Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Laereal Sekhi
|
Posted - 2010.07.08 22:43:00 -
[61]
|
Danlisa
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 12:15:00 -
[62]
Supported. |
Opiboble Inte
Mercurialis Inc. RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 15:56:00 -
[63]
Agree, the API needs some major work done. -Opi out. |
Mrs Inte
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 15:57:00 -
[64]
API needs updating!
|
Ohmiri
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 18:07:00 -
[65]
Agreed
|
Nathalia Itiero
Gallente Vanguard Frontiers Intrepid Crossing
|
Posted - 2010.07.10 01:35:00 -
[66]
/signed __________________________________________________ A part of the MMMetrics team.
EVE-Metrics |
Karbowiak
Superior Mass
|
Posted - 2010.07.10 03:43:00 -
[67]
Whole heartedly agree!
Co-Owner and Creator of EVSCO |
Krathos Morpheus
Legion Infernal
|
Posted - 2010.07.10 04:21:00 -
[68]
|
ChrisIsherwood
|
Posted - 2010.07.10 04:23:00 -
[69]
Yes!
Yes the API is a great way to spend some development resources. It doesn't have combat "balance" issues or CCP likes 0.0/lo/carebear better - all would benefit. It doesn't require a client upgrade so it can happen in between the 6 months cycles. It is also very visible.
Yes to EVEGate using APIs
Yes Yes Yes to open standards!
Yes to realizing that as you move into the web in general and open standards and especially social networking, a good job is going to require CCP to move far, far away from their Microsoft comfort zone.
yes to now is the time to address EvEGate and the architecture before more gets built. Nor do you want to get the DUST integration started this way.
|
Garil Xolte
|
Posted - 2010.07.10 10:54:00 -
[70]
/signed |
|
Jarjar
Blue Republic
|
Posted - 2010.07.10 15:49:00 -
[71]
|
Saijuri
|
Posted - 2010.07.12 10:51:00 -
[72]
/signed
|
Gianna Mattioli
|
Posted - 2010.07.13 00:07:00 -
[73]
I support this proposal.
|
Elle D
Ars ex Discordia Test Alliance Please Ignore
|
Posted - 2010.07.13 01:19:00 -
[74]
/signed
|
n30na
|
Posted - 2010.07.13 14:56:00 -
[75]
yes, please.
Both to making eve gate actually useful (I keep forgetting it's even there), and to making it so we can do more with the api.
|
Sakari Orisi
Atomic Battle Pigeons
|
Posted - 2010.07.14 19:17:00 -
[76]
Agreed
|
Serpentine Logic
|
Posted - 2010.07.17 07:30:00 -
[77]
+1. Google has shown how open APIs benefit them just as much as their users.
|
Hel O'Ween
Men On A Mission
|
Posted - 2010.07.17 15:29:00 -
[78]
Originally by: Drake Draconis API Improvments - Yes
Spacebook - No
Listen to this wise man's words!
API - Yes Spacebook - No. It's a painful waste of resources. Bring the forum to today's standards. And after that, you might play around with that other web thingy. -- EVEWalletAware - an offline wallet manager |
Rikki Sals
|
Posted - 2010.07.17 21:02:00 -
[79]
Supported. Do it the intelligent way!
|
BeanBagKing
Ch3mic4l Warfare STR8NGE BREW
|
Posted - 2010.07.17 23:29:00 -
[80]
More API is always better. Personally I think a contracts API would be the best. Imagine how happy currior runners would be if you could get info on contract location, destination, collateral and reward. It would make moving your stuff in space much easier, this info could be imported into a tool so they could plan their route for optimum profit. I think this would result in more haulers doing curior contracts for profit, which would result in a system that's much easier to move stuff around in while stil being player controlled.
It'd also be nice to fetch price updates on faction/officer items. =D |
|
Ebisu Kami
|
Posted - 2010.07.17 23:40:00 -
[81]
|
Catari Taga
Centre Of Attention Middle of Nowhere
|
Posted - 2010.07.18 11:33:00 -
[82]
Supported, another one for CCP's backlog to be considered when dev time and server performance allows it...
Write access via API authentication to EVEGate functions (which apparently has an XML-RPC backend already anyway) would be real nice though as I'm sure any player implementation of those features will be better (and more compatible) than the backwards official one they have so many people working on... --
Originally by: CCP the data does not seem to support that polished quality sells better than new features
|
OwlManAtt
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
|
Posted - 2010.07.19 00:34:00 -
[83]
/support
And can I kindly have something like the S&I -> Corp Blueprints tab over the API? I maintain a database of all my BPOs and their ME/PE levels. Occasionally, my staff (or myself ) **** up and all our numbers are off until someone catches it.
It would be a huge quality of life increase if I could get this data over the API and ensure accuracy. --- Owl |
Dodgy Past
Trans-Solar Works Rooks and Kings
|
Posted - 2010.07.19 00:50:00 -
[84]
|
Chi Quan
Bibkor Enterprises
|
Posted - 2010.07.19 10:48:00 -
[85]
---- Ceterum censeo blasters need some tracking love |
Abdiel Kavash
Paladin Order Fidelas Constans
|
Posted - 2010.07.19 11:17:00 -
[86]
Going through the Assembly Hall, supporting awesome ideas.
|
Dierdra Vaal
|
Posted - 2010.07.23 10:00:00 -
[87]
I agree with most of the points - I'll have to make it into an issue one of these days :)
* * * Director of Education :: EVE University * * * CSM1 delegate, CSM3 chairman and CSM5 vice-chairman
|
aqil
|
Posted - 2010.08.01 05:48:00 -
[88]
Edited by: aqil on 01/08/2010 05:50:52 /signed
|
wr3cks
Reliables Inc Majesta Empire
|
Posted - 2010.08.01 09:36:00 -
[89]
right on
CCP should really be smarter about third party apps.
Just think: how much dev time would it take to make EVEmon? Or eve-central?
All you have to do is give people tools, and they make all this stuff for free.
If only the UI were this way. Say what you will about WOW, you can't argue that the quantity and quality of the player-developed UI mods for that game are anything short of incredible.
Our players are smarter. I bet they could come up with way better stuff if you worked on opening up the code more.
|
Anna Weston
Holdings Inc
|
Posted - 2010.08.03 14:30:00 -
[90]
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |