rely on and compare hulls to before we can move to more delicate and complex ships, like Black Ops or tech 3 hulls.
Also don't forget this is just our long term plan for now, and things may change in the future. In all cases they are not forgotten, but will take time to get to.
Hope that helps!
Hope this isnt considered crossposting but i just wanted to point this thread at you, contains some suggestions regarding black ops I think you should see
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=135180&find=unread |

Sentient Blade
Walk It Off LEGIO ASTARTES ARCANUM
450
|
Posted - 2012.07.23 11:47:00 -
[78] - Quote
CCP Ytterbium wrote:So, when would this be coming out? Unfortunately, not for a while.
I appreciate the feedback you gave us, and I understand the long term goals.
But in the mean time those of us that have trained in black ops find them a complete pain in the ass for the most part - can you placate us in the short time and fiddle with some database numbers and adjust the fuel bay / costs? |

Peter Powers
Terrorists of Dimensions Free 2 Play
85
|
Posted - 2012.07.23 12:00:00 -
[79] - Quote
leave black ops alone. |

ovenproofjet
The Illuminatii Mildly Intoxicated
64
|
Posted - 2012.07.23 12:29:00 -
[80] - Quote
CCP Ytterbium wrote: So, when would this be coming out? Unfortunately, not for a while. As explained in the various blogs before, our current priority is to fix tech 1 ships as a whole before moving to more advanced hulls. That is because we need a solid frame of reference to rely on and compare hulls to before we can move to more delicate and complex ships, like Black Ops or tech 3 hulls.
Also don't forget this is just our long term plan for now, and things may change in the future. In all cases they are not forgotten, but will take time to get to.
Hope that helps!
Thank you for this response, as a member of one of the groups you mention that uses Black Ops all the time this is very encouraging.
Once T1 is sorted (and hopefully the drake nerfed!) could you please prioritise Black Ops in the T2 rebalancing. There isn't really any T2 class that is as broken as the Black Ops!!!
|

POLITE ALLCAPSGUY
Hedion University Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.07.23 12:36:00 -
[81] - Quote
CCP Ytterbium wrote:a statistic query we ran at the beginning of this year shown there are more Titan than Block Ops pilot on TQ
PLEASE EXCUSE ME ASKING, BUT DOES THIS MEAN THERE ARE MORE PLAYERS SITTING IN A TITAN AT ANY GIVEN TIME, MORE PLAYERS THAT LEARNED THE TITAN SKILL THAN THOSE THAT INJECTED BLACK OPS, OR REALLY MORE TITANS IN SPACE THEN THERE ARE BLACK OPS IN HANGARS SOMEWHERE? TITAN PILOTS ARE DEDICATED ALTS, WHILE BLACK OPS PILOTS MIGHT JUST HAVE IT STASHED AWAY SOMEWHERE.
I HUMBLY AWAIT YOUR CLARIFICATIONS IN THIS MATTER. |

Lord Helghast
Dirty Old Bastards Nulli Secunda
101
|
Posted - 2012.07.23 12:38:00 -
[82] - Quote
ovenproofjet wrote:CCP Ytterbium wrote: So, when would this be coming out? Unfortunately, not for a while. As explained in the various blogs before, our current priority is to fix tech 1 ships as a whole before moving to more advanced hulls. That is because we need a solid frame of reference to rely on and compare hulls to before we can move to more delicate and complex ships, like Black Ops or tech 3 hulls.
Also don't forget this is just our long term plan for now, and things may change in the future. In all cases they are not forgotten, but will take time to get to.
Hope that helps!
Thank you for this response, as a member of one of the groups you mention that uses Black Ops all the time this is very encouraging. Once T1 is sorted (and hopefully the drake nerfed!) could you please prioritise Black Ops in the T2 rebalancing. There isn't really any T2 class that is as broken as the Black Ops!!!
Have to agree here, since blackops are so far out on the replacements behind all T1's and then even when it ets to T2's they are battleships so will be hit nearly last.. .
Why not just do some basic number shuffling atleast on fuel bays and maybe a small bonus per level to reduce fuel usage more... its kinda nuts at this point atleast show them some short term love considering how negected they are, i mean no one expects a fix right now but a bandaid for the time being till you get around to T2 BS's would be cool. |

Lord Helghast
Dirty Old Bastards Nulli Secunda
101
|
Posted - 2012.07.23 12:40:00 -
[83] - Quote
POLITE ALLCAPSGUY wrote:CCP Ytterbium wrote:a statistic query we ran at the beginning of this year shown there are more Titan than Block Ops pilot on TQ PLEASE EXCUSE ME ASKING, BUT DOES THIS MEAN THERE ARE MORE PLAYERS SITTING IN A TITAN AT ANY GIVEN TIME, MORE PLAYERS THAT LEARNED THE TITAN SKILL THAN THOSE THAT INJECTED BLACK OPS, OR REALLY MORE TITANS IN SPACE THEN THERE ARE BLACK OPS IN HANGARS SOMEWHERE? TITAN PILOTS ARE DEDICATED ALTS, WHILE BLACK OPS PILOTS MIGHT JUST HAVE IT STASHED AWAY SOMEWHERE. I HUMBLY AWAIT YOUR CLARIFICATIONS IN THIS MATTER.
Does it matter? There are more ACTIVELY USED titans than blackops simple fact. Why? Short Range, High Fuel Cost, Limited scale, Limited Usefulness, High Skill train :( |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
412
|
Posted - 2012.07.23 12:45:00 -
[84] - Quote
POLITE ALLCAPSGUY wrote:CCP Ytterbium wrote:a statistic query we ran at the beginning of this year shown there are more Titan than Block Ops pilot on TQ PLEASE EXCUSE ME ASKING, BUT DOES THIS MEAN THERE ARE MORE PLAYERS SITTING IN A TITAN AT ANY GIVEN TIME, MORE PLAYERS THAT LEARNED THE TITAN SKILL THAN THOSE THAT INJECTED BLACK OPS, OR REALLY MORE TITANS IN SPACE THEN THERE ARE BLACK OPS IN HANGARS SOMEWHERE? TITAN PILOTS ARE DEDICATED ALTS, WHILE BLACK OPS PILOTS MIGHT JUST HAVE IT STASHED AWAY SOMEWHERE. I HUMBLY AWAIT YOUR CLARIFICATIONS IN THIS MATTER. People are far more likely to read your posts if they don't feel like they're being shouted at.
As a rule all-uppercase is also significantly harder to read than mixed-case text.
In any case, I'm guessing that what he really means is that there are more titan hulls than black ops hulls in the game. EVE's 4th of July Fireworks |

Bloodpetal
Mimidae Risk Solutions
714
|
Posted - 2012.07.23 15:00:00 -
[85] - Quote
Yitterbium...
So you're saying we'll see a T2 Abaddon/Maelstrom/Hyperion hull...
 Mimidae Risk Solutions Recruiting |

Clolo
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
17
|
Posted - 2012.07.23 15:04:00 -
[86] - Quote
Lord Helghast wrote:ovenproofjet wrote:CCP Ytterbium wrote: So, when would this be coming out? Unfortunately, not for a while. As explained in the various blogs before, our current priority is to fix tech 1 ships as a whole before moving to more advanced hulls. That is because we need a solid frame of reference to rely on and compare hulls to before we can move to more delicate and complex ships, like Black Ops or tech 3 hulls.
Also don't forget this is just our long term plan for now, and things may change in the future. In all cases they are not forgotten, but will take time to get to.
Hope that helps!
Thank you for this response, as a member of one of the groups you mention that uses Black Ops all the time this is very encouraging. Once T1 is sorted (and hopefully the drake nerfed!) could you please prioritise Black Ops in the T2 rebalancing. There isn't really any T2 class that is as broken as the Black Ops!!! Have to agree here, since blackops are so far out on the replacements behind all T1's and then even when it ets to T2's they are battleships so will be hit nearly last.. . Why not just do some basic number shuffling atleast on fuel bays and maybe a small bonus per level to reduce fuel usage more... its kinda nuts at this point atleast show them some short term love considering how negected they are, i mean no one expects a fix right now but a bandaid for the time being till you get around to T2 BS's would be cool.
This. Can we please get some basic quality of life updates to BOs? At the current rate of CCPs re balancing, BOs probably wont even be touched for another 2 years.
CCP would be able to make BOs much more enjoyable with tweaking a few numbers, which I can't imagine taking to long. Give BO T2 resists, increase the fuel bay slightly or decrease fuel needed and give a .5-1.0 ly boost to jump/bridge range. Those changes would go a long way from making us BO pilots feel like the bastard children of eve. |

Paul Clancy
Korpu no Byakko Tower of Dark Alliance
10
|
Posted - 2012.07.23 15:04:00 -
[87] - Quote
CCP Ytterbium, I know this is somehow off-topic, but still, will the Micro Jump Drive appear in august? |

Ravcharas
GREY COUNCIL Nulli Secunda
173
|
Posted - 2012.07.23 15:44:00 -
[88] - Quote
CCP Ytterbium wrote:So, when would this be coming out? Unfortunately, not for a while. How many developers are actively working with ship balancing at the moment?
|

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
413
|
Posted - 2012.07.23 15:47:00 -
[89] - Quote
Bloodpetal wrote:Yitterbium... So you're saying we'll see a T2 Abaddon/Maelstrom/Hyperion hull...  Time to fap! EVE's 4th of July Fireworks |

Greg Valanti
Looney Clones Ayn Sof Aur
65
|
Posted - 2012.07.23 15:48:00 -
[90] - Quote
POLITE ALLCAPSGUY wrote:CCP Ytterbium wrote:a statistic query we ran at the beginning of this year shown there are more Titan than Block Ops pilot on TQ PLEASE EXCUSE ME ASKING, BUT DOES THIS MEAN THERE ARE MORE PLAYERS SITTING IN A TITAN AT ANY GIVEN TIME, MORE PLAYERS THAT LEARNED THE TITAN SKILL THAN THOSE THAT INJECTED BLACK OPS, OR REALLY MORE TITANS IN SPACE THEN THERE ARE BLACK OPS IN HANGARS SOMEWHERE? TITAN PILOTS ARE DEDICATED ALTS, WHILE BLACK OPS PILOTS MIGHT JUST HAVE IT STASHED AWAY SOMEWHERE. I HUMBLY AWAIT YOUR CLARIFICATIONS IN THIS MATTER.
Take your novelty account back to reddit. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |