Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Locin WeEda
Gallente Red Frog Investments Blue Sky Consortium
|
Posted - 2010.07.03 14:59:00 -
[1]
I feel it is time to raise these issues (again)
The improvement to courier contract size, and the ability to deliver a courier contract by rightclicking on the courier package were great additions in Dominion, and have done both the setup of courier contracts, and the completion of courier contracts to a much more enjoyable task.
There are however many other improvements that could be made to the courier contract interface to make it even more useful, for both the issuer and the contractor.
When setting up courier contracts:
- It is difficult for the issuer of a contract to see how much m3 he has added to the contract, until the contract is nearly finished. Some kind of counter for the m3 would be useful.
When searching for courier contracts it would be useful with more courier contract friendly filters - filter on route security (max and min security rating for systems along the route)
- filter on collateral
- filter on reward
- filter on trip length (number of jumps)
- filter on distance to pickup system
- filter on volume (max and min volume)
Better sorting options (related to filters) - sort on collateral
- sort on reward
- sort on jumps to pickup
After accepting a contract:
- add a "show contract" to the menu when right-clicking on a courier package
Corporate courier contracts:
- add a role for accepting courier contracts issued to a corporation
- make it possible for contract managers to see who in a corporation has accepted a courier contract issued to the corporation
- make sorting of contracts better. Currently it is impossible to sort courier contracts properly after completed date or time left for outstanding contracts. When you have more than 100 contracts outstanding to your corporation, and you sort on time left, the oldest contracts appear on page 2, not page 1 as you would expect.
Last, but not least:
Give us a contract API, for personal, corporate and alliance contracts, as well as an option to export particular contract details in an easy way to our computer for further parsing.
I will gladly invite a dev or a CSM representative to our corp for a few days so that he/she can experience the issues with courier contracts firsthand.
Red Frog Freight Service
|

Janos Saal
|
Posted - 2010.07.03 15:01:00 -
[2]
Sensible and reasonable suggestions.
|

Ryomanni
Red Frog Investments
|
Posted - 2010.07.03 18:33:00 -
[3]
Locin has offered a concise list improvements from which everyone who uses courier contracts would benefit. They apply to an issuer, an individual hauler, or a corporation that relies heavily on courier contracts.
It is a remedy to the "pain" that can only be fully understood by those who use courier contracts constantly.
This proposal gathers my full support.
|

Promethia Macleod
|
Posted - 2010.07.03 19:16:00 -
[4]
Edited by: Promethia Macleod on 03/07/2010 19:18:37 A very detailed and relevant enhancement request. I support this 120%.
|

Ghettolove
|
Posted - 2010.07.03 19:17:00 -
[5]
This is a very good idea. There is something for all sides are concerned dealing with contracts. Thanks for taking the time listing it all down for the devs, and also want to thank the devs in advance for thier time!
|

Gabriel Rosencrantz
Red Frog Investments
|
Posted - 2010.07.03 19:32:00 -
[6]
Contract API please. Would also be great if there was a way to pass courier contracts between pilots. It would help corpmates assist one another and possibly use a dispatch system.
Red Frog Freight: Hisec Courier Service |

Takseen
|
Posted - 2010.07.03 21:44:00 -
[7]
Supported. Courier contract UI is terrible in oh so many ways. |

Herschel Yamamoto
Agent-Orange Nabaal Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.07.04 16:11:00 -
[8]
Great list of improvements. Fully supported.
|

Orb Vex
|
Posted - 2010.07.04 20:08:00 -
[9]
|

De'Veldrin
Special Projects Executive The Obsidian Legion
|
Posted - 2010.07.04 20:38:00 -
[10]
For the love of courier pilots everywhere, don't even think about it, just do it! --Vel
|
|

Kazuo Ishiguro
House of Marbles
|
Posted - 2010.07.04 22:03:00 -
[11]
Supported.
Speaking as someone accounting for about 6% of RF's business, I'd also like to see a way of setting lots of parallel contracts very quickly and without too many clicks. --- 34.4:1 mineral compression |

rufeno
|
Posted - 2010.07.06 11:32:00 -
[12]
I also support this!
get on this CCP! :D |

Cravarian Kuhnitis
Order of Paradox Night Sky Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.07.08 15:25:00 -
[13]
+1
|

Jaquard
|
Posted - 2010.07.08 15:35:00 -
[14]
Aye, that be helpful.
|

Mynxee
|
Posted - 2010.07.08 16:32:00 -
[15]
Good, useful ideas.
Life In Low Sec |

JurassicDragon
|
Posted - 2010.07.08 17:02:00 -
[16]
|

Ave Volta
Red Frog Investments Blue Sky Consortium
|
Posted - 2010.07.08 18:02:00 -
[17]
Good suggestions...now implement! :) --------------------------------
chown -R us:us /yourbase |

ChrisIsherwood
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 01:44:00 -
[18]
quite reasonable.
Regarding:
Originally by: Locin WeEda
- It is difficult for the issuer of a contract to see how much m3 he has added to the contract, until the contract is nearly finished. Some kind of counter for the m3 would be useful.
I think there are many aggregations of items - e.g. hangars, jetcans, bays, assets - where volume is sometimes of interest to the player. A general widget capability throughout the EVE UI that provided a sortable volume column with total would be even better. I.e., address the general need not just this specific instance. |

Locin WeEda
Gallente Red Frog Investments Blue Sky Consortium
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 06:56:00 -
[19]
That is a very good suggestion, ChrisIsherwood
Red Frog Freight Service
|

Belid Hagen
Shade. Cry Havoc.
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 10:46:00 -
[20]
another thing that should already be in the game. CCP stop inventing new things to put into the game and **** up. Fix the stuff we have
|
|

ChaoticDemon
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 15:10:00 -
[21]
Excellent suggestions please implement also Red frog has excellent service have used several times
|

Undin Trelay
|
Posted - 2010.07.11 15:03:00 -
[22]
Supported. Outstanding ideas. |

Jin Nib
Resplendent Knives
|
Posted - 2010.07.11 16:07:00 -
[23]
-Jin Nib Trading on behalf of Opera Noir since: 2009.03.02 03:53:00
|

Flippington Bigboy
|
Posted - 2010.07.13 09:55:00 -
[24]
A great set of well thought out ideas that will help gameplay enourmously. Well done Locin - and another big thumbs up for the excellent Red Frog Investments courier service.
|

Chinar Tiner
|
Posted - 2010.07.13 09:57:00 -
[25]
These improvements would help play ENORMOUSLY.
|

kassie kelmar
|
Posted - 2010.07.14 23:12:00 -
[26]
|

Abdiel Kavash
Paladin Order Fidelas Constans
|
Posted - 2010.07.15 02:36:00 -
[27]
When issuing courrier contracts from your Assets window (i.e. contracting items in a far away station), give us the option to only contract a part of the item stack. Let's say I have 40k m^3 of Tritannium somewhere in a single stack, there is currently no way to set up two transport-sized courrier contracts.
|

chunkylover2
|
Posted - 2010.07.15 20:03:00 -
[28]
I support. Good ideas.
|

Deepspace Diver
|
Posted - 2010.07.15 21:34:00 -
[29]
|

Saelie
|
Posted - 2010.07.15 22:39:00 -
[30]
Excellent ideas.
|
|

Xubber
|
Posted - 2010.07.16 12:58:00 -
[31]
BUMP BUMP
|

Ronan Connor
|
Posted - 2010.07.16 13:40:00 -
[32]
Sounds feasible - supported
|

Ban Doga
|
Posted - 2010.07.16 14:24:00 -
[33]
Looking forward to seeing this implemented in 3 years
|

Cursan Voran
|
Posted - 2010.07.17 04:40:00 -
[34]
Solid ideas and totally supported.
|

Amras Archon
|
Posted - 2010.07.18 22:35:00 -
[35]
Showing support, especially for the API on courier contracts/all contracts.
|

Bassinium
|
Posted - 2010.07.20 16:43:00 -
[36]
|

Liisi Rukila
|
Posted - 2010.07.20 18:39:00 -
[37]
Just a few of these improvements would be a joy. |

ThisIsNotMyAlt
|
Posted - 2010.07.20 18:49:00 -
[38]
supporting this for something getting pushed into the backlog. nothing of priority. |

debbie harrio
|
Posted - 2010.07.20 21:21:00 -
[39]
Originally by: Abdiel Kavash When issuing courrier contracts from your Assets window (i.e. contracting items in a far away station), give us the option to only contract a part of the item stack. Let's say I have 40k m^3 of Tritannium somewhere in a single stack, there is currently no way to set up two transport-sized courrier contracts.
when setting up the contract from assets window and it comes to your list of stuff to tick for inclusion, unclick the 40m^3 pile, r click and split stack, then tick the new pile of your required size.
HTH.
also supported
|

Vasaczk
|
Posted - 2010.07.20 21:50:00 -
[40]
Good thinking batman.
Would love the contract filter options :)
|
|

Ayumi Sang
|
Posted - 2010.07.22 10:58:00 -
[41]
signed
|

Hugo Kindeze
|
Posted - 2010.07.22 12:13:00 -
[42]
Edited by: Hugo Kindeze on 22/07/2010 12:13:58 Support on all, but especially the API. Planning routes is such a pain :(
|

Draciste
Boiians Green Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.07.22 15:43:00 -
[43]
+1
|

Lykouleon
Trust Doesn't Rust
|
Posted - 2010.07.22 16:23:00 -
[44]
Quote: CCP Mindstar > Sorry - I've completely messed all that up. lets try again
|

Saartje Sarel
|
Posted - 2010.07.22 16:43:00 -
[45]
Edited by: Saartje Sarel on 22/07/2010 16:43:25 Supported.
|

Palovana
Inner Fire Inc.
|
Posted - 2010.07.23 03:04:00 -
[46]
As someone who has screwed up and accidentally repackaged courier packages, I definitely support this.
|

Delagos Almondis
|
Posted - 2010.07.23 12:36:00 -
[47]
RF Freight seems to not only deliver good services, but also good suggestions. /signed.
|

Dal LaScena
Exigenesis
|
Posted - 2010.07.25 00:40:00 -
[48]
Wholeheartedly support all of the issues raised here. No idea why there isn't better search/sort/filtering built into the clients...it's not even a server loading issue (all of this could easily be done client side, using the client cached data)
|

Xearal
SOL Industries Kamikaze Project
|
Posted - 2010.07.25 05:20:00 -
[49]
All very good ideas.. and it will make setting up unattainable contracts a little harder for scammers, one of the reasons I've never done much courrier contracts is that most of the ones I see are scams, or I fear they are.. something like this would be very nice to have.
Supported!
<a href="https://eve-search.com/externalLink.asp?l=http%3A%2F%2Frumandmonkey%2Ecom%2Fwidgets%2Ftoys%2Ftestgen%2F6199%2F"><img src="http://stat.rumandmonkey.com/tests/9/9/6199/25764.jpg" title="Industrialist with teeth" alt="Industrialist with teeth" border="0" |

Khadrea Shakor
Shakor Freight and Mining Service
|
Posted - 2010.07.25 08:30:00 -
[50]
|
|

Dierdra Vaal
|
Posted - 2010.07.25 17:55:00 -
[51]
this issue was passed 9/0 in CSM meeting 5.5 and will be presented to CCP
* * * Director of Education :: EVE University * * * CSM1 delegate, CSM3 chairman and CSM5 vice-chairman
|

Gabriel Rosencrantz
Red Frog Investments
|
Posted - 2010.07.26 17:08:00 -
[52]
Originally by: Dierdra Vaal this issue was passed 9/0 in CSM meeting 5.5 and will be presented to CCP
Yay! Red Frog salutes you!
Red Frog Freight: Hisec Courier Service |

Papa Yoru
Somnium Vita Hitchhikers Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.07.26 23:06:00 -
[53]
Agreed, great proposals +++ Reality Error 404 - Reboot Cosmos +++ |

Avensis Darko
Imperial Tau Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.07.29 18:10:00 -
[54]
Excellent thoughts. |

Philip Ogtaulmolfi
Milking Interstellar Incorporated.
|
Posted - 2010.08.06 15:48:00 -
[55]
I absolutely endorse this proposal.
|

Mike Gabinsky
|
Posted - 2010.08.09 03:20:00 -
[56]
these changes should be made, the service these guys are doing is outstanding
|

Nikolai Kondratiev
|
Posted - 2010.08.09 13:27:00 -
[57]
Bump because those are all reasonable suggestions that deserve to make it ingame.
|

Phoebe Halliwel
|
Posted - 2010.08.10 20:56:00 -
[58]
|

F90OEX
F9X WE FORM VOLTRON
|
Posted - 2010.08.10 21:30:00 -
[59]
Supported
|

Breaker77
Reclamation Industries
|
Posted - 2010.08.10 23:05:00 -
[60]
Supported
|
|

Varo Jan
Caravanserai Consulting
|
Posted - 2010.08.10 23:23:00 -
[61]
Supported.
|

Lucyna
Interstellar Killer Bee Enterprises
|
Posted - 2010.08.11 01:20:00 -
[62]
I'm so game for this... This really needs to be done.
ESPECIALLY THE API FUNCTIONALITY
|

Companion Trollin
You are going too fast
|
Posted - 2010.08.11 04:38:00 -
[63]
This is a terrible idea everyone should vote it down.
♥
Originally by: CCP Shadow Off-topic posts dealing with sexual orientation have been removed. Please keep this discussion on-topic.
Thanks.
-- Shadow
|

Thoraxe Rig
|
Posted - 2010.08.11 06:27:00 -
[64]
^ 
Supported.
|

Aishwarya Rai
Ta'aqiru Technologies
|
Posted - 2010.08.11 08:38:00 -
[65]
These changes would be great
|

Onyth
Had Holdings
|
Posted - 2010.08.11 10:02:00 -
[66]
Only 1 thing any sensible person can say about these requests! YES
|

Hel O'Ween
Men On A Mission
|
Posted - 2010.08.11 15:45:00 -
[67]
Supported.
Especially for the API part, which is a feature player have asked for again and again. -- EVEWalletAware - an offline wallet manager |

Xeross155
NED-Clan Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2010.08.12 13:01:00 -
[68]
I don't support this because it's useful for me at the moment but because it will help the haulers and hauling corporations manage their contracts. --------------------------------------------- Xeross' ventures into EVE |

Kreastr
|
Posted - 2010.08.13 17:50:00 -
[69]
The more user-friendly interface you have - the more new users will enjoy the game. Good ideas.
|

Uriel Winston
|
Posted - 2010.08.14 15:46:00 -
[70]
Edited by: Uriel Winston on 14/08/2010 15:46:08 well detailed, /supported
|
|

Ares Reaper
SKULLDOGS Black Star Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.08.14 16:36:00 -
[71]
supported your proposal 
|

SpartanK34
|
Posted - 2010.08.14 19:35:00 -
[72]
Supported |

Astroka
|
Posted - 2010.08.15 09:15:00 -
[73]
Great suggestions. Would certainly make searching for courier contracts far more user-friendly.
|

Cromo Effect
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2010.08.15 09:19:00 -
[74]
This is hardly a worthy idea of diverting development resources to it when there are a vast amount of other thing that are more worthy of attention.
/Not supported
|

Astroka
|
Posted - 2010.08.15 10:00:00 -
[75]
Originally by: Cromo Effect This is hardly a worthy idea of diverting development resources to it when there are a vast amount of other thing that are more worthy of attention.
/Not supported
Do you come to these forums just to troll? Honestly, every post of yours I have read seems to be there specifically to annoy or anger people, typed completely in bold.
True, there are more important issues to deal with, but that's no reason to not support a relevant (and rather good) idea. This isn't a forum specifically for issues of only the highest priority.
|

Galmalmin
THE INSURGENCY DEFI4NT
|
Posted - 2010.08.21 21:12:00 -
[76]
Edited by: Galmalmin on 21/08/2010 21:14:34 These suggestions all seem reasonable, I support them.
Also, all contracts from Cromo Effect shall be rejected.
|

Luxotor
|
Posted - 2010.08.22 15:08:00 -
[77]
I highly support this proposol. Especially the suggestion of adding an m3 counter when setting up courier contracts prior to the near-finalization stage of the contract itself.
Lux ---------------
Make lowsec useful! |

Ramon Wilco
Psycho Corp
|
Posted - 2010.08.23 15:38:00 -
[78]
Longer and better proposal than my post.
I support entirely this proposal. Fear your incomprehension, but love the differences. Ramon Wilco |

Snasty
The Hippies House of Mercury
|
Posted - 2010.08.23 15:51:00 -
[79]
Agree.
--------------------------------------- -=Snasty, short for Shagnasty ever since the GM's in SWG made me change it...!=- |

Dzil
Caldari Independent Navy Reserve OWN Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.08.23 16:11:00 -
[80]
/John Han****ed
Retired from corp sales. Time to spend some of this on pretty explosions :) |
|

Victor Michaelle
|
Posted - 2010.08.23 17:50:00 -
[81]
Sounds like reasonable stuff.
I would regard sorting possibilities when looking through courier contracts as particularly important. That interface is so intimidating.
Would also be really nice to be able to pass courier contracts between players, would enable more division of labor type cooperation, but I guess that would be harder to implement.
|

kurikymoko yasai
|
Posted - 2010.08.24 08:00:00 -
[82]
Sensible ideas to develop player driven courier.... hope ccp could find some programmer love for the task.
|

clixoras
|
Posted - 2010.08.24 11:37:00 -
[83]
Right on the mark this proposal
|

Caleb Ayrania
TarNec manufacturing disaster
|
Posted - 2010.08.25 23:37:00 -
[84]
Perfect summation of what is needed... Except there was one thing missing..
Please make couriers have a bigger and separate contract numbers impact. A limitation to outstanding transport orders is ******ed. Limit on contracts should be on autctions and item exchange etc if any, not on something that is key to developing a good shipping business.
Tycoon wannabe go here: SCC Lounge cocktails and Dreams. |

Squid Prime
|
Posted - 2010.08.26 07:52:00 -
[85]
Every single point raised is valid and greatly enhances the experience ANY player could have with courier contracts. And the effort for implementing these changes is minimal.
|

Shinde Kudasai
Exemplar Autonomy
|
Posted - 2010.08.27 03:38:00 -
[86]
Absolutely supported - especially the filter via sec status option.
|

Cearain
|
Posted - 2010.08.27 04:11:00 -
[87]
-Cearain
Make fw occupancy pvp instead of pve: http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1329906 |

Ramon Wilco
Caldari Psycho Corp
|
Posted - 2010.08.27 07:13:00 -
[88]
So, any new by CCP or the CSM ? Fear your incomprehension, but love the differences. Ramon Wilco |

Dont Lookatme
|
Posted - 2010.08.27 19:36:00 -
[89]
Just for the fact that this is a stellar example of how to make a proposal you get a thumbs up.
|

Eric Deloitte
|
Posted - 2010.08.30 06:48:00 -
[90]
Love the volume counter & insurance ideas.
As for the rest I'm not sure how helpful they'd be, because I dont live and breathe courier contracts, but if it makes couriers lives easier then it gets my vote!!!
|
|

Commoner
The Tuskers
|
Posted - 2010.08.30 09:53:00 -
[91]
Edited by: Commoner on 30/08/2010 09:52:51 Well i support this.
On a related note, why is the "check for damaged items" on the LAST step of creating an item exhchange contract? Meaning you have to start all over and search for the damaged item. It's a pain when you're trying to do hangar cleanup by remote contracting.
|

Ramon Wilco
Caldari Psycho Corp
|
Posted - 2010.08.30 18:49:00 -
[92]
Any news about the proposal made from CSM to CCP teams ? Fear your incomprehension, but love the differences. Ramon Wilco |

Jorsalir
|
Posted - 2010.08.30 19:29:00 -
[93]
Swell idea, thumbs up!
|

mazzilliu
|
Posted - 2010.09.02 05:28:00 -
[94]
this is an excellent writeup. I'm taking this to our next csm meeting
|

Shinde Kudasai
Mercurial Freight
|
Posted - 2010.09.03 16:15:00 -
[95]
Originally by: mazzilliu this is an excellent writeup. I'm taking this to our next csm meeting
mazzilliu, best illiu. 
Mercurial Freight - get it hauled!
|

Shaky Spillcus
|
Posted - 2010.09.15 15:05:00 -
[96]
|

Count Martyre
|
Posted - 2010.09.21 17:01:00 -
[97]
Supported 100%
|

Muncitor Calificat
|
Posted - 2010.09.22 06:43:00 -
[98]
|

Imuran
The first genesis Veritas Immortalis
|
Posted - 2010.09.22 15:04:00 -
[99]
Much needed
|

Omnia Opera
Vain Follies
|
Posted - 2010.09.25 11:44:00 -
[100]
supported.
I still dream of courier contracts in which you can offer transport space on a route which others can fill up until a certain deadline.
|
|

Buffy Killatron
|
Posted - 2010.09.30 02:58:00 -
[101]
Great list of improvements. Fully supported.
|

Skyre Kusanagi
|
Posted - 2010.10.08 11:55:00 -
[102]
Great ideas, hope this gets thrown in as i put out a lot of courier contracts.
|

Talmeric Eratirel
|
Posted - 2010.10.25 21:13:00 -
[103]
supported
|

Haul Gagner
|
Posted - 2010.11.09 23:53:00 -
[104]
I totally support these ideas.
|

Syrian Aaski
Interstellar Trade Association
|
Posted - 2010.11.15 15:33:00 -
[105]
supported
|
|

CCP Atlas

|
Posted - 2010.11.20 01:40:00 -
[106]
+1
|
|

Fredrick Engly
SPUDS of WAR
|
Posted - 2010.11.21 01:24:00 -
[107]
+10 idea :)
|

Tigrandyr
Everset Dropbears Fidelas Constans
|
Posted - 2010.11.21 05:12:00 -
[108]
+1
|

Chaos Cell
University of Caille
|
Posted - 2010.11.21 09:34:00 -
[109]
Originally by: CCP Atlas +1
awesome, even ccp supports it :D
|

Venorati
|
Posted - 2010.11.21 20:59:00 -
[110]
|
|

Altaree
The Graduates Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2010.11.22 15:28:00 -
[111]
Great ideas Locin! --Altaree
|

Jaena Proudmore
|
Posted - 2010.11.24 09:23:00 -
[112]
Support!
|

Black Dranzer
|
Posted - 2010.11.24 09:35:00 -
[113]
|

Jai Di
|
Posted - 2010.11.24 09:53:00 -
[114]
|

Locin WeEda
Gallente Red Frog Investments
|
Posted - 2010.11.30 19:56:00 -
[115]
Originally by: CCP Atlas +1
Very glad that you liked it, CCP Atlas. Is there any chance that some of the suggestions for improvements will make it into the january contract refactoring? Red Frog Freight Service
|

Bagehi
Association of Commonwealth Enterprises R.A.G.E
|
Posted - 2010.11.30 20:04:00 -
[116]
Originally by: CCP Atlas +1
He forgot to tick the "support this topic" box though. 
This signature is useless, but it is red.
|

Lord Osculumn
Veroswen Industries
|
Posted - 2010.12.17 21:16:00 -
[117]
|

Ripard Teg
Senex Legio Get Off My Lawn
|
Posted - 2011.02.01 08:37:00 -
[118]
I endorse this. There are a lot of excellent ideas here. Hell, CCP should open up the APIs more in general as long as they're working on them anyway. -- Ripard Teg
|

Whitehound
The Whitehound Corporation Hounds of Anarchy
|
Posted - 2011.02.01 11:40:00 -
[119]
Supported.
The proposal speaks for itself. With better contracts will the EVE community be able to do easier business. --
|

Taisuke Black
|
Posted - 2011.02.01 21:48:00 -
[120]
+1
|
|

Salpun
Paramount Commerce
|
Posted - 2011.02.01 22:14:00 -
[121]
Lets get this done.
|

Alaekessa
|
Posted - 2011.03.05 01:56:00 -
[122]
I think that all of these suggestions are worthwhile and deserve inclusion.
Especially the Contract API as it would potentially allow community development of a tool to prevent deadheading.
|

Von Faulhaber
|
Posted - 2011.05.22 00:50:00 -
[123]
Why are we still talking about this? Should have all been implemented already
|

Ji'kahr
1st Praetorian Guard
|
Posted - 2011.05.22 03:48:00 -
[124]
|

LOLCatofJita
Positive Cashflow through Positive Thinking
|
Posted - 2011.06.18 18:32:00 -
[125]
Fix courier contract forwarding that includes containers! |

rootimus maximus
|
Posted - 2011.06.18 20:18:00 -
[126]
|

Mars Theran
EVE Rogues EVE Rogues Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.06.19 06:38:00 -
[127]
I see nothing wrong with this. I particularly like the volume counter idea, as that would be enormously helpful for setting up these contracts. That's plaenty of filters, but I suppose they might be neccessary, and they're all relevent. Lastly, I think the Corp role for Courier contract acceptance is great, and would help immensely with making Courier contracts a shared Corp activity.
Great idea. +1
|

Troy Severasse
|
Posted - 2011.06.28 20:47:00 -
[128]
Makes so much sense!
Thanks for putting together such a great list!
I'd love to do more courier work, but contracts are really cumbersome to work with right now and rarely worth the time to even find a suitable one, let alone fly it.
"Hm, I'm flying from Rens to X. I could take some cargo along for the way. That'd be fun! Nah, it'll take half an hour even finding a contract that's relevant and doesn't look too scammy..."
|

Eizon Amarr
|
Posted - 2011.07.13 21:43:00 -
[129]
Supportin mah space truckin' brothers.
|

Ranka Mei
|
Posted - 2011.07.13 21:58:00 -
[130]
All good ideas.
+1
-- "All your monies AUR belong to us." -- CCP |
|

Lakuma
|
Posted - 2011.07.13 23:54:00 -
[131]
Quality of Life Improvements that Don't Break Gameplay
Incarna almost fell in this category - until it melted a few cards (and subscriptions).
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 :: [one page] |