EVE Search - Think Deadspace should allow MWD's?...Here's your chance to change it

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Think Deadspace should allow MWD's?...Here's your chance to change it

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Discorporation	Posted - 2004.12.21 09:24:00 - [1] Proposal rejected . [Heterocephalus glaber]
Discorporation	Posted - 2004.12.21 09:24:00 - [2] Proposal rejected . [Heterocephalus glaber]
Discorporation	Posted - 2004.12.21 09:28:00 - [3] Go aweh DC and Avon, you ppl make me feel like a pirate =/ [Heterocephalus glaber]
Discorporation	Posted - 2004.12.21 09:28:00 - [4] Go aweh DC and Avon, you ppl make me feel like a pirate =/ [Heterocephalus glaber]
Discorporation	Posted - 2004.12.21 11:26:00 - [5] Tried using Rails yet? [Heterocephalus glaber]
Discorporation	Posted - 2004.12.21 11:26:00 - [6] Tried using Rails yet? [Heterocephalus glaber]
Discorporation	Posted - 2004.12.21 12:06:00 - [7] Originally by: Kerry Originally by: Discorporation Tried using Rails yet? indeed... now that isn't close combat is it... Originally by: Avon ...and drones 1k drone space in my Deimos... both of these are great ideas! and well thought out... NM continue to give us thorax/deimos users absolutely zip as a bonus! I guess I didn't think this out! Yea, I mean, it's not like they're the most powerful closerange Assault cruisers already Glad you agree w us. [Heterocephalus glaber]
Discorporation	Posted - 2004.12.21 12:06:00 - [8] Originally by: Kerry Originally by: Discorporation Tried using Rails yet? indeed... now that isn't close combat is it... Originally by: Avon ...and drones 1k drone space in my Deimos... both of these are great ideas! and well thought out... NM continue to give us thorax/deimos users absolutely zip as a bonus! I guess I didn't think this out! Yea, I mean, it's not like they're the most powerful closerange Assault cruisers already Glad you agree w us. [Heterocephalus glaber]
Discorporation	Posted - 2004.12.21 13:35:00 - [9] Originally by: ElCoCo Would a bonus like "10% boost per level to afterburner max speedboost in deadspace" be so irrational and overpowering? More like impossible. [Heterocephalus glaber]
Discorporation	Posted - 2004.12.21 13:35:00 - [10] Originally by: ElCoCo Would a bonus like "10% boost per level to afterburner max speedboost in deadspace" be so irrational and overpowering? More like impossible. [Heterocephalus glaber]
Discorporation	Posted - 2004.12.21 13:55:00 - [11] Originally by: ElCoCo I'm sure you know more than me if that is possible or not, but do you think it's a bad idea? If you go towards making alternate bonusses for alternate scenarios, then yes. Like Avon said, the optimal bonus on a caldari ship is useless when you're getting swarmed by small ships, can it be changed to +% (something). A thorax performs quite well without MWD. If you shoose your complexes wisely, the NPC's will come to you, grently drifting into Blaster optimal range [Heterocephalus glaber]
Discorporation	Posted - 2004.12.21 13:55:00 - [12] Originally by: ElCoCo I'm sure you know more than me if that is possible or not, but do you think it's a bad idea? If you go towards making alternate bonusses for alternate scenarios, then yes. Like Avon said, the optimal bonus on a caldari ship is useless when you're getting swarmed by small ships, can it be changed to +% (something). A thorax performs quite well without MWD. If you shoose your complexes wisely, the NPC's will come to you, grently drifting into Blaster optimal range [Heterocephalus glaber]
Discorporation	Posted - 2004.12.21 14:24:00 - [13] Originally by: ElCoCo That's not a good comparison... is something wrong with caldari ships fitting blasters (like you so rightly said "tried fitting rails?"? The optimal range bonus benefits them as well as they get in their falloff range further away=more damage. yeah, opt bonus is pointless when fitting blasters, due to their tiny tiny tiny optimal range. Hey, I know, they should get a 5% tracking boost to Hybrids when they fit blasters (see where I'm going here?) Originally by: ElCoCo And if the rats were gently drifting into my blaster optimal range without me doing anything I wouldn't even bother to put mwd/AB on would I? (but that is by choice, not imposed) And ofcourse you don't get to choose the deadspace missions you're given... You choose to accept them, no? [Heterocephalus glaber]
Discorporation	Posted - 2004.12.21 14:24:00 - [14] Originally by: ElCoCo That's not a good comparison... is something wrong with caldari ships fitting blasters (like you so rightly said "tried fitting rails?"? The optimal range bonus benefits them as well as they get in their falloff range further away=more damage. yeah, opt bonus is pointless when fitting blasters, due to their tiny tiny tiny optimal range. Hey, I know, they should get a 5% tracking boost to Hybrids when they fit blasters (see where I'm going here?) Originally by: ElCoCo And if the rats were gently drifting into my blaster optimal range without me doing anything I wouldn't even bother to put mwd/AB on would I? (but that is by choice, not imposed) And ofcourse you don't get to choose the deadspace missions you're given... You choose to accept them, no? [Heterocephalus glaber]
Discorporation	Posted - 2004.12.21 15:00:00 - [15] Originally by: ElCoCo That would be an accurate comparison if for instance they said you were forbidden to use shieldboosters in deadspace. That would make a shield boost bonus on a Moa useless, not just decrease it's effect in some cases like what you say with the optimal range. That where I'm going here I'm just saying, attaching alternate bonusses for ships tied into different situations is bad ;/ Originally by: ElCoCo Yup ofcourse... although with current standing losses formula it's almost suicidal to be rejecting missions, but that's another story. And anyway I just hop into a raven for doing kill missions.... fun huh? Oh well... going home now...bbl k, cya later! [Heterocephalus glaber]
Discorporation	Posted - 2004.12.21 15:00:00 - [16] Originally by: ElCoCo That would be an accurate comparison if for instance they said you were forbidden to use shieldboosters in deadspace. That would make a shield boost bonus on a Moa useless, not just decrease it's effect in some cases like what you say with the optimal range. That where I'm going here I'm just saying, attaching alternate bonusses for ships tied into different situations is bad ;/ Originally by: ElCoCo Yup ofcourse... although with current standing losses formula it's almost suicidal to be rejecting missions, but that's another story. And anyway I just hop into a raven for doing kill missions.... fun huh? Oh well... going home now...bbl k, cya later! [Heterocephalus glaber]
Discorporation	Posted - 2004.12.21 15:10:00 - [17] >Obligatory witty comment to show my appreciation for being noticed< [Heterocephalus glaber]
Discorporation	Posted - 2004.12.21 15:10:00 - [18] >Obligatory witty comment to show my appreciation for being noticed< [Heterocephalus glaber]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.