| Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Hidden Snake
Caldari
Inglorious-Basterds
   |
Posted - 2010.07.12 13:43:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Hidden Snake on 12/07/2010 13:43:23
Ladies and gents,
I propose to ballance inability of the faction militia corps to create alliances, which makes response of virtual alliances
(MDP, CDI) to wardecks quite complicated and also increase number of communication channels and organization structures.
How it will work:
1) Corporation can create normal alliances while in the militia
2) Alliances can join militias
3) Alliances cannot have sov once in militia
What it will bring:
1) Simplification of the corporation and wardec mechanics in the militias
2) Militias will be diferent flag - not the "hack style" like it is now
3) Militias will not be overrun by null entities/powerblocks, because they will not sacrifice their precious sov.
4) Reduction of the comm channels
5) Militia corps/alliances can participate on Alliance tournaments without stupid need to create some aritfitial alliances.
6) More organized fights in FW and more FUN IN PVP
CCP please stop treating us as a unwanted child you have with postman. We are pretty pvp strong community and have serious impact on lowsec and economy as FW is biggest shipgrinder in the Eve universe.
I would like to ask other militias leaders to drive this topic as a solid discussion and avoid usual "Warfare and Tactics" animosities.
thnx
Hidden Snake
"There is no honor in war" |
Jin Nib
Resplendent Knives
|
Posted - 2010.07.12 13:59:00 -
[2]
Faction alliances will go a long way to making FW a more fun and more interesting place.
-Jin Nib
Trading on behalf of Opera Noir since:
2009.03.02 03:53:00
|
Darveses
DAEDALUS X
The Final Stand.
|
Posted - 2010.07.12 15:01:00 -
[3]
Suppoerted, should have already been done when FW was introduced in the first place.
---
|
Arkady Sadik
Electus Matari
|
Posted - 2010.07.12 15:12:00 -
[4]
It's already meant to be this way in the code (hence why factions are separate entries in kill mails, for example). CCP more or less said a few times that this will happen.
Yes please.
|
Gallactica
Shadows Of The Federation
|
Posted - 2010.07.12 15:38:00 -
[5]
Agreed, Come on CCP sort it out please.
|
Neu Bastian
Valklear Guard
|
Posted - 2010.07.12 15:57:00 -
[6]
.
 Quote:
Neu Bastian
Valklear Guard - CEO
|
Hirana Yoshida
Behavioral Affront
|
Posted - 2010.07.12 15:58:00 -
[7]
As far as I know the "No Sovereignty" rule was suggested by CCP themselves .. so what's the bloody hold-up?
Think it might even work to clean up the horrendous clashes that cause standing drops on RR and what not!
|
Aurora Nyx
Inglorious-Basterds
|
Posted - 2010.07.12 17:19:00 -
[8]
*tap* *tap* .... is this thing on ? ....
*cough*
I support this.
|
No Mauk'Ob
Murientor Tribe
|
Posted - 2010.07.12 19:26:00 -
[9]
yes please
------------------------------------------------
Captain No Mauk'Ob
Murientor Tribe Navy 1st MCW
MURIE is Recruiting! |
The GreenT
|
Posted - 2010.07.12 19:36:00 -
[10]
FW needs representation in the alliance tournament. There is nothing in this proposal that seems outlandish. Plus, it would be nice to be able to send alliance mails to a broader FW group than just your corp. But really, we need FW veterans in AT9, and CCP knows it!
|
|
|
Voddick
|
Posted - 2010.07.12 19:42:00 -
[11]
Good idea
|
CompactDisc7227
MultiStar Protectorate Militia
|
Posted - 2010.07.12 21:17:00 -
[12]
I like totally support this idea!
It's one of the reasons our corporation left the militia, bad coordination with the CDI and stuff. I would definitely come back to the militia if this gets introduced.
CD
|
Jondo Marikesh
Valklear Guard
|
Posted - 2010.07.12 21:35:00 -
[13]
once again
|
GavinGoodrich
Destry's Lounge
Important Internet Spaceship League
|
Posted - 2010.07.12 21:49:00 -
[14]
.
\o |
At'igan Kurucz
|
Posted - 2010.07.12 23:47:00 -
[15]
I support the idea.
|
Phattecia
|
Posted - 2010.07.13 04:29:00 -
[16]
If CCP had any idea how many problems this would clear up, it would have already been done
|
Rashmika Clavain
|
Posted - 2010.07.13 08:16:00 -
[17]
That said, CCP have shown no interest in addressing the playbase's concerns and wish lists for Factional Warfare.
As long as the 0.0 power blocks cannot specifically join a militia, then yes, do it.
|
Antihrist Pripravnik
4S Corporation
Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2010.07.13 08:29:00 -
[18]
+1
|
Lao Zuki
The Deadbeats
|
Posted - 2010.07.13 11:44:00 -
[19]
Agreed, please create FW alliances, with restrictions and protections to keep existing power blocs out.
Also, make System Occupancy mean something. Whizzing around the plex buttons for no apparent gain (other than the arbitrary change of title at the top of the page) loses it's appeal after the first hundred plex.
If one side gains Occupancy, then give them something. For example, disallow new POS for the losers, or give the winners the ability to use Jump Bridges. Give the winners of System Occupancy something to keep their pilots motivated. Give them something useful.
Thank you CCP!
|
Cap Ciubis
|
Posted - 2010.07.13 11:46:00 -
[20]
this is great idea, it will make fw more fun.
|
|
|
coilex
|
Posted - 2010.07.13 12:45:00 -
[21]
+1
|
Sneaky Noob
Ice Fire Warriors
|
Posted - 2010.07.13 13:16:00 -
[22]
I, The Noob of Sneaks, support this idea for it is very ideal.
That is all.
The Sneakiest N00b in all of EVE
-------
|
Doctor Scarblood
Spolia Opima
|
Posted - 2010.07.13 13:17:00 -
[23]
Aye, allow Alliances in FW, as long as the member corps meet the Faction Standing criteria now in place.
Also like the idea of tying FW Alliances to Occupancy. Make orbiting the coin worth something other than Victory Points. When an FW Alliance achieves Occupancy (not Sovereignty) they can use cyno jammers, or j bridges, or exclusive station rights, or a big permanent Faction Standing boost for all corps members. There has to be some reward.
|
Hidden Snake
Caldari
Inglorious-Basterds
|
Posted - 2010.07.13 13:31:00 -
[24]
guys please keep occupancy as a separate topic .... do not let this die on offtopic discussions. thnx snake
"There is no honor in war" |
Syekuda
State Protectorate
|
Posted - 2010.07.13 14:06:00 -
[25]
I'm not in a corp in faction warfare but I do support this. This will make fw more organised I believe and lots more people should participate in fw. almost 70% are just "dead" in some channels. Too busy doing something else lol.
--------------------------------------------------
Life is pleasant. Death is peaceful. It's the transition that's troublesome.
ISAAC ASIMOV |
Tri Vetra
Locus Industries
|
Posted - 2010.07.13 14:30:00 -
[26]
BAM
No sov idea is great.
|
Theronth Valarax
|
Posted - 2010.07.14 00:02:00 -
[27]
Supported
|
Nomedasi
|
Posted - 2010.07.14 01:10:00 -
[28]
To make it simple just joining the militia should put you in an alliance. I mean we have most of the rules of one already. It is simple and elegant.
|
Galdornae
Locus Industries
|
Posted - 2010.07.14 01:30:00 -
[29]
Edited by: Galdornae on 14/07/2010 01:30:16
I actually clicked on this thread thinking I wouldn't be supporting it, but the no sov idea makes all the difference.
Two things strike me as real good things that this opens up.
1. As stated in OP, the ability for FW peeps to do alliance tourney.
2. The ability for FW groups who wish to transition to 0.0 to have a more effective way of building up a player base prior to any such move.
|
Cadian Smith
|
Posted - 2010.07.14 06:57:00 -
[30]
Supported
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |