Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Niding
Amarr Polaris Project Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.07.28 08:10:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Niding on 28/07/2010 08:11:08
Originally by: General Windypops Edited by: General Windypops on 27/07/2010 23:16:22
Originally by: Garreck I'm really confused about what we've "won" here
I'm not surprised. You've lost far more than you've gained, from what I can see. I've always been puzzled as to why U'K was so determined to make sure that CVA was always kept alive. Personally I couldn't give a toss, but I've only been a part of U'K for 2 years, and I know the relationship has lasted for many many more years than that.
I don't understand why Hydra has some sort of level of control over CVA though, since you claim your decision about whether to participate or not was out of your control?
Control of what? Attacking r3/n8 or the UK hostile takeover? We didnt see Hydra around since they pulled out of Sev3rance, so I wouldnt say thatHydra had a hold on us. For the most part we have been sticking around r3 area doing our own thing until Hydra made their play that have revived the intrest some of the ex CVAers that moved north. If we let ourselves be "controlled", we would have accepted the AAA deal back before Providence got sieged beyond D-G.
As for r3/n8 if thats what your talking about; Havent we been throwing SBUs like they are candy at those systems the last few months? Its not like Hyrda have had anything to do with that fact in the past, nor now.
|

Niding
Amarr Polaris Project Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.07.28 08:55:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Rodj Blake I'm probably gonna get flamed for this, but seriously guys, neither the CVA nor the former U'K are doing themselves any favours with this mostly irrelevant back-and-forth.
The fact of the matter is that whether or not Aralis should have tipped off his enemies in advance is actually a pretty minor component in this whole sorry tale.
Why leave us wondering Rodj? Why not point to the MAJOR component(s)? |

Niding
Amarr Polaris Project Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.07.28 09:14:00 -
[3]
Fair enough Rodj, but that goes back to the whole discussion Garreck have been conducting.
Not sure how informed you are with regards to the conduct at the battlefield the last year in Providence. You might have drawn different conclusions if exposed to the changed nature of the ROE.
|
|
|