EVE Search - Just a quick question about wardecs

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Just a quick question about wardecs

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
SurrenderMonkey	Posted - 2010.07.20 17:12:00 - [1] Originally by: Eneko Clarius Yes well, the aggressor just leaves the system when both me and my corp mate are on. He simply waits for one of us to be logged and comes to try and get one of us in mission ships... Am i supposed to just sit in a pvp ship for as long as im logged on, do nothing apart from get killed by someone with 3 accounts, 2 of which seem to be neutral rr? You're not "supposed" to do anything. Deal with it whatever way you want - the point is that using a shady tactic to attempt to dodge a perfectly legitimate aspect of Eve's gameplay does not confer the right to cry harassment when said shady tactic fails. --------------- Faction-Militia:Player-Alliance::Newbie-corp:Player-corp
SurrenderMonkey	Posted - 2010.07.20 17:22:00 - [2] Edited by: SurrenderMonkey on 20/07/2010 17:25:10 Originally by: Joe SMASH Edited by: Joe SMASH on 20/07/2010 17:15:54 Originally by: Eneko Clarius The tactic works fine, just like his double neutral rr will do if he eventually manages to catch one of us lol. You "tactic" is against the TOS. Disbanding a corp for the sole purpose to avoid a dec is not allowed. gb2WoW It's not against the TOS - It's merely lame. This is a commonly believed myth. It was against the rules to leave a corp during war to intentionally get the other guy concordokkened, back when you could leave a corp while in space. That loophole was fixed (can no longer leave corp while in space). Source Quote: Hello, For #1, Closing a corporation and opening a new one with the same members is allowed, and the people who declared war on your now closed corporation can declare a new war on your new corporation if they choose to do so. For #2, Using alt corps to increase the cost of wars against your corporation or alliance is prohibited. --------------- Faction-Militia:Player-Alliance::Newbie-corp:Player-corp
SurrenderMonkey	Posted - 2010.07.20 17:29:00 - [3] Edited by: SurrenderMonkey on 20/07/2010 17:30:02 Originally by: Joe SMASH Edited by: Joe SMASH on 20/07/2010 17:23:24 Originally by: Jennifer Fenring Edited by: Jennifer Fenring on 20/07/2010 17:19:56 Originally by: Joe SMASH You "tactic" is against the TOS. Disbanding a corp for the sole purpose to avoid a dec is not allowed. Well swapping corps obviously is just as well a game mechanic. I never heard of someone being penalized for jumping corps. Moving from one corp to another during a dec is allowed. However OP states that he *disbands* the corp which is not allowed for the sole purpose of avoiding a dec. No, sorry, but you're wrong. Disbanding a corp to avoid a war dec is explicitly allowed. --------------- Faction-Militia:Player-Alliance::Newbie-corp:Player-corp
SurrenderMonkey	Posted - 2010.07.20 17:36:00 - [4] Edited by: SurrenderMonkey on 20/07/2010 17:35:52 Heh. --------------- Faction-Militia:Player-Alliance::Newbie-corp:Player-corp
SurrenderMonkey	Posted - 2010.07.20 18:20:00 - [5] Edited by: SurrenderMonkey on 20/07/2010 18:24:27 Originally by: Yuki Kulotsuki Edited by: Yuki Kulotsuki on 20/07/2010 18:16:05 English really isn't your thing is it? Find my uses of the word exploit. Check context. Read post 53. Ask yourself why a GM should compare notes over lunch with another GM regarding game play decisions. I should think most people are mapped to have at least perc or int in a high range. It should only be a few minutes tops. Basically what you seem to be saying is, "ZOMG is too an exploit because this one random person posted something that seems to vaguely contradict the explicit GM statement!" We have a crystal clear, straight forward, GM statement that explicitly declares it is not an exploit. There is not the slightest bit of ambiguity there. That is much weightier than the ramblings of EvePostingAlt #239802. Can you find a GM post stating that it IS an exploit? I sure can't. As previously noted, once upon a time (readme) it was an exploit to LEAVE a corp during war while in space in an attempt to get the other guy concorded. This exploit was fixed. This is the source of much of the confusion around the myth that disbanding a corp to dodge a war dec is an exploit. --------------- Faction-Militia:Player-Alliance::Newbie-corp:Player-corp

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.