SencneS
Rebellion Against Big Irreversible Dinks
   |
Posted - 2010.07.14 15:01:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Laina Delapore
Originally by: SencneS
I would want the following.
30 days unfueled.
You have to declare war
You have to attack the POS to the point where structure is no more then 50% This would destabilize the structure
Then you can unanchored it and have to repair it.
30 days unfuelled.... I think we've covered already, the various reasons why, if you let your tower go offline, it's your fault. I fail to see why a number of days that the tower has been offline should be brought into this.
There's no requirement for a corp to have been active for X days or for the POS to have been offline for X days before you can pay a couple of mill and blow up the tower.
Why should it be any different if you're stealing it in the manner outlined?
Why a wardec and bring damage into the equation? If this is in additionto the ADU, why not just make it so you have the option to unanchor a tower at 50% structure without having the new anchorable?
Also; I thought of a new name for the ADU. STRuctural Interdiction Protocol Module. STRIP. As in "I'm going to strip your tower." 
It's pretty simple... One man One POS Corps.. He gets into an accident in real life, ends up in hospital for a week, comes back knowing his POS is offline only to find his entire POS is missing.. That's just adding insult to injury. There needs to be a least a little time passing between when it goes offline and when it can be unanchored by anyone...
MAIN REASON which will probably change your mind...
Corp Member Alts.
You have a Corp Member that is a POS Fuel tech with NO OTHER rights (he can't unanchor etc), he knows the tower is about to go offline, instead of fueling the POS, he is looking for some easy profit. He logs into his alt, travels out to the POS, waits for the VERY SECOND the POS goes offline, then starts to unanchor all the MODS and the POS. Sounds reasonable to you? or are you just a greifer?
This is why I proposed
1) A reasonable time frame to pass before anyone can unanchor anything.
2) YOU HAVE to declare war. A Wardec warns the entire CORP something is coming. Besides you can't attack structures without Concord coming to BBQ you, Which is why.....
3) Attacking the POS to structure is a reasonable game mechanic. You do NOT have the right to just unanchor, but you can attack it to destabilize the achnor. In fact I would propose anyway even if this proposal is rejected by CCP. I want to declare war on one man corps and attack arrays around offline POSES and unanchor them, without having to destroy the POS.
The idea of you can't just warp around looking for offline POSes in a Orca scooping them as you come across them.. That's not good game design.
Amarr for Life |